[1] | Bergen, K.J., Johnson, P.A., de Hoop, M.V., and Beroza, G.C. (2019). Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience. Science 363 : eaau0323. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau0323. |
[2] | Pasini, A., Racca, P., Amendola, S., et al. (2017). Attribution of recent temperature behaviour reassessed by a neural-network method. Scientific Reports 7: 17681. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18011-8. |
[3] | Li, W., Migliavacca, M., Forkel, M., et al. (2022). Widespread increasing vegetation sensitivity to soil moisture. Nature Communications 13: 3959. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31667-9. |
[4] | Lian, X., Zhao, W., and Gentine, P. (2022). Recent global decline in rainfall interception loss due to altered rainfall regimes. Nature Communications 13: 7642. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35414-y. |
[5] | Zhu, J., Jiang, J., Yang, M., et al. (2023). ChatGPT and Environmental Research. Environmental Science & Technology 57: 17667−17670. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01818. |
Wang Z., Zhang J., Hua P., et al., (2023). Filling in missing pieces in the co-development of artificial intelligence and environmental science. The Innovation Geoscience 1(1), 100007. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100007 |
(A) Literature review of AI technique application in environmental science, derived from 2,106 relevant articles. The top 15 countries with the most publications are shown on the map. The categories are informing data collection and analysis, environmental variable prediction, chemical screening analysis, risk assessment and management, and environmental decision-making. (B) A schematic diagram describing missing pieces and relevant solvers in the co-development of artificial intelligence and environmental science.