[1] | Fire, M., and Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: Observing Goodhart's Law in action. Gigascience 8: 1−20. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz053. |
[2] | Edwards, M.A., and Roy, S. (2017). Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition. Environ. Eng. Sci. 34: 51−61. DOI: 10.1089/ees.2016.0223. |
[3] | Errington, T.M., et al. (2021). Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. eLife 10: e71601. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.71601. |
[4] | Kelly, S. (2018). The continuing evolution of publishing in the biological sciences. Biol. Open. 7: bio037325. DOI: 10.1242/bio.037325. |
[5] | Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.) (University of Chicago Press). DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001. |
Zhang H. and Zhu J.-K. (2023). Improving the scientific cycle. The Innovation Life 1(1), 100002. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100002 |
To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.
The scientific method cycle can be improved through standardized process.