Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

Comprehensive profiling of antibiotic resistance genes in diverse environments and novel function discovery

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. ONN4ARG is an ontology-aware neural network model for antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) prediction.

      ONN4ARG detects remotely homologous ARGs and generates a comprehensive set of ARGs with high fidelity.

      ONN4ARG enables comprehensive enrichment analysis of ARGs among diverse hosts and environments.

      Computational work and wet-lab experimental validation together validated a novel streptomycin ARG.

  • Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) have emerged in pathogens and are arousing worldwide concern, and accurately identifying unknown ARGs is a formidable challenge in studying the generation and spread of antibiotic resistance in diverse environments. Current methods can identify known ARGs but have limited utility for the discovery of novel ARGs, thus rendering the profiling of ARGs incomprehensive. Here, we developed ONN4ARG, an ontology-aware deep learning approach for comprehensive ARG discovery. Systematic evaluation revealed that ONN4ARG outperforms previous methods in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and comprehensiveness. Experiments using 200 million microbial genes collected from 815 metagenomic samples from diverse environments or hosts have resulted in 120,726 candidate ARGs, of which more than 20% are not yet present in public databases. The comprehensive set of ARGs revealed environment-specific and host-specific patterns. The wet-lab functional validation together with structural investigation have validated a novel streptomycin resistance gene from oral microbiome samples, confirming ONN4ARG’s ability to discover novel functions. In summary, ONN4ARG enables comprehensive ARG discovery toward a grand view of ARGs worldwide.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Zha, Y., Chong, H., Yang, P., et al. (2022). Microbial dark matter: from discovery to applications. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 20: 867−881. DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.02.007.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Li, J., Jia, H., Cai, X., et al. (2014). An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 32: 834−841. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2942.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Brogan, D.M., and Mossialos, E. (2016). A critical analysis of the review on antimicrobial resistance report and the infectious disease financing facility. Global Health 12: 8−8. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-016-0147-y.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Goossens, H., Ferech, M., Stichele, R.V., et al. (2005). Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: A cross-national database study. The Lancet 365: 579−587. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17907-0.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Jia, B., Raphenya, A.R., Alcock, B., et al. (2017). CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 45: D566−D573. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Alcock, B.P., Raphenya, A.R., Lau, T.T.Y., et al. (2019). CARD 2020: Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 48: D517−D525. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz935.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Böhm, M.-E., Razavi, M., Marathe, N.P., et al. (2020). Discovery of a novel integron-borne aminoglycoside resistance gene present in clinical pathogens by screening environmental bacterial communities. Microbiome 8: 1−11. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00814-z.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Bortolaia, V., Kaas, R.S., Ruppe, E., et al. (2020). ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75 : 3491-3500. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [9] Bateman, A., Martin, M.J., O'Donovan, C., et al. (2015). UniProt: A hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 43(D1): D204−D212. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku989.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Rowe, W., Baker, K.S., Verner-Jeffreys, D., et al. (2015). Search engine for antimicrobial resistance: a cloud compatible pipeline and web interface for rapidly detecting antimicrobial resistance genes directly from sequence data. PLoS One 10: e0133492. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133492.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Kleinheinz, K.A., Joensen, K.G., and Larsen, M.V. (2014). Applying the ResFinder and VirulenceFinder web-services for easy identification of acquired antibiotic resistance and E. coli virulence genes in bacteriophage and prophage nucleotide sequences. Bacteriophage 4: e27943. doi:10.4161/bact.27943.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [12] Arango-Argoty, G., Garner, E., Pruden, A., et al. (2018). DeepARG: A deep learning approach for predicting antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomic data. Microbiome 6: 23. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0401-z.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Davis, J.J., Boisvert, S., Brettin, T., et al. (2016). Antimicrobial resistance prediction in PATRIC and RAST. Sci. Rep. 6: 27930. DOI: 10.1038/srep27930.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Lakin, S.M., Kuhnle, A., Alipanahi, B., et al. (2019). Hierarchical Hidden Markov models enable accurate and diverse detection of antimicrobial resistance sequences. Commun. Biol. 2: 294. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0545-9.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Doster, E., Lakin, S.M., Dean, C.J., et al. (2020). MEGARes 2.0: A database for classification of antimicrobial drug, biocide and metal resistance determinants in metagenomic sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 : D561-D569. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1010.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [16] Li, Y., Xu, Z., Han, W., et al. (2021). HMD-ARG: hierarchical multi-task deep learning for annotating antibiotic resistance genes. Microbiome 9: 40. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01002-3.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Gupta, S.K., Padmanabhan, B.R., Diene, S.M., et al. (2014). ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58: 212−220. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01310-13.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Feldgarden, M., Brover, V., Haft, D.H., et al. (2019). Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63: e00483−00419. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00483-19.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Inouye, M., Dashnow, H., Raven, L.A., et al. (2014). SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome. Med. 6: 90. DOI: 10.1186/s13073-014-0090-6.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Rowe, W.P.M. and Winn, M.D. (2018). Indexed variation graphs for efficient and accurate resistome profiling. Bioinformatics 34: 3601−3608. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty387.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W.C., et al. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403−410. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Edgar, R.C. (2010). Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460−2461. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Buchfink, B., Xie, C., and Huson, D.H. (2015). Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12: 59−60. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3176.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Lakin, S.M., Dean, C., Noyes, N.R., et al. (2017). MEGARes: an antimicrobial resistance database for high throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 45: D574−D580. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1009.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Steinegger, M., Meier, M., Mirdita, M., et al. (2019). HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics 20: 1−15. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Wang, X.-R., Lian, X.-L., Su, T.-T., et al. (2021). Duck wastes as a potential reservoir of novel antibiotic resistance genes. Sci. Total Environ. 771: 144828. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144828.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Wang, S., Wei, L., Gao, Y., et al. (2022). Novel amikacin resistance genes identified from human gut microbiota by functional metagenomics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 133: 898−907. DOI: 10.1111/jam.15615.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Sunagawa, S., Coelho, L.P., Chaffron, S., et al. (2015). Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348: 1261359. DOI: 10.1126/science.1261359.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Mitchell, A.L., Scheremetjew, M., Denise, H., et al. (2018). EBI metagenomics in 2017: Enriching the analysis of microbial communities, from sequence reads to assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 46: D726−D735. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx967.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Hyatt, D., Chen, G.L., LoCascio, P.F., et al. (2010). Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 11: 119. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Qian, X., Gunturu, S., Guo, J., et al. (2021). Metagenomic analysis reveals the shared and distinct features of the soil resistome across tundra, temperate prairie, and tropical ecosystems. Microbiome 9: 108. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01047-4.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Ning, K., Ji, L., Zhang, L., et al. (2022). Is rice-crayfish co-culture a better aquaculture model: from the perspective of antibiotic resistome profiles. Environ. Pollut. 292: 118450. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118450.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Li, B., Yang, Y., Ma, L., et al. (2015). Metagenomic and network analysis reveal wide distribution and co-occurrence of environmental antibiotic resistance genes. ISME J. 9: 2490−2502. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.59.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Plata, G., Baxter, N.T., Susanti, D., et al. (2022). Growth promotion and antibiotic induced metabolic shifts in the chicken gut microbiome. Commun. Biol. 5: 293. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03239-6.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., et al. (2023). Listening to enteric bacteria from the perspective of antibiotic alternatives in animal husbandry. The Innovation Life 1: 100022. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100022.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Qi, F., Lei, C., Li, F., et al. (2018). Deciphering the late steps of rifamycin biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 9: 2342. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04772-x.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Floss, H.G., and Yu, T.-W. (2005). Rifamycin-mode of action, resistance, and biosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 105: 621−632. DOI: 10.1021/cr030112j.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Yao, Y., Zhang, W., Jiao, R., et al. (2002). Efficient isolation of total RNA from antibiotic-producing bacterium Amycolatopsis mediterranei. J. Microbiol. Methods 51: 191−195. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(02)00078-7.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Wilson, M.C., Gulder, T.A.M., Mahmud, T., et al. (2010). Shared biosynthesis of the saliniketals and rifamycins in Salinispora arenicola is controlled by the sare1259-encoded cytochrome P450. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132: 12757−12765. DOI: 10.1021/ja105891a.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Saxena, A., Kumari, R., Mukherjee, U., et al. (2014). Draft genome sequence of the rifamycin producer Amycolatopsis rifamycinica DSM 46095. Genome Announc. 2: e00662−00614. DOI: 10.1128/genomea.00662-14.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Huang, H., Lv, J., Hu, Y., et al. (2008). Micromonospora rifamycinica sp.nov., a novel actinomycete from mangrove sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58: 17−20. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.64484-0.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Pinto-Alphandary, H., Mabilat, C., and Courvalin, P. (1990). Emergence of aminoglycoside resistance genes aadA and aadE in the genus Campylobacter. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34: 1294−1296. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.6.1294.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Holden, M.T.G., Hauser, H., Sanders, M., et al. (2009). Rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. PloS One 4: e6072. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006072.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Leplae, R., Hebrant, A., Wodak, S.J., et al. (2004). ACLAME: A classification of mobile genetic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: D45−D49. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh084.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Ramirez, M.S., Nikolaidis, N., and Tolmasky, M. (2013). Rise and dissemination of aminoglycoside resistance: the aac(6′)-Ib paradigm. Front. Microbiol. 4: 121. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00121.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Gligorijević, V., Renfrew, P.D., Kosciolek, T., et al. (2021). Structure-based protein function prediction using graph convolutional networks. Nat. Commun. 12: 3168. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23303-9.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596: 583−589. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Liu, Y., Chen, Y., and Han, L. (2023). Bioinformatics: Advancing biomedical discovery and innovation in the era of big data and artificial intelligence. The Innovation Medicine 1: 100012. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100012.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Yang, P. and Ning, K. (2022). How much metagenome data is needed for protein structure prediction: The advantages of targeted approach from the ecological and evolutionary perspectives. iMeta 1: e9. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.9.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Wu, Y. and He, K. (2020). Group Normalization. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 128: 742−755. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-019-01198-w.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Hendrycks, D., and Gimpel, K. (2016). Gaussian error linear units (gelus). arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1606.08415.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [52] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., et al. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [53] Wood, D.E., Lu, J., and Langmead, B. (2019). Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20: 1−13. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., et al. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35: 1547−1549. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy096.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Letunic, I. and Bork, P. (2019). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 47: W256−W259. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz239.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Rohl, C.A., Strauss, C.E.M., Misura, K.M.S., et al. (2004). Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383: 66−93. DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(04)83004-0.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Tian, W., Chen, C., Lei, X., et al. (2018). CASTp 3.0: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 46 : W363-W367. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky473.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [58] Cole, J.C., Korb, O., McCabe, P., et al. (2018). Knowledge-based conformer generation using the cambridge structural database. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58: 615−629. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00697.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Trott, O. and Olson, A.J. (2010). AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31: 455−461. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21334.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Benjamin, D.J., Berger, J.O., Johannesson, M., et al. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2: 6−10. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Zha Y., Chen C., Jiao Q., et al., (2024). Comprehensive profiling of antibiotic resistance genes in diverse environments and novel function discovery. The Innovation Life 2(1): 100054. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100054
    Zha Y., Chen C., Jiao Q., et al., (2024). Comprehensive profiling of antibiotic resistance genes in diverse environments and novel function discovery. The Innovation Life 2(1): 100054. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100054

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(6)     Tables(1)

Supplementary Information

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(7929) PDF downloads(6346)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint