Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access     Cite

The detection, function, and therapeutic potential of RNA 2'-O-methylation

    Show all affliationsShow less
More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. 2'-O-methylation (Nm) in non-coding RNA and mRNA is vital in human biological and pathological processes.

      Various Nm detection methods include biochemical assays, RNA sequencing, and AI-based prediction.

      Nanopore sequencing offers quantitative, single-molecule, and context-aware Nm detection.

      Nm improves RNA efficacy, stability, and durability, holding promise to advance RNA therapies.

  • RNA modifications play crucial roles in shaping RNA structure, function, and metabolism. Their dysregulation has been associated with many diseases, including cancer, developmental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, as well as neurological and immune-related conditions. A particular type of RNA modification, 2'-O-methylation (Nm) stands out due to its widespread occurrence on all four types of nucleotides (A, U, G, C) and in most RNA categories, e.g., mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, miRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, and viral RNA. Nm is the addition of a methyl group to the 2' hydroxyl of the ribose moiety of a nucleoside. Given its great biological significance and reported association with many diseases, we first reviewed the occurrences and functional implications of Nm in various RNA species. We then summarized the reported Nm detection methods, ranging from biochemical techniques in the 70’s and 80’s to recent methods based on Illumina RNA sequencing, artificial intelligence (AI) models for computational prediction, and the latest nanopore sequencing methods currently under active development. Moreover, we discussed the applications of Nm in the realm of RNA medicine, highlighting its therapeutic potential. At last, we present perspectives on potential research directions, aiming to offer insights for future investigations on Nm modification.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Roundtree I.A., Evans M.E., Pan T., et al. (2017). Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell 169:1187−1200. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.045

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Han X., Wang M., Zhao Y.L., et al. (2021). RNA methylations in human cancers. Semin. Cancer Biol. 75:97−115. DOI:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.11.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [3] Cui L., Ma R., Cai J., et al. (2022). RNA modifications: Importance in immune cell biology and related diseases. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7:334. DOI:10.1038/s41392-022-01175-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Boccaletto P., Stefaniak F., Ray A., et al. (2021). MODOMICS: A database of RNA modification pathways. 2021 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 :D231-D235. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkab1083.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [5] Wiener D. and Schwartz S. (2021). The epitranscriptome beyond m6A. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22:119−131. DOI:10.1038/s41576-020-00295-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Boo S.H. and Kim Y.K. (2020). The emerging role of RNA modifications in the regulation of mRNA stability. Exp. Mol. Med. 52:400−408. DOI:10.1038/s12276-020-0407-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [7] Karijolich J., Kantartzis A. and Yu Y.T. (2010). RNA modifications: A mechanism that modulates gene expression. Methods Mol. Biol. 629:1−19. DOI:10.1007/978-1-60761-657-3_1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Lewis C.J., Pan T. and Kalsotra A. (2017). RNA modifications and structures cooperate to guide RNA-protein interactions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18:202−210. DOI:10.1038/nrm.2016.163

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [9] Li Y., Yi Y., Lv J., et al. (2023). Low RNA stability signifies increased post-transcriptional regulation of cell identity genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51:6020−6038. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkad300

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [10] Gao X., Yi Y., Lv J., et al. (2023). Low RNA stability signifies strong expression regulatability of tumor suppressors. Nucleic Acids Res. 51:11534−11548. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkad838

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [11] Ayadi L., Galvanin A., Pichot F., et al. (2019). RNA ribose methylation (2'-O-methylation): Occurrence, biosynthesis and biological functions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1862:253−269. DOI:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.11.009

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] BioRender.com (2023). In R.S. common Eukaryotic mRNA modifications, transfer RNA (tRNA) structure, RNA (small nucleolar), SARS-CoV-2, HIV-1 structure, ed.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [13] Picard-Jean F., Brand C., Tremblay-Letourneau M., et al. (2018). 2'-O-methylation of the mRNA cap protects RNAs from decapping and degradation by DXO. PLoS One 13:e0193804. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0193804

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Picard-Jean F., Brand C., Tremblay-Letourneau M., et al. (2018). Correction: 2'-O-methylation of the mRNA cap protects RNAs from decapping and degradation by DXO. PLoS One 13:e0202308. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202308

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Bao H.J., Chen X., Liu X., et al. (2022). Box C/D snoRNA SNORD89 influences the occurrence and development of endometrial cancer through 2'-O-methylation modification of Bim. Cell Death Discov. 8:309. DOI:10.1038/s41420-022-01102-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Monaco P.L., Marcel V., Diaz J.J., et al. (2018). 2'-O-methylation of ribosomal RNA: Towards an epitranscriptomic control of translation. Biomolecules 8:106. DOI:10.3390/biom8040106

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Choi J., Indrisiunaite G., DeMirci H., et al. (2018). 2'-O-methylation in mRNA disrupts tRNA decoding during translation elongation. Nat. Struct Mol. Biol. 25:208−216. DOI:10.1038/s41594-018-0030-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Bizarro J., Deryusheva S., Wacheul L., et al. (2021). Nopp140-chaperoned 2'-O-methylation of small nuclear RNAs in Cajal bodies ensures splicing fidelity. Genes Dev. 35:1123−1141. DOI:10.1101/gad.348660.121

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [19] Stenvang J., Petri A., Lindow M., et al. (2012). Inhibition of microRNA function by antimiR oligonucleotides. Silence 3:1. DOI:10.1186/1758-907X-3-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [20] Ching Y.P., Zhou H.J., Yuan J.G., et al. (2002). Identification and characterization of FTSJ2, a novel human nucleolar protein homologous to bacterial ribosomal RNA methyltransferase. Genomics 79:2−6. DOI:10.1006/geno.2001.6670

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [21] Ochs R.L., Lischwe M.A., Spohn W.H., et al. (1985). Fibrillarin: A new protein of the nucleolus identified by autoimmune sera. Biol. Cell 54:123−133. DOI:10.1111/j.1768-322x.1985.tb00387.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Sportoletti P., Nachmani D., Riccardi L., et al. (2020). Macrophage function is regulated by NPM1-mediated 2’-O-methylation. bioRxiv:2020.2004.2018.048223. DOI:10.1101/2020.04.18.048223.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [23] Koh C.M., Gurel B., Sutcliffe S., et al. (2011). Alterations in nucleolar structure and gene expression programs in prostatic neoplasia are driven by the MYC oncogene. Am. J. Pathol. 178:1824−1834. DOI:10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.040

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [24] Su H., Xu T., Ganapathy S., et al. (2014). Elevated snoRNA biogenesis is essential in breast cancer. Oncogene 33:1348−1358. DOI:10.1038/onc.2013.89

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [25] Marcel V., Ghayad S.E., Belin S., et al. (2013). p53 acts as a safeguard of translational control by regulating fibrillarin and rRNA methylation in cancer. Cancer Cell 24:318−330. DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.013

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Nachmani D., Bothmer A.H., Grisendi S., et al. (2019). Germline NPM1 mutations lead to altered rRNA 2'-O-methylation and cause dyskeratosis congenita. Nat. Genet. 51:1518−1529. DOI:10.1038/s41588-019-0502-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Yi, Y. Li, Y., Meng Q., et al. (2021). A PRC2-independent function for EZH2 in regulating rRNA 2'-O methylation and IRES-dependent translation. Nat. Cell Biol. 23:341−354. DOI:10.1038/s41556-021-00653-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Liu L. Liu Z., Liu Q., et al. (2023). LncRNA INHEG promotes glioma stem cell maintenance and tumorigenicity through regulating rRNA 2'-O-methylation. Nat. Commun. 14:7526. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-43113-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Tollervey D., Lehtonen H., Jansen R., et al. (1993). Temperature-sensitive mutations demonstrate roles for yeast fibrillarin in pre-rRNA processing, pre-rRNA methylation, and ribosome assembly. Cell 72:443−457. DOI:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90120-f

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [30] Tessarz P., Santos-Rosa H., Robson S.C., et al. (2014). Glutamine methylation in histone H2A is an RNA-polymerase-I-dedicated modification. Nature 505:564−568. DOI:10.1038/nature12819

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [31] Loza-Muller L., Rodriguez-Corona U., Sobol M., et al. (2015). Fibrillarin methylates H2A in RNA polymerase I trans-active promoters in Brassica oleracea. Front. Plant Sci. 6:976. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2015.00976

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [32] Galvanin A., Vogt L.M., Grober A., et al. (2020). Bacterial tRNA 2'-O-methylation is dynamically regulated under stress conditions and modulates innate immune response. Nucleic Acids Res. 48:12833−12844. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaa1123

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [33] Li J., Wang Y.N., Xu B.S., et al. (2020). Intellectual disability-associated gene ftsj1 is responsible for 2'-O-methylation of specific tRNAs. EMBO Rep. 21:e50095. DOI:10.15252/embr.202050095

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Guy M.P. and Phizicky E.M. (2015). Conservation of an intricate circuit for crucial modifications of the tRNAPhe anticodon loop in eukaryotes. RNA 21:61−74. DOI:10.1261/rna.047639.114

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [35] Ramser J., Winnepenninckx B., Lenski C., et al. (2004). A splice site mutation in the methyltransferase gene FTSJ1 in Xp11.23 is associated with non-syndromic mental retardation in a large Belgian family (MRX9). J. Med. Genet. 41 :679-683. DOI:10.1136/jmg.2004.019000.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [36] Guy M.P., Shaw M., Weiner C.L., et al. (2015). Defects in tRNA anticodon loop 2'-O-methylation are implicated in nonsyndromic X-linked intellectual disability due to mutations in FTSJ1. Hum. Mutat. 36:1176−1187. DOI:10.1002/humu.22897

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Zhang M., Li K., Bai J., et al. (2023). A snoRNA-tRNA modification network governs codon-biased cellular states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120:e2312126120. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2312126120

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Belanger F., Stepinski J., Darzynkiewicz E., et al. (2010). Characterization of hMTr1, a human Cap1 2'-O-ribose methyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 285:33037−33044. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M110.155283

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Dahlin A., Denny J., Roden D.M., et al. (2015). CMTR1 is associated with increased asthma exacerbations in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 3:350−359. DOI:10.1002/iid3.73

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [40] Boza-Serrano A., Yang Y., Paulus A., et al. (2018). Innate immune alterations are elicited in microglial cells before plaque deposition in the Alzheimer's disease mouse model 5xFAD. Sci. Rep. 8:1550. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-19699-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [41] Despic V. and Jaffrey S.R. (2023). mRNA ageing shapes the Cap2 methylome in mammalian mRNA. Nature 614:358−366. DOI:10.1038/s41586-022-05668-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [42] Li P., Liu Y., Song R., et al. (2022). RNA 2’-O-methyltransferase fibrillarin facilitates virus entry into macrophages through inhibiting type I interferon response. Front. Immunol. 13:793582. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2022.793582

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Li Y., Yi Y., Gao X., et al. (2024). 2'-O-methylation at internal sites on mRNA promotes mRNA stability. Mol. Cell 84:2320−2336.e2326. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.04.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Drazkowska K., Tomecki R., Warminski M., et al. (2022). 2'-O-Methylation of the second transcribed nucleotide within the mRNA 5' cap impacts the protein production level in a cell-specific manner and contributes to RNA immune evasion. Nucleic Acids Res. 50:9051−9071. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkac722

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Werner M., Purta E., Kaminska,K.H., et al. (2011). 2'-O-ribose methylation of cap2 in human: function and evolution in a horizontally mobile family. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:4756−4768. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkr038

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Elliott B.A., Ho H.T., Ranganathan S.V., et al. (2019). Modification of messenger RNA by 2'-O-methylation regulates gene expression in vivo. Nat. Commun. 10:3401. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-11375-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Cavaille J. (2017). Box C/D small nucleolar RNA genes and the Prader-Willi syndrome: A complex interplay. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 8 :10.1002/wrna.1417. DOI:10.1002/wrna.1417.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [48] van Ingen E., Engbers P.A.M., Woudenberg T., et al. (2022). C/D box snoRNA SNORD113-6 guides 2'-O-methylation and protects against site-specific fragmentation of tRNA(Leu)(TAA) in vascular remodeling. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 30:162−172. DOI:10.1016/j.omtn.2022.09.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Jia Y., Mu J.C. and Ackerman, S.L. (2012). Mutation of a U2 snRNA gene causes global disruption of alternative splicing and neurodegeneration. Cell 148:296−308. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.057

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Lim S.L., Qu Z.P., Kortschak R.D., et al. (2015). HENMT1 and piRNA Stability Are Required for Adult Male Germ Cell Transposon Repression and to Define the Spermatogenic Program in the Mouse. PLoS Genet. 11:e1005620. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005620

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [51] Lim S.L., Qu Z.P., Kortschak R.D., et al. (2015). Correction: HENMT1 and piRNA stability are required for adult male germ cell transposon repression and to define the spermatogenic program in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 11:e1005782. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005782

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Ringeard M., Marchand V., Decroly E., et al. (2019). FTSJ3 is an RNA 2'-O-methyltransferase recruited by HIV to avoid innate immune sensing. Nature 565:500−504. DOI:10.1038/s41586-018-0841-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] El Kazzi P., Rabah N., Chamontin C., et al. (2023). Internal RNA 2'O-methylation in the HIV-1 genome counteracts ISG20 nuclease-mediated antiviral effect. Nucleic Acids Res. 51:2501−2515. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkac996

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Yang S.L., DeFalco L., Anderson D.E., et al. (2021). Comprehensive mapping of SARS-CoV-2 interactions in vivo reveals functional virus-host interactions. Nat. Commun. 12:5113. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-25357-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [55] Viswanathan T., Misra A., Chan S.H., et al. (2021). A metal ion orients SARS-CoV-2 mRNA to ensure accurate 2'-O methylation of its first nucleotide. Nat. Commun. 12:3287. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-23594-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Ojha S., Malla S. and Lyons S.M. (2020). snoRNPs: Functions in ribosome biogenesis. Biomolecules 10:783. DOI:10.3390/biom10050783

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Reichow S.L., Hamma T., Ferre-D'Amare A.R., et al. (2007). The structure and function of small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:1452−1464. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkl1172

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [58] Samarsky D.A., Fournier M.J., Singer R.H., et al. (1998). The snoRNA box C/D motif directs nucleolar targeting and also couples snoRNA synthesis and localization. EMBO J. 17:3747−3757. DOI:10.1093/emboj/17.13.3747

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [59] Azevedo-Favory J., Gaspin C., Ayadi L., et al. (2021). Mapping rRNA 2'-O-methylations and identification of C/D snoRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. RNA Biol. 18:1760−1777. DOI:10.1080/15476286.2020.1869892

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Cavaille J., Nicoloso M. and Bachellerie, J.P. (1996). Targeted ribose methylation of RNA in vivo directed by tailored antisense RNA guides. Nature 383:732−735. DOI:10.1038/383732a0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [61] Khoshnevis S., Dreggors-Walker R.E., Marchand V., et al. (2022). Ribosomal RNA 2'-O-methylations regulate translation by impacting ribosome dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119:e2117334119. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2117334119

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Liang X.H., Liu Q. and Fournier, M.J. (2007). rRNA modifications in an intersubunit bridge of the ribosome strongly affect both ribosome biogenesis and activity. Mol. Cell 28:965−977. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.012

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Bartek J., Iggo R., Gannon J., et al. (1990). Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines. Oncogene 5:893−899.

    View in Article Google Scholar Scopus

    [64] Yi Y., Li Y., Chen K., et al. (2023). Unveiling the non-canonical functions of EZH2 in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 14:127−128. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.28357

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [65] Reddy R., Singh R. and Shimba, S. (1992). Methylated cap structures in eukaryotic RNAs: structure, synthesis and functions. Pharmacol. Ther. 54:249−267. DOI:10.1016/0163-7258(92)90002-h

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Ke S., Pandya-Jones A., Saito Y., et al. (2017). m6A mRNA modifications are deposited in nascent pre-mRNA and are not required for splicing but do specify cytoplasmic turnover. Genes Dev. 31:990−1006. DOI:10.1101/gad.301036.117

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] Louloupi A., Ntini E., Conrad T., et al. (2018). Transient N-6-methyladenosine transcriptome sequencing reveals a regulatory role of m6A in splicing efficiency. Cell Rep. 23:3429−3437. DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.077

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [68] Xu W., He C., Kaye E.G., et al. (2022). Dynamic control of chromatin-associated m6A methylation regulates nascent RNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 82:1156−1168.e1157. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.02.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Langberg S.R. and Moss, B. (1981). Post-transcriptional modifications of mRNA. Purification and characterization of cap I and cap II RNA (nucleoside-2'-)-methyltransferases from HeLa cells. J. Biol. Chem. 256 :10054-10060. DOI.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [70] Kos M. and Tollervey D. (2010). Yeast pre-rRNA processing and modification occur cotranscriptionally. Mol. Cell 37:809−820. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.024

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Birkedal U., Christensen-Dalsgaard M., Krogh, N. et al. (2015). Profiling of ribose methylations in RNA by high-throughput sequencing. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54:451−455. DOI:10.1002/anie.201408362

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [72] Li P., Liu Y., Song R., et al. (2022). RNA 2'-O-methyltransferase fibrillarin facilitates virus entry into macrophages through inhibiting type I interferon response. Front. Immunol. 13:793582. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2022.793582

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Dai Q., Moshitch-Moshkovitz S., Han D., et al. (2017). Nm-seq maps 2'-O-methylation sites in human mRNA with base precision. Nat. Methods 14:695−698. DOI:10.1038/nmeth.4294

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [74] Tang Y., Wu Y., Wang S., et al. (2024). An integrative platform for detection of RNA 2'-O-methylation reveals its broad distribution on mRNA. Cell Rep. Methods 4:100721. DOI:10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100721

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Chen L., Zhang L.S., Ye C., et al. (2023). Nm-Mut-seq: A base-resolution quantitative method for mapping transcriptome-wide 2'-O-methylation. Cell Res. 33:727−730. DOI:10.1038/s41422-023-00836-w

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [76] Abou Assi H., Rangadurai A.K., Shi H., et al. (2020). 2′-O-methylation can increase the abundance and lifetime of alternative RNA conformational states. Nucleic Acids Res. 48:12365−12379. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaa928

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [77] Somme J., Van Laer B., Roovers M., et al. (2014). Characterization of two homologous 2'-O-methyltransferases showing different specificities for their tRNA substrates. RNA 20:1257−1271. DOI:10.1261/rna.044503.114

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [78] Darzacq X., Jady B.E., Verheggen C., et al. (2002). Cajal body-specific small nuclear RNAs: a novel class of 2'-O-methylation and pseudouridylation guide RNAs. EMBO J. 21:2746−2756. DOI:10.1093/emboj/21.11.2746

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [79] Biedenbander T., de Jesus V., Schmidt-Dengler M., et al. (2022). RNA modifications stabilize the tertiary structure of tRNAfMet by locally increasing conformational dynamics. Nucleic Acids Res. 50:2334−2349. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkac040

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [80] Agris P.F., Narendran A., Sarachan K., et al. (2017). The Importance of being modified: The role of RNA modifications in translational fidelity. Enzymes 41:1−50. DOI:10.1016/bs.enz.2017.03.005

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [81] Schaffer A.E., Pinkard O. and Coller, J.M. (2019). tRNA Metabolism and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 20:359−387. DOI:10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015334

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [82] Torres A.G., Batlle E. and Ribas de Pouplana L. (2014). Role of tRNA modifications inhuman diseases. Trends Mol. Med. 20:306−314. DOI:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [83] Yu Y.T., Shu M.D. and Steitz, J.A. (1998). Modifications of U2 snRNA are required for snRNP assembly and pre-mRNA splicing. EMBO J. 17:5783−5795. DOI:10.1093/emboj/17.19.5783

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [84] Morais P., Adachi H. and Yu Y.T. (2021). Spliceosomal snRNA Epitranscriptomics. Front. Genet. 12:652129. DOI:10.3389/fgene.2021.652129

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [85] Karijolich J. and Yu Y.T. (2010). Spliceosomal snRNA modifications and their function. RNA Biol. 7:192−204. DOI:10.4161/rna.7.2.11207

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [86] Blijlevens M., Li J. and van Beusechem, V.W. (2021). Biology of the mRNA Splicing Machinery and Its Dysregulation in Cancer Providing Therapeutic Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:5110. DOI:10.3390/ijms22105110

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [87] Siomi M.C., Sato K., Pezic D., et al. (2011). PIWI-interacting small RNAs: The vanguard of genome defence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:246−258. DOI:10.1038/nrm3089

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [88] Kirino Y. and Mourelatos Z. (2007). Mouse Piwi-interacting RNAs are 2'-O-methylated at their 3' termini. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:347−348. DOI:10.1038/nsmb1218

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [89] Encinar J.A. and Menendez J.A. (2020). Potential drugs targeting early innate immune evasion of SARS-coronavirus 2 via 2'-O-methylation of viral RNA. Viruses 12:525. DOI:10.3390/v12050525

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] Yang J., Sharma, S. Watzinger P., et al. (2016). Mapping of complete set of ribose and base modifications of yeast rRNA by RP-HPLC and Mung Bean Nuclease Assay. PLoS One 11:e0168873. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168873

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Jaafar M., Paraqindes H., Gabut M., et al. (2021). 2'O-ribose methylation of ribosomal RNAs: Natural diversity in living organisms, biological processes, and diseases. Cells 10:1948. DOI:10.3390/cells10081948

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [92] Marchand V., Pichot F., Thuring K., et al. (2017). Next-generation sequencing-based RiboMethSeq protocol for analysis of tRNA 2'-O-methylation. Biomolecules 7:13. DOI:10.3390/biom7010013

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [93] Furuichi Y., Morgan M., Shatkin A.J., et al. (1975). Methylated, blocked 5 termini in HeLa cell mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:1904−1908. DOI:10.1073/pnas.72.5.1904

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [94] Krogh N., Kongsbak-Wismann M., Geisler C., et al. (2017). Substoichiometric ribose methylations in spliceosomal snRNAs. Org. Biomol. Chem. 15:8872−8876. DOI:10.1039/c7ob02317k

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [95] Wang N., Qu S., Sun W., et al. (2018). Direct quantification of 3' terminal 2'-O-methylation of small RNAs by RT-qPCR. RNA 24:1520−1529. DOI:10.1261/rna.065144.117

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [96] Liang H., Jiao Z., Rong W., et al. (2020). 3'-Terminal 2'-O-methylation of lung cancer miR-21-5p enhances its stability and association with Argonaute 2. Nucleic Acids Res. 48:7027−7040. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaa504

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [97] Liang Z., Ye H., Ma J., et al. (2024). m6A-Atlas v2.0: Updated resources for unraveling the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) epitranscriptome among multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 52 :D194-D202. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkad691.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [98] Cappannini A., Ray A., Purta E., et al. (2024). MODOMICS: A database of RNA modifications and related information. 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 52 :D239-D244. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkad1083.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [99] Xuan J., Chen L., Chen Z., et al. (2024). RMBase v3.0: Decode the landscape, mechanisms and functions of RNA modifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 52 :D273-D284. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkad1070.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [100] Song B., Wang X., Liang Z., et al. (2023). RMDisease V2.0: An updated database of genetic variants that affect RNA modifications with disease and trait implication. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 :D1388-D1396. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkac750.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [101] Luo X., Li H., Liang J., et al. (2021). RMVar: An updated database of functional variants involved in RNA modifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 49:D1405−D1412. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaa811

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [102] Zhang Y., Jiang J., Ma J., et al. (2023). DirectRMDB: A database of post-transcriptional RNA modifications unveiled from direct RNA sequencing technology. Nucleic Acids Res. 51:D106−D116. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkac1061

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [103] Bergeron D., Paraqindes H., Fafard-Couture E., et al. (2023). snoDB 2.0: An enhanced interactive database, specializing in human snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 :D291-D296. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkac835.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [104] Yoshihama M., Nakao A. and Kenmochi N. (2013). snOPY: A small nucleolar RNA orthological gene database. BMC Res. Notes 6:426. DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-6-426

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [105] Boileau E., Wilhelmi H., Busch A., et al. (2024). Sci-ModoM: A quantitative database of transcriptome-wide high-throughput RNA modification sites. Nucleic Acids Res. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkae972.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [106] Consortium R.N. (2021). RNAcentral 2021: Secondary structure integration, improved sequence search and new member databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 49:D212−D220. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaa921

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [107] Rimbach K., Kaiser S., Helm M., et al. (2015). 2'-O-methylation within bacterial RNA acts as suppressor of TLR7/TLR8 activation in human innate immune cells. J. Innate. Immun. 7:482−493. DOI:10.1159/000375460

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [108] Abe M., Naqvi A., Hendriks G.J., et al. (2014). Impact of age-associated increase in 2'-O-methylation of miRNAs on aging and neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 28:44−57. DOI:10.1101/gad.226654.113

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [109] Donis-Keller H., Maxam A.M., and Gilbert W. (1977). Mapping adenines, guanines, and pyrimidines in RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 4:2527−2538. DOI:10.1093/nar/4.8.2527

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [110] Peattie D.A. (1979). Direct chemical method for sequencing RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:1760−1764. DOI:10.1073/pnas.76.4.1760

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [111] Klootwijk J. and Planta R.J. (1973). Analysis of the methylation sites in yeast ribosomal RNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 39:325−333. DOI:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb03130.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [112] Lockard R.E., Connaughton J.F. and Kumar A. (1982). Nucleotide sequence of the 5'- and 3'- domains for rabbit 18S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 10:3445−3457. DOI:10.1093/nar/10.11.3445

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [113] Connaughton J.F., Rairkar A., Lockard R.E., et al. (1984). Primary structure of rabbit 18S ribosomal RNA determined by direct RNA sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:4731−4745. DOI:10.1093/nar/12.11.4731

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [114] Maden B.E. (1990). The numerous modified nucleotides in eukaryotic ribosomal RNA. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 39:241−303. DOI:10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60629-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [115] Grosjean H., Keith G. and Droogmans L. (2004). Detection and quantification of modified nucleotides in RNA using thin-layer chromatography. Methods Mol. Biol. 265:357−391. DOI:10.1385/1-59259-775-0:357

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [116] Leech R.M., Dyer T.A., Poole C.E.,et al. (1968). The determination of base ratios of very small samples of ribonucleic acid using thin layer chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 34:364−369. DOI:10.1016/0021-9673(68)80068-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [117] Abbate J. and Rottman, F. (1972). Gas chromatographic method for determination of 2'-O-methylation in RNA. Anal. Biochem. 47:378−388. DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(72)90131-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [118] Pike L.M. and Rottman F. (1974). The determination of 2'-O-methylnucleosides in RNA. Anal. Biochem. 61:367−378. DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(74)90404-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [119] Sardana M.K. and Fuke M. (1980). A rapid procedure to determine the content of 2'-O-methylation in RNA by homochromatography. Anal. Biochem. 103:285−288. DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(80)90611-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [120] Sanger F., Brownlee G.G. and Barrell B.G. (1965). A two-dimensional fractionation procedure for radioactive nucleotides. J. Mol. Biol. 13:373−398. DOI:10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80104-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [121] Yang J., Sharma S., Kotter P., et al. (2015). Identification of a new ribose methylation in the 18S rRNA of S. cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:2342−2352. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkv058

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [122] Yang J., Sharma S., Watzinger P., et al. (2017). Correction: Mapping of complete set of ribose and base modifications of yeast rRNA by RP-HPLC and Mung Bean Nuclease Assay. PLoS One 12:e0173940. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0173940

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] Qu H.L., Michot B. and Bachellerie J.P. (1983). Improved methods for structure probing in large RNAs: a rapid 'heterologous' sequencing approach is coupled to the direct mapping of nuclease accessible sites. Application to the 5' terminal domain of eukaryotic 28S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 11 :5903-5920. DOI:10.1093/nar/11.17.5903.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [124] Maden B.E., Corbett M.E., Heeney P.A., et al. (1995). Classical and novel approaches to the detection and localization of the numerous modified nucleotides in eukaryotic ribosomal RNA. Biochimie 77:22−29. DOI:10.1016/0300-9084(96)88100-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [125] Li W., Jiang G., Jin Y.X.,et al. (2003). Detection of 2'-O-ribose methylation sites on rice 25 S rRNA. Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao (Shanghai) 35:289−295.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [126] Kiss-Laszlo Z., Henry Y., Bachellerie J.P., et al. (1996). Site-specific ribose methylation of preribosomal RNA: a novel function for small nucleolar RNAs. Cell 85:1077−1088. DOI:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81308-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [127] Tycowski K.T., Smith C.M., Shu M.D., et al. (1996). A small nucleolar RNA requirement for site-specific ribose methylation of rRNA in Xenopus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:14480−14485. DOI:10.1073/pnas.93.25.14480

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [128] Schaefer M., Kapoor U. and Jantsch, M.F. (2017). Understanding RNA modifications: the promises and technological bottlenecks of the 'epitranscriptome'. Open Biol. 7:170077. DOI:10.1098/rsob.170077

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [129] Maden B.E. (2001). Mapping 2'-O-methyl groups in ribosomal RNA. Methods 25:374−382. DOI:10.1006/meth.2001.1250

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [130] Aschenbrenner J. and Marx A. (2016). Direct and site-specific quantification of RNA 2'-O-methylation by PCR with an engineered DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:3495−3502. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw200

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [131] Elliott B.A. and Holley, C.L. (2021). Assessing 2'-O-methylation of mRNA using quantitative PCR. Methods Mol. Biol. 2298:171−184. DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-1374-0_11

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [132] Benevides Lima L., Mesquita F.P., Brasil de Oliveira L.L., et al. (2022). True or false: What are the factors that influence COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-qPCR. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 22:157−167. DOI:10.1080/14737159.2022.2037425

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [133] Taoka M., Nobe Y., Yamaki Y., et al. (2018). Landscape of the complete RNA chemical modifications in the human 80S ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 46:9289−9298. DOI:10.1093/nar/gky811

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [134] Taoka M., Nobe Y., Yamaki Y., et al. (2016). The complete chemical structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae rRNA: Partial pseudouridylation of U2345 in 25S rRNA by snoRNA snR9. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:8951−8961. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw564

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [135] Popova A.M. and Williamson, J.R. (2014). Quantitative analysis of rRNA modifications using stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136:2058−2069. DOI:10.1021/ja412084b

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [136] Taoka M., Nobe Y., Hori M., et al. (2015). A mass spectrometry-based method for comprehensive quantitative determination of post-transcriptional RNA modifications: the complete chemical structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe ribosomal RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:e115. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkv560

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [137] Qiu F. and McCloskey J.A. (1999). Selective detection of ribose-methylated nucleotides in RNA by a mass spectrometry-based method. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:e20. DOI:10.1093/nar/27.18.e20

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [138] Felden B., Hanawa K., Atkins J.F., et al. (1998). Presence and location of modified nucleotides in Escherichia coli tmRNA: structural mimicry with tRNA acceptor branches. EMBO J. 17:3188−3196. DOI:10.1093/emboj/17.11.3188

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [139] Yang R., Li J., Wu Y., et al. (2022). A novel method to purify small RNAs from human tissues for methylation analysis by LC-MS/MS. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9:949181. DOI:10.3389/fmolb.2022.949181

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [140] Dong Z.W., Shao P., Diao L.T., et al. (2012). RTL-P: a sensitive approach for detecting sites of 2'-O-methylation in RNA molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e157. DOI:10.1093/nar/gks698

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [141] Yu Y.T., Shu M.D. and Steitz J.A. (1997). A new method for detecting sites of 2'-O-methylation in RNA molecules. RNA 3:324−331.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [142] Buchhaupt M., Peifer C., and Entian K.D. (2007). Analysis of 2'-O-methylated nucleosides and pseudouridines in ribosomal RNAs using DNAzymes. Anal. Biochem. 361:102−108. DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2006.11.001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [143] Silverman S.K. (2005). In vitro selection, characterization, and application of deoxyribozymes that cleave RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:6151−6163. DOI:10.1093/nar/gki930

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [144] Shaw S.J., Desiderio D.M., Tsuboyama K., et al. (1970). Mass spectrometry of nucleic acid components. Analogs of adenosine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92:2510−2522. DOI:10.1021/ja00711a049

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [145] Marchand V., Blanloeil-Oillo F., Helm M., et al. (2016). Illumina-based RiboMethSeq approach for mapping of 2'-O-Me residues in RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:e135. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw547

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [146] Seistrup K.H., Rose S., Birkedal U., et al. (2017). Bypassing rRNA methylation by RsmA/Dim1during ribosome maturation in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Nanoarchaeum equitans. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:2007−2015. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw839

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [147] Sharma S., Marchand V., Motorin Y., et al. (2017). Identification of sites of 2'-O-methylation vulnerability in human ribosomal RNAs by systematic mapping. Sci. Rep. 7:11490. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-09734-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [148] Krogh N., Jansson M.D., Hafner S.J., et al. (2016). Profiling of 2'-O-Me in human rRNA reveals a subset of fractionally modified positions and provides evidence for ribosome heterogeneity. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:7884−7895. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw482

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [149] Motorin Y. and Marchand, V. (2018). Detection and analysis of RNA ribose 2′-O-methylations: Challenges and solutions. Genes 9:642. DOI:10.3390/genes9120642

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [150] Gumienny R., Jedlinski D.J., Schmidt A., et al. (2017). High-throughput identification of C/D box snoRNA targets with CLIP and RiboMeth-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:2341−2353. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw1321

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [151] Pichot F., Marchand V., Ayadi L., et al. (2020). Holistic optimization of bioinformatic analysis pipeline for detection and quantification of 2'-O-methylations in RNA by RiboMethSeq. Front. Genet. 11:38. DOI:10.3389/fgene.2020.00038

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [152] Ayadi L., Motorin Y. and Marchand V. (2018). Quantification of 2'-O-Me residues in RNA using next-generation sequencing (Illumina RiboMethSeq Protocol). Methods Mol. Biol. 1649:29−48. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-7213-5_2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [153] Motorin Y., Quinternet M., Rhalloussi W., et al. (2021). Constitutive and variable 2'-O-methylation (Nm) in human ribosomal RNA. RNA Biol. 18:88−97. DOI:10.1080/15476286.2021.1974750

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [154] Krogh N. Birkedal U. and Nielsen, H. (2017). RiboMeth-seq: Profiling of 2'-O-Me in RNA. Methods Mol. Biol. 1562:189−209. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-6807-7_13

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [155] Dai Q., Moshitch-Moshkovitz S., Han D. et al. (2018). Corrigendum: Nm-seq maps 2'-O-methylation sites in human mRNA with base precision. Nat. Methods 15:226−227. DOI:10.1038/nmeth0318-226c

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [156] Hsu P.J., Fei Q., Dai Q., et al. (2019). Single base resolution mapping of 2'-O-methylation sites in human mRNA and in 3' terminal ends of small RNAs. Methods 156:85−90. DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.11.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [157] Zhu Y., Pirnie S.P. and Carmichael G.G. (2017). High-throughput and site-specific identification of 2'-O-methylation sites using ribose oxidation sequencing (RibOxi-seq). RNA 23:1303−1314. DOI:10.1261/rna.061549.117

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [158] Zhu Y., Holley C.L. and Carmichael, G.G. (2022). Transcriptome-wide identification of 2'-O-methylation sites with RibOxi-Seq. Methods Mol. Biol. 2404:393−407. DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-1851-6_22

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [159] Incarnato D., Anselmi, F., Morandi, E., et al. (2017). High-throughput single-base resolution mapping of RNA 2΄-O-methylated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:1433−1441. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw810

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [160] Bartoli K.M., Schaening C., Carlile T.M., et al. (2018). Conserved methyltransferase Spb1 targets mRNAs for regulated modification with 2′-O-methyl ribose. bioRxiv:271916. DOI:10.1101/271916.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [161] Zhang P., Huang J., Zheng W., et al. (2023). Single-base resolution mapping of 2'-O-methylation sites by an exoribonuclease-enriched chemical method. Sci. China Life Sci. 66:800−818. DOI:10.1007/s11427-022-2210-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [162] Chen L., Zhang L.S., Ye C., et al. (2023). Nm-Mut-seq: A base-resolution quantitative method for mapping transcriptome-wide 2'-O-methylation. Cell Res. DOI:10.1038/s41422-023-00836-w.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [163] Tang Y., Wu Y., Wang S., et al. (2023). A novel platform of RNA 2′-O-methylation high-throughput and site-specific quantification tools revealed its broad distribution on mRNA. bioRxiv:2020.2003.2027.011759. DOI:10.1101/2020.03.27.011759.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [164] Chen W., Feng P., Tang H., et al. (2016). Identifying 2'-O-methylationation sites by integrating nucleotide chemical properties and nucleotide compositions. Genomics 107:255−258. DOI:10.1016/j.ygeno.2016.05.003

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [165] Yang H., Lv H., Ding H., et al. (2018). iRNA-2OM: A sequence-based predictor for identifying 2'-O-methylation sites in Homo sapiens. J. Comput. Biol. 25:1266−1277. DOI:10.1089/cmb.2018.0004

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [166] Yang Y.H., Ma C.Y., Gao D., et al. (2023). i2OM: Toward a better prediction of 2'-O-methylation in human RNA. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 239:124247. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124247

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [167] Zhou Y., Cui Q. and Zhou, Y. (2019). NmSEER V2.0: A prediction tool for 2'-O-methylation sites based on random forest and multi-encoding combination. BMC Bioinformatics 20 :690. DOI:10.1186/s12859-019-3265-8.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [168] Ao C., Zou Q. and Yu L. (2022). NmRF: Identification of multispecies RNA 2'-O-methylation modification sites from RNA sequences. Brief. Bioinform. 23 :bbab480. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab480.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [169] Pichot F., Marchand V., Helm M., et al. (2022). Machine learning algorithm for precise prediction of 2'-O-methylation (Nm) sites from experimental RiboMethSeq datasets. Methods 203:311−321. DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.03.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [170] Mostavi M., Salekin S. and Huang Y. (2018). Deep-2'-O-me: Predicting 2'-O-methylation sites by convolutional neural networks. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2018:2394−2397. DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512780

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [171] Tahir M., Tayara H. and Chong K.T. (2019). iRNA-PseKNC(2methyl): Identify RNA 2'-O-methylation sites by convolution neural network and Chou's pseudo components. J. Theor. Biol. 465:1−6. DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.12.034

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [172] Li H., Chen L., Huang Z., et al. (2021). DeepOMe: A web server for the prediction of 2'-O-Me sites based on the hybrid CNN and BLSTM architecture. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:686894. DOI:10.3389/fcell.2021.686894

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [173] Soylu N.N. and Sefer E. (2023). BERT2OME: Prediction of 2′-O-methylation modifications from RNA sequence by transformer architecture based on BERT. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 20:2177−2189. DOI:10.1109/tcbb.2023.3237769

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [174] Zhao X., Zhang Y., Hang D., et al. (2022). Detecting RNA modification using direct RNA sequencing: A systematic review. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 20:5740−5749. DOI:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.10.023

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [175] Deamer D., Akeson M. and Branton, D. (2016). Three decades of nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 34:518−524. DOI:10.1038/nbt.3423

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [176] van Dijk, E.L., Jaszczyszyn, Y., Naquin, D., et al. (2018). The Third Revolution in Sequencing Technology. Trends Genet. 34:666−681. DOI:10.1016/j.tig.2018.05.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [177] Timp W., Mirsaidov U.M., Wang D., et al. (2010). Nanopore sequencing: Electrical measurements of the code of Life. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 9:281−294. DOI:10.1109/TNANO.2010.2044418

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [178] Amarasinghe S.L., Su S., Dong X., et al. (2020). Opportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis. Genome Biol. 21:30. DOI:10.1186/s13059-020-1935-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [179] Jain M., Fiddes I.T., Miga K.H., et al. (2015). Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer. Nat. Methods 12:351−356. DOI:10.1038/nmeth.3290

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [180] Technologies O.N. New basecaller now performs ‘raw basecalling’, for improved sequencing accuracy. https://nanoporetech.com/about-us/news/new-basecaller-now-performs-raw-basecalling-improved-sequencing-accuracy.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [181] Technologies. O.N. Nanopore sequencing data analysis.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [182] Li H. (2018). Minimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094−3100. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [183] Simpson J.T., Workman R.E., Zuzarte P.C., et al. (2017). Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Methods 14:407−410. DOI:10.1038/nmeth.4184

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [184] Garalde D.R., Snell E.A., Jachimowicz D., et al. (2018). Highly parallel direct RNA sequencing on an array of nanopores. Nat. Methods 15:201−206. DOI:10.1038/nmeth.4577

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [185] Liu H., Begik O., Lucas M.C., et al. (2019). Accurate detection of m(6)A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences. Nat. Commun. 10:4079. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-11713-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [186] Gao Y., Liu X., Wu B., et al. (2021). Quantitative profiling of N(6)-methyladenosine at single-base resolution in stem-differentiating xylem of Populus trichocarpa using Nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Genome Biol. 22:22. DOI:10.1186/s13059-020-02241-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [187] Lorenz D.A., Sathe S., Einstein J.M., et al. (2020). Direct RNA sequencing enables m(6)A detection in endogenous transcript isoforms at base-specific resolution. RNA 26:19−28. DOI:10.1261/rna.072785.119

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [188] Qin H., Ou L., Gao J., et al. (2022). DENA: Training an authentic neural network model using Nanopore sequencing data of Arabidopsis transcripts for detection and quantification of N(6)-methyladenosine on RNA. Genome Biol. 23:25. DOI:10.1186/s13059-021-02598-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [189] Leger A., Amaral P.P., Pandolfini L., et al. (2021). RNA modifications detection by comparative Nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 12:7198. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-27393-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [190] Jenjaroenpun P., Wongsurawat T., Wadley T.D., et al. (2021). Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 49:e7. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaa620

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [191] Parker M.T., Knop K., Sherwood A.V., et al. (2020). Nanopore direct RNA sequencing maps the complexity of Arabidopsis mRNA processing and m6A modification. eLife 9 . DOI:10.7554/eLife.49658.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [192] Price A.M., Hayer K.E., McIntyre A.B.R., et al. (2020). Direct RNA sequencing reveals m6A modifications on adenovirus RNA are necessary for efficient splicing. Nat. Commun. 11:6016. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-19787-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [193] Parker M.T., Barton G.J. and Simpson, G.G. (2021). Yanocomp: Robust prediction of m6A modifications in individual nanopore direct RNA reads.bioRxiv:2021.2006.2015.448494. DOI:10.1101/2021.06.15.448494.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [194] Pratanwanich P.N., Yao F., Chen Y., et al. (2021). Identification of differential RNA modifications from nanopore direct RNA sequencing with xPore. Nat. Biotechnol. 39:1394−1402. DOI:10.1038/s41587-021-00949-w

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [195] Ueda H. (2021). nanoDoc: RNA modification detection using Nanopore raw reads with Deep One-Class Classification. bioRxiv:2020.2009.2013.295089. DOI:10.1101/2020.09.13.295089.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [196] Chan A., Naarmann-de Vries I.S., Scheitl C.P.M., et al. (2024). Detecting m6A at single-molecular resolution via direct RNA sequencing and realistic training data. Nat. Commun. 15:3323. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-47661-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [197] Huang S., Zhang W., Katanski C.D., et al. (2021). Interferon inducible pseudouridine modification in human mRNA by quantitative nanopore profiling. Genome Biol. 22:330. DOI:10.1186/s13059-021-02557-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [198] Begik O., Lucas M.C., Pryszcz L.P., et al. (2021). Quantitative profiling of pseudouridylation dynamics in native RNAs with nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 39:1278−1291. DOI:10.1038/s41587-021-00915-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [199] Stoiber M., Quick J., Egan, R., et al. (2017). De novo identification of DNA modifications enabled by genome-guided nanopore signal processing. bioRxiv:094672. DOI:10.1101/094672.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [200] Furlan M., Delgado-Tejedor A., Mulroney L., et al. (2021). Computational methods for RNA modification detection from nanopore direct RNA sequencing data. RNA Biol. 18:31−40. DOI:10.1080/15476286.2021.1978215

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [201] Huang S., Wylder A.C. and Pan T. (2024). Simultaneous nanopore profiling of mRNA m6A and pseudouridine reveals translation coordination. Nat. Biotechnol. DOI:10.1038/s41587-024-02135-0.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [202] Acera Mateos P., A J.S., Ravindran A., et al. (2024). Prediction of m6A and m5C at single-molecule resolution reveals a transcriptome-wide co-occurrence of RNA modifications. Nat. Commun. 15:3899. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-47953-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [203] Wu Y., Shao W., Yan M., et al. (2024). Transfer learning enables identification of multiple types of RNA modifications using nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 15:4049. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-48437-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [204] Hassan D., Acevedo D., Daulatabad S.V., et al. (2022). Penguin: A tool for predicting pseudouridine sites in direct RNA nanopore sequencing data. Methods 203:478−487. DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.02.005

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [205] Hassan D., Ariyur A., Daulatabad S.V., et al. (2024). Nm-Nano: A machine learning framework for transcriptome-wide single-molecule mapping of 2-O-methylation (Nm) sites in nanopore direct RNA sequencing datasets. RNA Biol. 21:1−15. DOI:10.1080/15476286.2024.2352192

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [206] Hendra C., Pratanwanich P.N., Wan Y.K., et al. (2022). Detection of m6A from direct RNA sequencing using a multiple instance learning framework. Nat. Methods 19:1590−1598. DOI:10.1038/s41592-022-01666-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [207] Stephenson W., Razaghi R., Busan S., et al. (2022). Direct detection of RNA modifications and structure using single-molecule nanopore sequencing.Cell Genom. 2 :100097. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100097

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [208] Pan S., Zhang Y., Wei Z., et al. (2022). Prediction and motif analysis of 2’-O-methylation using a hybrid deep learning model from RNA primary sequence and nanopore signals. Curr. Bioinform. 17:873−882. DOI:10.2174/1574893617666220815153653

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [209] Frietze L.R. and Pan T. (2024). Internal mRNA 2'-O-methyl mapping by nanopore sequencing and consequence on mRNA stability and role in cancer. Mol. Cell 84:2215−2217. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.05.020

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [210] Burmeister P.E., Lewis S.D., Silva R.F., et al. (2005). Direct in vitro selection of a 2'-O-methyl aptamer to VEGF. Chem. Biol. 12:25−33. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.10.017

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [211] Robbins M., Judge A., Liang L., et al. (2007). 2'-O-methyl-modified RNAs act as TLR7 antagonists. Mol. Ther. 15:1663−1669. DOI:10.1038/sj.mt.6300240

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [212] Ha D.I., Lee J.M., Lee N.E., et al. (2020). Highly efficient and safe genome editing by CRISPR-Cas12a using CRISPR RNA with a ribosyl-2'-O-methylated uridinylate-rich 3'-overhang in mouse zygotes. Exp. Mol. Med. 52:1823−1830. DOI:10.1038/s12276-020-00521-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [213] Ke Y., Ghalandari B., Huang S., et al. (2022). 2'-O-Methyl modified guide RNA promotes the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discrimination ability of CRISPR-Cas12a systems. Chem. Sci. 1:2050−2061. DOI:10.1039/d1sc06832f

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [214] Scott T., Soemardy C. and Morris, K.V. (2020). Development of a facile approach for generating chemically modified CRISPR/Cas9 RNA. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 19:1176−1185. DOI:10.1016/j.omtn.2020.01.004

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [215] Rozners E. (2022). Chemical modifications of CRISPR RNAs to improve gene-editing activity and specificity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144:12584−12594. DOI:10.1021/jacs.2c02633

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [216] Zhou K.I., Pecot C.V. and Holley C.L. (2024). 2'-O-methylation (Nm) in RNA: Progress, challenges, and future directions. RNA 30:570−582. DOI:10.1261/rna.079970.124

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [217] Georgeson J. and Schwartz, S. (2024). No evidence for ac4C within human mRNA upon data reassessment. Mol. Cell 84:1601−1610.e1602. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.03.017

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [218] Beiki H., Sturgill D., Arango D., et al. (2024). Detection of ac4C in human mRNA is preserved upon data reassessment. Mol. Cell 84 :1611-1625 e1613. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.03.018.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [219] Tardu M., Jones J.D., Kennedy R.T., et al. (2019). Identification and quantification of modified nucleosides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNAs. ACS Chem. Biol. 14:1403−1409. DOI:10.1021/acschembio.9b00369

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [220] Arango D., Sturgill D., Yang R., et al. (2022). Direct epitranscriptomic regulation of mammalian translation initiation through N4-acetylcytidine. Mol. Cell 82:2912. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.06.022

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [221] Sas-Chen A., Thomas J.M., Matzov D., et al. (2020). Dynamic RNA acetylation revealed by quantitative cross-evolutionary mapping. Nature 583:638−643. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2418-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [222] Arango D., Sturgill D., Yang R., et al. (2022). Direct epitranscriptomic regulation of mammalian translation initiation through N4-acetylcytidine. Mol. Cell 82 :2797-2814 e2711. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.016.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [223] Shi J., Yang C., Zhang J., et al. (2023). NAT10 Is Involved in Cardiac Remodeling Through ac4C-Mediated Transcriptomic Regulation. Circ. Res. 133:989−1002. DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.322244

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [224] Liu R., Wubulikasimu Z., Cai R., et al. (2023). NAT10-mediated N4-acetylcytidine mRNA modification regulates self-renewal in human embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 51:8514−8531. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkad628

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

  • Cite this article:

    Wu K., Li Y., Yi Y., et al. (2025). The detection, function, and therapeutic potential of RNA 2'-O-methylation. The Innovation Life 3:100112. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100112
    Wu K., Li Y., Yi Y., et al. (2025). The detection, function, and therapeutic potential of RNA 2'-O-methylation. The Innovation Life 3:100112. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100112

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(5)     Tables(5)

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(10718) PDF downloads(5999)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint