Article Contents
REPORT   Open Access     Cite

Singlet oxygen-responsive nanoplatform for synergetic photodynamic-immunotherapy guided by NIR-II imaging

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. This study develops a light-activated system to improve therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.

      The nanoparticle uses CRISPR/Cas9 to edit the PD-L1 gene and a light-triggered therapy to kill tumor cells.

      The two methods work together to reshape the tumor's immune environment and enhance anti-tumor immunity.

      The system is monitored using advanced near-infrared imaging.

  • Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents significant treatment challenges due to its lack of clear molecular targets and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). This study reports the development of a light-triggered biomimetic nanodelivery system (OPTC-RNP@CM) to overcome these hurdles. The system integrates a semiconducting polymer for second near-infrared (NIR-II) imaging, a photosensitizer (Ce6), and CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein targeting PD-L1 via a singlet oxygen-cleavable linker. Coated with homologous tumor cell membranes for enhanced targeting, the nanoparticles accumulate at the tumor site. Upon NIR irradiation, generated singlet oxygen simultaneously triggers the release of Cas9 RNP for PD-L1 gene editing and induces photodynamic therapy (PDT). This dual action promotes immunogenic cell death (ICD) and, synergistically with PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade, effectively remodels the immunosuppressive TME, amplifying the antitumor immune response. This versatile platform offers a promising strategy for precise and enhanced immunotherapy against TNBC.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Simon N., Antignani A., Sarnovsky R., et al. (2016). Targeting a cancer-specific epitope of the epidermal growth factor receptor in triple-negative breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 108:djw028. DOI:10.1093/jnci/djw028

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Leon-Ferre R.A. and Goetz M.P. (2023). Advances in systemic therapies for triple negative breast cancer. BMJ 381:e071674. DOI:10.1136/bmj-2022-071674

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Derakhshan F. and Reis-Filho J.S. (2025). Pathogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 17:181−204. DOI:10.1146/annurev-pathol-042420-093238

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Nasiri F., Kazemi M., Mirarefin S.M.J., et al. (2022). CAR-T cell therapy in triple-negative breast cancer: Hunting the invisible devil. Front. Immunol. 13:1018786. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1018786

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Guha M., Srinivasan S., Raman P., et al. (2018). Aggressive triple negative breast cancers have unique molecular signature on the basis of mitochondrial genetic and functional defects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1864:1060−1071. DOI:10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.01.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Zhang Y. and Zhang Z. (2020). The history and advances in cancer immunotherapy: Understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 17:807−821. DOI:10.1038/s41423-020-0488-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Fan L., Qu S., Qian J., et al. (2024). Melanin-based duplex Cas9 ribonucleoprotein nanomedicine for synergistic phototherapy and immunotherapy. Chem. Eng. J. 493:152754. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.152754

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Wang X., Tokheim C., Gu S.S., et al. (2021). In vivo CRISPR screens identify the E3 ligase Cop1 as a modulator of macrophage infiltration and cancer immunotherapy target. Cell 184:5357−5374. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Zhao L., Li D., Zhang Y., et al. (2022). HSP70-Promoter-Driven CRISPR/Cas9 system activated by reactive oxygen species for multifaceted anticancer immune response and potentiated immunotherapy. ACS Nano 16:13821−13833. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.2c01885

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Liu X., Wang D., Zhang P., et al. (2019). Recent advances in nanosized drug delivery systems for overcoming the barriers to anti-PD immunotherapy of cancer. Nano Today 29:100801. DOI:10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100801

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Zhao L., Luo Y., Huang Q., et al. (2020). Photo-enhanced CRISPR/Cas9 system enables robust PD-L1 gene disruption in cancer cells and cancer stem-like cells for efficient cancer immunotherapy. Small 16:2004879. DOI:10.1002/smll.202004879

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [12] Li L., Yang Z., Zhu S., et al. (2019). A rationally designed semiconducting polymer brush for NIR-II imaging-guided light-triggered remote control of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Adv. Mater. 31:1901187. DOI:10.1002/adma.201901187

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Hayashi K., Nikolos F., Lee Y.C., et al. (2020). Tipping the immunostimulatory and inhibitory DAMP balance to harness immunogenic cell death. Nat. Commun. 11:6299. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-19970-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Aria H. and Rezaei M. (2023). Immunogenic cell death inducer peptides: A new approach for cancer therapy, current status and future perspectives. Biomed. Pharmacother. 161:114503. DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114503

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Li Z., Lai X., Fu S., et al. (2022). Immunogenic cell death activates the tumor immune microenvironment to boost the immunotherapy efficiency. Adv. Sci. 9:2201734. DOI:10.1002/advs.202201734

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Minute L., Teijeira A., Sanchez-Paulete A.R., et al. (2020). Cellular cytotoxicity is a form of immunogenic cell death. J. immunother. cancer 8:e000325. DOI:10.1136/jitc-2019-000325

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Xiong W., Cheng Z., Chen H., et al. (2024). Biomimetic tumor cell membrane-encapsulated nanoparticles combine NIR-II photothermal therapy and chemotherapy for enhanced immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Adv. Funct. Mater. n/a:2410841. DOI:10.1002/adfm.202410841.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [18] Dai X., Liu D., Pan P., et al. (2024). Multifunctional two-dimensional Bi2Se3 nanodisks as a non-inflammatory photothermal agent for glioma treatment. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 661:930−942. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.01.130

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Lan G., Ni K., Xu Z., et al. (2018). Nanoscale metal–organic framework overcomes hypoxia for photodynamic therapy primed cancer immunotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140:5670−5673. DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b01072

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Overchuk M., Weersink R.A., Wilson B.C. et al. (2023). Photodynamic and photothermal therapies: synergy opportunities for nanomedicine. ACS Nano 17:7979−8003. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.3c00891

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Ji Y., Fan L., Qu S. and Han X. (2022). Stimuli-responsive delivery strategies for controllable gene editing in tumor therapeutics. J. Mater. Chem. B 10:7694−7707. DOI:10.1039/D2TB01055K

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Rahaiee S., Assadpour E., Faridi Esfanjani A., et al. (2020). Application of nano/microencapsulated phenolic compounds against cancer. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 279:102153. DOI:10.1016/j.cis.2020.102153

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Lyu Y., Yang C., Lyu X. and Pu K. (2021). Active delivery of CRISPR system using targetable or controllable nanocarriers. Small 17:2005222. DOI:10.1002/smll.202005222

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Lyu Y., He S., Li J., et al. (2019). A photolabile semiconducting polymer nanotransducer for near-infrared regulation of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58:18197−18201. DOI:10.1002/anie.201909264

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Miao Q., Xie C., Zhen X., et al. (2017). Molecular afterglow imaging with bright, biodegradable polymer nanoparticles. Nat. Biotechnol. 35:1102−1110. DOI:10.1038/nbt.3987

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Jiang Y. and Pu K. (2018). Multimodal biophotonics of semiconducting polymer nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 51:1840−1849. DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00242

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Li J., Huang J., Lyu Y., et al. (2019). Photoactivatable organic semiconducting pro-nanoenzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141:4073−4079. DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b13507

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Li J. and Pu K. (2019). Development of organic semiconducting materials for deep-tissue optical imaging, phototherapy and photoactivation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48:38−71. DOI:10.1039/c8cs00001h

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Polstein L.R. and Gersbach C.A. (2015). A light-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system for control of endogenous gene activation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11:198−200. DOI:10.1038/nchembio.1753

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Pan Y., Yang J., Luan X., et al. Near-infrared upconversion–activated CRISPR-Cas9 system: A remote-controlled gene editing platform. Sci. Adv. 5:eaav7199. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aav7199

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [31] Ju A., Lee S.W., Lee Y.E., et al. (2019). A carrier-free multiplexed gene editing system applicable for suspension cells. Biomaterials 217:119298. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119298

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Xu X., Liu C., Wang Y., et al. (2021). Nanotechnology-based delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for cancer treatment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 176:113891. DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113891

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Chen Z., Hu Q. and Gu Z. (2018). Leveraging engineering of cells for drug delivery. Acc. Chem. Res. 51:668−677. DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00526

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Fang R.H., Jiang Y., Fang J.C. and Zhang L. (2017). Cell membrane-derived nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 128:69−83. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.041

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Miao Y., Yang Y., Guo L., et al. (2022). Cell membrane-camouflaged nanocarriers with biomimetic deformability of erythrocytes for ultralong circulation and enhanced cancer therapy. ACS Nano 16:6527−6540. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.2c00893

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Li J., Tian C., Yuan Y., et al. (2015). A water-soluble conjugated polymer with pendant disulfide linkages to PEG chains: A highly efficient ratiometric probe with solubility-induced fluorescence conversion for thiol detection. Macromolecules 48:1017−1025. DOI:10.1021/ma5021775

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Xiong W., Cheng Z., Chen H., et al. (2024). Biomimetic tumor cell membrane‐encapsulated nanoparticles combine NIR-II photothermal therapy and chemotherapy for enhanced immunotherapy in triple‐negative breast cancer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34:2410841. DOI:10.1002/adfm.202410841

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [38] Fang R.H., Gao W. and Zhang L. (2023). Targeting drugs to tumours using cell membrane-coated nanoparticles. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20:33−48. DOI:10.1038/s41571-022-00699-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Liang S., Hu D., Li G., et al. (2022). NIR-II fluorescence visualization of ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening for enhanced photothermal therapy against glioblastoma using indocyanine green microbubbles. Sci. Bull. 67:2316−2326. DOI:10.1016/j.scib.2022.10.025

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Li Y., Qu F., Wan F., et al. (2025). Aggregation control of anionic pentamethine cyanine enabling excitation wavelength selective NIR-II fluorescence imaging-guided photodynamic therapy. Nat. Commun. 16:762. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-55429-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Ji Y., Qian J., Fan L., et al. (2026). Singlet oxygen-responsive nanoplatform for synergetic photodynamic-immunotherapy guided by NIR-II imaging. The Innovation Materials 4:100190. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2026.100190
    Ji Y., Qian J., Fan L., et al. (2026). Singlet oxygen-responsive nanoplatform for synergetic photodynamic-immunotherapy guided by NIR-II imaging. The Innovation Materials 4:100190. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2026.100190

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(5)    

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(2021) PDF downloads(520)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint