Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

Unprecedented v-shaped [SeO2E] units stabilized in KM[Se2O5]2[SeO2] (M= Al and Ga) constructed by nanoconfinement strategy

More Information
  • Corresponding author: yuhw@email.tjut.edu.cn
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. The first [SeO2]-type selenite, KM[Se2O5]2[SeO2] (M= Al, Ga) were synthesized.

      The strong polarization of [SeO2] largely improves second harmonic generation and birefringence of selenite.

      KM[Se2O5]2[SeO2] exhibit excellent properties and are promising NLO crystals.

      Unprecedented [SeO2] units bring selenites structural chemistry into a new era.

  • Pyramidal [SeO3E]2- (E being a lone pair) selenite units with stereochemically active lone pairs (SCALP) have been widely used for the design of nonlinear optical (NLO) materials with large second harmonic generation (SHG) response. However, compared with the sp3 hybridization pyramidal [SeO3E]2- units, primitive V-shaped sp2 hybridization [SeO2E] units containing not only SCALP but also the delocalized π-electrons are more conducive to excellent NLO performances. But up to now, no crystalline selenites containing V-shaped [SeO2E] groups have been reported because of the fact when the acid SeO2 gaseous molecule reacts with a basic oxide molecule, the V-shaped [SeO2E] unit typically transforms into the pyramidal [SeO3E]2- units. Herein, through constructing three-dimension (3D) ordered electrically-neutral nanopores in K-Al/Ga-Se-O framework to ‘adsorb’ SeO2 gaseous molecule, the first selenites containing the [SeO2E] units, KGa[Se2O5]2[SeO2] (I) and KAl[Se2O5]2[SeO2] (II) were designed and synthesized successfully. Theoretical calculations and experimental results indicate that they both exhibit excellent NLO properties, including the largest SHG response ((I)~10.2×KDP, (II)~11.5×KDP) and birefringence (Δn(I)=0.196@546 nm; Δn(II)=0.208@546 nm) in selenites that have no d0 transition metal (TM) and other stereochemically active lone pair cations, suggesting their immense potential as NLO crystals.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Halasyamani P. S. (2004). Asymmetric cation coordination in oxide materials: Influence of lone-pair cations on the intra-octahedral distortion in d0 transition metals. Chem. Mater. 16:3586−3592. DOI:10.1021/cm049297g

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Parrish K. A., Salij A., Kamp K. R., et al. (2025). Differential absorption of circularly polarized light by a centrosymmetric crystal. Science. 388:1194−1197. DOI:10.1126/science.adr5478

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Dong X., Huang L., Hu C., et al. (2019). CsSbF2SO4: An excellent ultraviolet nonlinear optical sulfate with a KTiOPO4 (KTP)-type structure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 85:6528−6534. DOI:10.1002/anie.201900637

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Wang L., Wang H., Sun Q., et al. (2025). Prismatic crystal field stabilized divalent rare-earth chalcogenide REIIBII6CIII6QVI16 with bifunctionality. Innov. Mater. 3:100118. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2024.100118

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Deng Y., Huang L., Dong X., et al. (2020). K2Sb(P2O7)F: Cairo Pentagonal layer with bifunctional genes reveal optical performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59:21151−21156. DOI:10.1002/ange.202009441

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Dong X., Huang L. and Zou G. (2025). Rational design and controlled synthesis of high-performance inorganic short-wave UV nonlinear optical materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 58:150−162. DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.4c0070

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Li P., Mao J. and Kong F. (2023). Pb2(SeO3)(SiF6): the first selenite fluorosilicate with a wide bandgap and large birefringence achieved through perfluorinated group modification. Mater. Today. Phys. 37:101197. DOI:10.1039/d4sc01376j

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Li P., Hu C., Mao J., et al. (2024). Old tree blossoms anew: research progress on the structures and optical properties of ultraviolet selenites. Coord. Chem. Rev. 517:216000. DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216000

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Kong F., Sun C., Yang B., et al. (2012). Structure-Property Relationships in Non-Linear Optical Crystals I (Springer Berlin).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [10] Li P., Hu C., Kong F., et al. (2023). The first UV nonlinear optical selenite material: Fluorination control in CaYF(SeO3)2 and Y3F(SeO3)4. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62:e202301420. DOI:10.1002/anie.202301420

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Shi S., Lin C., Yang G., et al. (2022). A2Bi2(SeO3)3F2 (A = K and Rb): Excellent mid-infrared nonlinear optical materials with both strong SHG responses and large band gaps. Chem. Mater. 32:7958−7964. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02837

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Shang M. and Halasyamani P. S. (2020). Mixed-valent selenium compounds: Noncentrosymmetric Cd3(SeO3)2(SeO4) and Hg3(SeO3)2(SeO4) and centrosymmetric Pb2(SeO3)(SeO4). J. Solid. State. Chem. 286:121292. DOI:10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121292

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Wang X., Li X., Hu C., et al. (2019). Ag4Hg(SeO3)2(SeO4): A novel SHG material created in mixed valent selenium oxides by in situ synthesis. Sci. China. Mater. 62:1821−1830. DOI:10.1007/s40843-019-1193-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Li P., Hu C., Li B., et al. (2023). Y(HSeO3)(SeO3)(H2O)·(H2O) and Y2(SeO3)2(SeO4)(H2O)2·(H2O)0.75: Two yttrium selenites with a short UV cut-off edge explored from pure selenite compounds. J. Alloys. Compd. 959:170570. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170570.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [15] Takeo H., Hirota E. and Morino Y. (1972). Third-order potential constants and dipole moment of SeO2 by microwave spectroscopy. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 41:420−422. DOI:10.1016/0022-2852(72)90216-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Hastie J. W., Hauge R. and Margrave J. L. (1969). Infra-red spectra and geometry of SO2 and SeO2 in rare gas matrices. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 31:281−289. DOI:10.1016/0022-1902(69)80471-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Ozin G. A. and Voet A. V. (1971). Matrix raman spectra, molecular structure and vibrational analysts of SeO2 and (SeO2)2. J. Mol. Struct. 10:173−182. DOI:10.1016/0022-2860(71)87075-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Ye N., Chen Q., Wu B., et al. (1998). Searching for new nonlinear optical materials on the basis of the anionic group theory. J. Appl. Phys. 84:555−558. DOI:10.1063/1.368060

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Tian Y., Zeng W., Dong X., et al. (2024). Enhanced UV Nonlinear Optical Properties in Layered germanous phosphites through functional group sequential construction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63:e202409093. DOI:10.1002/anie.202409093

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Bang S. E. and Ok K. M. (2015). Structure-directing effect of alkali metal cations in new molybdenum selenites, Na2Mo2O5(SeO3)2, K2Mo2O5(SeO3)2, and Rb2Mo3O7(SeO3)3. Inorg. Chem. 54:8832−8839. DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01588

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Chung J., Jo H., Yeon S., et al. (2020). Bi3(SeO3)3(Se2O5)F: A polar bismuth selenite fluoride with polyhedra of highly distortive lone pair cations and strong second-harmonic generation response. Chem. Mater. 32:7318−7326. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02167

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Lee D. W. and Ok K. M. (2013). New alkali-metal gallium selenites, AGa(SeO3)2 (A = Li, Na, K, and Cs): Effect of cation size on the framework structures and macroscopic centricities. Inorg. Chem. 52:5176−5184. DOI:10.1021/ic400458a

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Park G. and OK K. M. (2020). Hexagonal tungsten oxides with large bandgaps synthesized by a chemical substitution method. Inorg. Chem. Front. 7:4469−4476. DOI:10.1039/D0QI01056A

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Zhang J., Yu H., Hu Z., et al. (2023). A selenite containing unusual [Ga2F(Se2O5)4(HSeO3)2]5- clusters with the polarization ‘lighted’ by F anions. Mater. Today. Phys. 35:101145. DOI:10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101145

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Shen C., Mei D., Sun C., et al. (2017). Hydrothermal synthesis and crystal structures of Na2Be3(SeO3)4·H2O and Cs2[Mg(H2O)6]3(SeO3)4. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 643:1082−1087. DOI:10.1002/zaac.201700078

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Lee D. W. and Ok K. M. (2013). New selenites: Hydrothermal syntheses, crystal structures, and characterization of Rb3HGa2(OH)2(SeO3)4, Rb3Ga5(SeO3)8(HSeO3)2·0.5H2O, and RbGa(SeO3)2·H2O. Inorg. Chem. 52:10080-10086. DOI:10.1021/ic4013894.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [27] Geng L., Meng C. and Lu H. (2020). Hydrogen-bond-assisted alignment of [MCu(SeO3)4Cl(H2O)]4− (M = Fe, Ga) Anionic Layers to Form Two Polar Oxychlorides: Pb2MCu(SeO3)4Cl(H2O). Inorg. Chem. 60:831−839. DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02868

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Muñoz-Santiburcio D. and Marx D. (2021). Confinement-controlled aqueous chemistry within nanometric slit pores. Chem. Rev. 121:6293−6320. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01292

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Sheldrick G. M. (2008). A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 64:112−122. DOI:10.1107/S0108767307043930

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Spek A. L. (2003). Single-crystal structure validation with the program PLATON. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36:7−13. DOI:10.1107/S0021889802022112

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Kurtz S. K. and Perry T. T. (1968). A powder technique for the evaluation of nonlinear optical materials. J. Appl. Phy. 39:3798−3813. DOI:10.1063/1.1656857

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Clark S. J., Segall M. D., Pickard C. J., et al. (2009). First principles methods using CASTEP Zeitschrift fur Krist. 220:567-570. DOI:10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [33] Payne M. C., Teter M. P., Allan D. C., et al. (1992). Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total-energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients. Rev. Mod. Phy. 64:1045−1097. DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.1045

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Rappe A. M., Rabe K. M. and Kaxiras E. (1990). Optimized pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B. 41:1227−1230. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1227

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Lin J., Qteish A. and Payne M. C. (1993). Optimized and ttransferable nonlocal separable ab initio pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B. 47:4174−4180. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.47.4174

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Monkhorst H. J. and Pack J. D. (1976). Special points for brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 13:5188−5192. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Wu H., Wei Z., Hu Z., et al. (2024). Assembly of π-conjugated [B3O6] units by mer-isomer [YO3F3] octahedra to design a UV nonlinear optical material, Cs2YB3O6F2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63:e202406318. DOI:10.1002/anie.202406318

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Crystal data of KGa[Se2O5]2[SeO2]: Space group is P212121, a= 6.475(2) Å, b= 8.818(3) Å, c= 21.274(9) Å, V= 1214.7(8) Å3, Z=4; Crystal data of KAl[Se2O5]2[SeO2]: Space group is P212121, a= 6.3910(6) Å, b= 8.7850(8) Å, c= 21.2137(16) Å, V= 1191.04(18) Å3, Z=4. Deposition number 2390041 (for KGa[Se2O5]2[SeO2]) and 2390042 (for KAl[Se2O5]2[SeO2]) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service. K. Stahl, A. J. Galy, Z. Kristallogr. (1992). 209:99-107.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [39] Konings R. J. M., Booij A. and Kovács A. (1998). The infrared spectra of SeO2 and TeO2 in the gas phase. Chem. Phys. Lett. 292:447−453. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00689-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Christoph P., Jens L., Brown I.D., et al. (1999). Long-range coulomb forces and localized bonds. Acta. Cryst. 55:698−711. DOI:10.1107/S0108768199003961

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Liu B., Jiang X., Pei S., et al. (2021). Balanced infrared nonlinear optical performance achieved by modulating the covalency and ionicity distributions in the electron localization function map. Mater. Horiz. 8:3394−3398. DOI:10.1039/D1MH01434J

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Zhao J., Zhang P., Yuan T., et al. (2023). Modulation of *CHxO adsorption to facilitate electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4 over Cu-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145:6622−6627. DOI:10.1021/jacs.2c12006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Song Z., Liu X., He L., et al. (2015). Complementary method to locate atomic coordinates by combined searching method of structure-sensitive indexes based on bond valence method. Chin. Phys. B. 24:106101. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/24/10/106101

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Tawfik A. S. (2022). Chapter 2 - Adsorption technology and surface science. Interface Sci. Technol. 34:39−64. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-849876-7.00006-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Nespolo M., Aroyo M. and Souvignier B. (2018). Crystallographic shelves: Space-group hierarchy explained. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51:1481−1491. DOI:10.1107/S1600576718012724

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Fecher G. H., Kübler J. and Felser C. (2022). Chirality in the solid state: Chiral crystal structures in chiral and achiral space groups. Materials 15:5812. DOI:10.3390/ma15175812

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Nespolo M. and Benahsene A. H. (2021). Symmetry and chirality in crystals, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 54:1594−1599. DOI:10.1107/S1600576721009109

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Frost R. L. and Keeffe E. C. (2008). Raman spectroscopic study of the schmiederite Pb2Cu2[(OH)4|SeO3|SeO4]. J. Raman. Spectrosc. 39: 1408-1412. DOI:10.1002/jrs.2012.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [49] Frost R. L., Čejka J., Scholz R., et al. (2014). Vibrational spectroscopic study of the uranyl selenite mineral derriksite Cu4UO2(SeO3)2(OH)6·H2O. Spectrochim. Acta. Part. A. 117:473−477. DOI:10.1016/j.saa.2013.08.026

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Ding S., Ren H., Li H., et al. (2021). raman spectrum, thermal properties, and laser damage threshold of Y3Sc2Ga3O12 single crystal. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32:1616−1622. DOI:10.1007/s10854-020-04930-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Simmons E. L. (1975). Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: A comparison of the theories. Appl. Opt. 16:1380−1386. DOI:10.1364/AO.14.001380

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Liu S., Liu X., Zhao S., et al. (2020). Exceptional peroxide birefringent material resulting from d–π interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59:9414−9417. DOI:10.1002/anie.202002828

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Sørensen B. E. (2013). A revised Michel-Lévy interference colour chart based on first-principles calculations. Eur. J. Mineral. 25:5−10. DOI:10.1127/0935-1221/2013/0025-2252

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Zhang J., Wang Q., Chen C., et al. (2018). RbSe3B2O9(OH) and CsSe3B2O9(OH): one dimensional boroselenite-based anionic frameworks with second harmonic generation properties. Dalton. Trans. 47:5764−5770. DOI:10.1039/C8DT00390D

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Wang Y., Dong X., Huang L., et al. (2024). Two short-wave UV beryllium selenites exhibiting diverse optical properties stemming from functional group arrangements. Inorg. Chem. 63:10854−10859. DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c01611

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Ren J., Chen Y., Ren L., et al. (2023). Hg3(SeO3)2(SO4): A UV nonlinear optical mercury selenite sulfate constructed by neat [Hg6O8(SeO3)4] layers and SO4 tetrahedra. Inorg. Chem. 62:9130−9138. DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00986

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Bai Z., Lee J., Kim H., et al. (2023). A rare-earth selenite with unexpectedly well-balanced ultraviolet nonlinear optical functionality, Sc(HSeO3)3. Small. 19:2370134. DOI:10.1002/smll.202207709

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Li P., Gong Y., Hu C., et al. (2023). Four UV transparent linear and nonlinear optical materials explored from pure selenite compounds. Adv. Opt. Mater. 12:2301426. DOI:10.1002/adom.202301426

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Zhang X., Wang X., Hu C., et al. (2024). UV-transparent SHG material explored in an alkali metal sulfate selenite system. Inorg. Chem. 63:6067−6074. DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c00405

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Wu C., Li L., Lin L., et al. (2020). Gd(NO3)(Se2O5)·3H2O: A nitrate–selenite nonlinear optical material with a short ultraviolet cutoffedge. Dalton. Trans. 49:3253−3259. DOI:10.1039/D0DT00116C

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Li P., Hu C., Mao J., et al. (2024). A UV non-hydrogen pure selenite nonlinear optical material for achieving balanced properties through framework-optimized structural transformation. Mater. Horiz. 11:1704−1709. DOI:10.1039/D3MH01790G

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Li Q., Zheng Y., Wu H., et al. (2024). Reticular chemistry-aided effective design of new second-order nonlinear optical selenites. Mater. Horiz. 11:6435−6442. DOI:10.1039/D4MH01043D

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Wu C., Jiang X., Lin L., et al. (2020). AGa3F6(SeO3)2 (A = Rb, Cs): A new type of phase-matchable hexagonal tungsten oxide material with strong second-harmonic generation responses. Chem. Mater. 32:6906−6915. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01971

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Wu H., Yu H., Yang Z., et al. (2013). Designing a deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical material with a large second harmonic generation response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135:4215−4218. DOI:10.1021/ja400500m

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Zheng Y., Li Q., Wu H., et al. (2025). Unprecedented v-shaped [SeO2E] units stabilized in KM[Se2O5]2[SeO2] (M= Al and Ga) constructed by nanoconfinement strategy. The Innovation Materials 3:100160. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2025.100160
    Zheng Y., Li Q., Wu H., et al. (2025). Unprecedented v-shaped [SeO2E] units stabilized in KM[Se2O5]2[SeO2] (M= Al and Ga) constructed by nanoconfinement strategy. The Innovation Materials 3:100160. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2025.100160

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(6)     Tables(1)

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(2419) PDF downloads(2145)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint