Article Contents
DEEP REVIEW   Open Access     Cite

M2 macrophage extracellular vesicles in bone regeneration: Applications and challenges

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. M2 macrophage extracellular vesicles promote bone repair by reducing inflammation and stimulating blood vessel growth.

      When combined with functionalized scaffolds, these vesicles significantly improve implant integration and defect healing.

      Challenges remain in targeting, scalable production, and quality control for clinical use.

  • Extracellular vesicles (EVs) can carry bioactive molecules and mediateintercellular communication. Among EVs from various sources, those derivedfrom M2 macrophages (M2-EVs) have attracted widespread attention in thefield of bone regeneration due to their inherent anti-inflammatory andosteogenic properties. M2-EVs promote osteogenic differentiation ofmesenchymal stem cells by delivering specific microRNAs and proteins thatactivate key signaling pathways, such as MAPK, TGF-β/Smad, AMPK-mTOR,and PI3K/Akt. They also modulate the osteoimmune microenvironment bysuppressing inflammation and inducing M2 polarization, while enhancingangiogenesis through VEGF and miR-21 transfer. In bone tissue engineering,M2-EVs can be integrated with various scaffolds—such as β-TCP, PCLfibrous scaffolds, and hydrogels—to improve osseointegration and bonedefect repair, as confirmed in preclinical models. However, clinical translationfaces challenges, including insufficient targeting, heterogeneity, isolationstandardization, and quality control. Despite these limitations, M2-EVsrepre-sent a promising cell-free therapeutic strategy for bone repair. Futureresearch may focus on engineering approaches to enhance their specificity,stability, and large-scale production, ultimately unlocking their full potential inregenerative medicine.
  • 加载中
  • [1] González E. and Falcón-Pérez J. M. (2025). Expanding horizons: Next-generation and interdisciplinary advances in the applications of extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Biol 4:e70101. DOI:10.1002/jex2.70101

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Couch Y., Buzàs E. I., Di Vizio D., et al. (2021). A brief history of nearly EV-erything - The rise and rise of extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles 10:e12144. DOI:10.1002/jev2.12144

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Biswas S., Gangadaran P., Dhara C., et al. (2025). Extracellular vesicles in osteogenesis: A comprehensive review of mechanisms and therapeutic potential for bone regeneration. Curr Issues Mol Biol 47:675. DOI:10.3390/cimb47080675

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Epelman S., Lavine K. J. and Randolph G. J. (2014). Origin and functions of tissue macrophages. Immunity 41:21−35. DOI:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.013

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Tong L., van Wijnen A. J., Wang H., et al. (2024). Advancing bone biology: The mutual promotion of biology and pioneering technologies. Innov Life 2:100078. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100078

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Pajarinen J., Lin T., Gibon E., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials 196:80−89. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.025

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Gu Q. L., Yang H. L. and Shi Q. (2017). Macrophages and bone inflammation. J. Orthop. Transl. 10:86−93. DOI:10.1016/j.jot.2017.05.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Peng M., Li N., Wang H., et al. (2025). Macrophages: Subtypes, distribution, polarization, immunomodulatory functions, and therapeutics. MedComm 6:e70304. DOI:10.1002/mco2.70304

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Zhou S., Zhu Y., Wu Y., et al. (2025). New insights on metabolic reprogramming in macrophage plasticity. Int Immunopharmacol 157:114797. DOI:10.1016/j.intimp.2025.114797

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Daneshvar A., Nemati P., Azadi A., et al. (2024). M2 macrophage-derived exosomes for bone regeneration: A systematic review. Arch Oral Biol 166:106034. DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106034

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Zhang B.B., Zha Xi D.W., Li C., et al. (2022). M2 macrophagy-derived exosomal miRNA-26a-5p induces osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Surg Res 17:137. DOI:10.1186/s13018-022-03029-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Ho C. C., Hsu T. T., Lin Y. H., et al. (2026). 3D-printed dictamni-calcium silicate scaffolds modulate the osteoimmune microenvironment and enhance macrophage-derived exosomal miR-21 signaling in vascularized bone regeneration. J Nanobiotechnology 24:596. DOI:10.1186/s12951-026-04507-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Yin L., Zhang Z., Lin P., et al. (2025). Three-dimensional printed PCL/nHA/SA/COL structure-mediated M2 macrophage polarization enhances angiogenesis and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Int Immunopharmacol 167:115679. DOI:10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115679

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Kalluri R. and LeBleu V. S. (2020). The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science 367:eaau6977. DOI:10.1126/science.aau6977

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Kahlert C. and Kalluri R. (2013). Exosomes in tumor microenvironment influence cancer progression and metastasis. J. Mol. Med. 91:431−437. DOI:10.1007/s00109-013-1020-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Kalluri R. (2016). The biology and function of exosomes in cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 126:1208−1215. DOI:10.1172/jci81135

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Corso G., Mäger I., Lee Y., et al. (2017). Reproducible and scalable purification of extracellular vesicles using combined bind-elute and size exclusion chromatography. Sci Rep 7:11561. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-10646-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Li B., Wu W., Xu W., et al. (2025). Advances of extracellular vesicles isolation and detection frontier technology: from heterogeneity analysis to clinical application. J Nanobiotechnology 23:678. DOI:10.1186/s12951-025-03768-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Kim T., Hong J. W. and Lee L. P. (2025). Efficient methods of isolation and purification of extracellular vesicles. Nano Converg 12:45. DOI:10.1186/s40580-025-00509-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Oksvold M. P., Neurauter A. and Pedersen K. W. (2015). Magnetic bead-based isolation of exosomes. Methods Mol Biol 1218:465−481. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-1538-5_27

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. (2022). Database resources of the national genomics data center, china national center for bioinformation in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D27−D38. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkab951

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Sidhom K., Obi P. O. and Saleem A. (2020). A review of exosomal isolation methods: Is size exclusion chromatography the best option. Int J Mol Sci 21:6466. DOI:10.3390/ijms21186466

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Liu W. Z., Ma Z. J. and Kang X. W. (2022). Current status and outlook of advances in exosome isolation. Anal Bioanal Chem 414:7123−7141. DOI:10.1007/s00216-022-04253-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Mazahir F. and Yadav A. K. (2024). Recent progress in engineered extracellular vesicles and their biomedical applications. Life Sci 350:122747. DOI:10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122747

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Malvicini R., De Lazzari G., Tolomeo A. M., et al. (2024). Influence of the isolation method on characteristics and functional activity of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Cytotherapy 26:157−170. DOI:10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.11.001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Pascucci L. and Scattini G. (2021). Imaging extracelluar vesicles by transmission electron microscopy: Coping with technical hurdles and morphological interpretation. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1865:129648. DOI:10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129648

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Comfort N., Cai K., Bloomquist T. R., et al. (2021). Nanoparticle tracking analysis for the quantification and size determination of extracellular vesicles. J Vis Exp 2021:62447. DOI:10.3791/62447

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Ekström K., Omar O., Granéli C., et al. (2013). Monocyte exosomes stimulate the osteogenic gene expression of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One 8:e75227. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0075227

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Arab T., Mallick E. R., Huang Y., et al. (2021). Characterization of extracellular vesicles and synthetic nanoparticles with four orthogonal single-particle analysis platforms. J Extracell Vesicles 10:e12079. DOI:10.1002/jev2.12079

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Volkman A. and Gowans J. L. (1965). Origin of macrophages from bone marrow in rat. Brit. J. Exp. Pathol. 46:62−70.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [31] Mosser D. M. and Edwards J. P. (2008). Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8:958−969. DOI:10.1038/nri2448

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] He P., Dai M., Li Z., et al. (2024). Effect of connexin 43 in LPS/IL-4-induced macrophage M1/M2 polarization: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 103:e37811. DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000037811

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Messex J. K. and Liou G. Y. (2021). Targeting btk signaling in the microenvironment of solid tumors as a feasible cancer therapy option. Cancers (Basel) 13:2198. DOI:10.3390/cancers13092198

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Luo Q. T., Li X. Y., Zhong W. C., et al. (2022). Dicalcium silicate-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy-mediated macrophagic inflammation promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Regen. Biomater. 9:rbab075. DOI:10.1093/rb/rbab075

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Hwang S. M., Chung G., Kim Y. H., et al. (2019). The role of maresins in inflammatory pain: Function of macrophages in wound regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:5849. DOI:10.3390/ijms20235849

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Tedesco S., Bolego C., Toniolo A., et al. (2015). Phenotypic activation and pharmacological outcomes of spontaneously differentiated human monocyte-derived macrophages. Immunobiology 220:545−554. DOI:10.1016/j.imbio.2014.12.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Shabo I. and Svanvik J. (2011). Expression of macrophage antigens by tumor cells. Dittmar T. and Zanker K. S. (ed). Cell fusion in health and disease II: cell fusion in disease. (Springer-verlag Berlin), pp: 141-150. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0782-5_7

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [38] Raes G., De Baetselier P., Noël W., et al. (2002). Differential expression of FIZZ1 and Ym1 in alternatively versus classically activated macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 71:597−602.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [39] Salomon B. and Bluestone J. A. (2001). Complexities of CD28/B7: CTLA-4 costimulatory pathways in autoimmunity and transplantation. Annu Rev Immunol 19:225−252. DOI:10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.225

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Holtrop T., Budding K., Brandsma A. M., et al. (2022). Targeting the high affinity receptor, FcγRI, in autoimmune disease, neuropathy, and cancer. Immunother Adv 2:ltac011. DOI:10.1093/immadv/ltac011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Chen M. T., Lin H. S., Shen C., et al. (2015). Pu.1-regulated long noncoding rna lnc-mc controls human monocyte/macrophage differentiation through interaction with microrna 199a-5p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35:3212-3224. DOI:10.1128/mcb.00429-15

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [42] Cao J., Dong R., Jiang L., et al. (2019). Lncrna-mm2p identified as a modulator of macrophage m2 polarization. Cancer Immunol. Res. 7:292−305. DOI:10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-18-0145

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Michalski M. N. and McCauley L. K. (2017). Macrophages and skeletal health. Pharmacol. Ther. 174:43−54. DOI:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.017

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Wynn T. A. (2008). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J. Pathol. 214:199−210. DOI:10.1002/path.2277

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Wynn T. A. and Ramalingam T. R. (2012). Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat. Med. 18:1028−1040. DOI:10.1038/nm.2807

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Wynn T. A. and Barron L. (2010). Macrophages: Master regulators of inflammation and fibrosis. Semin. Liver Dis. 30:245−257. DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1255354

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Weiskopf K. and Weissman I. L. (2015). Macrophages are critical effectors of antibody therapies for cancer. MAbs 7:303−310. DOI:10.1080/19420862.2015.1011450

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Mills C. D. (2012). M1 and m2 macrophages: Oracles of health and disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 32:463−488. DOI:10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v32.i6.10

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Boniakowski A. E., Kimball A. S., Jacobs B. N., et al. (2017). Macrophage-mediated inflammation in normal and diabetic wound healing. J. Immunol. 199:17−24. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.1700223

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Sica A. and Mantovani A. (2012). Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J. Clin. Invest. 122:787−795. DOI:10.1172/jci59643

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Sawa-Wejksza K. and Kandefer-Szerszen M. (2018). Tumor-associated macrophages as target for antitumor therapy. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 66:97−111. DOI:10.1007/s00005-017-0480-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Le G., Wen R., Fang H., et al. (2025). Exosomal miR-122 derived from M2 macrophages induces osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of alcoholic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Surg Res 20:107. DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05515-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Zhang B., Li Y. L., Yu Y., et al. (2018). Microrna-378 promotes osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling in bmmscs for potential bone regeneration. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 2018:1−9. DOI:10.1155/2018/8402390

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Kang M. Y., Huang C. C., Lu Y., et al. (2020). Bone regeneration is mediated by macrophage extracellular vesicles. Bone 141:115627. DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115627

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Lee D. Y., Deng Z. Q., Wang C. H., et al. (2007). MicroRNA-378 promotes cell survival, tumor growth, and angiogenesis by targeting SuFu and Fus-1 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:20350−20355. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0706901104

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] You L., Gu W. S., Chen L., et al. (2014). MiR-378 overexpression attenuates high glucose-suppressed osteogenic differentiation through targeting CASP3 and activating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 7:7249−7261.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [57] Jia J., Tian Q., Ling S., et al. (2013). MiR-145 suppresses osteogenic differentiation by targeting Sp7. FEBS Lett 587:3027−3031. DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.07.030

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Lin Z., Xiong Y., Sun Y., et al. (2023). Circulating miRNA-21-enriched extracellular vesicles promote bone remodeling in traumatic brain injury patients. Experimental and Molecular Medicine 55:587−596. DOI:10.1038/s12276-023-00956-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Liu G. Z., Cao R. M., Liu Q. M., et al. (2025). M2 macrophages-derived exosomes for osteonecrosis of femoral head treatment: modulating neutrophil extracellular traps formation and endothelial phenotype transition. Bone Res. 13:1. DOI:10.1038/s41413-025-00412-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Sun F., Luo J. H., Yue T. T., et al. (2021). The role of hydrogen sulphide signalling in macrophage activation. Immunology 162:3−10. DOI:10.1111/imm.13253

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Nomachi A., Yoshinaga M., Liu J., et al. (2013). Moesin controls clathrin-mediated s1pr1 internalization in t cells. PLoS One 8:e82590. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0082590

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Zhou Y. K., Han C. S., Zhu Z. L., et al. (2024). M2 exosomes modified by hydrogen sulfide promoted bone regeneration by moesin mediated endocytosis. Bioact. Mater. 31:192−205. DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.08.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Wu X. L., Jin S. S., Wang Q. B., et al. (2026). Calcium phosphate nanoparticle-immobilized macrophage-derived extracellular vesicle nanohybrid facilitates diabetic bone regeneration. Adv. Mater. 38:19. DOI:10.1002/adma.202509410

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Rafieezadeh D. (2024). Extracellular vesicles and their therapeutic applications: a review article (part 2). Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 16:81−88. DOI:10.62347/aupq6330

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Yan W. H., Li T. H., Yin T. Y., et al. (2020). M2 macrophage-derived exosomes promote the c-KIT phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells during vascular tissue repair after intravascular stent implantation. Theranostics 10:10712−10728. DOI:10.7150/thno.46143

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Mata R., Yao Y. J., Cao W. B., et al. (2021). The dynamic inflammatory tissue microenvironment: Signality and disease therapy by biomaterials. Research 2021:4189516. DOI:10.34133/2021/4189516

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] Champagne C. M., Takebe J., Offenbacher S., et al. (2002). Macrophage cell lines produce osteoinductive signals that include bone morphogenetic protein-2. Bone 30:26−31. DOI:10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00638-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [68] Pirraco R. P., Reis R. L. and Marques A. P. (2013). Effect of monocytes/macrophages on the early osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 7:392−400. DOI:10.1002/term.535

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Liu H., Zhang H., Han Y. F., et al. (2022). Bacterial extracellular vesicles-based therapeutic strategies for bone and soft tissue tumors therapy. Theranostics 12:6576−6594. DOI:10.7150/thno.78034

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [70] Hoff P., Gaber T., Strehl C., et al. (2016). Immunological characterization of the early human fracture hematoma. Immunol Res 64:1195−1206. DOI:10.1007/s12026-016-8868-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Pajarinen J., Lin T., Gibon E., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials 196:80−89. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.025

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [72] Zhang J., Pan J. and Jing W. (2020). Motivating role of type H vessels in bone regeneration. Cell Prolif 53:e12874. DOI:10.1111/cpr.12874

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Wang L., Zhou S., Liu B., et al. (2006). Locally applied nerve growth factor enhances bone consolidation in a rabbit model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res 24:2238−2245. DOI:10.1002/jor.20269

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [74] Park B. W., Kim J. R., Lee J. H., et al. (2006). Expression of nerve growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in the inferior alveolar nerve after distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:624−630. DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2006.02.019

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Guihard P., Danger Y., Brounais B., et al. (2012). Induction of osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by activated monocytes/macrophages depends on oncostatin m signaling. Stem Cells 30:762−772. DOI:10.1002/stem.1040

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [76] Guihard P., Boutet M. A., Brounais-Le Royer B., et al. (2015). Oncostatin m, an inflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages, supports intramembranous bone healing in a mouse model of tibia injury. Am. J. Pathol. 185:765−775. DOI:10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [77] Ninomiya T., Hosoya A., Hiraga T., et al. (2011). Prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4-selective agonist (ONO-4819) increases bone formation by modulating mesenchymal cell differentiation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 650:396−402. DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.10.021

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [78] Lu L. Y., Loi F., Nathan K., et al. (2017). Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages promote Osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells via the COX-2-prostaglandin E2 pathway. J. Orthop. Res. 35:2378−2385. DOI:10.1002/jor.23553

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [79] Ryoo H. M., Lee M. H. and Kim Y. J. (2006). Critical molecular switches involved in BMP-2-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells. Gene 366:51−57. DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [80] Cho H. H., Shin K. K., Kim Y. J., et al. (2010). Nf-κb activation stimulates osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human adipose tissue by increasing taz expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 223:168−177. DOI:10.1002/jcp.22024

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [81] Briolay A., Lencel P., Bessueille L., et al. (2013). Autocrine stimulation of osteoblast activity by Wnt5a in response to TNF-α in human mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430:1072−1077. DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.036

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [82] Chang M. K., Raggatt L. J., Alexander K. A., et al. (2008). Osteal tissue macrophages are intercalated throughout human and mouse bone lining tissues and regulate osteoblast function in vitro and in vivo. J. Immunol. 181:1232−1244. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.181.2.1232

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [83] Alexander K. A., Chang M. K., Maylin E. R., et al. (2011). Osteal macrophages promote in vivo intramembranous bone healing in a mouse tibial injury model. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26:1517−1532. DOI:10.1002/jbmr.354

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [84] Kholodenko B. N. and Birtwistle M. R. (2009). Four-dimensional dynamics of MAPK information-processing systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol 1:28−44. DOI:10.1002/wsbm.16

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [85] Hao J., Hu Y. X., Li Y. M., et al. (2017). Involvement of JNK signaling in IL4-induced M2 macrophage polarization. Exp. Cell Res. 357:155−162. DOI:10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.05.010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [86] Ge C. X., Xiao G. Z., Jiang D., et al. (2007). Critical role of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-MAPK pathway in osteoblast differentiation and skeletal development. J. Cell Biol. 176:709−718. DOI:10.1083/jcb.200610046

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [87] Niu H. Y., Ma Y. F., Wu G. Y., et al. (2019). Multicellularity-interweaved bone regeneration of BMP-2-loaded scaffold with orchestrated kinetics of resorption and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 216:119216. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.027

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [88] Liu X. Z., Li X., Tao Y. C., et al. (2020). TCDD inhibited the osteogenic differentiation of human fetal palatal mesenchymal cells through AhR and BMP-2/TGF-β/Smad signaling. Toxicology 431:152353. DOI:10.1016/j.tox.2019.152353

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [89] Byles V., Covarrubias A. J., Ben-Sahra I., et al. (2013). The TSC-mTOR pathway regulates macrophage polarization. Nat. Commun. 4:2834. DOI:10.1038/ncomms3834

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] Han R., Gao J., Zhai H., et al. (2016). RAD001 (everolimus) attenuates experimental autoimmune neuritis by inhibiting the mTOR pathway, elevating Akt activity and polarizing M2 macrophages. Exp Neurol 280:106−114. DOI:10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.04.005

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Koh Y. C., Yang G. L., Lai C. S., et al. (2018). Chemopreventive effects of phytochemicals and medicines on m1/m2 polarized macrophage role in inflammation-related diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:2208. DOI:10.3390/ijms19082208

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [92] He Y., Gao Y., Zhang Q., et al. (2020). Il-4 switches microglia/macrophage m1/m2 polarization and alleviates neurological damage by modulating the jak1/stat6 pathway following ich. Neuroscience 437:161−171. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [93] Vergadi E., Ieronymaki E., Lyroni K., et al. (2017). Akt signaling pathway in macrophage activation and m1/m2 polarization. J. Immunol. 198:1006−1014. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.1601515

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [94] Vlashi R., Zhang X., Wu M., et al. (2023). Wnt signaling: Essential roles in osteoblast differentiation, bone metabolism and therapeutic implications for bone and skeletal disorders. Genes Dis 10:1291−1317. DOI:10.1016/j.gendis.2022.07.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [95] Drager J., Harvey E. J. and Barralet J. (2015). Hypoxia signalling manipulation for bone regeneration. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 17:e6. DOI:10.1017/erm.2015.4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [96] Hall A. (1998). Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279:509−514. DOI:10.1126/science.279.5350.509

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [97] MacNeil S. (2007). Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin. Nature 445:874−880. DOI:10.1038/nature05664

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [98] Sacks M. S., Schoen F. J. and Mayer J. E. (2009). Bioengineering challenges for heart valve tissue engineering. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11:289−313. DOI:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124903

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [99] Ouyang J., Xie A., Zhou J., et al. (2022). Minimally invasive nanomedicine: nanotechnology in photo-/ultrasound-/radiation-/magnetism-mediated therapy and imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51:4996−5041. DOI:10.1039/d1cs01148k

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [100] Hosseini V., Maroufi N. F., Saghati S., et al. (2019). Current progress in hepatic tissue regeneration by tissue engineering. J. Transl. Med. 17:383. DOI:10.1186/s12967-019-02137-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [101] Okuda T., Ioku K., Yonezawa I., et al. (2007). The effect of the microstructure of β-tricalcium phosphate on the metabolism of subsequently formed bone tissue. Biomaterials 28:2612−2621. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.040

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [102] Zhang J. Y., Liu X. L., Li H. Y., et al. (2016). Exosomes/tricalcium phosphate combination scaffolds can enhance bone regeneration by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 7:136. DOI:10.1186/s13287-016-0391-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [103] Fu X. K., Li Y. Y., Huang T. L., et al. (2018). Runx2/osterix and zinc uptake synergize to orchestrate osteogenic differentiation and citrate containing bone apatite formation. Adv. Sci. 5:1700755. DOI:10.1002/advs.201700755

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [104] Liao J. G., Li Y. Q., Li H. Y., et al. (2018). Preparation, bioactivity and mechanism of nano-hydroxyapatite/sodium alginate/chitosan bone repair material. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 16:28−35. DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000372

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [105] Liang B., Liang J. M., Ding J. N., et al. (2019). Dimethyloxaloylglycine-stimulated human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes enhance bone regeneration through angiogenesis by targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10:335. DOI:10.1186/s13287-019-1410-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [106] Wen Z. H., Li S. Y., Liu Y., et al. (2025). An engineered M2 macrophage-derived exosomes-loaded electrospun biomimetic periosteum promotes cell recruitment, immunoregulation, and angiogenesis in bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 50:95−115. DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.03.027

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [107] Xue R. Y., Qian Y. N., Li L. H., et al. (2017). Polycaprolactone nanofiber scaffold enhances the osteogenic differentiation potency of various human tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8:148. DOI:10.1186/s13287-017-0588-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [108] Zha Y., Li Y. W., Lin T. Y., et al. (2021). Progenitor cell-derived exosomes endowed with VEGF plasmids enhance osteogenic induction and vascular remodeling in large segmental bone defects. Theranostics 11:397−409. DOI:10.7150/thno.50741

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [109] Jin S., Wen J., Zhang Y., et al. (2024). M2 macrophage-derived exosome-functionalized topological scaffolds regulate the foreign body response and the coupling of angio/osteoclasto/osteogenesis. Acta Biomater 177:91−106. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2024.01.043

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [110] Jin S., Li J., Zhou Z., et al. (2027). PTGFRN- and IL-4-overexpressing exosome-functionalized Janus fibrous scaffolds for enhanced heterogeneous tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 336:124440. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2026.124440

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [111] Kapanen A., Ryhänen J., Danilov A., et al. (2001). Effect of nickel-titanium shape memory metal alloy on bone formation. Biomaterials 22:2475−2480. DOI:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00435-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [112] Zhang Z. C., Xu R. G., Yang Y., et al. (2021). Micro/nano-textured hierarchical titanium topography promotes exosome biogenesis and secretion to improve osseointegration. J. Nanobiotechnol. 19:78. DOI:10.1186/s12951-021-00826-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [113] Zhai M. M., Zhu Y., Yang M. Y., et al. (2020). Human mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes enhance cell-free bone regeneration by altering their mirnas profiles. Adv. Sci. 7:2001334. DOI:10.1002/advs.202001334

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [114] Wei F., Li M. T., Crawford R., et al. (2019). Exosome-integrated titanium oxide nanotubes for targeted bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 86:480−492. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [115] Guan P. F., Liu C., Xie D. H., et al. (2022). Exosome-loaded extracellular matrix-mimic hydrogel with anti-inflammatory property Facilitates/promotes growth plate injury repair. Bioact. Mater. 10:145−158. DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [116] Zhao X., Chen X., Deng Y., et al. (2023). A novel adhesive dual-sensitive hydrogel for sustained release of exosomes derived from M2 macrophages promotes repair of bone defects. Mater Today Bio 23:100840. DOI:10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100840

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [117] Mondschein R. J., Kanitkar A., Williams C. B., et al. (2017). Polymer structure-property requirements for stereolithographic 3D printing of soft tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 140:170−188. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.005

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [118] Li S., Li W. Q., Wu X. G., et al. (2024). Immune cell-derived extracellular vesicles for precision therapy of inflammatory-related diseases. J. Control. Release 368:533−547. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.03.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [119] Li H., Feng Y., Zheng X., et al. (2022). M2-type exosomes nanoparticles for rheumatoid arthritis therapy via macrophage re-polarization. J. Control. Release 341:16−30. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.11.019

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [120] Cui Y., Hong S. B., Xia Y. H., et al. (2023). Melatonin engineering m2 macrophage-derived exosomes mediate endoplasmic reticulum stress and immune reprogramming for periodontitis therapy. Adv. Sci. 10:2302029. DOI:10.1002/advs.202302029

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [121] Ma T. L., Chen S. J., Wang J. H., et al. (2024). Enhanced osteolysis targeted therapy through fusion of exosomes derived from m2 macrophages and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: Modulating macrophage polarization. Small 20:14. DOI:10.1002/smll.202303506

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [122] Yang J., Tang X. L., Chen L., et al. (2025). Liver-derived exosomal mirna in nafld: Mechanisms of action, biomarkers, and therapeutic applications. Curr. Med. Chem. 32:3606−3619. DOI:10.2174/0109298673276581231210170332

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] Hou J., Chen K. X., He C., et al. (2024). Aged bone marrow macrophages drive systemic aging and age-related dysfunction via extracellular vesicle-mediated induction of paracrine senescence. Nature Aging 4:1562−1581. DOI:10.1038/s43587-024-00694-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [124] Xie L., Chen J. Y., Hu H. C., et al. (2024). Engineered M2 macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles with platelet membrane fusion for targeted therapy of atherosclerosis. Bioact. Mater. 35:447−460. DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.02.015

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [125] Zuo T. C., Shi C. G., Li J. Y., et al. (2026). M2 macrophage-derived exosome nanoplatform for targeted H2S delivery to alleviate hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury via synergistic anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-ferroptotic effects. Acta Biomater. 212:593−612. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2025.12.041

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [126] Wiklander O. P. B., Mamand D. R., Mohammad D. K., et al. (2024). Antibody-displaying extracellular vesicles for targeted cancer therapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng 8:1453−1468. DOI:10.1038/s41551-024-01214-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [127] He C., Hu C., He W. Z., et al. (2024). Macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles regulate skeletal stem/ progenitor Cell lineage fate and bone deterioration in obesity. Bioact. Mater. 36:508−523. DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.06.035

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [128] Guan X., Li C. Y., Wang X. Y., et al. (2025). Engineered M2 macrophage-derived exosomes: mechanisms and therapeutic potential in inflammation regulation and regenerative medicine. Acta Biomater. 203:38−58. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2025.07.039

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [129] Manno M., Bongiovanni A., Margolis L., et al. (2025). The physico-chemical landscape of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 3:68−82. DOI:10.1038/s44222-024-00255-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [130] Limongi T., Milla P., Stella B., et al. (2026). Regulatory challenges and opportunities for cell-derived extracellular vesicles in pharmaceutical development: A european and global perspective. J Extracell Vesicles 15:e70332. DOI:10.1002/jev2.70332

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Lu P., Luo F., Zhou Z., et al. (2026). M2 macrophage extracellular vesicles in bone regeneration: Applications and challenges. The Innovation Reviews 1:100003. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.tirv.2026.100003
    Lu P., Luo F., Zhou Z., et al. (2026). M2 macrophage extracellular vesicles in bone regeneration: Applications and challenges. The Innovation Reviews 1:100003. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.tirv.2026.100003

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(7)     Tables(1)

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(790) PDF downloads(261)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint