Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

Comparative genomics and population resequencing elucidate streamlined immune adaptations to aquatic environments in cetaceans

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Cetaceans possess streamlined MHC regions with reduced gene content and repetitive elements.

      Cetaceans maintain conserved MHC structural frameworks.

      Class II genes mediated ancestral cetaceans’ aquatic transition, Class I genes drove species diversity.

      Cetaceans exhibit aquatic adaptations, including olfactory reduction and metabolic downregulation.

      Sousa chinensis exhibit specialized pathogen defense mechanisms and attenuated reproductive gene sets.

  • Cetaceans have evolved numerous adaptations to thrive in aquatic environments. In this study, we identified and analyzed the entire MHC regions across cetacean species/populations and their terrestrial counterparts to elucidate immune adaptation strategies to aquatic life. Results reveal cetaceans have evolved a structurally streamlined MHC architecture, marked by reduced repetitive sequences (e.g., loss of BovB, decreased LTRs) and compacted gene content (class II and extended class I regions). Contracted gene sets were involved in olfactory transduction and reproduction. Class II genes were found critical for the initial aquatic transition in ancestral cetaceans, whereas class I genes facilitated subsequent habitat specialization and diversification. Strong signatures of positive selection were detected at both species level (e.g., in DR, TRIM, LTB, MOG genes) and population level (e.g., in DR, TRIM, BTN, DQ genes) within S. chinensis. These findings highlight the pivotal role of MHC-driven adaptations in enabling cetaceans to colonize and thrive in diverse aquatic niches. Collectively, our study provides key insights into the specialized immune evolution underpinning cetacean success in marine environments.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Liu J., Lu Z., Wang X., et al. (2024). From land to sea: Unique evolution in reproductive strategies of marine mammals. Innov. Life 2:100090. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100090

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Zhang P., Goodman S. J., O’Connell M. J., et al. (2023). Marine mammal genomes: Important resources for unravelling adaptation and evolution in the marine environment. Innov. Geosci. 1:100022. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100022

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Mössner S. and Ballschmiter K. (1997). Marine mammals as global pollution indicators for organochlorines. Chemosphere 34:1285−1296. DOI:10.1016/s0045-6535(97)00426-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Lefebvre K. A., Charapata P., Stimmelmayr R., et al. (2025). Bowhead whale faeces link increasing algal toxins in the Arctic to ocean warming. Nature 644:693−698. DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-09230-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Vermeij G. J. (2017). How the land became the locus of major evolutionary innovations. Curr. Biol. 27:3178-3182. e3171. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.076

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [6] Huelsmann M., Hecker N., Springer M. S., et al. (2019). Genes lost during the transition from land to water in cetaceans highlight genomic changes associated with aquatic adaptations. Sci. Adv. 5:eaaw6671. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aaw6671

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Marcovitz A., Turakhia Y., Chen H. I., et al. (2019). A functional enrichment test for molecular convergent evolution finds a clear protein-coding signal in echolocating bats and whales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116:21094−21103. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1818532116

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Yuan Y., Zhang Y., Zhang P., et al. (2021). Comparative genomics provides insights into the aquatic adaptations of mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118:e2106080118. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2106080118

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Xu S., Shan L., Tian R., et al. (2025). Multi-level genomic convergence of secondary aquatic adaptation in marine mammals. The Innovation 6:100789. DOI:10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100798

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Shen T., Xu S., Wang X., et al. (2012). Adaptive evolution and functional constraint at TLR4 during the secondary aquatic adaptation and diversification of cetaceans. BMC Evol. Biol. 12:39. DOI:10.1186/1471-2148-12-39

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Kelley J., Walter L. and Trowsdale J. (2005). Comparative genomics of major histocompatibility complexes. Immunogenetics 56:683−695. DOI:10.1007/s00251-004-0717-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Benacerraf B. (1981). Role of MHC gene products in immune regulation. Science 212:1229−1238. DOI:10.1126/science.6165083

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Radosavljevic M., Cuillerier B., Wilson M. J., et al. (2002). A cluster of ten novel MHC class I related genes on human chromosome 6q24.2-q25.3. Genomics 79:114-123. DOI:10.1006/geno.2001.6673

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [14] Trowsdale J. (2011). The MHC, disease and selection. Immunol. Lett. 137:1−8. DOI:10.1016/j.imlet.2011.01.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Piertney S. B. and Oliver M. K. (2006). The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 96:7−21. DOI:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800724

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Goldberg A. C. and Rizzo L. V. (2015). MHC structure and function – antigen presentation. Part 1. Einstein-Sao Paulo 13:153-156. DOI:10.1590/s1679-45082015rb3122

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [17] Bartl S., Baish M. A., Flajnik M. F., et al. (1997). Identification of class I genes in cartilaginous fish, the most ancient group of vertebrates displaying an adaptive immune response. J. Immunol. 159:6097−6104. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.159.12.6097

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Bartl S. and Weissman I. L. (1994). Isolation and characterization of major histocompatibility complex class IIB genes from the nurse shark. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:262−266. DOI:10.1073/pnas.91.1.262

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Kasahara M., Vazquez M., Sato K., et al. (1992). Evolution of the major histocompatibility complex: Isolation of class II A cDNA clones from the cartilaginous fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6688−6692. DOI:10.1073/pnas.89.15.6688

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Ohta Y., McKinney E. C., Criscitiello M. F., et al. (2002). Proteasome, transporter associated with antigen processing, and class I genes in the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum: Evidence for a stable class I region and MHC haplotype lineages. J. Immunol. 168:771−781. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.168.2.771

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Okamura K., Ototake M., Nakanishi T., et al. (1997). The most primitive vertebrates with jaws possess highly polymorphic MHC class I genes comparable to those of humans. Immunity 7:777−790. DOI:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80396-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Belov K., Deakin J. E., Papenfuss A. T., et al. (2006). Reconstructing an ancestral mammalian immune supercomplex from a marsupial major histocompatibility complex. PLoS Biol. 4:e46. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040046

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] de Sá A. L. A., Breaux B., Burlamaqui T. C. T., et al. (2019). The marine mammal class II major histocompatibility complex organization. Front. Immunol. 10:696. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00696

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Ruan R., Ruan J., Wan X. L., et al. (2016). Organization and characteristics of the major histocompatibility complex class II region in the Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis). Sci. Rep. 6:22471. DOI:10.1038/srep22471

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Reche P. A. and Reinherz E. L. (2003). Sequence variability analysis of human class I and class II MHC molecules: Functional and structural correlates of amino acid polymorphisms. J. Mol. Biol. 331:623−641. DOI:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00750-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Spurgin L. G. and Richardson D. S. (2010). How pathogens drive genetic diversity: MHC, mechanisms and misunderstandings. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277:979−988. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2009.2084

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Nei M., Gu X. and Sitnikova T. (1997). Evolution by the birth-and-death process in multigene families of the vertebrate immune system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7799−7806. DOI:10.1073/pnas.94.15.7799

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Jefferson T. A., Webber M. A. and Pitman R. L. (2015). Marine mammals of the world (Second Edition) (Academic Press). DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409542-7.50004-4

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [29] Xu S., Zhang P., Ij S., et al. (2009). A preliminary analysis of genetic variation at three MHC loci of the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis ). Acta Theriologica Sinica 29:372-381. https://www.mammal.cn/EN/Y2009/V29/I4/372

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [30] Zhang P., Zhao Y., Li C., et al. (2020). An Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin genome reveals insights into chromosome evolution and the demography of a vulnerable species. iScience 23:101640. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101640

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Flynn J. M., Hubley R., Goubert C., et al. (2020). RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117:9451−9457. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1921046117

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Ou S. and Jiang N. (2018). LTR_retriever: A highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol. 176:1410−1422. DOI:10.1104/pp.17.01310

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Chen N. (2004). Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 5:4−10. DOI:10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s05

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Stanke M., Keller O., Gunduz I., et al. (2006). AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:W435−439. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkl200

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Birney E., Clamp M. and Durbin R. (2004). GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14:988−995. DOI:10.1101/gr.1865504

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Haas B. J., Salzberg S. L., Zhu W., et al. (2008). Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol. 9:R7. DOI:10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Buchfink B., Xie C. and Huson D. H. (2015). Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12:59−60. DOI:10.1038/nmeth.3176

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Wang Y., Tang H., Debarry J. D., et al. (2012). MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e49. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkr1293

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Emms D. M. and Kelly S. (2019). OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20:238. DOI:10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., et al. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403−410. DOI:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Rokas A. (2011). Phylogenetic analysis of protein sequence data using the Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAXML) Program. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 96:19.11.1−19.11.14. DOI:10.1002/0471142727.mb1911s96

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Yang Z. and Rannala B. (2006). Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:212−226. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msj024

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Yang Z. (2007). PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1586−1591. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msm088

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Horton R., Wilming L., Rand V., et al. (2004). Gene map of the extended human MHC. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5:889−899. DOI:10.1038/nrg1489

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Fukami-Kobayashi K., Shiina T., Anzai T., et al. (2005). Genomic evolution of MHC class I region in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:9230−9234. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0500770102

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Martelossi J., Nicolini F., Subacchi S., et al. (2023). Multiple and diversified transposon lineages contribute to early and recent bivalve genome evolution. BMC Biol. 21:145. DOI:10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Wong L. H. and Tremethick D. J. (2024). Multifunctional histone variants in genome function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 26:82−104. DOI:10.1038/s41576-024-00759-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Cassandri M., Smirnov A., Novelli F., et al. (2017). Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discov. 3:17071. DOI:10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.71

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Rogers L. W., Koehler A. M., Crouch J. A., et al. (2022). Comparative genomic analysis reveals contraction of gene families with putative roles in pathogenesis in the fungal boxwood pathogens Calonectria henricotiae and C. pseudonaviculata. BMC Ecol. Evol. 22:79. DOI:10.1186/s12862-022-02035-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Demuth J. P. and Hahn M. W. (2009). The life and death of gene families. Bioessays 31:29−39. DOI:10.1002/bies.080085

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Freitas L. and Nery M. F. (2020). Expansions and contractions in gene families of independently-evolved blood-feeding insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 20:87. DOI:10.1186/s12862-020-01650-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Fabrizius A., Hoff M. L., Engler G., et al. (2016). When the brain goes diving: Transcriptome analysis reveals a reduced aerobic energy metabolism and increased stress proteins in the seal brain. BMC Genomics 17:583. DOI:10.1186/s12864-016-2892-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Mazzatenta A., Bondi D., Di Giulio C., et al. (2022). Olfactory response to altitude hypoxia: A pilot study during a Himalayan trek. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1375:55−61. DOI:10.1007/5584_2021_679

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Lu T. (2023). The High-altitude adaptation mechanism of Vulpes in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. (Northeast Forestry University). DOI: 10.27009/d.cnki.gdblu.2023.000021

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [55] Kishida T., Thewissen J., Hayakawa T., et al. (2015). Aquatic adaptation and the evolution of smell and taste in whales. Zoological Lett. 1:9. DOI:10.1186/s40851-014-0002-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Browning J. L., Ngam-ek A., Lawton P., et al. (1993). Lymphotoxin beta, a novel member of the TNF family that forms a heteromeric complex with lymphotoxin on the cell surface. Cell 72:847−856. DOI:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90574-a

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Browning J. L., Androlewicz M. J. and Ware C. F. (1991). Lymphotoxin and an associated 33-kDa glycoprotein are expressed on the surface of an activated human T cell hybridoma. J. Immunol. 147:1230−1237. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.147.4.1230

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Dahmer M. K., Cornell T. and Quasney M. W. (2016). Genetic and epigenetic factors in the regulation of the immune response. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 28:281−286. DOI:10.1097/mop.0000000000000356

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Nguyen K. H., Le N. V., Nguyen P. H., et al. (2025). Human immune system: Exploring diversity across individuals and populations. Heliyon 11:e41836. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41836

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Mehta S. and Jeffrey K. L. (2015). Beyond receptors and signaling: Epigenetic factors in the regulation of innate immunity. Immunol. Cell Biol. 93:233−244. DOI:10.1038/icb.2014.101

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Abeler-Dörner L., Swamy M., Williams G., et al. (2012). Butyrophilins: An emerging family of immune regulators. Trends Immunol. 33:34−41. DOI:10.1016/j.it.2011.09.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Hatakeyama S. (2017). TRIM family proteins: Roles in autophagy, immunity, and carcinogenesis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 42:297-311. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2017.01.002

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [63] Zou J., Niu K., Lu T., et al. (2024). The multifunction of TRIM26: From immune regulation to oncology. Protein Pept. Lett. 31:424−436. DOI:10.2174/0109298665311516240621114519

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Liu D., Liu J., Xie P., et al. (2026). Comparative genomics and population resequencing elucidate streamlined immune adaptations to aquatic environments in cetaceans. The Innovation Life 4:100245. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2026.100245
    Liu D., Liu J., Xie P., et al. (2026). Comparative genomics and population resequencing elucidate streamlined immune adaptations to aquatic environments in cetaceans. The Innovation Life 4:100245. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2026.100245

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(7)     Tables(1)

Supplementary Information

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(1078) PDF downloads(348)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint