Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access     Cite

An emerging role beyond genetics: DNA methylation in horticultural quality shaping

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. DNA methylation of 5-methyl-cytosine is found important for horticultural quality in this starting decade.

      Promoter methylation and spreading of transposable element methylation are important function patterns.

      Ripening, coloration, flavor volatiles, and cold action are highly methylation-affected.

      The locus-specific methylation editing has been preliminarily accomplished and is developing.

      The methylation-editing-mediated horticultural improvement may help address food challenges.

  • Horticultural products play an increasingly vital role in addressing the nutritional needs of the world’s expanding population, which has surpassed 8 billion. The global trend towards health-oriented diets has motivated consumers to seek high-quality natural horticultural food consumption. This highlights the pressing requirement for updated guidance and strategies for sustainable horticultural quality upgrading. Meanwhile, DNA methylation, an epigenetic modification having transcriptional-regulation potential, is emerging as a crucial quality dominator of horticultural food. In this current investigation, we integrate valuable methylation loci regulating quality traits in fruit and vegetable, elucidating the underlying mechanisms and emphasizing the impressive species-specificity. At this early stage, the most extensively studied aspects of DNA methylation include promoter methylation and transposable elements. Additionally, we delve into locus-specific methylation-editing techniques, whose achievable genetic-modification-free advantages are promising to alleviate consumer concerns regarding genetic-modification products. Overall, this review is devoted to providing insights into the sustainable development of horticultural produce and food quality design strategies in response to global food quality and security challenges.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Graham, A.E., and Ledesma-Amaro, R. (2023). The microbial food revolution. Nat. Commun. 14: 2231. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37891-1.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Wang, R., Bai, Z., Chang, J., et al. (2022). China’s low-emission pathways toward climate-neutral livestock production for animal-derived foods. The Innovation 3: 100220. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100220.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Rockström, J., Edenhofer, O., Gaertner, J., et al. (2020). Planet-proofing the global food system. Nat. Food 1: 3−5. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-019-0010-4.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Liu, R.H. (2013). Health-promoting components of fruits and vegetables in the diet. Adv. Nutr. 4: 384S−392S. DOI: 10.3945/an.112.003517.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Mujcic, R., and J. Oswald, A. (2016). Evolution of well-being and happiness after increases in consumption of fruit and vegetables. Am. J. Public Health 106: 1504−1510. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303260.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Głąbska, D., Guzek, D., Groele, B., et al. (2020). Fruit and vegetable intake and mental health in adults: a systematic review. Nutrients 12: 115. DOI: 10.3390/nu12010115.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] He, M., Kong, X., Jiang, Y., et al. (2022). MicroRNAs: emerging regulators in horticultural crops. Trends Plant Sci. 27: 936−951. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.03.011.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Allan, A.C., and Espley, R.V. (2018). MYBs drive novel consumer traits in fruits and vegetables. Trends Plant Sci. 23: 693−705. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.06.001.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Li, S., Chen, K., and Grierson, D. (2019). A critical evaluation of the role of ethylene and MADS transcription factors in the network controlling fleshy fruit ripening. New Phytol. 221: 1724−1741. DOI: 10.1111/nph.15545.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Naing, A.H., and Kim, C.K. (2018). Roles of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in horticultural plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 98: 1−18. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-018-0771-4.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Santner, A. and Estelle, M. (2009). Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature 459: 1071−1078. DOI: 10.1038/nature08122.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Tong, H. and Chu, C. (2018). Functional specificities of brassinosteroid and potential utilization for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 23: 1016−1028. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.007.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Karlova, R., Chapman, N., David, K., et al. (2014). Transcriptional control of fleshy fruit development and ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 65: 4527−4541. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru316.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Zhao, X., Muhammad, N., Zhao, Z., et al. (2021). Molecular regulation of fruit size in horticultural plants: A review. Sci. Hortic. 288: 110353. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110353.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Kamthan, A., Chaudhuri, A., Kamthan, M., et al. (2015). Small RNAs in plants: Recent development and application for crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 6 : 208. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00208.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [16] Wyatt, G.R. (1950). Occurrence of 5-methyl-cytosine in nucleic acids. Nature 166: 237−238. DOI: 10.1038/166237b0.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Matzke, M.A. and Mosher, R.A. (2014). RNA-directed DNA methylation: An epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15: 394−408. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3683.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Zhang, H., Lang, Z., and Zhu, J.-K. (2018). Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19: 489−506. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-018-0016-z.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Liu, R. and Lang, Z. (2020). The mechanism and function of active DNA demethylation in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 62: 148−159. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12879.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Liu, R., How-Kit, A., Stammitti, L., et al. (2015). A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 112: 10804−10809. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503362112.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Lang, Z., Wang, Y., Tang, K., et al. (2017). Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114: E4511−E4519. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705233114.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Chakraborty, T., Kendall, T., Grover, J.W., et al. (2021). Embryo CHH hypermethylation is mediated by RdDM and is autonomously directed in Brassica rapa. Genome Biol. 22: 140. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02358-3.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Ding, X., Liu, X., Jiang, G., et al. (2022). SlJMJ7 orchestrates tomato fruit ripening via crosstalk between H3K4me3 and DML2-mediated DNA demethylation. New Phytol. 233: 1202−1219. DOI: 10.1111/nph.17838.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Du, X., Yang, Z., Xie, G., et al. (2023). Molecular basis of the plant ROS1-mediated active DNA demethylation. Nat. Plants 9: 271−279. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-022-01322-8.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Fang, J., Jiang, J., Leichter, S.M., et al. (2022). Mechanistic basis for maintenance of CHG DNA methylation in plants. Nat. Commun. 13: 3877. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31627-3.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] He, L., Huang, H., Bradai, M., et al. (2022). DNA methylation-free Arabidopsis reveals crucial roles of DNA methylation in regulating gene expression and development. Nat. Commun. 13: 1335. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28940-2.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Lyons, D.B., Briffa, A., He, S., et al. (2023). Extensive de novo activity stabilizes epigenetic inheritance of CG methylation in Arabidopsis transposons. Cell Rep. 42: 112132. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112132.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Ning, Y.-Q., Liu, N., Lan, K.-K., et al. (2020). DREAM complex suppresses DNA methylation maintenance genes and precludes DNA hypermethylation. Nat. Plants 6: 942−956. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-020-0710-7.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Niu, Q., Song, Z., Tang, K., et al. (2021). A histone H3K4me1-specific binding protein is required for siRNA accumulation and DNA methylation at a subset of loci targeted by RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nat. Commun. 12: 1−13. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23637-4.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Rothi, M.H., Tsuzuki, M., Sethuraman, S., et al. (2021). Reinforcement of transcriptional silencing by a positive feedback between DNA methylation and non-coding transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 49: 9799−9808. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab746.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Sigman, M.J., Panda, K., Kirchner, R., et al. (2021). An siRNA-guided ARGONAUTE protein directs RNA polymerase V to initiate DNA methylation. Nat. Plants 7: 1461−1474. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-01008-7.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] To, T.K. and Kakutani, T. (2022). Crosstalk among pathways to generate DNA methylome. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 68: 102248. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102248.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Wang, Z., Zheng, H., Huang, J., et al. (2022). DEMETHYLATION REGULATOR 1 regulates DNA demethylation of the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64: 2344−2360. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.13386.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Xue, Y., Zhong, Z., Harris, C.J., et al. (2021). Arabidopsis MORC proteins function in the efficient establishment of RNA directed DNA methylation. Nat. Commun. 12: 4292. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24553-3.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Liu, P., Liu, R., Xu, Y., et al. (2023). DNA cytosine methylation dynamics and functional roles in horticultural crops. Hort. Res. 10: uhad170. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad170.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Holliday, R. and Pugh, J.E. (1975). DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science 187: 226−232. DOI: 10.1126/science.187.4173.226.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Schmid, M.W., Heichinger, C., Coman Schmid, D., et al. (2018). Contribution of epigenetic variation to adaptation in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 9: 4446. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06932-5.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Lei, M., La, H., Lu, K., et al. (2014). Arabidopsis EDM2 promotes IBM1 distal polyadenylation and regulates genome DNA methylation patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111: 527−532. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320106110.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Williams, B.P., Pignatta, D., Henikoff, S., et al. (2015). Methylation-sensitive expression of a DNA demethylase gene serves as an epigenetic rheostat. PLoS Genet. 11: e1005142−e1005142. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005142.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Sabatucci, A., Berchet, V., Bellia, F., et al. (2020). A new methodological approach for in vitro determination of the role of DNA methylation on transcription factor binding using AlphaScreen® analysis: Focus on CREB1 binding at hBDNF promoter IV. J. Neurosci. Method 341: 108720. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108720.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Vatov, E., Zentgraf, U., and Ludewig, U. (2022). Moderate DNA methylation changes associated with nitrogen remobilization and leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 73: 4733−4752. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erac167.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Qiu, Q., Mei, H., Deng, X., et al. (2019). DNA methylation repels targeting of Arabidopsis REF6. Nat. Commun. 10: 2063. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10026-1.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Charvin, M., Halter, T., Blanc-Mathieu, R., et al. (2023). Single-cytosine methylation at W-boxes repels binding of WRKY transcription factors through steric hindrance. Plant Physiol. 192: 77−84. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiad069.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Muyle, A.M., Seymour, D.K., Lv, Y., et al. (2022). Gene body methylation in plants: Mechanisms, functions, and important implications for understanding evolutionary processes. Genome Biol. Evol. 14: evac038. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evac038.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Wang, X. and Kadarmideen, H.N. (2020). Characterization of global DNA methylation in different gene regions reveals candidate biomarkers in pigs with high and low levels of boar taint. Vet. Sci. 7: 77. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci7020077.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Brenet, F., Moh, M., Funk, P., et al. (2011). DNA methylation of the first exon is tightly linked to transcriptional silencing. PLoS One 6: e14524. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014524.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Li, S., Zhang, J., Huang, S., et al. (2018). Genome-wide analysis reveals that exon methylation facilitates its selective usage in the human transcriptome. Brief Bioinform. 19: 754−764. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx019.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Wang, M., Bissonnette, N., Laterrière, M., et al. (2022). Methylome and transcriptome data integration reveals potential roles of DNA methylation and candidate biomarkers of cow Streptococcus uberis subclinical mastitis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 13: 136. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-022-00779-z.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Takuno, S., and Gaut, B.S. (2012). Body-methylated genes in Arabidopsis thaliana are functionally important and evolve slowly. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 219−227. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr188.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Whole-genome characterization of chronological age-associated changes in methylome and circular RNAs in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) from vegetative to floral growth. Plant J. 106: 435−453. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.15174.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Tang, D., Gallusci, P., and Lang, Z. (2020). Fruit development and epigenetic modifications. New Phytol. 228: 839−844. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16724.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Zhang, X., Yazaki, J., Sundaresan, A., et al. (2006). Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 126: 1189−1201. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.003.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Li, Q., Gent, J.I., Zynda, G., et al. (2015). RNA-directed DNA methylation enforces boundaries between heterochromatin and euchromatin in the maize genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 112: 14728−14733. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514680112.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Zhang, L., Hu, J., Han, X., et al. (2019). A high-quality apple genome assembly reveals the association of a retrotransposon and red fruit colour. Nat. Commun. 10: 1494. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09518-x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Wang, L., Shi, Y., Chang, X., et al. (2019). DNA methylome analysis provides evidence that the expansion of the tea genome is linked to TE bursts. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17: 826−835. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13018.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Martinhoa, C., Wang, Z., Ghigi, A., et al. (2022). CHROMOMETHYLTRANSFERASE3/KRYPTONITE maintains the sulfurea paramutation in Solanum lycopersicum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 119: e2112240119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2112240119.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Jia, H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, S., et al. (2020). Effect of the methylation level on the grape fruit development process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68: 2099−2115. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07740.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Ong-Abdullah, M., Ordway, J.M., Jiang, N., et al. (2015). Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525: 533−537. DOI: 10.1038/nature15365.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Lin, J.-S., Lin, C.-C., Li, Y.-C., et al. (2013). Interaction of small RNA–8105 and the intron of IbMYB1 RNA regulates IbMYB1 family genes through secondary siRNAs and DNA methylation after wounding. Plant J. 75: 781−794. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12238.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Corem, S., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Jouffroy, O., et al. (2018). Redistribution of CHH methylation and small interfering rnas across the genome of tomato ddm1 mutants. Plant Cell 30: 1628−1644. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.18.00167.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Gao, Y., Lin, Y., Xu, M., et al. (2022). The role and interaction between transcription factor NAC-NOR and DNA demethylase SlDML2 in the biosynthesis of tomato fruit flavor volatiles. New Phytol. 235: 1913−1926. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18301.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Zheng, G., Hu, S., Cheng, S., et al. (2022). Factor of DNA Methylation 1 affects woodland strawberry plant stature and organ size via DNA methylation. Plant Physiol. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac462.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [63] Giordano, A., Santo Domingo, M., Quadrana, L., et al. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing uncovers the roles of CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE 1 and REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 in melon fruit ripening and epigenetic regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 73: 4022−4033. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erac148.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Burgess, D., Chow, H.T., Grover, J.W., et al. (2022). Ovule siRNAs methylate protein-coding genes in trans. Plant Cell 34: 3647−3664. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koac197.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Guangyu, C., Yonghui, L., Zhenzhen, W., et al. (2022). Dynamic profiles of DNA methylation and the interaction with histone acetylation during fiber cell initiation of Gossypium hirsutum. J. Cotton Res. 5: 8. DOI: 10.1186/s42397-022-00115-w.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Cho, H.J., Kim, G.H., and Choi, C. (2020). Differential gene expression and epigenetic analyses between striped and blushed skinned sports of ‘Fuji’ apple. Sci. Hortic. 261: 108944. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108944.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] Manning, K., Tor, M., Poole, M., et al. (2006). A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38: 948−952. DOI: 10.1038/ng1841.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [68] Cheng, J., Niu, Q., Zhang, B., et al. (2018). Downregulation of RdDM during strawberry fruit ripening. Genome Biol. 19: 212. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1587-x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Lamparska, K., Clark, J., Babilonia, G., et al. (2012). 2’-Deoxyriboguanylurea, the primary breakdown product of 5-aza-2’-deoxyribocytidine, is a mutagen, an epimutagen, an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases and an inducer of 5-azacytidine-type fragile sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: 9788−9801. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks706.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [70] Piekarz, R.L., and Bates, S.E. (2009). Epigenetic modifiers: Basic understanding and clinical development. Clin. Cancer Res. 15: 3918−3926. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2788.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Yalamalle, V.R., Ithape, D.M., Kumar, A., et al. (2020). Seed treatment with 5-azacytidine reduces ageing-induced damage in onion seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 48: 407−412. DOI: 10.15258/sst.2020.48.3.09.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [72] Marfil, C.F., Asurmendi, S., and Masuelli, R.W. (2012). Changes in micro RNA expression in a wild tuber-bearing Solanum species induced by 5-azacytidine treatment. Plant Cell Rep. 31: 1449−1461. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-012-1260-x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Gao, W., Li, S., Li, Z., et al. (2014). Detection of genome DNA methylation change in spinach induced by 5-azaC. Mol. Cell. Probes 28: 163−166. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2014.02.002.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [74] Leljak-Levanic, D., Mrvkova, M., Tureckova, V., et al. (2016). Hormonal and epigenetic regulation during embryogenic tissue habituation in Cucurbita pepo L. Plant Cell Rep. 35: 77−89. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-015-1869-7.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Zhong, S., Fei, Z., Chen, Y.-R., et al. (2013). Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 154−159. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2462.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [76] Guo, D.-L., Li, Q., Ji, X.-R., et al. (2019). Transcriptome profiling of ‘Kyoho’ grape at different stages of berry development following 5-azaC treatment. BMC Genomics 20: 825. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6204-1.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [77] Chen, Y., Li, D., Zhang, X., et al. (2023). Azacytidine-induced hypomethylation delays senescence and coloration in harvested strawberries by stimulating antioxidant enzymes and modulating abscisate metabolism to minimize anthocyanin overproduction. Food Chem. 407: 135189. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135189.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [78] Zhu, F., Li, M., Yan, M., et al. (2021). Integrated transcriptome analysis and single-base resolution methylomes of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) reveal epigenome modifications in response to osmotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 12: 769712. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.769712.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [79] Kim, J.Y., Kwon, Y.J., Kim, S.-I., et al. (2016). Ammonium inhibits chromomethylase 3-mediated methylation of the Arabidopsis nitrate reductase gene NIA2. Front. Plant Sci. 6: 1161. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01161.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [80] Zhang, M., Zhang, X., Guo, L., et al. (2020). Single-base resolution methylome of cotton cytoplasmic male sterility system reveals epigenomic changes in response to high-temperature stress during anther development. J. Exp. Bot. 71: 951−969. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz470.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [81] Yang, D., Huang, Z., Jin, W., et al. (2018). DNA methylation: A new regulator of phenolic acids biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Ind. Crops Prod. 124: 402−411. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.046.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [82] Gallusci, P., Hodgman, C., Teyssier, E., et al. (2016). DNA methylation and chromatin regulation during fleshy fruit development and ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 7 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00807.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [83] Sicilia, A., Scialo, E., Puglisi, I., et al. (2020). Anthocyanin biosynthesis and DNA methylation dynamics in sweet orange fruit [Citrus sinensis L(Osbeck)] under cold stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68: 7024−7031. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02360.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [84] Xin, Y., Ma, B., Zeng, Q., et al. (2021). Dynamic changes in transposable element and gene methylation in mulberry (Morus notabilis) in response to Botrytis cinerea. Hort. Res. 8: 154. DOI: 10.1038/s41438-021-00588-x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [85] Zhang, B., Tieman, D.M., Jiao, C., et al. (2016). Chilling-induced tomato flavor loss is associated with altered volatile synthesis and transient changes in DNA methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113: 12580−12585. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613910113.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [86] Kurdyukov, S. and Bullock, M. (2016). DNA methylation analysis: Choosing the right method. Biology (Basel) 5: E3. DOI: 10.3390/biology5010003.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [87] Pan, S. and Zhang, J. (2021). DNA methylation detection techniques. Clin. Mol. Diagn. pp: 427–435. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-1037-0_31.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [88] Yang, J., Gu, D., Wu, S., et al. (2021). Feasible strategies for studying the involvement of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in the stress-induced formation of quality-related metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis). Hort Res 8: 253. DOI: 10.1038/s41438-021-00679-9.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [89] Cherian, S., Figueroa, C.R., and Nair, H. (2014). ‘Movers and shakers’ in the regulation of fruit ripening: a cross-dissection of climacteric versus non-climacteric fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 65: 4705−4722. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru280.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] Messeguer, R., Ganal, M.W., Steffens, J.C., et al. (1991). Characterization of the level, target sites and inheritance of cytosine methylation in tomato nuclear DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 16: 753−770. DOI: 10.1007/BF00015069.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Teyssier, E., Bernacchia, G., Maury, S., et al. (2008). Tissue dependent variations of DNA methylation and endoreduplication levels during tomato fruit development and ripening. Planta 228: 391−399. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-008-0743-z.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [92] Zhou, L., Tian, S., and Qin, G. (2019). RNA methylomes reveal the m6A-mediated regulation of DNA demethylase gene SlDML2 in tomato fruit ripening. Genome Biol. 20: 156. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1771-7.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [93] Jia, H.-F., Chai, Y.-M., Li, C.-L., et al. (2011). Abscisic acid plays an important role in the regulation of strawberry fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 157: 188−199. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.177311.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [94] Li, B.-J., Grierson, D., Shi, Y., et al. (2022). Roles of abscisic acid in regulating ripening and quality of strawberry, a model non-climacteric fruit. Hort. Res. 9: uhac089. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac089.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [95] Bai, Q., Huang, Y., and Shen, Y. (2021). The physiological and molecular mechanism of abscisic acid in regulation of fleshy fruit ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 11: 619953. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.619953.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [96] Huang, H., Liu, R., Niu, Q., et al. (2019). Global increase in DNA methylation during orange fruit development and ripening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 116: 1430−1436. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1815441116.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [97] Guo, D.-L., Li, Q., Zhao, H.-L., et al. (2019). The variation of berry development and DNA methylation after treatment with 5-azaC on ‘Kyoho’ grape. Sci. Hortic. 246: 265−271. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.006.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [98] Zhou, C., Yang, M., Guo, J., et al. (2022). Dynamic changes in DNA methylome and transcriptome patterns during papaya fruit ripening. Acta Hortic. Sinica. 49: 519−532. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-1046.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [99] Yu, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). DNA methylation balance is involved in anthocyanin accumulation during Vaccinium corymbosum fruit ripening. J. Berry Res. 10: 651−663. DOI: 10.3233/jbr-200553.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [100] Tang, M., Xue, W., Li, X., et al. (2022). Mitotically heritable epigenetic modifications of CmMYB6 control anthocyanin biosynthesis in chrysanthemum. New Phytol. 236: 1075−1088. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18389.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [101] Butelli, E., Licciardello, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2012). Retrotransposons control fruit-specific, cold-dependent accumulation of anthocyanins in blood oranges. The Plant Cell 24: 1242−1255. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.095232.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [102] Xiao, K., Chen, J., He, Q., et al. (2020). DNA methylation is involved in the regulation of pepper fruit ripening and interacts with phytohormones. J. Exp. Bot. 71: 1928−1942. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa003.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [103] Li, Y., Zhu, J., Xu, X., et al. (2022). DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine promotes leaf senescence in pak choi (Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis) by regulating senescence-related genes. Agronomy 12: 2568. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12102568.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [104] Wang, L., Tang, T., Wang, W., et al. (2022). Multi-omics landscape of DNA methylation regulates browning in “Fuji” apple. Front. Nutr. 8: 800489. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.800489.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [105] Li, J., Liu, J., Wang, G., et al. (2015). A chaperone function of NO CATALASE ACTIVITY1 is required to maintain catalase activity and for multiple stress responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 27: 908−925. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.135095.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [106] Anstis, P.J.P. and Northcote, D.H. (1973). Development of chloroplasts from amyloplasts in potato tuber discs. New Phytol. 72: 449−463. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1973.tb04394.x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [107] Tolley, B.J., Woodfield, H., Wanchana, S., et al. (2012). Light-regulated and cell-specific methylation of the maize PEPC promoter. J. Exp. Bot. 63: 1381−1390. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err367.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [108] Xiong, Y., Liu, X., You, Q., et al. (2022). Analysis of DNA methylation in potato tuber in response to light exposure during storage. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 170: 218−224. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.12.007.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [109] Xia, H., Shen, Y., Hu, R., et al. (2021). Methylation of MYBA1 is associated with the coloration in “Manicure finger” grape skin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69: 15649−15659. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04550.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [110] Azuma, A. and Kobayashi, S. (2022). Demethylation of the 3’ LTR region of retrotransposon in VvMYBA1 BEN allele enhances anthocyanin biosynthesis in berry skin and flesh in ‘Brazil’ grape. Plant Sci. 322: 111341. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111341.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [111] El-Sharkawy, I., Liang, D., and Xu, K. (2015). Transcriptome analysis of an apple (Malus × domestica) yellow fruit somatic mutation identifies a gene network module highly associated with anthocyanin and epigenetic regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 66: 7359−7376. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv433.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [112] Telias, A., Lin-Wang, K., Stevenson, D.E., et al. (2011). Apple skin patterning is associated with differential expression of MYB10. BMC Plant Biol. 11: 1−15. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-93.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [113] Jia, D., Li, Z., Dang, Q., et al. (2020). Anthocyanin biosynthesis and methylation of the MdMYB10 promoter are associated with the red blushed-skin mutant in the red striped-skin “Changfu 2” apple. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68: 4292−4304. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07098.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [114] Li, W., Ning, G., Mao, J., et al. (2019). Whole-genome DNA methylation patterns and complex associations with gene expression associated with anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple fruit skin. Planta 250: 1833−1847. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-019-03266-4.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [115] Jiang, S., Sun, Q., Chen, M., et al. (2019). Methylome and transcriptome analyses of apple fruit somatic mutations reveal the difference of red phenotype. BMC Genom. 20: 117−117. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5499-2.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [116] Wei, C., Liu, H., Cao, X., et al. (2021). Synthesis of flavour-related linalool is regulated by PpbHLH1 and associated with changes in DNA methylation during peach fruit ripening. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19: 2082−2096. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13638.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [117] O’Malley, R.C., Huang, S.C., Song, L., et al. (2016). Cistrome and Epicistrome Features Shape the Regulatory DNA Landscape. Cell 165: 1280−1292. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.038.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [118] Jiang, S., Wang, N., Chen, M., et al. (2020). Methylation of MdMYB1 locus mediated by RdDM pathway regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18: 1736−1748. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13337.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [119] Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Sun, H., et al. (2020). Transposon-induced methylation of the RsMYB1 promoter disturbs anthocyanin accumulation in red-fleshed radish. J. Exp. Bot. 71: 2537−2550. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa010.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [120] Chiu, L.-W., Zhou, X., Burke, S., et al. (2010). The purple cauliflower arises from activation of a MYB transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 154: 1470−1480. DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.164160.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [121] Liu, M., Zhang, C., Duan, L., et al. (2019). CsMYB60 is a key regulator of flavonols and proanthocyanidans that determine the colour of fruit spines in cucumber. J. Exp. Bot. 70: 69−84. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery336.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [122] Chen, Y., Belwal, T., Xu, Y., et al. (2022). Updated insights into anthocyanin stability behavior from bases to cases: Why and why not anthocyanins lose during food processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 3: 8639−8671. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2063250.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] Albuquerque, B.R., Oliveira, M.B.P.P., Barros, L., et al. (2021). Could fruits be a reliable source of food colorants Pros and cons of these natural additives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 61: 805−835. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1746904.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [124] Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B. (2016). Natural food pigments and colorants. Curr. Opin. in Food Sci. 7: 20−26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2015.08.004.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [125] Perez-Galvez, A., Viera, I., and Roca, M. (2020). Carotenoids and chlorophylls as antioxidants. Antioxidants 9: 505. DOI: 10.3390/antiox9060505.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [126] Eggersdorfer, M. and Wyss, A. (2018). Carotenoids in human nutrition and health. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 652: 18−26. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.06.001.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [127] Khoo, H.E., Azlan, A., Tang, S.T., et al. (2017). Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits. Food Nutr. Res. 61: 1−21. DOI: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1361779.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [128] Takashi, M., Mochida, K., Kozuka, M., et al. (2001). Cancer chemopreventive activity of carotenoids in the fruits of red paprika Capsicum annuum L. Cancer Lett. 172: 103−109. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00635-8.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [129] Aizawa, K., and Inakuma, T. (2009). Dietary capsanthin, the main carotenoid in paprika (Capsicum annuum), alters plasma high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and hepatic gene expression in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 102: 1760−1766. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509991309.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [130] Xu, J., Wang, X., Cao, H., et al. (2017). Dynamic changes in methylome and transcriptome patterns in response to methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine treatment in citrus. DNA Res. 24: 509−522. DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsx021.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [131] Liu, G., Li, C., Yu, H., et al. (2020). GREEN STRIPE, encoding methylated TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1, regulates chloroplast development and Chl synthesis in fruit. New Phytol. 228: 302−317. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16705.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [132] Daccord, N., Celton, J.-M., Linsmith, G., et al. (2017). High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development. Nat. Genet. 49: 1099−1106. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3886.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [133] Yao, J.-L., Xu, J., Cornille, A., et al. (2015). A microRNA allele that emerged prior to apple domestication may underlie fruit size evolution. Plant J. 84: 417−427. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13021.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [134] Bucher, E., Kong, J., Teyssier, E., et al. (2018). Chapter Ten - Epigenetic regulations of fleshy fruit development and ripening and their potential applications to breeding strategies. In Advances in Botanical Research Plant Epigenetics Coming of Age for Breeding Applications., M. Mirouze, E. Bucher, and P. Gallusci, eds. (Academic Press), pp. 327–360. DOI: 10.1016/bs.abr.2018.09.015.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [135] Lu, Z., Huang, Y., Mao, S., et al. (2022). The high-quality genome of pummelo provides insights into the tissue-specific regulation of citric acid and anthocyanin during domestication. Hort. Res. 9: uhac175. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac175.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [136] Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, F., et al. (2022). Methylation profiling of biosynthetic genes reveals the role of D-galacturonic acid reductase in ascorbic acid accumulation in tomato fruit. Plant Growth Regul. 98: 281−288. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-022-00863-4.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [137] Ma, W., Li, B., Zheng, L., et al. (2021). Combined profiling of transcriptome and DNA methylome reveal genes involved in accumulation of soluble sugars and organic acid in apple fruits. Foods 10: 2198. DOI: 10.3390/foods10092198.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [138] Wei, C., Li, M., Cao, X., et al. (2022). Linalool synthesis related PpTPS1 and PpTPS3 are activated by transcription factor PpERF61 whose expression is associated with DNA methylation during peach fruit ripening. Plant Sci. 317: 111200. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111200.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [139] Duan, W., Yang, C., Cao, X., et al. (2022). Chilling-induced peach flavor loss is associated with expression and DNA methylation of functional genes. J. Adv. Res. 53 : 17-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.12.003.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [140] Zhu, Y., Wang, K., Wu, C., et al. (2021). DNA hypermethylation associated with the development of temperature-dependent postharvest chilling injury in peach fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 181: 111645. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111645.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [141] Duan, W., Yang, C., Cao, X., et al. (2022). Transcriptome and DNA methylome analysis reveal new insights into methyl jasmonate-alleviated chilling injury of peach fruit after cold storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 189: 111915. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111915.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [142] Guo, X., Huang, D., Jing, G., et al. (2023). Nitric oxide-mediated DNA methylation enhances cold resistance in postharvest peach fruit. Food Chem. 404: 134660. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134660.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [143] Zhu, Y.-C., Zhang, B., Allan, A.C., et al. (2020). DNA demethylation is involved in the regulation of temperature-dependent anthocyanin accumulation in peach. Plant J. 102: 965−976. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14680.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [144] Rothkegel, K., Espinoza, A., Sanhueza, D., et al. (2021). Identification of DNA methylation and transcriptomic profiles associated with fruit mealiness in Prunus persica (L. ) batsch. Front. Plant Sci. 12 : 684130. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.684130.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [145] Zheng, G., Dong, X., Wei, J., et al. (2022). Integrated methylome and transcriptome analysis unravel the cold tolerance mechanism in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L). BMC Plant Biol. 22: 414. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03797-1.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [146] Gallego-Bartolomé, J. (2020). DNA methylation in plants: mechanisms and tools for targeted manipulation. New Phytol. 227: 38−44. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16529.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [147] Pribylova, A., Cermak, V., Tyc, D., et al. (2019). Detailed insight into the dynamics of the initial phases of de novo RNA-directed DNA methylation in plant cells. Epigenetic Chromatin. 12: 54. DOI: 10.1186/s13072-019-0299-0.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [148] Guo, Q., Liu, Q., Smith, N.A., et al. (2016). RNA silencing in plants: Mechanisms, technologies and applications in horticultural crops. Curr. Genomics 17: 476−489. DOI: 10.2174/1389202917666160520103117.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [149] Zicola, J., Liu, L., Tänzler, P., et al. (2019). Targeted DNA methylation represses two enhancers of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Plants 5: 300−307. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-019-0375-2.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [150] Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Liu, W., Kuo, P.H., et al. (2019). Co-targeting RNA polymerases IV and V promotes efficient De Novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 176: 1068−1082. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.029.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [151] Johnson, L.M., Du, J., Hale, C.J., et al. (2014). SRA- and SET-domain-containing proteins link RNA polymerase V occupancy to DNA methylation. Nature 507: 124−128. DOI: 10.1038/nature12931.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [152] Soppe, W.J.J., Jacobsen, S.E., Alonso-Blanco, C., et al. (2000). The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell 6: 791−802. DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00090-0.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [153] Tanenbaum, M.E., Gilbert, L.A., Qi, L.S., et al. (2014). A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell 159: 635−646. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [154] Papikian, A., Liu, W., Gallego-Bartolomé, J., et al. (2019). Site-specific manipulation of Arabidopsis loci using CRISPR-Cas9 SunTag systems. Nat. Commun. 10: 729. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08736-7.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [155] Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Gardiner, J., Liu, W., et al. (2018). Targeted DNA demethylation of the Arabidopsis genome using the human TET1 catalytic domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 115: E2125−E2134. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716945115.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [156] Li, J., Yang, D.-L., Huang, H., et al. (2020). Epigenetic memory marks determine epiallele stability at loci targeted by de novo DNA methylation. Nat. Plants 6: 661−674. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-020-0671-x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [157] Chi, J., Zhao, J., Wei, S., et al. (2021). A CRISPR-cas9-based near-infrared upconversion-activated DNA methylation editing system. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13: 6043−6052. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c21223.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [158] Liu, Z.-H., Tang, S., Hu, W., et al. (2022). Precise editing of methylated cytosine in Arabidopsis thaliana using a human APOBEC3Bctd-Cas9 fusion. Sci. China Life Sci. 65: 219−222. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-021-1970-x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [159] Yang, J., Zhou, X., Wu, S., et al. (2021). Involvement of DNA methylation in regulating the accumulation of the aroma compound indole in tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves during postharvest processing. Food Res. Int. 142: 110183. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110183.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [160] Lu, P., Yu, S., Zhu, N., et al. (2018). Genome encode analyses reveal the basis of convergent evolution of fleshy fruit ripening. Nat. Plants 4: 784−791. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-018-0249-z.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [161] Ding, W., Chen, J., Feng, G., et al. (2020). DNMIVD: DNA methylation interactive visualization database. Nucleic Acids Res. 48: D856−D862. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz830.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [162] Hachiya, T., Furukawa, R., Shiwa, Y., et al. (2017). Genome-wide identification of inter-individually variable DNA methylation sites improves the efficacy of epigenetic association studies. NPJ Genom. Med. 2: 11. DOI: 10.1038/s41525-017-0016-5.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [163] Zhang, M., Zong, W., Zou, D., et al. (2023). MethBank 4.0: An updated database of DNA methylation across a variety of species. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 : D208–D216. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac969.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [164] Liu, Z., Wu, X., Liu, H., et al. (2022). DNA methylation in tomato fruit ripening. Physiol. Plant 174: e13627. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13627.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [165] Gao, C. (2021). Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell 184: 1621−1635. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.005.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [166] Lieberman-Lazarovich, M., Kaiserli, E., Bucher, E., et at. (2022). Natural and induced epigenetic variation for crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 70: 102297. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102297.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [167] Shew, A.M., Nalley, L.L., Snell, H.A., et al. (2018). CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation. Glob. Food Sec. 19: 71−80. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.005.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Chen Y., Li D., Lang Z., et al., (2024). An emerging role beyond genetics: DNA methylation in horticultural quality shaping. The Innovation Life 2(1): 100050. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100050
    Chen Y., Li D., Lang Z., et al., (2024). An emerging role beyond genetics: DNA methylation in horticultural quality shaping. The Innovation Life 2(1): 100050. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100050

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(7)    

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(8035) PDF downloads(4016)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint