Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access     Cite

Interactions of the karrikin signaling pathway with phytohormones and environmental signals in plants

More Information
  • Corresponding author: wanglei@sjziam.ac.cn
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Karrikins (KARs) are a class of butenolide compounds derived from smoke following vegetation burning.

      KARs mimic an unknown phytohormone to regulate many aspects of development and environmental adaptation.

      KAR signaling is perceived and transduced to trigger transcriptional reprogramming by one pathway.

      KAR signaling interacts with many phytohormones and environmental signals.

  • Karrikins (KARs), a class of butenolide compounds discovered in the smoke of burned vegetation, can mimic an unidentified phytohormone to regulate plant development and responses to environmental cues. The KAR signaling pathway is mediated by the 26S proteasome. Upon perception of KARs, the receptor of KARs, KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 (KAI2), recruits the F-box protein, MORE AXILLARY GROWTH 2 (MAX2), and the repressor proteins, SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2 1 (SMAX1) and SMAX1-LIKE 2 (SMXL2), leading to the degradation of SMAX1 and SMXL2, which then reprograms the transcription of the KAR-responsive genes. This review focuses on the latest research progress regarding KAR signaling transduction, the identification of KAI2 ligands, and the crosstalk between KAR signaling, plant hormones, and environmental cues, providing new insights for future studies and applications in agriculture.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Kamiya Y. (2010). Plant hormones: Versatile regulators of plant growth and development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61. DOI:10.1146/annurev.arplant.61.031110.100001

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [2] Flematti G. R., Dixon K. W. and Smith S. M. (2015). What are karrikins and how were they 'discovered' by plants. BMC Biol. 13:108. DOI:10.1186/s12915-015-0219-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Nelson D. C., Flematti G. R., Ghisalberti E. L., et al. (2012). Regulation of seed germination and seedling growth by chemical signals from burning vegetation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63:107−130. DOI:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105545

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Chiwocha S. D. S., Dixon K. W., Flematti G. R., et al. (2009). Karrikins: A new family of plant growth regulators in smoke. Plant Sci. 177:252−256. DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.06.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Conn C. E. and Nelson D. C. (2015). Evidence that KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2) receptors may perceive an unknown signal that is not karrikin or strigolactone. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1219. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2015.01219

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Sun Y. K., Flematti G. R., Smith S. M., et al. (2016). Reporter gene-facilitated detection of compounds in Arabidopsis leaf extracts that activate the karrikin signaling pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1799. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.01799

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Waters M. T. and Nelson D. C. (2023). Karrikin perception and signalling. New Phytol. 237:1525−1541. DOI:10.1111/nph.18598

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Varshney K. and Gutjahr C. (2023). KAI2 can do: Karrikin receptor function in plant development and response to abiotic and biotic factors. Plant Cell Physiol. 64:984−995. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcad077

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Baldwin I. T., Staszak-Kozinski L. and Davidson R. (1994). Up in smoke: I. Smoke-derived germination cues for postfire annual, Nicotiana attenuata torr. Ex. Watson. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2345−2371. DOI:10.1007/BF02033207

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Dixon K. W., Roche S. and Pate J. S. (1995). The promotive effect of smoke derived from burnt native vegetation on seed germination of Western Australian plants. Oecologia 101:185−192. DOI:10.1007/BF00317282

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Brown N. A. C. and van Staden J. (1997). Smoke as a germination cue: a review. Plant Growth Regul. 22:115−124. DOI:10.1023/A:1005852018644

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Keeley J. E. and Fotheringham C. J. (1997). Trace gas emissions and smoke-induced seed germination. Science 276:1248−1250. DOI:10.1126/science.276.5316.1248

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Wicklow D. T. (1977). Germination response in Emmenanthe Penduliflora (Hydrophyllaceae). Ecology 58:201−205. DOI:10.2307/1935123

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] de Lange J. H. and Boucher C. (1990). Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). I. Plant-derived smoke as a seed germination cue. S. Afr. J. Bot. 56:700−703. DOI:10.1016/s0254-6299(16)31009-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Flematti G. R., Ghisalberti E. L., Dixon K. W., et al. (2004). A compound from smoke that promotes seed germination. Science 305:977. DOI:10.1126/science.1099944

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Dixon K. W., Merritt D. J., Flematti G. R., et al. (2009). Karrikinolide—a phytoreactive compound derived from smoke with applications in horticulture, ecological restoration and agriculture. Acta Hortic. 813:155−170. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.813.20

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Nelson D. C., Riseborough J. A., Flematti G. R., et al. (2009). Karrikins discovered in smoke trigger Arabidopsis seed germination by a mechanism requiring gibberellic acid synthesis and light. Plant Physiol. 149:863−873. DOI:10.1104/pp.108.131516

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Flematti G. R., Ghisalberti E. L., Dixon K. W., et al. (2009). Identification of alkyl substituted 2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-ones as germination stimulants present in smoke. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57:9475−9480. DOI:10.1021/jf9028128

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Flematti G. R., Goddard-Borger E. D., Merritt D. J., et al. (2007). Preparation of 2H-Furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one derivatives and evaluation of their germination-promoting activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:2189−2194. DOI:10.1021/jf0633241

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Martinez S. E., Conn C. E., Guercio A. M., et al. (2022). A KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 paralog in lettuce mediates highly sensitive germination responses to karrikinolide. Plant Physiol. 190:1440−1456. DOI:10.1093/plphys/kiac32

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Zheng J., Hong K., Zeng L., et al. (2020). Karrikin signaling acts parallel to and additively with strigolactone signaling to regulate rice mesocotyl elongation in darkness. Plant Cell 32:2780−2805. DOI:10.1105/tpc.20.00123

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Bursch K., Niemann E. T., Nelson D. C., et al. (2021). Karrikins control seedling photomorphogenesis and anthocyanin biosynthesis through a HY5-BBX transcriptional module. Plant J. 107:1346−1362. DOI:10.1111/tpj.15383

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Carbonnel S., Das D., Varshney K., et al. (2020). The karrikin signaling regulator SMAX1 controls Lotus japonicus root and root hair development by suppressing ethylene biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117:21757−21765. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2006111117

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Choi J., Lee T., Cho J., et al. (2020). The negative regulator SMAX1 controls mycorrhizal symbiosis and strigolactone biosynthesis in rice. Nat. Commun. 11:2114. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-16021-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Feng Z., Liang X., Tian H., et al. (2022). SUPPRESSOR of MAX2 1 (SMAX1) and SMAX1-LIKE2 (SMXL2) negatively regulate drought resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 63:1900−1913. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcac080

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Gutjahr C., Gobbato E., Choi J., et al. (2015). Rice perception of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi requires the karrikin receptor complex. Science 350:1521−1524. DOI. DOI:10.1126/science.aac9715

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Li W., Nguyen K. H., Chu H. D., et al. (2017). The karrikin receptor KAI2 promotes drought resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 13:e1007076. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007076

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Li W., Nguyen K. H., Chu H. D., et al. (2020). Comparative functional analyses of DWARF14 and KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 in drought adaptation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 103:111−127. DOI:10.1111/tpj.14712

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Meng Y., Varshney K., Incze N., et al. (2022). KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 regulates leaf development, root system architecture and arbuscular-mycorrhizal symbiosis in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant J. 109:1559−1574. DOI:10.1111/tpj.15651

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Nelson D. C., Flematti G. R., Riseborough J. A., et al. (2010). Karrikins enhance light responses during germination and seedling development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:7095−7100. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0911635107

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Shah F. A., Ni J., Tang C., et al. (2021). Karrikinolide alleviates salt stress in wheat by regulating the redox and K+/Na+ homeostasis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 167:921−933. DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.09.023

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Shah F. A., Wei X., Wang Q., et al. (2020). Karrikin improves osmotic and salt stress tolerance via the regulation of the redox homeostasis in the Oil Plant Sapium sebiferum. Front. Plant Sci. 11:216. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2020.00216

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Stanga J. P., Smith S. M., Briggs W. R., et al. (2013). SUPPRESSOR OF MORE AXILLARY GROWTH2 1 controls seed germination and seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 163:318−330. DOI:10.1104/pp.113.221259

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Swarbreck S. M., Guerringue Y., Matthus E., et al. (2019). Impairment in karrikin but not strigolactone sensing enhances root skewing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 98:607−621. DOI:10.1111/tpj.14233

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Villaécija-Aguilar J. A., Hamon-Josse M., Carbonnel S., et al. (2019). SMAX1/SMXL2 regulate root and root hair development downstream of KAI2-mediated signalling in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 15:e1008327. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008327

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Villaecija-Aguilar J. A., Korosy C., Maisch L., et al. (2022). KAI2 promotes Arabidopsis root hair elongation at low external phosphate by controlling local accumulation of AUX1 and PIN2. Curr. Biol. 32:228-236 e223. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.044.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [37] Sun X. D. and Ni M. (2011). HYPOSENSITIVE TO LIGHT, an alpha/beta fold protein, acts downstream of ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 to regulate seedling de-etiolation. Mol. Plant 4:116−126. DOI:10.1093/mp/ssq055

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Waters M. T., Nelson D. C., Scaffidi A., et al. (2012). Specialisation within the DWARF14 protein family confers distinct responses to karrikins and strigolactones in Arabidopsis. Development 139:1285−1295. DOI:10.1242/dev.074567

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Guo Y., Zheng Z., La Clair J. J., et al. (2013). Smoke-derived karrikin perception by the α/β-hydrolase KAI2 from Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:8284−8289. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1306265110

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Kagiyama M., Hirano Y., Mori T., et al. (2013). Structures of D14 and D14L in the strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways. Genes Cells 18:147−160. DOI:10.1111/gtc.12025

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Lee I., Kim K., Lee S., et al. (2018). A missense allele of KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE2 impairs ligand-binding and downstream signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 69:3609−3623. DOI:10.1093/jxb/ery164

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Waters M. T., Scaffidi A., Moulin S. L., et al. (2015). A Selaginella moellendorffii Ortholog of KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 functions in Arabidopsis development but cannot mediate responses to karrikins or strigolactones. Plant Cell 27:1925−1944. DOI:10.1105/tpc.15.00146

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Zhao L. H., Zhou X. E., Wu Z. S., et al. (2013). Crystal structures of two phytohormone signal-transducing α/β hydrolases: karrikin-signaling KAI2 and strigolactone-signaling DWARF14. Cell Res. 23:436−439. DOI:10.1038/cr.2013.19

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Yao J., Mashiguchi K., Scaffidi A., et al. (2018). An allelic series at the KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 locus of Arabidopsis thaliana decouples ligand hydrolysis and receptor degradation from downstream signalling. Plant J. 96:75−89. DOI:10.1111/tpj.14017

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Waters M. T., Scaffidi A., Flematti G., et al. (2015). Substrate-induced degradation of the α/β-fold hydrolase KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 requires a functional catalytic triad but is independent of MAX2. Mol. Plant 8:814−817. DOI:10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.020

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Guercio A. M., Gilio A. K., Pawlak J., et al. (2024). Structural insights into rice KAI2 receptor provide functional implications for perception and signal transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 300:107593. DOI:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107593

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Chang W., Qiao Q., Li Q., et al. (2024). Non-transcriptional regulatory activity of SMAX1 and SMXL2 mediates karrikin-regulated seedling response to red light in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 17:1054−1072. DOI:10.1016/j.molp.2024.05.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Scaffidi A., Waters M. T., Sun Y. K., et al. (2014). Strigolactone hormones and their stereoisomers signal through two related receptor proteins to induce different physiological responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 165:1221−1232. DOI:10.1104/pp.114.240036

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Waters M. T. and Smith S. M. (2013). KAI2- and MAX2-mediated responses to karrikins and strigolactones are largely independent of HY5 in Arabidopsis seedlings. Mol. Plant 6:63−75. DOI:10.1093/mp/sss127

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Bürger M., Mashiguchi K., Lee H. J., et al. (2019). Structural basis of karrikin and non-natural strigolactone perception in Physcomitrella patens. Cell Rep. 26:855−865. DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.003

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Ishikawa S., Maekawa M., Arite T., et al. (2005). Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 46:79−86. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pci022

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Nelson D. C., Scaffidi A., Dun E. A., et al. (2011). F-box protein MAX2 has dual roles in karrikin and strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:8897−8902. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1100987108

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Stirnberg P., van de Sande K. and Leyser H. M. O. (2002). MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development 129 1131-1141. DOI:10.1242/dev.129.5.1131

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [54] Jiang L., Liu X., Xiong G., et al. (2013). DWARF 53 acts as a repressor of strigolactone signalling in rice. Nature 504:401−405. DOI:10.1038/nature12870

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Stirnberg P., Furner I. J. and Ottoline Leyser H. M. (2007). MAX2 participates in an SCF complex which acts locally at the node to suppress shoot branching. Plant J. 50:80−94. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03032.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Wang L., Wang B., Jiang L., et al. (2015). Strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis regulates shoot development by targeting D53-Like SMXL repressor proteins for ubiquitination and degradation. Plant Cell 27:3128−3142. DOI:10.1105/tpc.15.00605

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Wang L., Xu Q., Yu H., et al. (2020). Strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways elicit ubiquitination and proteolysis of SMXL2 to regulate hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 32:2251−2270. DOI:10.1105/tpc.20.00140

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Zhou F., Lin Q., Zhu L., et al. (2013). D14-SCFD3-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling. Nature 504:406−410. DOI:10.1038/nature12878

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Shen H., Luong P. and Huq E. (2007). The F-box protein MAX2 functions as a positive regulator of photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 145:1471−1483. DOI:10.1104/pp.107.107227

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Soundappan I., Bennett T., Morffy N., et al. (2015). SMAX1-LIKE/D53 family members enable distinct MAX2-dependent responses to strigolactones and karrikins in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27:3143−3159. DOI:10.1105/tpc.15.00562

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Stanga J. P., Morffy N. and Nelson D. C. (2016). Functional redundancy in the control of seedling growth by the karrikin signaling pathway. Planta 243:1397−1406. DOI:10.1007/s00425-015-2458-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Shabek N., Ticchiarelli F., Mao H., et al. (2018). Structural plasticity of D3-D14 ubiquitin ligase in strigolactone signalling. Nature 563:652−656. DOI:10.1038/s41586-018-0743-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Tal L., Guercio A. M., Varshney K., et al. (2023). C-terminal conformational changes in SCF-D3/MAX2 ubiquitin ligase are required for KAI2-mediated signaling. New Phytol. 239:2067−2075. DOI:10.1111/nph.19101

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Tal L., Palayam M., Ron M., et al. (2022). A conformational switch in the SCF-D3/MAX2 ubiquitin ligase facilitates strigolactone signalling. Nat. Plants 8:561−573. DOI:10.1038/s41477-022-01145-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Moturu T. R., Thula S., Singh R. K., et al. (2018). Molecular evolution and diversification of the SMXL gene family. J. Exp. Bot. 69:2367−2378. DOI:10.1093/jxb/ery097

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Temmerman A., Guillory A., Bonhomme S., et al. (2022). Masks start to drop: Suppressor of MAX2 1-Like proteins reveal their many faces. Front. Plant Sci. 13:887232. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.887232

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] Khosla A., Morffy N., Li Q., et al. (2020). Structure-function analysis of SMAX1 reveals domains that mediate its karrikin-induced proteolysis and interaction with the receptor KAI2. Plant Cell 32:2639−2659. DOI:10.1105/tpc.19.00752

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [68] Xu P., Hu J., Chen H., et al. (2023). SMAX1 interacts with DELLA protein to inhibit seed germination under weak light conditions via gibberellin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 42:112740. DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112740

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Kushihara R., Nakamura A., Takegami K., et al. (2025). Structural requirements of KAI2 ligands for activation of signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122:e2414779122. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2414779122

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [70] Yao J., Scaffidi A., Meng Y., et al. (2021). Desmethyl butenolides are optimal ligands for karrikin receptor proteins. New Phytol. 230:1003−1016. DOI:10.1111/nph.17224

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Yao R., Wang F., Ming Z., et al. (2017). ShHTL7 is a non-canonical receptor for strigolactones in root parasitic weeds. Cell Res. 27:838−841. DOI:10.1038/cr.2017.3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [72] Sepulveda C., Guzman M. A., Li Q., et al. (2022). KARRIKIN UP-REGULATED F-BOX 1 (KUF1) imposes negative feedback regulation of karrikin and KAI2 ligand metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119:e2112820119. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2112820119

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Waters M. T., Scaffidi A., Sun Y. K., et al. (2014). The karrikin response system of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 79:623−631. DOI:10.1111/tpj.12430

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [74] Seto Y., Yasui R., Kameoka H., et al. (2019). Strigolactone perception and deactivation by a hydrolase receptor DWARF14. Nat. Commun. 10:191. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-08124-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Yao R., Ming Z., Yan L., et al. (2016). DWARF14 is a non-canonical hormone receptor for strigolactone. Nature 536:469−473. DOI:10.1038/nature19073

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [76] Yao R., Wang L., Li Y., et al. (2018). Rice DWARF14 acts as an unconventional hormone receptor for strigolactone. J. Exp. Bot. 69:2355−2365. DOI:10.1093/jxb/ery014

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [77] Stirling S. A., Guercio A. M., Patrick R. M., et al. (2024). Volatile communication in plants relies on a KAI2-mediated signaling pathway. Science 383:1318−1325. DOI. DOI:10.1126/science.adl4685

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [78] Rahimi M. and Bouwmeester H. (2021). Are sesquiterpene lactones the elusive KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE2 ligand. Planta 253:54. DOI:10.1007/s00425-021-03571-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [79] Spring O., Schmauder K., Lackus N. D., et al. (2020). Spatial and developmental synthesis of endogenous sesquiterpene lactones supports function in growth regulation of sunflower. Planta 252:2. DOI:10.1007/s00425-020-03409-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [80] Hamiaux C., Drummond R. S., Janssen B. J., et al. (2012). DAD2 is an α/β hydrolase likely to be involved in the perception of the plant branching hormone, strigolactone. Curr. Biol. 22:2032−2036. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [81] de Saint Germain A., Clave G., Badet-Denisot M. A., et al. (2016). An histidine covalent receptor and butenolide complex mediates strigolactone perception. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12:787−794. DOI:10.1038/nchembio.2147

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [82] Wang L., Wang B., Yu H., et al. (2020). Transcriptional regulation of strigolactone signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 583:277−281. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2382-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [83] Hu Q., Liu H., He Y., et al. (2024). Regulatory mechanisms of strigolactone perception in rice. Cell 187:1−17. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.009

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [84] Chevalier F., Nieminen K., Sánchez-Ferrero J. C., et al. (2014). Strigolactone promotes degradation of DWARF14, an α/β hydrolase essential for strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26:1134−1150. DOI:10.1105/tpc.114.122903

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [85] Hu Q., He Y., Wang L., et al. (2017). DWARF14, A receptor covalently linked with the active form of strigolactones, undergoes strigolactone-dependent degradation in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1935. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2017.01935

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [86] Li Q., Martin-Fontecha E. S., Khosla A., et al. (2022). The strigolactone receptor D14 targets SMAX1 for degradation in response to GR24 treatment and osmotic stress. Plant Commun. 3:100303. DOI:10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100303

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [87] Akiyama K., Matsuzaki K. and Hayashi H. (2005). Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435:824−827. DOI:10.1038/nature03608

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [88] Mashiguchi K., Morita R., Tanaka K., et al. (2023). Activation of strigolactone biosynthesis by the DWARF14-LIKE/KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE2 pathway in mycorrhizal angiosperms, but not in Arabidopsis, a non-mycorrhizal plant. Plant Cell Physiol. 64:1066−1078. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcad079

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [89] Yoneyama K., Yoneyama K., Takeuchi Y., et al. (2007). Phosphorus deficiency in red clover promotes exudation of orobanchol, the signal for mycorrhizal symbionts and germination stimulant for root parasites. Planta 225:1031−1038. DOI:10.1007/s00425-006-0410-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] López‐Ráez J. A., Charnikhova T., Gómez‐Roldán V., et al. (2008). Tomato strigolactones are derived from carotenoids and their biosynthesis is promoted by phosphate starvation. New Phytol. 178:863−874. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02406.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Umehara M., Hanada A., Yoshida S., et al. (2008). Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455:195−200. DOI:10.1038/nature07272

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [92] Liu W., Kohlen W., Lillo A., et al. (2011). Strigolactone biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula and rice requires the symbiotic GRAS-type transcription factors NSP1 and NSP2. Plant Cell 23:3853−3865. DOI:10.1105/tpc.111.089771

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [93] Shen H., Zhu L., Bu Q. Y., et al. (2012). MAX2 affects multiple hormones to promote photomorphogenesis. Mol. Plant 5:750−762. DOI:10.1093/mp/sss029

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [94] Murase K., Hirano Y., Sun T.-p., et al. (2008). Gibberellin-induced DELLA recognition by the gibberellin receptor GID1. Nature 456:459−463. DOI:10.1038/nature07519

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [95] Kim J. Y., Park Y. J., Lee J. H., et al. (2022). SMAX1 integrates karrikin and light signals into GA-mediated hypocotyl growth during seedling establishment. Plant Cell Physiol. 63:932−943. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcac055

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [96] Kepczynski J., Dziurka M. and Wojcik A. (2024). KAR1-induced dormancy release in Avena fatua caryopses involves reduction of caryopsis sensitivity to ABA and ABA/GAs ratio in coleorhiza and radicle. Planta 259:126. DOI:10.1007/s00425-024-04387-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [97] Okamoto M., Kuwahara A., Seo M., et al. (2006). CYP707A1 and CYP707A2, which encode abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylases, are indispensable for proper control of seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 141:97−107. DOI:10.1104/pp.106.079475

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [98] Brun G., Thoiron S., Braem L., et al. (2019). CYP707As are effectors of karrikin and strigolactone signalling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana and parasitic plants. Plant Cell Environ. 42:2612−2626. DOI:10.1111/pce.13594

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [99] Wang L., Waters M. T. and Smith S. M. (2018). Karrikin-KAI2 signalling provides Arabidopsis seeds with tolerance to abiotic stress and inhibits germination under conditions unfavourable to seedling establishment. New Phytol. 219:605−618. DOI:10.1111/nph.15192

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [100] Bentsink L. and Koornneef M. (2008). Seed dormancy and germination. Arabidopsis Book 6:e0119. DOI:10.1199/tab.0119

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [101] Yang L., Liu S. and Lin R. (2020). The role of light in regulating seed dormancy and germination. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 62:1310−1326. DOI:10.1111/jipb.13001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [102] Hountalas J. E., Bunsick M., Xu Z., et al. (2024). HTL/KAI2 signaling substitutes for light to control plant germination. PLoS Genet. 20:e1011447. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011447

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [103] Meng Y., Chen F., Shuai H., et al. (2016). Karrikins delay soybean seed germination by mediating abscisic acid and gibberellin biogenesis under shaded conditions. Sci. Rep. 6:22073. DOI:10.1038/srep22073

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [104] Park C., Lee H. Y. and Yoon G. M. (2021). The regulation of ACC synthase protein turnover: a rapid route for modulating plant development and stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 63:102046. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102046

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [105] Rudus I., Cembrowska-Lech D., Jaworska A., et al. (2019). Involvement of ethylene biosynthesis and perception during germination of dormant Avena fatua L. caryopses induced by KAR1 or GA3. Planta 249:719-738. DOI:10.1007/s00425-018-3032-5.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [106] Halliday K. J., Martinez-Garcia J. F. and Josse E. M. (2009). Integration of light and auxin signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1:a001586. DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a001586

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [107] Adamowski M. and Friml J. (2015). PIN-dependent auxin transport: action, regulation, and evolution. Plant Cell 27:20−32. DOI:10.1105/tpc.114.134874

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [108] Hamon-Josse M., Villaecija-Aguilar J. A., Ljung K., et al. (2022). KAI2 regulates seedling development by mediating light-induced remodelling of auxin transport. New Phytol. 235:126−140. DOI:10.1111/nph.18110

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [109] Xu P., Jinbo H. and Cai W. (2022). Karrikin signaling regulates hypocotyl shade avoidance response by modulating auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 236:1748−1761. DOI:10.1111/nph.18459

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [110] Jiao Y., Lau O. S. and Deng X. W. (2007). Light-regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:217−230. DOI:10.1038/nrg2049

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [111] Lee I., Choi S., Lee S., et al. (2019). KAI2-KL signaling intersects with light-signaling for photomorphogenesis. Plant Signal. Behav. 14:e1588660. DOI:10.1080/15592324.2019.1588660

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [112] Oh E., Kim J., Park E., et al. (2004). PIL5, a phytochrome-interacting basic helix-loop-helix protein, is a key negative regulator of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 16:3045−3058. DOI:10.1105/tpc.104.025163

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [113] Oh E., Yamaguchi S., Kamiya Y., et al. (2006). Light activates the degradation of PIL5 protein to promote seed germination through gibberellin in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 47:124−139. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02773.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [114] Oh E., Yamaguchi S., Hu J., et al. (2007). PIL5, a phytochrome-interacting bHLH protein, regulates gibberellin responsiveness by binding directly to the GAI and RGA promoters in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell 19:1192−1208. DOI:10.1105/tpc.107.050153

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [115] Kim D. H., Yamaguchi S., Lim S., et al. (2008). SOMNUS, a CCCH-Type zinc finger protein in Arabidopsis, negatively regulates light-dependent seed germination downstream of PIL5. Plant Cell 20:1260−1277. DOI:10.1105/tpc.108.058859

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [116] de Wit M., Galvão V. C. and Fankhauser C. (2016). Light-mediated hormonal regulation of plant growth and development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 67:513−537. DOI:10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112252

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [117] Ang L.-H. and Deng X. W. (1994). Regulatory hierarchy of photomorphogenic loci: allele-specific and light-dependent interaction between the HY5 and COP1 loci. Plant Cell 6:613−628. DOI:10.1105/tpc.6.5.613

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [118] Ang L.-H., Chattopadhyay S., Wei N., et al. (1998). Molecular interaction between COP1 and HY5 defines a regulatory switch for light control of Arabidopsis development. Mol. Cell 1:213−222. DOI:10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80022-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [119] Chattopadhyay S., Ang L. H., Puente P., et al. (1998). Arabidopsis bZIP protein HY5 directly interacts with light-responsive promoters in mediating light control of gene expression. Plant Cell 10:673−683. DOI:10.1105/tpc.10.5.673

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [120] Deng X. W., Caspar T. and Quail P. H. (1991). cop1: a regulatory locus involved in light-controlled development and gene expression in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 5:1172−1182. DOI:10.1101/gad.5.7.1172

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [121] Quint M., Delker C., Franklin K. A., et al. (2016). Molecular and genetic control of plant thermomorphogenesis. Nat. Plants 2:15190. DOI:10.1038/nplants.2015.190

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [122] Delker C., Quint M. and Wigge P. A. (2022). Recent advances in understanding thermomorphogenesis signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 68:102231. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102231

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] Wei J., Zhang Q., Zhang Y., et al. (2024). Advance in the thermoinhibition of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. ) seed germination. Plants 13:2051. DOI:10.3390/plants13152051

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [124] Jung J. H., Domijan M., Klose C., et al. (2016). Phytochromes function as thermosensors in Arabidopsis. Science 354:886−889. DOI:10.1126/science.aaf6005

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [125] Legris M., Klose C., Burgie E. S., et al. (2016). Phytochrome B integrates light and temperature signals in Arabidopsis. Science 354:897−900. DOI:10.1126/science.aaf5656

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [126] Park Y. J., Kim J. Y. and Park C. M. (2022). SMAX1 potentiates phytochrome B-mediated hypocotyl thermomorphogenesis. Plant Cell 34:2671−2687. DOI:10.1093/plcell/koac124

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [127] Abdelrahman M., Mostofa M. G., Tran C. D., et al. (2023). The karrikin receptor KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 positively regulates heat stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 63:1914−1926. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcac112

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [128] Lantzouni O., Alkofer A., Falter-Braun P., et al. (2020). GROWTH-REGULATING FACTORS interact with DELLAs and regulate growth in cold stress. Plant Cell 32:1018−1034. DOI:10.1105/tpc.19.00784

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [129] Shah F. A., Ni J., Yao Y., et al. (2021). Overexpression of karrikins receptor gene Sapium sebiferum KAI2 promotes the cold stress tolerance via regulating the redox homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 12:657960. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.657960

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [130] Shao Z., Yang S., Gu Y., et al. (2023). Ubiquitin negatively regulates ABA responses by inhibiting SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.3 kinase activity in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 74:5394-5404. DOI:10.1093/jxb/erad229

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [131] Liu M., Shan Q., Ding E., et al. (2023). Karrikin increases tomato cold tolerance via strigolactone and the abscisic acid signaling network. Plant Sci. 332:111720. DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111720

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [132] Bu Q., Lv T., Shen H., et al. (2014). Regulation of drought tolerance by the F-box protein MAX2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 164:424−439. DOI:10.1104/pp.113.226837

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [133] Ha C. V., Leyva-Gonzalez M. A., Osakabe Y., et al. (2014). Positive regulatory role of strigolactone in plant responses to drought and salt stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111:851−856. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1322135111

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [134] Raghavendra A. S., Gonugunta V. K., Christmann A., et al. (2010). ABA perception and signalling. Trends Plant Sci. 15:395−401. DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [135] Nakashima K. and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2013). ABA signaling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep. 32:959−970. DOI:10.1007/s00299-013-1418-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [136] Mukherjee A., Dwivedi S., Bhagavatula L., et al. (2023). Integration of light and ABA signaling pathways to combat drought stress in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 42:829−841. DOI:10.1007/s00299-023-02999-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [137] Mostofa M. G., Abdelrahman M., Rahman M. M., et al. (2023). Karrikin receptor KAI2 coordinates salt tolerance mechanisms in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 63:1927−1942. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcac121

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [138] Saez A., Robert N., Maktabi M. H., et al. (2006). Enhancement of abscisic acid sensitivity and reduction of water consumption in Arabidopsis by combined inactivation of the protein phosphatases type 2C ABI1 and HAB1. Plant Physiol. 141:1389−1399. DOI:10.1104/pp.106.081018

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [139] Ma Y., Szostkiewicz I., Korte A., et al. (2009). Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 324:1064−1068. DOI:10.1126/science.1172408

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [140] Blazquez M. A., Nelson D. C. and Weijers D. (2020). Evolution of plant hormone response pathways. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71:327−353. DOI:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100309

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [141] Zheng X., Yang X., Chen Z., et al. (2021). Arabidopsis SMAX1 overaccumulation suppresses rosette shoot branching and promotes leaf and petiole elongation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 553:44−50. DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [142] Chang S. H., George W. J. and Nelson D. C. (2024). An N-terminal domain specifies developmental control by the SMAX1-LIKE family of transcriptional co-repressors in Arabidopsis thaliana. bioRxiv:2024.2005.2012.593779. DOI:10.1101/2024.05.12.593779

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [143] Chang S. H., George W. and Nelson D. C. (2025). Transcriptional regulation of development by SMAX1-LIKE proteins, targets of strigolactone and karrikin/KAI2 ligand signaling. J. Exp. Bot. 76:1888−1906. DOI:10.1093/jxb/eraf027

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [144] Zou J., Zhang S., Zhang W., et al. (2006). The rice HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 encoding an ortholog of Arabidopsis MAX3 is required for negative regulation of the outgrowth of axillary buds. Plant J. 48:687−698. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02916.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [145] Wang Y., Shang L., Yu H., et al. (2020). A strigolactone biosynthesis gene contributed to the green revolution in rice. Mol. Plant 13:923−932. DOI:10.1016/j.molp.2020.03.009

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Cao S., Li X. and Wang L. (2025). Interactions of the karrikin signaling pathway with phytohormones and environmental signals in plants. The Innovation Life 3:100148. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2025.100148
    Cao S., Li X. and Wang L. (2025). Interactions of the karrikin signaling pathway with phytohormones and environmental signals in plants. The Innovation Life 3:100148. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2025.100148

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(6)    

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(5758) PDF downloads(3107)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint