Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access     Cite

Extracellular and membrane-targeted protein degradation (emTPD): Mechanisms, design frameworks, and therapeutic opportunities

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Extracellular and membrane proteins are key disease targets but remain hard to remove.

      This review summarizes emTPD, which routes targets to lysosomes by receptors, E3s, or programs.

      We identify endolysosomal routing as key to predictable, tissue-selective, and durable degradation.

  • Over the past five years, the field of extracellular and membrane-targeted protein degradation (emTPD) has reoriented target proteins toward endolysosomal degradation, providing an alternative to traditional inhibitors. Here, we classify current emTPD strategies according to the primary fate-determining module that commits cargo to degradation: (1) Receptor hijacking, in which endogenous receptors drive uptake and lysosomal routing; (2) Surface E3 ligase recruitment, in which ubiquitin serves as the internalization and sorting signal; (3) Receptor-independent or programmable routing mechanisms, which do not rely on canonical lysosomal shuttle receptors but instead encode degradative fate through alternative endocytic, sorting, or autophagy-linked cues. We synthesize shared mechanistic principles—membrane ternary-complex biophysics, endocytic flux, and condition-triggered dissociation—into a unified design framework that guides molecular engineering, tissue selectivity, and rational combination strategies. Major translational challenges include PK/PD modeling, tissue penetration, immunogenicity and safety window. With the emergence of early clinical evaluations (e.g., BHV-1400 entering early clinical evaluation), emTPD is gradually shifting towards clinical validation. In the future, the combination of artificial intelligence-driven design and pathway engineering will expand its therapeutic applications across tumors, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and metabolic diseases.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Wells J. A. and Kumru O. S. (2024). Extracellular targeted protein degradation: an emerging modality for drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 23:126−140. DOI:10.1038/s41573-023-00833-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Uhlén M. and Karlsson M. J. (2019). The human secretome. Science Signaling 12:eaaz0274. DOI:10.1126/scisignal.aaz0274

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Uhlén M., Fagerberg L., Hallström B. M., et al. (2015). Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347:1260419. DOI:10.1126/science.1260419

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Santos R., Ursu O., Gaulton A., et al. (2017). A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:19−34. DOI:10.1038/nrd.2016.230

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Banik S. M., Pedram K., Wisnovsky S., et al. (2020). Lysosome-targeting chimaeras for degradation of extracellular proteins. Nature 584:291−297. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2545-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Heppner F. L., Ransohoff R. M. and Becher B. (2015). Immune attack: the role of inflammation in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 16:358−372. DOI:10.1038/nrn3880

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] You M., Xie Z., Zhang N., et al. (2023). Signaling pathways in cancer metabolism: mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther 8:196. DOI:10.1038/s41392-023-01442-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Long Y., Wang P., Lei J., et al. (2025). Mechanical Signaling: Molecular Mechanisms, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Therapeutic Targets. MedComm (2020) 6:e70523. DOI:10.1002/mco2.70523.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [9] Sriram K. and Insel P. A. (2018). G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Targets for Approved Drugs: How Many Targets and How Many Drugs. Mol Pharmacol 93:251−258. DOI:10.1124/mol.117.111062

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Lazar T., Connor A., DeLisle C. F., et al. (2025). Targeting protein disorder: the next hurdle in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 24:743−763. DOI:10.1038/s41573-025-01220-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Arkin M. R. and Wells J. A. (2004). Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:301−317. DOI:10.1038/nrd1343

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Schapira M., Tyers M., Torrent M., et al. (2017). WD40 repeat domain proteins: a novel target class. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:773−786. DOI:10.1038/nrd.2017.179

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Dang C. V., Reddy E. P., Shokat K. M., et al. (2017). Drugging the 'undruggable' cancer targets. Nat Rev Cancer 17:502−508. DOI:10.1038/nrc.2017.36

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Xie X., Yu T., Li X., et al. (2023). Recent advances in targeting the "undruggable" proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials. Signal Transduct Target Ther 8:335. DOI:10.1038/s41392-023-01589-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Rodríguez-Nava C., Ortuño-Pineda C., Illades-Aguiar B., et al. (2023). Mechanisms of Action and Limitations of Monoclonal Antibodies and Single Chain Fragment Variable (scFv) in the Treatment of Cancer. Biomedicines 11. DOI:10.3390/biomedicines11061610.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [16] Mekala J. R., Nalluri H. P., Reddy P. N., et al. (2024). Emerging trends and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies. Gene 925:148607. DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2024.148607

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Zhao L., Zhao J., Zhong K., et al. (2022). Targeted protein degradation: mechanisms, strategies and application. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7:113. DOI:10.1038/s41392-022-00966-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Wang S., He F., Tian C., et al. (2024). From PROTAC to TPD: Advances and Opportunities in Targeted Protein Degradation. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 17. DOI:10.3390/ph17010100

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [19] Yang N., Kong B., Zhu Z., et al. (2024). Recent advances in targeted protein degraders as potential therapeutic agents. Mol Divers 28:309−333. DOI:10.1007/s11030-023-10606-w

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Qin L., Dai H. and Wang J. (2022). Key Considerations in Targeted Protein Degradation Drug Discovery and Development. Front Chem 10:934337. DOI:10.3389/fchem.2022.934337

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Zhu R., Zhang H. and Chen P. R. (2025). Targeted protein degradation in the transmembrane and extracellular space. Science 390:eadx5094. DOI:10.1126/science.adx5094

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Eladl O. (2025). Molecular glues and PROTACs in targeted protein degradation: mechanisms, advances, and therapeutic potential. Biochem Pharmacol 242:117297. DOI:10.1016/j.bcp.2025.117297

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Kannt A. and Đikić I. (2021). Expanding the arsenal of E3 ubiquitin ligases for proximity-induced protein degradation. Cell Chem Biol 28:1014−1031. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.04.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Liu Y., Bai J., Li D., et al. (2025). Routes to molecular glue degrader discovery. Trends Biochem Sci 50:134−142. DOI:10.1016/j.tibs.2024.12.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Sakamoto K. M., Kim K. B., Kumagai A., et al. (2001). Protacs: chimeric molecules that target proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F box complex for ubiquitination and degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:8554−8559. DOI:10.1073/pnas.141230798

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Schapira M., Calabrese M. F., Bullock A. N., et al. (2019). Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18:949−963. DOI:10.1038/s41573-019-0047-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Chen X., Zhou Y., Zhao Y., et al. (2023). Targeted degradation of extracellular secreted and membrane proteins. Trends Pharmacol Sci 44:762−775. DOI:10.1016/j.tips.2023.08.013

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Mamun M. A. A., Bakunts A. G. and Chernorudskiy A. L. (2025). Targeted degradation of extracellular proteins: state of the art and diversity of degrader designs. J Hematol Oncol 18:52. DOI:10.1186/s13045-025-01703-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Ahn G., Banik S. M. and Bertozzi C. R. (2021). Degradation from the outside in: Targeting extracellular and membrane proteins for degradation through the endolysosomal pathway. Cell Chem Biol 28:1072−1080. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.02.024

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Li Y. Y., Yang Y., Zhang R. S., et al. (2025). Targeted degradation of membrane and extracellular proteins with LYTACs. Acta Pharmacol Sin 46:1−7. DOI:10.1038/s41401-024-01364-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Ahn G., Banik S. M., Miller C. L., et al. (2021). LYTACs that engage the asialoglycoprotein receptor for targeted protein degradation. Nat Chem Biol 17:937−946. DOI:10.1038/s41589-021-00770-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Ahn G., Riley N. M., Kamber R. A., et al. (2023). Elucidating the cellular determinants of targeted membrane protein degradation by lysosome-targeting chimeras. Science 382:eadf6249. DOI:10.1126/science.adf6249

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Ramírez-Cortés F. and Ménová P. (2025). Hepatocyte targeting via the asialoglycoprotein receptor. RSC Med Chem 16:525−544. DOI:10.1039/d4md00652f

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Cotton A. D., Nguyen D. P., Gramespacher J. A., et al. (2021). Development of Antibody-Based PROTACs for the Degradation of the Cell-Surface Immune Checkpoint Protein PD-L1. J Am Chem Soc 143:593−598. DOI:10.1021/jacs.0c10008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Monroy M. F., Krumpoch M., McTeague T. A., et al. (2025). Bi-functional integrin degraders cause stronger anti-proliferative effects than a blocking antibody by modulating distinct downstream signaling. MAbs 17:2575849. DOI:10.1080/19420862.2025.2575849

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Chen S., Cui J., Chen H., et al. (2023). Recent progress in degradation of membrane proteins by PROTACs and alternative targeted protein degradation techniques. Eur J Med Chem 262:115911. DOI:10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115911

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Wang H., Zhou R., Xu F., et al. (2023). Beyond canonical PROTAC: biological targeted protein degradation (bioTPD). Biomater Res 27:72. DOI:10.1186/s40824-023-00385-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Cheng B., Li M., Zheng J., et al. (2025). Chemically engineered antibodies for autophagy-based receptor degradation. Nat Chem Biol 21:855−866. DOI:10.1038/s41589-024-01803-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Zhou Z., Liang J., Cheng B., et al. (2025). Targeted Degradation Technologies Utilizing Autophagy. Int J Mol Sci 26. DOI:10.3390/ijms26146576

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [40] Zhang H., Han Y., Yang Y., et al. (2021). Covalently Engineered Nanobody Chimeras for Targeted Membrane Protein Degradation. J Am Chem Soc 143:16377−16382. DOI:10.1021/jacs.1c08521

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Fang T., Zheng Z., Li N., et al. (2024). Lysosome-targeting chimeras containing an endocytic signaling motif trigger endocytosis and lysosomal degradation of cell-surface proteins. Chem Sci 15:17652−17662. DOI:10.1039/d4sc05093b

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Yu J., Li H., Fang T., et al. (2023). Harnessing the Lysosomal Sorting Signals of the Cation-Independent Mannose-6-Phosphate Receptor for Targeted Degradation of Membrane Proteins. J Am Chem Soc 145:19107−19119. DOI:10.1021/jacs.3c07687

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Grohmann C., Marapana D. S. and Ebert G. (2022). Targeted protein degradation at the host-pathogen interface. Mol Microbiol 117:670−681. DOI:10.1111/mmi.14849

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Alam M. M., Wasim S. and Lee S. Y. (2025). Emerging Concepts of Targeted Protein Degrader Technologies via Lysosomal Pathways. Int J Mol Sci 26. DOI:10.3390/ijms26125582

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [45] Mikitiuk M., Barczyński J., Bielski P., et al. (2023). IGF2 Peptide-Based LYTACs for Targeted Degradation of Extracellular and Transmembrane Proteins. Molecules 28. DOI:10.3390/molecules28227519.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [46] Niebel B., Chen W., Mukai K., et al. (2026). LYTACs and other extracellular targeted protein degradation TACnologies: guiding principles and potential clinical prospects. Drug Discov Today 31:104601. DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2026.104601

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Kim J., Byun I., Kim D. Y., et al. (2024). Targeted protein degradation directly engaging lysosomes or proteasomes. Chem Soc Rev 53:3253−3272. DOI:10.1039/d3cs00344b

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Erlendsson S. and Teilum K. (2020). Binding Revisited-Avidity in Cellular Function and Signaling. Front Mol Biosci 7:615565. DOI:10.3389/fmolb.2020.615565

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Weikl T. R., Hu J., Xu G. K., et al. (2016). Binding equilibrium and kinetics of membrane-anchored receptors and ligands in cell adhesion: Insights from computational model systems and theory. Cell Adh Migr 10:576−589. DOI:10.1080/19336918.2016.1180487

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Li L., Hu J., Li L., et al. (2019). Binding constant of membrane-anchored receptors and ligands that induce membrane curvatures. Soft Matter 15:3507−3514. DOI:10.1039/c8sm02504e

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Murray D., Ben-Tal N., Honig B., et al. (1997). Electrostatic interaction of myristoylated proteins with membranes: simple physics, complicated biology. Structure 5:985−989. DOI:10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00251-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Lv Y., Li Y., Fu Q., et al. (2025). Controllable multivalent LYTACs enhance targeted protein degradation. Chem Commun (Camb) 61:580−583. DOI:10.1039/d4cc04842c

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Woythe L., Tito N. B. and Albertazzi L. (2021). A quantitative view on multivalent nanomedicine targeting. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 169:1−21. DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Roy R. D., Rosenmund C. and Stefan M. I. (2017). Cooperative binding mitigates the high-dose hook effect. BMC Syst Biol 11:74. DOI:10.1186/s12918-017-0447-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Sonawane S. J., Kalhapure R. S. and Govender T. (2017). Hydrazone linkages in pH responsive drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Sci 99:45−65. DOI:10.1016/j.ejps.2016.12.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Ding H., Tan P., Fu S., et al. (2022). Preparation and application of pH-responsive drug delivery systems. J Control Release 348:206−238. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.056

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Ahn G., Coventry B., Haefner E., et al. (2025). Computational design of pH-sensitive binders. bioRxiv. DOI:10.1101/2025.09.29.678932.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [58] Klaus T. and Deshmukh S. (2021). pH-responsive antibodies for therapeutic applications. J Biomed Sci 28:11. DOI:10.1186/s12929-021-00709-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Paulk J. (2021). Lysosome-targeting chimeras evolve. Nat Chem Biol 17:931−933. DOI:10.1038/s41589-021-00835-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Kaksonen M. and Roux A. (2018). Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19:313−326. DOI:10.1038/nrm.2017.132

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Gauthier C., El Cheikh K., Basile I., et al. (2024). Cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor: From roles and functions to targeted therapies. J Control Release 365:759−772. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.12.014

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Orofiamma L. A., Delos Santos R. C., Mehrabi A., et al. (2025). Cargo-selective regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by AMP-activated protein kinase. iScience 28:113131. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113131

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Hong S. H., Cortesio C. L. and Drubin D. G. (2015). Machine-Learning-Based Analysis in Genome-Edited Cells Reveals the Efficiency of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Cell Rep 12:2121−2130. DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.048

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Arpino G., Somasundaram A., Shin W., et al. (2022). Clathrin-mediated endocytosis cooperates with bulk endocytosis to generate vesicles. iScience 25:103809. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2022.103809

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Marei H., Tsai W. K., Kee Y. S., et al. (2022). Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation. Nature 610:182−189. DOI:10.1038/s41586-022-05235-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Siepe D. H., Picton L. K. and Garcia K. C. (2023). Receptor Elimination by E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Recruitment (REULR): A Targeted Protein Degradation Toolbox. ACS Synth Biol 12:1081−1093. DOI:10.1021/acssynbio.2c00587

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] Li Y., Yu W., Wang X., et al. (2026). Antibody-based targeted protein degradation: Mechanisms, challenges and future directions. Int J Biol Macromol 337:149426. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.149426

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [68] Wollert T. and Hurley J. H. (2010). Molecular mechanism of multivesicular body biogenesis by ESCRT complexes. Nature 464:864−869. DOI:10.1038/nature08849

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Katzmann D. J., Babst M. and Emr S. D. (2001). Ubiquitin-dependent sorting into the multivesicular body pathway requires the function of a conserved endosomal protein sorting complex, ESCRT-I. Cell 106:145−155. DOI:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00434-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [70] Sun R., Meng Z., Lee H., et al. (2023). ROTACs leverage signaling-incompetent R-spondin for targeted protein degradation. Cell Chem Biol 30:739−752.e738. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.05.010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Ghosh P., Dahms N. M. and Kornfeld S. (2003). Mannose 6-phosphate receptors: new twists in the tale. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:202−212. DOI:10.1038/nrm1050

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [72] Miller J. J., Bohnsack R. N., Olson L. J., et al. (2021). Tissue plasminogen activator is a ligand of cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor and consists of glycoforms that contain mannose 6-phosphate. Sci Rep 11:8213. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-87579-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Sung Y., Choi Y., Kim E. S., et al. (2025). Receptor-ligand interactions for optimized endocytosis in targeted therapies. J Control Release 380:524−538. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.060

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [74] Kim S., Kang J., An D., et al. (2025). Lysosome-Targeting Chimera Using Mannose-6-Phosphate Glycans Derived from Glyco-Engineered Yeast. Bioconjug Chem 36:424−436. DOI:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.4c00512

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Sedighi M., Mahmoudi Z., Ghasempour A., et al. (2023). Nanostructured multifunctional stimuli-responsive glycopolypeptide-based copolymers for biomedical applications. J Control Release 354:128−145. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.058

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [76] Kang J. Y., Shin K. K., Kim H. H., et al. (2018). Lysosomal Targeting Enhancement by Conjugation of Glycopeptides Containing Mannose-6-phosphate Glycans Derived from Glyco-engineered Yeast. Sci Rep 8:8730. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26913-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [77] Debacker A. J., Voutila J., Catley M., et al. (2020). Delivery of Oligonucleotides to the Liver with GalNAc: From Research to Registered Therapeutic Drug. Mol Ther 28:1759−1771. DOI:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.06.015

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [78] Prakash T. P., Graham M. J., Yu J., et al. (2014). Targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to hepatocytes using triantennary N-acetyl galactosamine improves potency 10-fold in mice. Nucleic Acids Res 42:8796−8807. DOI:10.1093/nar/gku531

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [79] D'Souza A. A. and Devarajan P. V. (2015). Asialoglycoprotein receptor mediated hepatocyte targeting - strategies and applications. J Control Release 203:126−139. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.022

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [80] Salim E. L., Kristensen K. and Sjögren E. (2025). Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of GalNAc-Conjugated siRNAs. Pharmaceutics 17. DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics17010069

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [81] Svecla M., Da Dalt L., Moregola A., et al. (2024). ASGR1 deficiency diverts lipids toward adipose tissue but results in liver damage during obesity. Cardiovasc Diabetol 23:42. DOI:10.1186/s12933-023-02099-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [82] Zhang Z., Leng X. K., Zhai Y. Y., et al. (2024). Deficiency of ASGR1 promotes liver injury by increasing GP73-mediated hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Commun 15:1908. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-46135-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [83] Zhang D., Duque-Jimenez J., Facchinetti F., et al. (2025). Transferrin receptor targeting chimeras for membrane protein degradation. Nature 638:787−795. DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-07947-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [84] Harding C., Heuser J. and Stahl P. (1983). Receptor-mediated endocytosis of transferrin and recycling of the transferrin receptor in rat reticulocytes. J Cell Biol 97:329−339. DOI:10.1083/jcb.97.2.329

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [85] Caculitan N. G., Dela Cruz Chuh J., Ma Y., et al. (2017). Cathepsin B Is Dispensable for Cellular Processing of Cathepsin B-Cleavable Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Cancer Res 77:7027−7037. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.Can-17-2391

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [86] Testi C., Boffi A. and Montemiglio L. C. (2019). Structural analysis of the transferrin receptor multifaceted ligand(s) interface. Biophys Chem 254:106242. DOI:10.1016/j.bpc.2019.106242

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [87] Niewoehner J., Bohrmann B., Collin L., et al. (2014). Increased brain penetration and potency of a therapeutic antibody using a monovalent molecular shuttle. Neuron 81:49−60. DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.061

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [88] Bonvicini G., Singh S., Sandersjöö L., et al. (2025). The effects of dose, valency, and affinity on TfR-mediated brain delivery in vivo. Fluids Barriers CNS 22:36. DOI:10.1186/s12987-025-00643-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [89] Zheng J., He W., Li J., et al. (2022). Bifunctional Compounds as Molecular Degraders for Integrin-Facilitated Targeted Protein Degradation. J Am Chem Soc 144:21831−21836. DOI:10.1021/jacs.2c08367

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] He W., Chen C., Cai R., et al. (2025). Bifunctional compounds for targeted degradation of carbonic anhydrase IX through integrin-facilitated lysosome degradation. J Biol Chem 301:108482. DOI:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108482

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Chastney M. R., Kaivola J., Leppänen V. M., et al. (2025). The role and regulation of integrins in cell migration and invasion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 26:147−167. DOI:10.1038/s41580-024-00777-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [92] Molnár M., Sőth Á. and Simon-Vecsei Z. (2022). Pathways of integrins in the endo-lysosomal system. Biol Futur 73:171−185. DOI:10.1007/s42977-022-00120-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [93] Hynes R. O. (2002). Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110:673−687. DOI:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00971-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [94] Pance K., Gramespacher J. A., Byrnes J. R., et al. (2023). Modular cytokine receptor-targeting chimeras for targeted degradation of cell surface and extracellular proteins. Nat Biotechnol 41:273−281. DOI:10.1038/s41587-022-01456-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [95] Korona B. and Itzhaki L. S. (2024). How to target membrane proteins for degradation: Bringing GPCRs into the TPD fold. J Biol Chem 300:107926. DOI:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107926

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [96] Jones B., Buenaventura T., Kanda N., et al. (2018). Targeting GLP-1 receptor trafficking to improve agonist efficacy. Nat Commun 9:1602. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-03941-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [97] Zhu L., Zhou Y., Zhang B., et al. (2023). Conjugation with glucagon like peptide-1 enables targeted protein degradation. Bioorg Chem 141:106908. DOI:10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.106908

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [98] He S., Huang W., Zhu Y., et al. (2025). HerTACs Enable Tumor-Selective Lysosomal Degradation of Membrane and Extracellular Proteins via HER2 Trafficking. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 64:e202511467. DOI:10.1002/anie.202511467

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [99] Li B. T., Michelini F., Misale S., et al. (2020). HER2-Mediated Internalization of Cytotoxic Agents in ERBB2 Amplified or Mutant Lung Cancers. Cancer Discov 10:674−687. DOI:10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-20-0215

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [100] Yang Z., Jiang J., Cao Y., et al. (2025). Cell-Selective Targeting Chimeras (SelecTAC(B)) for Membrane Protein Degradation on B Cells. J Am Chem Soc 147:36301−36309. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5c09630

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [101] Shan D. and Press O. W. (1995). Constitutive endocytosis and degradation of CD22 by human B cells. J Immunol 154:4466−4475. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.154.9.4466

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [102] Foot N., Henshall T. and Kumar S. (2017). Ubiquitination and the Regulation of Membrane Proteins. Physiological Reviews 97:253−281. DOI:10.1152/physrev.00012.2016

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [103] Spit M., Fenderico N., Jordens I., et al. (2020). RNF43 truncations trap CK1 to drive niche-independent self-renewal in cancer. Embo j 39:e103932. DOI:10.15252/embj.2019103932

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [104] Hao H. X., Xie Y., Zhang Y., et al. (2012). ZNRF3 promotes Wnt receptor turnover in an R-spondin-sensitive manner. Nature 485:195−200. DOI:10.1038/nature11019

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [105] Colozza G. and Koo B. K. (2021). Ub and Dub of RNF43/ZNRF3 in the WNT signalling pathway. EMBO Rep 22:e52970. DOI:10.15252/embr.202152970

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [106] Gramespacher J. A., Cotton A. D., Burroughs P. W. W., et al. (2022). Roadmap for Optimizing and Broadening Antibody-Based PROTACs for Degradation of Cell Surface Proteins. ACS Chem Biol 17:1259−1268. DOI:10.1021/acschembio.2c00185

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [107] Branigan E., Carlos Penedo J. and Hay R. T. (2020). Ubiquitin transfer by a RING E3 ligase occurs from a closed E2~ubiquitin conformation. Nat Commun 11:2846. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-16666-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [108] Crunkhorn S. (2022). Developing antibody-based PROTACs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 21:795. DOI:10.1038/d41573-022-00159-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [109] Li S., Niu J. and Smits R. (2024). RNF43 and ZNRF3: Versatile regulators at the membrane and their role in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1879:189217. DOI:10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189217

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [110] Ter Steege E. J. and Bakker E. R. M. (2021). The role of R-spondin proteins in cancer biology. Oncogene 40:6469−6478. DOI:10.1038/s41388-021-02059-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [111] Koo B. K., Spit M., Jordens I., et al. (2012). Tumour suppressor RNF43 is a stem-cell E3 ligase that induces endocytosis of Wnt receptors. Nature 488:665−669. DOI:10.1038/nature11308

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [112] Erickson A. H. (2011). PA-TM-RING proteins: a new family of endosomal membrane proteins. Febs j 278:46. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07921.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [113] Till N. A., Ramanathan M. and Bertozzi C. R. (2025). Induced proximity at the cell surface. Nat Biotechnol 43:702−711. DOI:10.1038/s41587-025-02592-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [114] Sardana R. and Emr S. D. (2021). Membrane Protein Quality Control Mechanisms in the Endo-Lysosome System. Trends Cell Biol 31:269−283. DOI:10.1016/j.tcb.2020.11.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [115] Raiborg C. and Stenmark H. (2009). The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of ubiquitylated membrane proteins. Nature 458:445−452. DOI:10.1038/nature07961

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [116] Paik H., Oh C., Hussain S., et al. (2024). ELiAH: the atlas of E3 ligases in human tissues for targeted protein degradation with reduced off-target effect. Database (Oxford) 2024. DOI:10.1093/database/baae111

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [117] Shao J., Xie S., Hong S., et al. (2025). Autophagy-Mediated Targeted Protein Degradation. ChemMedChem 20:e202400866. DOI:10.1002/cmdc.202400866

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [118] Ji C. H., Kim H. Y., Lee M. J., et al. (2022). The AUTOTAC chemical biology platform for targeted protein degradation via the autophagy-lysosome system. Nat Commun 13:904. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-28520-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [119] Huang B., Abedi M., Ahn G., et al. (2025). Designed endocytosis-inducing proteins degrade targets and amplify signals. Nature 638:796−804. DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-07948-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [120] He W., Chen C., Zheng J., et al. (2025). Targeted degradation of cell surface proteins through endocytosis triggered by cell-penetrating peptide-small molecule conjugates. Nat Commun 16:7575. DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-62776-w

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [121] Derakhshankhah H. and Jafari S. (2018). Cell penetrating peptides: A concise review with emphasis on biomedical applications. Biomed Pharmacother 108:1090−1096. DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.097

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [122] Coelho P. P., Hesketh G. G., Pedersen A., et al. (2022). Endosomal LC3C-pathway selectively targets plasma membrane cargo for autophagic degradation. Nat Commun 13:3812. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-31465-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] Adriaenssens E., Ferrari L. and Martens S. (2022). Orchestration of selective autophagy by cargo receptors. Curr Biol 32:R1357−r1371. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [124] North B. J., Fracchiolla D., Ragusa M. J., et al. (2025). The rapidly expanding role of LC3-interacting regions in autophagy. J Cell Biol 224. DOI:10.1083/jcb.202504076.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [125] Lőrincz P. and Juhász G. (2020). Autophagosome-Lysosome Fusion. J Mol Biol 432:2462−2482. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.028

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [126] Klionsky D. J., Abdel-Aziz A. K., Abdelfatah S., et al. (2021). Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)(1). Autophagy 17:1−382. DOI:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [127] Zhao Y. G., Codogno P. and Zhang H. (2021). Machinery, regulation and pathophysiological implications of autophagosome maturation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 22:733−750. DOI:10.1038/s41580-021-00392-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [128] Ben W. B. and Pirjo A. M. (2025). ATG8 in single membranes: Fresh players of endocytosis and acidic organelle quality control in cancer, neurodegeneration, and inflammation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 749:151384. DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151384

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [129] Gatica D., Lahiri V. and Klionsky D. J. (2018). Cargo recognition and degradation by selective autophagy. Nat Cell Biol 20:233−242. DOI:10.1038/s41556-018-0037-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [130] Takahashi D., Moriyama J., Nakamura T., et al. (2019). AUTACs: Cargo-Specific Degraders Using Selective Autophagy. Mol Cell 76:797−810.e710. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.009

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [131] Shen Q. (2023). Research Progress in Targeted ProteinDegradation Technology ofAutophagy-Lysosome System. Hans Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 11:262−272.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [132] Casper J., Schenk S. H., Parhizkar E., et al. (2023). Polyethylenimine (PEI) in gene therapy: Current status and clinical applications. J Control Release 362:667−691. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.09.001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [133] Hoyer M. J., Swarup S. and Harper J. W. (2022). Mechanisms Controlling Selective Elimination of Damaged Lysosomes. Curr Opin Physiol 29. DOI:10.1016/j.cophys.2022.100590

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [134] Li X., He S. and Ma B. (2020). Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in cancer. Mol Cancer 19:12. DOI:10.1186/s12943-020-1138-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [135] Singh S., Carosi J. M., Dang L., et al. (2025). Autophagy does not always decline with ageing. Nat Cell Biol 27:712−715. DOI:10.1038/s41556-025-01654-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [136] Xiao S., Yu Y., Liao M., et al. (2025). Post-Translational Modification of p62: Roles and Regulations in Autophagy. Cells 14. DOI:10.3390/cells14131016

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [137] King K. E., Losier T. T. and Russell R. C. (2021). Regulation of Autophagy Enzymes by Nutrient Signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 46:687−700. DOI:10.1016/j.tibs.2021.01.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [138] Wu Y., Lin B., Lu Y., et al. (2023). Aptamer-LYTACs for Targeted Degradation of Extracellular and Membrane Proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 62:e202218106. DOI:10.1002/anie.202218106

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [139] Qiu F., Feng Z., Chen H., et al. (2025). Development of LYTACs via incorporating a nucleolin-targeting and lysosome-directed aptamer. bioRxiv:2025.2008.2029.672993. DOI:10.1101/2025.08.29.672993

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [140] Fallah A., Imani Fooladi A. A., Havaei S. A., et al. (2024). Recent advances in aptamer discovery, modification and improving performance. Biochem Biophys Rep 40:101852. DOI:10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101852

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [141] Zhang Y., Zhang H., Chan D. W. H., et al. (2022). Strategies for developing long-lasting therapeutic nucleic acid aptamer targeting circulating protein: The present and the future. Front Cell Dev Biol 10:1048148. DOI:10.3389/fcell.2022.1048148

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [142] Lu R. H., Krishna J., Alp Y., et al. (2026). Polymeric Lysosome-Targeting Chimeras (PolyTACs): Extracellular Targeted Protein Degradation without Co-Opting Lysosome-Targeting Receptors. J Am Chem Soc. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5c17519

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [143] Békés M., Langley D. R. and Crews C. M. (2022). PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue. Nat Rev Drug Discov 21:181−200. DOI:10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [144] Lai A. C. and Crews C. M. (2017). Induced protein degradation: an emerging drug discovery paradigm. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:101−114. DOI:10.1038/nrd.2016.211

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [145] Li B., Li Y., Zhang J., et al. (2026). Lysosome-targeting chimeras enable targeted protein degradation. Cell Chem Biol. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2026.01.008

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [146] Ebrahimi S. B. and Samanta D. (2023). Engineering protein-based therapeutics through structural and chemical design. Nat Commun 14:2411. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-38039-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [147] Zhang W., Li S., Yuan H., et al. (2026). Advances in light-activated PROTACs and phototherapy-combined approaches for cancer treatment. Eur J Med Chem 302:118310. DOI:10.1016/j.ejmech.2025.118310

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [148] Reynders M. and Trauner D. (2021). Optical control of targeted protein degradation. Cell Chem Biol 28:969−986. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.05.010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [149] Liu H., Ren C., Sun R., et al. (2022). Reactive oxygen species-responsive Pre-PROTAC for tumor-specific protein degradation. Chem Commun (Camb) 58:10072−10075. DOI:10.1039/d2cc03367d

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [150] Lei K., Li J., Tu Z., et al. (2024). Endosome-microautophagy targeting chimera (eMIATAC) for targeted proteins degradation and enhance CAR-T cell anti-tumor therapy. Theranostics 14:4481−4498. DOI:10.7150/thno.98574

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [151] Grimm H. P. (2009). Gaining insights into the consequences of target-mediated drug disposition of monoclonal antibodies using quasi-steady-state approximations. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 36:407−420. DOI:10.1007/s10928-009-9129-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [152] Sheehan K., Jeon H., Corr S. C., et al. (2025). Antibody Aggregation: A Problem Within the Biopharmaceutical Industry and Its Role in AL Amyloidosis Disease. Protein J 44:1−20. DOI:10.1007/s10930-024-10237-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [153] Zhang Y., Liu H., Zhen W., et al. (2025). Advancement of drugs conjugated with GalNAc in the targeted delivery to hepatocytes based on asialoglycoprotein receptor. Carbohydr Res 552:109426. DOI:10.1016/j.carres.2025.109426

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [154] Bochel A. J., Williams C., McCoy A. J., et al. (2020). Structure of the Human Cation-Independent Mannose 6-Phosphate/IGF2 Receptor Domains 7-11 Uncovers the Mannose 6-Phosphate Binding Site of Domain 9. Structure 28:1300−1312.e1305. DOI:10.1016/j.str.2020.08.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [155] Fu Z., Pan M., Yang C., et al. (2026). Rational modification of PROTACs for tumor-selective protein degradation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 230:115775. DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2026.115775

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [156] Liu L. (2018). Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins. Protein Cell 9:15−32. DOI:10.1007/s13238-017-0408-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [157] Fujimori K., Covell D. G., Fletcher J. E., et al. (1990). A modeling analysis of monoclonal antibody percolation through tumors: a binding-site barrier. J Nucl Med 31:1191−1198

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [158] Thurber G. M., Schmidt M. M. and Wittrup K. D. (2008). Antibody tumor penetration: transport opposed by systemic and antigen-mediated clearance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1421−1434. DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2008.04.012

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [159] Dai H. I., Vugmeyster Y. and Mangal N. (2020). Characterizing Exposure-Response Relationship for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in Immuno-Oncology and Beyond: Challenges, Perspectives, and Prospects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 108:1156−1170. DOI:10.1002/cpt.1953

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [160] Proctor J. R. and Wong H. (2024). Time-dependent clearance can confound exposure-response analysis of therapeutic antibodies: A comprehensive review of the current literature. Clin Transl Sci 17:e13676. DOI:10.1111/cts.13676

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [161] Kawakatsu S., Bruno R., Kågedal M., et al. (2021). Confounding factors in exposure-response analyses and mitigation strategies for monoclonal antibodies in oncology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 87:2493−2501. DOI:10.1111/bcp.14662

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [162] Han B. (2020). A suite of mathematical solutions to describe ternary complex formation and their application to targeted protein degradation by heterobifunctional ligands. J Biol Chem 295:15280−15291. DOI:10.1074/jbc.RA120.014715

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [163] Haid R. T. U. and Reichel A. (2025). PK/PD modeling of targeted protein degraders: Charting new waters and navigating the shallows. Drug Discov Today 30:104311. DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104311

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [164] Yang J. L., Yamada-Hunter S. A., Labanieh L., et al. (2024). Directed evolution of genetically encoded LYTACs for cell-mediated delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121:e2320053121. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2320053121

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [165] Barrow J. C. and Lindsley C. W. (2023). The Importance of PK-PD. J Med Chem 66:4273−4274. DOI:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00514

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [166] Bon C., Hofer T., Bousquet-Mélou A., et al. (2017). Capacity limits of asialoglycoprotein receptor-mediated liver targeting. MAbs 9:1360−1369. DOI:10.1080/19420862.2017.1373924

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [167] Ayyar V. S. and Song D. (2024). Mechanistic Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GalNAc-siRNA: Translational Model Involving Competitive Receptor-Mediated Disposition and RISC-Dependent Gene Silencing Applied to Givosiran. J Pharm Sci 113:176−190. DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.10.026

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [168] Ayyar V. S., Song D., Zheng S., et al. (2021). Minimal Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (mPBPK-PD) Model of N-Acetylgalactosamine-Conjugated Small Interfering RNA Disposition and Gene Silencing in Preclinical Species and Humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 379:134−146. DOI:10.1124/jpet.121.000805

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [169] Gadd M. S., Testa A., Lucas X., et al. (2017). Structural basis of PROTAC cooperative recognition for selective protein degradation. Nat Chem Biol 13:514−521. DOI:10.1038/nchembio.2329

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [170] van Osdol W., Fujimori K. and Weinstein J. N. (1991). An analysis of monoclonal antibody distribution in microscopic tumor nodules: consequences of a "binding site barrier". Cancer Res 51:4776−4784

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [171] Crook Z. R., Sevilla G. P., Young P., et al. (2024). CYpHER: catalytic extracellular targeted protein degradation with high potency and durable effect. Nat Commun 15:8731. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-52975-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [172] Haraya K., Tachibana T., Iwayanagi Y., et al. (2016). PK/PD analysis of a novel pH-dependent antigen-binding antibody using a dynamic antibody-antigen binding model. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 31:123−132. DOI:10.1016/j.dmpk.2015.12.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [173] Sheyi R., de la Torre B. G. and Albericio F. (2022). Linkers: An Assurance for Controlled Delivery of Antibody-Drug Conjugate. Pharmaceutics 14. DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics14020396

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [174] Zhao S., Yu N., Han H., et al. (2025). Advances in acid-degradable and enzyme-cleavable linkers for drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Biol 84:102552. DOI:10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.102552

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [175] Giri A., Shin Y., Ha J., et al. (2025). Design of cathepsin-sensitive linkers for tumor-selective bioconjugate drug delivery. J Control Release 387:114197. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114197

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [176] Knisely J. M., Lee J. and Bu G. (2008). Measurement of receptor endocytosis and recycling. Methods Mol Biol 457:319−332. DOI:10.1007/978-1-59745-261-8_24

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [177] Wurz R. P., Rui H., Dellamaggiore K., et al. (2023). Affinity and cooperativity modulate ternary complex formation to drive targeted protein degradation. Nat Commun 14:4177. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-39904-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [178] Nowak R. P., Yue H., Park E. Y., et al. (2021). Methods for Quantitative Assessment of Protein Degradation. Methods Mol Biol 2365:247−263. DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-1665-9_13

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [179] Schwalm M. P., Krämer A., Dölle A., et al. (2023). Tracking the PROTAC degradation pathway in living cells highlights the importance of ternary complex measurement for PROTAC optimization. Cell Chem Biol 30:753−765.e758. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.06.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [180] Xu J., Coughlin J. E., Szyjka M., et al. (2024). Evaluation of the impact of antibody fragments on aggregation of intact molecules via size exclusion chromatography coupled with native mass spectrometry. MAbs 16:2334783. DOI:10.1080/19420862.2024.2334783

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [181] Pang K. T., Yang Y. S., Zhang W., et al. (2023). Understanding and controlling the molecular mechanisms of protein aggregation in mAb therapeutics. Biotechnol Adv 67:108192. DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108192

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [182] Lopatnikova J. A. and Sennikov S. V. (2025). Bispecific immunotherapy based on antibodies, T-cell receptors, and aptamers: mechanisms of action, adverse effects, and future perspectives. Front Immunol 16:1679092. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1679092

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [183] Fu S., Zhu X., Huang F., et al. (2025). Anti-PEG Antibodies and Their Biological Impact on PEGylated Drugs: Challenges and Strategies for Optimization. Pharmaceutics 17. DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics17081074

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [184] Kozma G. T., Shimizu T., Ishida T., et al. (2020). Anti-PEG antibodies: Properties, formation, testing and role in adverse immune reactions to PEGylated nano-biopharmaceuticals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 154-155:163–175. DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.024

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [185] Freire Haddad H., Burke J. A., Scott E. A., et al. (2022). Clinical Relevance of Pre-Existing and Treatment-Induced Anti-Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Antibodies. Regen Eng Transl Med 8:32−42. DOI:10.1007/s40883-021-00198-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [186] Bechtold-Peters K., Ruggiero A., Vriezen N., et al. (2023). CMC Regulatory Considerations for Antibody-Drug Conjugates. J Pharm Sci 112:2965−2980. DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.09.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [187] Agarwal P. and Bertozzi C. R. (2015). Site-specific antibody-drug conjugates: the nexus of bioorthogonal chemistry, protein engineering, and drug development. Bioconjug Chem 26:176−192. DOI:10.1021/bc5004982

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [188] Fu Z., Li S., Han S., et al. (2022). Antibody drug conjugate: the "biological missile" for targeted cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7:93. DOI:10.1038/s41392-022-00947-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [189] Cromm P. M. and Crews C. M. (2017). Targeted Protein Degradation: from Chemical Biology to Drug Discovery. Cell Chem Biol 24:1181−1190. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.05.024

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [190] Li H., Ma X., Shi D., et al. (2025). Proximity Ligation Assay: From a Foundational Principle to a Versatile Platform for Molecular and Translational Research. Biomolecules 15. DOI:10.3390/biom15101468

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [191] Riching K. M., Mahan S. D., Urh M., et al. (2020). High-Throughput Cellular Profiling of Targeted Protein Degradation Compounds using HiBiT CRISPR Cell Lines. J Vis Exp. DOI:10.3791/61787

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [192] Zhong G., Chang X., Xie W., et al. (2024). Targeted protein degradation: advances in drug discovery and clinical practice. Signal Transduct Target Ther 9:308. DOI:10.1038/s41392-024-02004-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [193] Strop P., Delaria K., Foletti D., et al. (2015). Site-specific conjugation improves therapeutic index of antibody drug conjugates with high drug loading. Nat Biotechnol 33:694−696. DOI:10.1038/nbt.3274

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [194] Beck A., Goetsch L., Dumontet C., et al. (2017). Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:315−337. DOI:10.1038/nrd.2016.268

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [195] Qin Q. and Gong L. (2022). Current Analytical Strategies for Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Biomatrices. Molecules 27. DOI:10.3390/molecules27196299.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [196] Delaine C., Alvino C. L., McNeil K. A., et al. (2007). A novel binding site for the human insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II)/mannose 6-phosphate receptor on IGF-II. J Biol Chem 282:18886−18894. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M700531200

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [197] Zhou X., Xiao Y. and Gao Y. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for lysosome-targeting chimeras. Cell Reports Physical Science 6. DOI:10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102778

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [198] Rosenberg A. S. and Sauna Z. E. (2018). Immunogenicity assessment during the development of protein therapeutics. J Pharm Pharmacol 70:584−594. DOI:10.1111/jphp.12810

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [199] Sathe G. and Sapkota G. P. (2023). Proteomic approaches advancing targeted protein degradation. Trends Pharmacol Sci 44:786−801. DOI:10.1016/j.tips.2023.08.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [200] Cho S. C. and Park H. W. (2026). Methods for detecting protein-protein interactions. Mol Cells 49:100301. DOI:10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100301

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [201] Jonker C. T. H., Deo C., Zager P. J., et al. (2020). Accurate measurement of fast endocytic recycling kinetics in real time. J Cell Sci 133. DOI:10.1242/jcs.231225.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [202] Fan Q., Chen H., Wei G., et al. (2025). A review of conjugation technologies for antibody drug conjugates. Antib Ther 8:157−170. DOI:10.1093/abt/tbaf010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [203] Walsh S. J., Bargh J. D., Dannheim F. M., et al. (2021). Site-selective modification strategies in antibody-drug conjugates. Chem Soc Rev 50:1305−1353. DOI:10.1039/d0cs00310g

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [204] Scholes N. S., Bertoni M., Comajuncosa-Creus A., et al. (2026). Inhibitors supercharge kinase turnover through native proteolytic circuits. Nature 649:1032−1041. DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-09763-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [205] Lin C. T., Shiau Y. P. and Lin C. C. (2026). Machine learning in targeted protein degradation drug design: a technical review of PROTACs and molecular glues. Drug Discov Today 31:104563. DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104563

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [206] Farley K., Bhattacharya S., Cleland J., et al. (2025). The targeted protein degradation landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov 24:164−165. DOI:10.1038/d41573-024-00187-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [207] Jang H. and Chang J. E. (2025). Strategic Combinations of Antibody-Drug Conjugates from 2023 to 2025: From Dual Therapies to Innovative ADC-Based Regimens. Pharmaceutics 17. DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics17121581

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [208] Zhou X., Han Y., Fang Y., et al. (2025). Antibody-drug conjugates: Current challenges and innovative solutions for precision cancer therapy. Med 6:100849. DOI:10.1016/j.medj.2025.100849

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [209] Double whammy: drugs that inhibit kinase enzymes also speed up their disposal. (2025). Nature. DOI:10.1038/d41586-025-03816-9

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [210] Słabicki M., Yoon H., Koeppel J., et al. (2020). Small-molecule-induced polymerization triggers degradation of BCL6. Nature 588:164−168. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2925-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [211] Wang Y., Mouli M., Ma M., et al. (2024). Making transient complexes stick. Nat Chem Biol 20:1557−1558. DOI:10.1038/s41589-024-01649-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [212] Pettersson M. and Crews C. M. (2019). PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) - Past, present and future. Drug Discov Today Technol 31:15−27. DOI:10.1016/j.ddtec.2019.01.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [213] Zhou R., Wang H., Zhang G. M., et al. (2025). Targeted degradation of endogenous YAP by nanobody bioPROTAC inhibits tumor progression. Nat Commun 16:9374. DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-64426-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [214] Sui Y., Hou X., Zhang J., et al. (2025). Lipid nanoparticle-mediated targeted mRNA delivery and its application in cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B 13:10085−10117. DOI:10.1039/d5tb01556a

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [215] Wei P. S., Thota N., John G., et al. (2024). Enhancing RNA-lipid nanoparticle delivery: Organ- and cell-specificity and barcoding strategies. J Control Release 375:366−388. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.08.030

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [216] Haghighi E., Abolmaali S. S., Dehshahri A., et al. (2024). Navigating the intricate in-vivo journey of lipid nanoparticles tailored for the targeted delivery of RNA therapeutics: a quality-by-design approach. J Nanobiotechnology 22:710. DOI:10.1186/s12951-024-02972-w

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [217] Zhang T., Yin H., Li Y., et al. (2024). Optimized lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) for organ-selective nucleic acids delivery in vivo. iScience 27:109804. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109804

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [218] van Dongen G. (2021). Improving Tumor Penetration of Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Taking Away the Barriers for Trojan Horses. Cancer Res 81:3956−3957. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.Can-21-0952

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [219] Wang J., Giragossian C. and Hansel S. (2021). Analyze impact of tumor-associated kinetics on antibody delivery in solid tumors with a physiologically based pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 168:110−121. DOI:10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.08.019

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [220] Harkins A. L., Ambegaokar P. P. and Keeler A. M. (2024). Immune responses to central nervous system directed adeno-associated virus gene therapy: Does direct CNS delivery make a difference. Neurotherapeutics 21:e00435. DOI:10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00435

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [221] Chornyy S., Herstine J. A., Holaway C., et al. (2025). Comparative analysis of cell-specific promoters in AAV9-mediated gene therapy targeting the central nervous system. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 33:101588. DOI:10.1016/j.omtm.2025.101588

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [222] Fàbrega C., Gallisà-Suñé N., Zuin A., et al. (2024). Aptamer-Hytac Chimeras for Targeted Degradation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-1. Cells 13. DOI:10.3390/cells13211767

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [223] Bazzacco A., Mercorelli B. and Loregian A. (2025). PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) and beyond: targeted degradation as a new path to fight microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 49. DOI:10.1093/femsre/fuaf046.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [224] Zhu W., Shenoy A., Kundrotas P., et al. (2023). Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes. Bioinformatics 39. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [225] Jumper J., Evans R., Pritzel A., et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596:583−589. DOI:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [226] Cui X., Ge L., Chen X., et al. (2025). Beyond static structures: protein dynamic conformations modeling in the post-AlphaFold era. Brief Bioinform 26. DOI:10.1093/bib/bbaf340

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [227] Wang L., Zhou Z., Yang X., et al. (2024). The present state and challenges of active learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 29:103985. DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103985

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [228] Pike A., Lee E. C. Y., Michaelides I. N., et al. (2026). Lessons learned in linking PROTACs from discovery to the clinic. Nat Rev Chem 10:117−132. DOI:10.1038/s41570-025-00784-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [229] Li B., Ran T. and Chen H. (2023). 3D based generative PROTAC linker design with reinforcement learning. Brief Bioinform 24. DOI:10.1093/bib/bbad323.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [230] Watson J. L., Juergens D., Bennett N. R., et al. (2023). De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 620:1089−1100. DOI:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [231] Cullen P. J. and Steinberg F. (2018). To degrade or not to degrade: mechanisms and significance of endocytic recycling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19:679−696. DOI:10.1038/s41580-018-0053-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [232] Li J. Y., Perry S. R., Muniz-Medina V., et al. (2016). A Biparatopic HER2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Induces Tumor Regression in Primary Models Refractory to or Ineligible for HER2-Targeted Therapy. Cancer Cell 29:117−129. DOI:10.1016/j.ccell.2015.12.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [233] Hoff S., Sen S. and Bonomi M. (2025). BPS2025 - Expanding the chemical space of ligands for virtual screening using cryo-EM structural ensembles. Biophysical Journal 124:506a. DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.2658

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [234] Hopf T. A., Colwell L. J., Sheridan R., et al. (2012). Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 149:1607−1621. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.012

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [235] Dauparas J., Anishchenko I., Bennett N., et al. (2022). Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378:49−56. DOI:10.1126/science.add2187

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [236] Dixon T., MacPherson D., Mostofian B., et al. (2022). Predicting the structural basis of targeted protein degradation by integrating molecular dynamics simulations with structural mass spectrometry. Nat Commun 13:5884. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-33575-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [237] Xue F., Zhang M., Li S., et al. (2025). SE(3)-equivariant ternary complex prediction towards target protein degradation. Nat Commun 16:5514. DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-61272-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [238] An Open-Label Biomarker Study of BHV-1400 in IgA Nephropathy. (2025).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [239] Yanagihara T., Brown R., Hall S., et al. (2012). In vitro-generated immune complexes containing galactose-deficient IgA1 stimulate proliferation of mesangial cells. Results Immunol 2:166−172. DOI:10.1016/j.rinim.2012.08.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [240] Mullard A. (2024). Extracellular targeted protein degrader removes antibodies in first test in humans. Nat Rev Drug Discov 23:483−486. DOI:10.1038/d41573-024-00103-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [241] Su L. Y., Tian Y., Zheng Q., et al. (2024). Anti-tumor immunotherapy using engineered bacterial outer membrane vesicles fused to lysosome-targeting chimeras mediated by transferrin receptor. Cell Chem Biol 31:1219−1230.e1215. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.01.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [242] Du J., Han S., Zhou H., et al. (2024). Targeted protein degradation combined with PET imaging reveals the role of host PD-L1 in determining anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 51:3559−3571. DOI:10.1007/s00259-024-06804-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [243] Cai L., Li Y., Tan J., et al. (2023). Targeting LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol 16:101. DOI:10.1186/s13045-023-01499-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [244] Collins D. M., Bossenmaier B., Kollmorgen G., et al. (2019). Acquired Resistance to Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Cancers (Basel) 11. DOI:10.3390/cancers11030394

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [245] Parrett B. J., Yamaoka S. and Barry M. A. (2025). Reducing off-target expression of mRNA therapeutics and vaccines in the liver with microRNA binding sites. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 33:101402. DOI:10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101402

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [246] Di Trani C. A., Cirella A., Arrizabalaga L., et al. (2023). Intratumoral injection of IL-12-encoding mRNA targeted to CSFR1 and PD-L1 exerts potent anti-tumor effects without substantial systemic exposure. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 33:599−616. DOI:10.1016/j.omtn.2023.07.020

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [247] Zhang K., Yang X., Wang Y., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence in drug development. Nat Med 31:45−59. DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-03434-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [248] Huber C., Friede T., Stingl J., et al. (2022). Classification of Companion Diagnostics: A New Framework for Biomarker-Driven Patient Selection. Ther Innov Regul Sci 56:244−254. DOI:10.1007/s43441-021-00352-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [249] Fernández-Quintero M. L., Ljungars A., Waibl F., et al. (2023). Assessing developability early in the discovery process for novel biologics. MAbs 15:2171248. DOI:10.1080/19420862.2023.2171248

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [250] Liu J., Ma T., Yao R., et al. (2026). Multimodal supramolecular targeting chimeras enable spatiotemporally resolved protein degradation in vivo. Cell 189:1108−1123.e1120. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Zhang K., Qiu F., Lyu A., et al. (2026). Extracellular and membrane-targeted protein degradation (emTPD): Mechanisms, design frameworks, and therapeutic opportunities. The Innovation Drug Discovery 1:100024. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-drugdisc.2026.100024
    Zhang K., Qiu F., Lyu A., et al. (2026). Extracellular and membrane-targeted protein degradation (emTPD): Mechanisms, design frameworks, and therapeutic opportunities. The Innovation Drug Discovery 1:100024. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-drugdisc.2026.100024

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(6)     Tables(4)

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(2212) PDF downloads(941)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint