-
-
REFERENCES
[1] Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature 624: 479–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8. [2] Joelving, F. (2024). Paper trial. Science 383(6680): 253–255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado0309. [3] Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G., and Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109. [4] Grieneisen, M.L., and Zhang, M. (2012). A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature. PLoS One 7(10): e44118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118. [5] Zhang, J., and Shen, Z. (2024). Analyzing journal category assignment using a paper-level classification system: multidisciplinary sciences journals. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04913-0. -
ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Cite this article:
Menghui Li, Zhesi Shen. Science map of academic misconduct[J]. The Innovation, 2024, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100593
Welcome!
To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.
Export File
Citation
Menghui Li, Zhesi Shen. Science map of academic misconduct[J]. The Innovation, 2024, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100593
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
Characteristics of academic misconduct retraction (AMR) across various disciplines or topics
Twitter