Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

Elevating gas turbine system efficiency by integration with super-high-temperature solid oxide fuel cells

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. A tubular super-high-temperature solid oxide fuel cell (SHT-SOFC) achieved a peak power of 4.67 W at 1200°C .

      The SHT-SOFC can achieve well temperature match with commercial hundred-MW-class gas turbine (GT).

      A super-high efficiency of 80.31% can be expected when SOFC temperature is further elevated to 1300°C.

      Extending the SHT-SOFCs lifespan is crucial for improving the techno-economic performance.

  • The solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine (SOFC-GT) hybrid system is among the most efficient power generation technologies. However, the development of SOFCs has focused on lower operating temperatures, which is much lower than the turbine inlet temperature (TIT) of the advanced hundred-MW-class gas turbines (GTs) (>1400oC), hindering their integration. Therefore, current large-scale GTs still primarily enhance power generation efficiency by increasing TIT, which approach has suffered from prominent marginal effects, leading to the bottleneck in efficiency enhancement. To address this, we propose a super-high-temperature SOFC operating at above 1200°C, which can be integrated with a commercial hundred-MW-class gas turbine to break the efficiency bottleneck. In our laboratory, a single tubular SOFC achieved a peak output power of 4.67 W at 1200°C, which is 5.5 times higher than that at 700°C. We simulated a hundred-MW-class hybrid system to demonstrate the necessity of the elevation of SOFCs temperature, analyzing it thermodynamically based on a T-s indicator diagram. When the SOFC operating temperature increases from 800°C to 1200°C, the temperature mismatch degree between the SOFC and the F-class gas turbine decreases significantly from 68.16% to 0%. This improvement is accompanied by an increase in fuel cell combustor (FCC) exergy efficiency from 76.52% to 85.93%, and an increase in system efficiency from 58.60% to 74.12%. Further elevating the SOFC operating temperature to approximately 1300°C could potentially yield a system efficiency of 80.31%. Considering these substantial thermodynamic advantages, we propose a new development route for SOFCs towards a super-high operating temperature of over 1200oC.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Buonomano A., Calise F. and D Accadia M.D., et al. (2015). Hybrid solid oxide fuel cells–gas turbine systems for combined heat and power: A review. Appl. Energy 156:32−85. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.027

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Choudhary T. and Sanjay (2017). Thermodynamic assessment of advanced SOFC-blade cooled gas turbine hybrid cycle. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42: 10248-10263. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.178.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [3] Pirkandi J. and Ommian M. (2019). Thermo-economic operation analysis of SOFC–GT combined hybrid system for application in power generation systems. J. Electrochem. Energy Convers. Storage 16:11001. DOI: doi.org/10.1115/1.4040056.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [4] Yi Y., Smith T.P. and Brouwer J., et al. (2003). Simulation of a 220 kW hybrid SOFC gas turbine system and data comparison. ECS Proceedings Volumes 2003-07:1442−1454. DOI:10.1149/200307.1442PV

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Kobayashi Y., Ando Y. and Kishizawa H., et al. (2013). Recent progress of SOFC-GT combined system with tubular type cell stack at MHI. ECS Transactions 51:79−86. DOI:10.1149/05101.0079ecst

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Huang Y. and Turan A. (2019). Fuel sensitivity and parametric optimization of SOFC – GT hybrid system operational characteristics. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 14:100407. DOI:10.1016/j.tsep.2019.100407

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Eisavi B., Chitsaz A. and Hosseinpour J., et al. (2018). Thermo-environmental and economic comparison of three different arrangements of solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine (SOFC-GT) hybrid systems. Energy Conv. Manag. 168:343−356. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.088

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Hajabdollahi Z. and Fu P. (2017). Multi-objective based configuration optimization of SOFC-GT cogeneration plant. Appl. Therm. Eng. 112:549−559. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.103

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Shamoushaki M., Ehyaei M.A. and Ghanatir F. (2017). Exergy, economic and environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a SOFC-GT power plant. Energy 134:515−531. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.058

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Sghaier S.F., Khir T. and Ben Brahim A. (2018). Energetic and exergetic parametric study of a SOFC-GT hybrid power plant. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 43:3542−3554. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.216

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Zhang S., Liu H. and Liu M., et al. (2017). An efficient integration strategy for a SOFC-GT-SORC combined system with performance simulation and parametric optimization. Appl. Therm. Eng. 121:314−324. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.066

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Eveloy V., Karunkeyoon W. and Rodgers P., et al. (2016). Energy, exergy and economic analysis of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell – gas turbine – organic Rankine power generation system. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41:13843−13858. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.146

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Gogoi T.K., Sarmah P. and Deb Nath D. (2014). Energy and exergy based performance analyses of a solid oxide fuel cell integrated combined cycle power plant. Energy Conv. Manag. 86:507−519. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Turja A.I., Khan I.A. and Rahman S., et al. (2024). Machine learning-based multi-objective optimization and thermal assessment of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles for gas turbine waste heat recovery. Energy and AI 16:100372. DOI:10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100372

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Ashraf W.M. and Dua V. (2024). Data Information integrated Neural Network (DINN) algorithm for modelling and interpretation performance analysis for energy systems. Energy and AI 16:100363. DOI:10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100363

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Dunn B., Kamath H. and Tarascon J. (2011). Lowering the temperature of solid oxide fuel cells. Science 334:928−935. DOI:10.1126/science.1212741

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Gao Z., Mogni L.V. and Miller E.C., et al. (2016). A perspective on low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 9:1602−1644. DOI:10.1039/C5EE03858H

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Duan C., Tong J. and Shang M., et al. (2015). Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Science 349:1321−1326. DOI:10.1126/science.aab3987

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Shin S.S., Kim J.H. and Bae K.T., et al. (2020). Multiscale structured low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells with 13 W power at 500 °C. Energy Environ. Sci. 13:3459−3468. DOI:10.1039/D0EE00870B

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Gülen S.C. and Zachary J. (2022). Feasibility of achieving 62% combined cycle efficiency with a 200 MW gas turbine. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2022:V005T09A003. DOI: doi.org/10.1115/GT2022-81807.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [21] Perna A., Minutillo M. and Jannelli E., et al. (2018). Performance assessment of a hybrid SOFC/MGT cogeneration power plant fed by syngas from a biomass down-draft gasifier. Appl. Energy 227:80−91. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.077

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Barelli L., Bidini G. and Ottaviano A. (2017). Integration of SOFC/GT hybrid systems in Micro-Grids. Energy 118:716−728. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.100

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Koç Y., Yağlı H. and Görgülü A., et al. (2020). Analysing the performance, fuel cost and emission parameters of the 50 MW simple and recuperative gas turbine cycles using natural gas and hydrogen as fuel. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45:22138−22147. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.267

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Yin F. and Rao A.G. (2020). A review of gas turbine engine with inter-stage turbine burner. Prog. Aeosp. Sci. 121:100695. DOI:10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100695

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Li J. and Li Y. (2023). Micro gas turbine: Developments, applications, and key technologies on components. Propuls. Power Res. 12:1−43. DOI:10.1016/j.jppr.2023.01.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Ghotkar R. and Milcarek R.J. (2020). Investigation of flame-assisted fuel cells integrated with an auxiliary power unit gas turbine. Energy 204:117979. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117979

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Reyhani H.A., Meratizaman M. and Ebrahimi A., et al. (2016). Thermodynamic and economic optimization of SOFC-GT and its cogeneration opportunities using generated syngas from heavy fuel oil gasification. Energy 107:141−164. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Maghsoudi P. and Sadeghi S. (2020). A novel economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a 200-kW recuperated micro gas turbine considering cycle thermal efficiency and discounted payback period. Appl. Therm. Eng. 166:114644. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114644

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Bao C., Shi Y. and Li C., et al. (2010). Multi-level simulation platform of SOFC–GT hybrid generation system. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35:2894−2899. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.047

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Bao C., Shi Y. and Croiset E., et al. (2010). A multi-level simulation platform of natural gas internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine hybrid generation system: Part I. Solid oxide fuel cell model library. J. Power Sources 195:4871−4892. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.078.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [31] Bao C., Cai N. and Croiset E. (2011). A multi-level simulation platform of natural gas internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine hybrid generation system – Part II. Balancing units model library and system simulation. J. Power Sources 196:8424−8434. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.032.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [32] Li Q., Zuo W. and Zhang Y., et al. (2020). Effects of rectangular rib on exergy efficiency of a hydrogen-fueled micro combustor. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45:10155−10163. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.221

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Udomsilp D., Rechberger J. and Neubauer R., et al. (2020). Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells with exceptionally high power density for range extender systems. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 1:100072. DOI:10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100072

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Li C., Ning X. and Li C. (2005). Effect of densification processes on the properties of plasma-sprayed YSZ electrolyte coatings for solid oxide fuel cells. Surface and Coatings Technology 190:60−64. DOI:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.04.086

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Wang Y., Gao J. and Chen W., et al. (2020). Development of ScSZ electrolyte by very low pressure plasma spraying for high-performance metal-supported SOFCs. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 29:223. DOI:10.1007/s11666-019-00970-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Cui T., Li H. and Lyu Z., et al. (2022). Identification of electrode process in large-size solid oxide fuel cell. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 38:2011009. DOI: doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202011009.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [37] Chen J., Li Y. and Zhang H., et al. (2021). Comparison of different fuel cell temperature control systems in an anode and cathode ejector-based SOFC-GT hybrid system. Energy Conv. Manag. 243:114353. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114353

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Beigzadeh M., Pourfayaz F. and Ghazvini M., et al. (2021). Energy and exergy analyses of solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid systems fed by different renewable biofuels: A comparative study. J. Clean. Prod. 280:124383. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124383

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Leal E.M., Bortolaia L.A. and Leal Junior A.M. (2019). Technical analysis of a hybrid solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine cycle. Energy Conv. Manag. 202:112195. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112195

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Ezzat M.F. and Dincer I. (2020). Energy and exergy analyses of a novel ammonia combined power plant operating with gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell systems. Energy 194:116750. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2019.116750

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Wang X., Lv X. and Weng Y. (2020). Performance analysis of a biogas-fueled SOFC/GT hybrid system integrated with anode-combustor exhaust gas recirculation loops. Energy 197:117213. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117213

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Huang Y. and Turan A. (2021). Mechanical equilibrium operation integrated modelling of recuperative solid oxide fuel cell – gas turbine hybrid systems: Design conditions and off-design analysis. Appl. Energy 283:116237. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116237

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Soleymani E., Ghavami Gargari S. and Ghaebi H. (2021). Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a novel power and hydrogen cogeneration cycle based on solid SOFC. Renew. Energy 177:495−518. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.103

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Lv X., Liu X. and Gu C., et al. (2016). Determination of safe operation zone for an intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid system. Energy 99:91−102. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.047

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Ding X., Lv X. and Weng Y. (2019). Coupling effect of operating parameters on performance of a biogas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid system. Appl. Energy 254:113675. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113675

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Baranowski M., Bober M. and Kudyba A., et al. (2019). The effect of surface condition on wetting of HASTELLOY® X by brazing filler metal of Ni-Pd-Cr-B-Si system. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28:3950−3959. DOI:10.1007/s11665-019-03998-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] https://www.hpalloy.com/Alloys/descriptions/HASTELLOY_X.aspx.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [48] Gamanov S., Holzer J. and Roupcova P., et al. (2022). High temperature oxidation kinetics of Fe-10Al-4Cr-4Y2O3 ODS alloy at 1200–1400 °C. Corros. Sci. 206:110498. DOI:10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110498

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Wang Y., Ren J. and Shi Y., et al. (2019). Numerical model of direct internal reforming SOFC: A comparison between anode-support and metal-support. ECS transactions 91:2013−2022. DOI:10.1149/09101.2013ecst

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Gu X., Wang Y., Shi Y., et al. (2025). Elevating gas turbine system efficiency by integration with super-high-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. The Innovation Energy 2:100096. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100096
    Gu X., Wang Y., Shi Y., et al. (2025). Elevating gas turbine system efficiency by integration with super-high-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. The Innovation Energy 2:100096. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100096

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(8)    

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(8694) PDF downloads(2402)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint