Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access     Cite

Challenges and potential solutions for the global optimization of "Offshore Wind Energy — Multi-Marine Resources" integration system in the Beibu Gulf of Guangxi

More Information
  • Corresponding author: han.arkey@sjtu.edu.cn
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Beibu Gulf aims to integrate offshore wind energy with multi-marine resource development.

      Accurate resource forecasting, global optimization, and resilience enhancement are essential for system success.

      Develop supply-storage-consumption integration to balance efficiency, cost, and stability of energy output.

      Assess typhoon resilience to safeguard the system against extreme weather impacts.

  • The development of a national energy base and modern energy system in the Beibu Gulf of Guangxi requires an innovative energy system. General energy system only consists of a single marine energy resource, this work introduces an "Offshore Wind Energy—Multi-Marine Resources" integration system, which distinctively centers on offshore wind power while incorporating seawater hydrogen production, pumped storage, seawater desalination, marine aquaculture, and other marine resource utilization complexes. Its potential challenges during its future construction and potential solutions for the global optimization that need to be addressed are as follows: 1) creating a high-precision wind speed prediction model across multiple scales; 2) developing a global optimization model for the system under multiple uncertainties; and 3) proposing a resilience assessment method for systems subjected to unconventional external shocks. This integration system can contribute to the comprehensive development of marine resources and the establishment of a national comprehensive energy base in Guangxi Province and around the world.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Region T.P.s.G.o.G.Z.A. (2023). Guangxi's Three-Year Action Plan for Vigorously Developing the Seaward Economy and Building a Strong Marine Zone (2023-2025).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [2] Hu H., Hu Z., Zhong K., et al. (2020). Long-term offshore wind power prediction using spatiotemporal kriging: A case study in China’s Guangdong Province. Energy Explor. Exploit. 38:703−722. DOI:10.1177/0144598719889368

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [3] Bodini N., Hu W., Optis M., et al. (2021). Assessing boundary condition and parametric uncertainty in numerical-weather-prediction-modeled, long-term offshore wind speed through machine learning and analog ensemble. Wind Energ. Sci. 6:1363−1377. DOI:10.5194/wes-6-1363-2021

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [4] Neshat M., Nezhad M.M., Abbasnejad E., et al. (2021). A deep learning-based evolutionary model for short-term wind speed forecasting: A case study of the Lillgrund offshore wind farm. Energy Conver. Manag. 236:114002. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114002

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [5] Xu X., Hu S., Shi P., et al. (2023). Natural phase space reconstruction-based broad learning system for short-term wind speed prediction: Case studies of an offshore wind farm. Energy 262:125342. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125342

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [6] Hall M.M., and Bryden H.L. (1982). Direct estimates and mechanisms of ocean heat transport. Deep-Sea Res. I 29(3):339-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(82)90099-1

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [7] L. Bryden H., and Imawaki S. (2001). Chapter 6.1 Ocean heat transport. In International Geophysics. G. Siedler, J. Church, and J. Gould, eds. (Academic Press). pp:455-474. DOI:10.1016/S0074-6142(01)80134-0

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [8] Kudryavtsev V.N. (1994). The coupling of wind and internal waves: modulation and friction mechanisms. J. Fluid Mech. 278:33−62. DOI:10.1017/S0022112094003605

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Cimarelli A., Romoli F., and Stalio E. (2023). On wind–wave interaction phenomena at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 956:A13. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2023.4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Hunt J.C.R. (1999). Environmental forecasting and turbulence modeling. Physica D 133:270-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00117-7

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [11] Ross B.B. (1986). An Overview of Numerical Weather Prediction. In Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting. P.S. Ray, ed. (American Meteorological Society). pp:720-751. DOI:10.1007/978-1-935704-20-1_30

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [12] Al-Yahyai S., Charabi Y. and Gastli A. (2010). Review of the use of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Models for wind energy assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14:3192−3198. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Saima H., Jaafar J., Belhaouari S., et al. (2011). Intelligent methods for weather forecasting: A review. 2011 National Postgraduate Conference.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [14] Jain H. and Jain R. (2017). Big data in weather forecasting: Applications and challenges. 2017 International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Computational Intelligence (ICBDAC). DOI: 10.1109/ICBDACI.2017.8070824

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [15] Fathi M., Haghi Kashani M., Jameii S.M., et al. (2022). Big Data Analytics in Weather Forecasting: A Systematic Review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 29:1247−1275. DOI:10.1007/s11831-021-09616-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [16] Mohandes M.A., Rehman S. and Halawani T.O. (1998). A neural networks approach for wind speed prediction. Renew. Energy 13:345-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00001-9

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [17] Chen Y., Dong Z., Wang Y., et al. (2021). Short-term wind speed predicting framework based on EEMD-GA-LSTM method under large scaled wind history. Energy Conver. Manag. 227:113559. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113559

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [18] Chen L., Zhong X., Zhang F., et al. (2023). FuXi: a cascade machine learning forecasting system for 15-day global weather forecast. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 6. DOI:10.1038/s41612-023-00512-1

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [19] Shu Z.R., Li Q.S., He Y.C., and Chan P.W. (2016). Observations of offshore wind characteristics by Doppler-LiDAR for wind energy applications. Appl. Energy 169:150−163. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.135

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [20] Gottschall J., Gribben B., Stein D., et al. (2017). Floating lidar as an advanced offshore wind speed measurement technique: current technology status and gap analysis in regard to full maturity. WIREs Energy Environ. 6:e250. DOI:10.1002/wene.250

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [21] Thielicke W., Hübert W., Müller U., et al. (2021). Towards accurate and practical drone-based wind measurements with an ultrasonic anemometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 14:1303−1318. DOI:10.5194/amt-14-1303-2021

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [22] Hasager C.B. (2014). Offshore winds mapped from satellite remote sensing. WIREs Energy Environ. 3:594−603. DOI:10.1002/wene.123

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [23] Nezhad M.M., Neshat M., Heydari A., et al. (2021). A new methodology for offshore wind speed assessment integrating Sentinel-1, ERA-Interim and in-situ measurement. Renew. Energy 172:1301−1313. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.026

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [24] Dinh V.N., Leahy P., McKeogh E., et al. (2021). Development of a viability assessment model for hydrogen production from dedicated offshore wind farms. Int. J. Hydro. Energy 46:24620−24631. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.232

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [25] Schär S., Bischi A., Baccioli A., et al. (2023). Optimization of sustainable seawater desalination: Modeling renewable energy integration and energy storage concepts. Energy Conver. Manag. 293:117447. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117447

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [26] Ferreira J.G., Sequeira A., Hawkins A.J.S., et al. (2009). Analysis of coastal and offshore aquaculture: Application of the FARM model to multiple systems and shellfish species. Aquaculture 28932-41. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.12.017

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [27] Palmer S.C.J., Barillé L., Kay S., et al. (2021). Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) growth modelling and indicators for offshore aquaculture in Europe under climate change uncertainty. Aquaculture 532:736116. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736116

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [28] Morro B., Davidson K., Adams T.P., et al. (2022). Offshore aquaculture of finfish: Big expectations at sea. Reviews in Aquaculture 14:791−815. DOI:10.1111/raq.12625

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [29] Yu S.E., Dong S.L., Zhang Z.X., et al. (2022). Mapping the potential for offshore aquaculture of salmonids in the Yellow Sea. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 4:329−342. DOI:10.1007/s42995-022-00141-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [30] Blonbou R., Monjoly S. and Dorville J.F. (2011). An adaptive short-term prediction scheme for wind energy storage management. Energy Conver. Manag. 52:2412−2416. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2011.01.013

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [31] Kou P., Gao F. and Guan X. (2015). Stochastic predictive control of battery energy storage for wind farm dispatching: Using probabilistic wind power forecasts. Renew. Energy 80:286−300. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [32] Zhu Y., Tong Q., Yan X., et al. (2020). Optimal design of multi-energy complementary power generation system considering fossil energy scarcity coefficient under uncertainty. J. Clean. Product. 274:12273. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12273

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [33] Shafiullah G.M., M.T. Oo A., Shawkat Ali A.B.M., et al. (2013). Potential challenges of integrating large-scale wind energy into the power grid–A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 20:306−321. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.057

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Liu Z., Liu B., Ding X., et al. (2022). Research on optimization of energy storage regulation model considering wind–solar and multi-energy complementary intermittent energy interconnection. Energy Rep. 8:490−501. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.062

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [35] Ren Y., Yao X., Liu D., et al. (2022). Optimal design of hydro-wind-PV multi-energy complementary systems considering smooth power output. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 50:101832. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101832

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [36] Han D. and Lee J.H. (2021). Two-stage stochastic programming formulation for optimal design and operation of multi-microgrid system using data-based modeling of renewable energy sources. Appl. Energy 291:116830. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116830

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [37] Yan R., Wang J., Lu S., et al. (2021). Multi-objective two-stage adaptive robust planning method for an integrated energy system considering load uncertainty. Energy Build. 235:110741. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110741

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [38] Hu W., Dong Y., Zhang L., et al. (2023). Research on Complementarity of Multi-Energy Power Systems: A Review. iEnergy 2:275−283. DOI:10.23919/ien.2023.0042

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Zhao Y., Yuan H., Zhang Z., et al. (2024). Performance analysis and multi-objective optimization of the offshore renewable energy powered integrated energy supply system. Energy Conver. Manag. 304:118232. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118232

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [40] Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Tan, J., et al. (2022). Capacity configuration optimization of multi-energy system integrating wind turbine/photovoltaic/hydrogen/battery. Energy 252:124046. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124046

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [41] de Souza Nascimento M.M., Shadman M., Silva C., et al. (2022). Offshore wind and solar complementarity in Brazil: A theoretical and technical potential assessment. Energy Conver. Manag. 270:116194. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116194

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [42] Li P., Lian J., Ma C., et al. (2023). Complementarity and development potential assessment of offshore wind and solar resources in China seas. Energy Conver. Manag. 296:117705. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117705

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [43] Wu Y. and Zhang T. (2021). Risk assessment of offshore wave-wind-solar-compressed air energy storage power plant through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model. Energy 223:120057. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120057

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [44] Lucas T.R., Ferreira A.F., Santos Pereira R.B., et al. (2022). Hydrogen production from the WindFloat Atlantic offshore wind farm: A techno-economic analysis. Appl. Energy 310:118481. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118481

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [45] Raou A., Tecchio S., Pezy J.P., et al. (2017). Benthic and fish aggregation inside an offshore wind farm: Which effects on the trophic web functioning. Ecolog. Indicat. 72:33−46. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.037

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [46] Li D. and Cai W. (2021). Optimal configuration of photovoltaic energy storage capacity for large power users. Energy Rep. 7:468−478. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.015

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [47] Zhang Y., Lian J., Ma C., et al. (2020). Optimal sizing of the grid-connected hybrid system integrating hydropower, photovoltaic, and wind considering cascade reservoir connection and photovoltaic-wind complementarity. J. Clean. Product. 274:123100. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123100

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [48] Yang H., Li M., Jiang Z., et al. (2020). Multi-Time Scale Optimal Scheduling of Regional Integrated Energy Systems Considering Integrated Demand Response. IEEE Access 8:5080−5090. DOI:10.1109/access.2019.2963463

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [49] Zhang Y., Liu Y., Shu S., et al. (2021). A data-driven distributionally robust optimization model for multi-energy coupled system considering the temporal-spatial correlation and distribution uncertainty of renewable energy sources. Energy 216:119171. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119171

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [50] Zhang Y., Le J., Zheng F., et al. (2019). Two-stage distributionally robust coordinated scheduling for gas-electricity integrated energy system considering wind power uncertainty and reserve capacity configuration. Renew. Energy 135:122−135. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.094

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [51] Wang Y., and Liu J. (2023). Optimal capacity allocation of wind-light-water multi-energy complementary capacity based on improved multi-objective optimization algorithm. Front. Energy Res. 10:1115769. DOI:10.3389/fenrg.2022.1115769

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [52] Hou H., Wang Z., Chen Y., et al. (2023). Multi-stage hybrid energy management strategy for reducing energy abandonment and load losses among multiple microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Sys. 148:108773. DOI:10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108773

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [53] Lu Z., Gao Y., Xu C., et al. (2023). Configuration optimization of an off-grid multi-energy microgrid based on modified NSGA-II and order relation-TODIM considering uncertainties of renewable energy and load. J. Clean. Product. 383:135312. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135312

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [54] Mentes A. and Turan O. (2019). A new resilient risk management model for Offshore Wind Turbine maintenance. Safety Sci. 119:360−374. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.022

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [55] Velarde J., Kramhøf C. and Sørensen J.D. (2019). Global sensitivity analysis of offshore wind turbine foundation fatigue loads. Renew. Energy 140:177−189. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.055

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [56] Gatzert N. and Kosub T. (2016). Risks and risk management of renewable energy projects: The case of onshore and offshore wind parks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60:982−998. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.103

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [57] Sun C. and Jahangiri V. (2019). Fatigue damage mitigation of offshore wind turbines under real wind and wave conditions. Eng. Struct. 178:472−483. DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.053

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [58] Chen X., Li C and Xu J. (2015). Failure investigation on a coastal wind farm damaged by super typhoon: A forensic engineering study. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynam. 147:132−142. DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2015.10.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [59] Khiyami A., Owens A., Doufene A., et al. (2017). Assessment of Resilience in Desalination Infrastructure Using Semi-Markov Models. Complex Systems Design & Management. G. Fanmuy, E. Goubault, D. Krob, and F. Stephan, eds. (Springer International Publishing). DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-49103-5_10

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [60] Durán O., Aguilar J. and Capaldo A. (2021). Evaluating maintenance strategies using a resilience index in a seawater desalination plant. Desalination 500:114855. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2020.114855

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [61] El-Kady A.H., Amin M.T., Khan F., et al. (2024). Identification and assessment of risk factors in offshore wind-integrated hydrogen production system. Int. J. Hydro. Energy 52:1312−1332. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.184

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [62] Kumar S., Arzaghi E., Baalisampang T., et al. (2024). A risk-based multi-criteria decision-making framework for offshore green hydrogen system developments: Pathways for utilizing existing and new infrastructure. Sustain. Product. Consumpt. 46:655−678. DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.03.020

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [63] Zhao H. and Hao X. (2024). Risk assessment of offshore wind power hydrogen production based on spherical fuzzy set and cumulative prospect theory - TOPSIS. Int. J. Hydro. Energy 73:475−489. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.015

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [64] Zhao Y.P., Yang H., Bi C.W., et al. (2019). Hydrodynamic responses of longline aquaculture facility with lantern nets in waves. Aquacult. Eng. 86:101996. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2019.101996

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [65] Liu H.F., Bi C.W. and Zhao Y.P. (2020). Experimental and numerical study of the hydrodynamic characteristics of a semisubmersible aquaculture facility in waves. Ocean Eng. 214:107714. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107714

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [66] Rickard G. (2020). Three-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling of tidal flows interacting with aquaculture fish cages. J. Fluids Struct. 93:102871. DOI:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102871

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [67] Ma C., Zhao Y.P. and Bi C.W. (2022). Numerical study on hydrodynamic responses of a single-point moored vessel-shaped floating aquaculture platform in waves. Aquacult. Eng. 96:102216. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2021.102216

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [68] Lagrange A., de Simón-Martín M., González-Martínez A., et al. (2020). Sustainable microgrids with energy storage as a means to increase power resilience in critical facilities: An application to a hospital. Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Sys. 119:105865. DOI:10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105865

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [69] Nazemi M., Moeini-Aghtaie M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad M., et al. (2020). Energy Storage Planning for Enhanced Resilience of Power Distribution Networks Against Earthquakes. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 11:795−806. DOI:10.1109/TSTE.2019.2907613

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [70] Huang W., Zhang X., Li K., et al. (2022). Resilience Oriented Planning of Urban Multi-Energy Systems With Generalized Energy Storage Sources. IEEE Tran. Power Sys. 37:2906−2918. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3123074

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Sinha Y. and Steel J.A. (2015). A progressive study into offshore wind farm maintenance optimisation using risk based failure analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42:735−742. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.087

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [72] Cheng M.Y., Wu Y.F., Wu Y.W., et al. (2019). Fuzzy Bayesian schedule risk network for offshore wind turbine installation. Ocean Eng. 188:106238. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106238

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [73] Lotfi R., Gharehbaghi A., Mehrjardi M.S., et al. (2023). A robust, resilience multi-criteria decision-making with risk approach: a case study for renewable energy location. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 30:43267−43278. DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-25223-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [74] Mou J., Jia X., Chen P., et al. (2021). Research on Operation Safety of Offshore Wind Farms. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9:881. DOI:10.3390/jmse9080881

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Torres F.S., Kulev N., Skobiej B., et al. (2020). Indicator-based Safety and Security Assessment of Offshore Wind Farms. 2020 Resilience Week (RWS). DOI:10.1109/RWS50334.2020.9241287

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [76] Göçmen T., Laan P.v.d., Réthoré P.E., et al. (2016). Wind turbine wake models developed at the technical university of Denmark: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60:752−769. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.113

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [77] Tian L., Zhu W., Shen W., et al. (2017). Prediction of multi-wake problems using an improved Jensen wake model. Renew. Energy 102:457−469. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.065

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [78] Ti Z., Deng X.W. and Yang H. (2020). Wake modeling of wind turbines using machine learning. Appl. Energy 257:114025. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114025

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [79] Zi-li L., Da H. and Chun-yang J. (2016). High frequency radar observation of wind field over Beibu gulf during typhoon Usagi. 2016 IEEE Adv. Inform. Manag. Commun. Elect. Auto. Control Conference (IMCEC).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [80] Kong H., Zhang Q., Du Y., et al. (2020). Characteristics of Coastal Low-Level Jets Over Beibu Gulf, China, During the Early Warm Season. J. Geophys. Res. A 125:e2019JD031918. DOI:10.1029/2019JD031918

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [81] Chen X., Foley A., Zhang Z., et al. (2020). An assessment of wind energy potential in the Beibu Gulf considering the energy demands of the Beibu Gulf Economic Rim. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 119:109605. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2019.10960

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [82] Cavazzi S. and Dutton A.G. (2016). An Offshore Wind Energy Geographic Information System (OWE-GIS) for assessment of the UK's offshore wind energy potential. Renew. Energy 87:212−228. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.021

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [83] Díaz H. and Guedes Soares C. (2020). An integrated GIS approach for site selection of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic continental European coastline. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 134:110328. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110328

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [84] Aasim S.S.N. and Mohapatra A. (2019). Repeated wavelet transform based ARIMA model for very short-term wind speed forecasting. Renew. Energy 136:758−768. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.031

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [85] Jiang Y., Song Z. and Kusiak A. (2013). Very short-term wind speed forecasting with Bayesian structural break model. Renew. Energy 50:637−647. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.041

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [86] García I., Huo S., Prado R., et al. (2020). Dynamic Bayesian temporal modeling and forecasting of short-term wind measurements. Renew. Energy 161:55−64. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.182

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [87] Chen Y., Wan Y., Dong Z., et al. (2021). 2-D regional short-term wind speed forecast based on CNN-LSTM deep learning model. Energy Conver. Manag. 244:114451. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114451

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [88] Li J., Song Z., Wang X., et al. (2022). A novel offshore wind farm typhoon wind speed prediction model based on PSO–Bi-LSTM improved by VMD. Energy 251:123848. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123848

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [89] Dragomiretskiy K., and Zosso D. (2014). Variational Mode Decomposition. IEEE Tran. Signal Process. 62:531−544. DOI:10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] Yu Y., Si X., Hu C., et al. (2019). A Review of Recurrent Neural Networks: LSTM Cells and Network Architectures. Neural Comput. 31:1235−1270. DOI:10.1162/neco_a_01199

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Mirjalili, S. (2019). Genetic Algorithm. Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks: Theory and Applications. S. Mirjalili, ed. (Springer International Publishing) pp:43-55. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-93025-1_4

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [92] Gabrielli P., Fürer F., Mavromatidis G., et al. (2019). Robust and optimal design of multi-energy systems with seasonal storage through uncertainty analysis. Appl. Energy 238:1192−1210. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.064

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [93] Mavromatidis G., Orehouni K. and Carmeliet J. (2018). Design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty: A two-stage stochastic programming approach. Appl. Energy 222:932−950. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.019

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [94] Li R., Guo S., Yang Y., et al. (2020). Optimal sizing of wind/ concentrated solar plant/ electric heater hybrid renewable energy system based on two-stage stochastic programming. Energy 209:118472. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118472

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [95] Wang M., Yu H., Lin X., et al. (2020). Comparing stochastic programming with posteriori approach for multi-objective optimization of distributed energy systems under uncertainty. Energy 210:118571. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118571

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [96] Wang M., Jing R., Zhang H., et al. (2018). An innovative Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) based Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) system with performance simulation and multi-objective optimization. Appl. Thermal Eng. 145:743−754. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.075

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [97] Xu C., Ke Y., Li Y., et al. (2020). Data-driven configuration optimization of an off-grid wind/PV/hydrogen system based on modified NSGA-II and CRITIC-TOPSIS. Energy Conver. Manag. 215:112892. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112892

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [98] Al-Shahri O.A., Ismail F.B., Hannan M.A., et al. (2021). Solar photovoltaic energy optimization methods, challenges and issues: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Product. 284:125465. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125465

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [99] Cha D.H. and Wang Y. (2013). A Dynamical Initialization Scheme for Real-Time Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones Using the WRF Model. Mon. Weather Rev. 141:964−986. DOI:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00077.1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [100] Islam T., Srivastava P.K., Rico-Ramirez M.A., et al. (2015). Tracking a tropical cyclone through WRF–ARW simulation and sensitivity of model physics. Natur. Haz. 76:1473−1495. DOI:10.1007/s11069-014-1494-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [101] Jiang G.Q., Xu J. and Wei J. (2018). A Deep Learning Algorithm of Neural Network for the Parameterization of Typhoon-Ocean Feedback in Typhoon Forecast Models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45:3706−3716. DOI:10.1002/2018GL077004

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [102] Chen R., Wang X., Zhang W., et al. (2019). A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for typhoon formation forecasting. Geo. Inf. 2:375−396. DOI:10.1007/s10707-019-00355-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [103] Chen R., Zhang W. and Wang X. (2020). Machine Learning in Tropical Cyclone Forecast Modeling: A Review. Atmos. 11:676. DOI:10.3390/atmos11070676

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [104] Ou S.H., Lia J.M., Hsu T.W., et al. (2002). Simulating typhoon waves by SWAN wave model in coastal waters of Taiwan. Ocean Eng. 29:947−971. DOI:10.1016/S0029-8018(01)00049-X

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [105] Hs T.W., Liau J.M., Lin J.G., et al. (2011). Sequential assimilation in the wind wave model for simulations of typhoon events around Taiwan Island. Ocean Eng. 38:456−467. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.11.023

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

    [106] Utsunomiya T., Sato I., Yoshida S., et al. (2013). Dynamic Response Analysis of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine During Severe Typhoon Event. ASME 2013 32nd Int. Conf. Ocean, Offshore Arctic Eng. DOI:10.1115/OMAE2013-10618

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [107] Ma Z., Li W., Ren N., et al. (2017). The typhoon effect on the aerodynamic performance of a floating offshore wind turbine. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2:279−287. DOI:10.1016/j.joes.2017.09.004

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

  • Cite this article:

    Fan T., Yang H., Liang Q., et al. (2025). Challenges and potential solutions for the global optimization of 'Offshore Wind Energy — Multi-Marine Resources' integration system in the Beibu Gulf of Guangxi. The Innovation Energy 2:100073. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100073
    Fan T., Yang H., Liang Q., et al. (2025). Challenges and potential solutions for the global optimization of "Offshore Wind Energy — Multi-Marine Resources" integration system in the Beibu Gulf of Guangxi. The Innovation Energy 2:100073. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100073

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(7)     Tables(1)

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(6167) PDF downloads(2116)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint