Chemical looping combustion: Advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and challenges

Haibo Zhao; Ying Li; Xi Chen; Jinchen Ma; Chaohe Zheng; Xianyu Liu; Lulu Li

doi:10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100118

The Innovation Energy > 2025 Vol. 2 > No. 4 > 100118

Next Article Previous Article

REVIEW Open Access

Cite PDF

Chemical looping combustion: Advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and challenges

1.
State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

More Information

Corresponding author: hzhao@mail.hust.edu.cn
Received Date: January 13, 2025

Accepted Date: June 23, 2025

Published Online: October 11, 2025

The Innovation Energy 2(4), https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100118 | Cite this article

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

DownLoad: Full size image

PUBLIC SUMMARY

PUBLIC SUMMARY
1. Chemical looping combustion (CLC) offers inherent CO2 capture and cascade energy utilization.
  
  Key challenges include cost-performance balance of oxygen carriers and reactor optimization.
  
  Commercialization is hindered by operational complexities and efficiency gaps.
  
  Advancing CLC requires cost-effective oxygen carriers and standardized reactor designs.

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

Chemical looping combustion (CLC) has garnered significant attention for its inherent CO₂ separation and efficient energy utilization, making it a leading low-energy CO₂ capture technology. Despite substantial progress, from studies on oxygen carriers (OCs) to pilot-scale applications, further research is essential for commercial deployment. This review examines the current status of CLC, highlighting its advantages, disadvantages, unresolved challenges, and opportunities. Key challenges include balancing OC cost and performance, optimizing heat and mass transfer, accelerating rate-limiting reactions, and improving reactor design and operation. The analysis reveals that while CLC demonstrates promising efficiency and scalability, its full commercialization is hindered by operational complexities and efficiency gaps. To advance CLC, this study recommends prioritizing the development of cost-effective, high-performance OCs and standardized reactor design methodologies through interdisciplinary collaboration and advanced computational tools.
- Chemical looping combustion /
- CCUS /
- Reactor /
- Oxygen carriers /
- CO₂ capture

FullText(HTML)

REFERENCES

[1]	BP Energy Outlook 2022 n.d.:57. View in Article Google Scholar
[2]	Exploring Clean Energy Pathways: The role of CO₂ storage n.d.:105. View in Article Google Scholar
[3]	Li K., Shen S., Fan J.L., et al. (2022). The role of carbon capture, utilization and storage in realizing China’s carbon neutrality: A source-sink matching analysis for existing coal-fired power plants. Res. Conserv. Recycl. 178:106070. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106070 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	Jawdekar T.A., Kudva I.K., Gun S., et al. (2025). Metal ferrite derivative chemical looping systems: a review towards a multiscale approach for technology readiness enabling clean energy conversion and carbon neutrality. Chem. Sci. 16:4971−4991. DOI:10.1039/D4SC05865H View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	Palone O., Cedola L., Borello D., et al. (2024). Decarbonizing power and fuels production by chemical looping processes: Systematic review and future perspectives. Appl. Therm. Eng. 254:123844. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123844 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	Pugsley T. (2025). Fluidized bed applications and modern scale‐up tools for the energy transition. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 103:1494−1501. DOI:10.1002/cjce.25420 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	Luo S., Zeng L. and Fan L.S. (2015). Chemical Looping Technology: Oxygen Carrier Characteristics. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 6:53−75. DOI:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040334 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	Daneshmand-Jahromi S., Sedghkerdar M.H. and Mahinpey N. (2023). A review of chemical looping combustion technology: Fundamentals, and development of natural, industrial waste, and synthetic oxygen carriers. Fuel 341:127626. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127626 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	Mattisson T., Keller M., Linderholm C., et al. (2018). Chemical-looping technologies using circulating fluidized bed systems: Status of development. Fuel Process. Technol. 172:1−12. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.016 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	Song T. and Shen L. (2018). Review of reactor for chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 76:92−110. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.06.004 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	Adánez J. and Abad A. (2019). Chemical-looping combustion: Status and research needs. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37:4303−4317. DOI:10.1016/j.proci.2018.09.002 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	Adánez J., Abad A., Mendiara T., et al. (2018). Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 65:6−66. DOI:10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.005 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	Zhu X., Imtiaz Q., Donat F., et al. (2020). Chemical looping beyond combustion–a perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 13:772−804. DOI:10.1039/c9ee03793d View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	Chen S., Pei C., Fu D., et al. (2024). Chemical looping for upgrading light alkanes: oxygen carriers, reaction kinetics, and reactor design. Sci. China Chem. 67. DOI: 10.1007/s11426-024-2365-9. View in Article Google Scholar
[15]	Lin Y., Wang H., Fang S., et al. (2022). Chemical looping combustion of lignite using iron ore: C-gas products (CO₂, CO, CH₄) and NO_x emissions. Energy 256:124602. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124602 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[16]	Xiang D., Li P. and Xia Y. (2023). Conceptual design and techno-economic analysis of a novel propane dehydrogenation process integrated with chemical looping combustion and CO₂ hydrogenation. Energy Convers. Manag. 281:116820. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116820 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	Pankhedkar N., Sartape R., Singh M.R., et al. (2024). System-level feasibility analysis of a novel chemical looping combustion integrated with electrochemical CO₂ reduction. Sustain. Energy Fuels. 8:3688−3703. DOI:10.1039/D4SE00770K View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[18]	Ruthwik N., Kavya D., Shadab A., et al. (2020). Thermodynamic analysis of chemical looping combustion integrated oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene with CO₂. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 153:107959. DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2020.107959 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[19]	Yan J., Wang S., Hu B., et al. (2024). Review of chemical looping technology for energy conservation and utilization: CO₂ capture and energy cascade utilization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 12:112602. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2024.112602 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	Sedighpour A., Khoshbakhti Saray R., Mirmasoumi S., et al. (2024). Optimization of a combined gas turbine and steam Rankine cycle utilizing the chemical looping combustion (CLC) reactor for CO₂ capture and storage: Towards enhanced efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Fuel 371:132015. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132015 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	Lin X., Liu Y., Song H., et al. (2023). Concept design, parameter analysis, and thermodynamic evaluation of a novel integrated gasification chemical-looping combustion combined cycle power generation system. Energy Convers. Manag. 279:116768. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116768 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[22]	Lane H. (1913). Process for the production of hydrogen. U.S. Patent, No. 1078686. View in Article Google Scholar
[23]	Lewis W. K., Gilliland E. R. (1954). Production of pure carbon dioxide. U.S. Patent, No. 2665972. View in Article Google Scholar
[24]	Richter H. J. and Knoche K. F. (1983). Reversibility of combustion processes. ACS Symp. Ser. 235:71−85. DOI:10.1021/bk-1983-0235.ch003 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	Ishida M., Zheng D., Akehata T. (1987). Evaluation of a chemical-looping-combustion power-generation system by graphic exergy analysis. Energy 12:147−154. DOI:10.1016/0360-5442(87)90119-8 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	Ishida M. and Jin H. (1994). A new advanced power-generation system using chemical-looping combustion. Energy 19:415−422. DOI:10.1016/0360-5442(94)90120-1 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	Lyngfelt A., Leckner B. and Mattisson T. (2001). A fluidized-bed combustion process with inherent CO₂ separation; application of chemical-looping combustion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56:3101−3113. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00007-0 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	Lyngfelt A., Kronberger B., Adanez J., et al. (2004). Design and operation of a 10 kW chemical-looping combustor. Proceed. 7th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol. :115-123. DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50013-6. View in Article Google Scholar
[29]	Noorman S., van Sint Annaland M. and Kuipers. (2007). Packed bed reactor technology for chemical-looping combustion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46:4212−4220. DOI:10.1021/ie061178i View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[30]	Dahl I.M., Bakken E., Larring Y., et al. (2009). On the development of novel reactor concepts for chemical looping combustion. Energy Procedia. 1:1513−1519. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.198 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[31]	Adanez J., Abad A., Garcia-Labiano F., et al. (2012). Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog. Energ. Combust. 38:215−282. DOI:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[32]	Cuadrat A., Abad A., García-Labiano F., et al. (2012). Relevance of the coal rank on the performance of the in situ gasification chemical-looping combustion. Chem. Eng. J. 195–196:91–102. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.052. View in Article Google Scholar
[33]	Shen Z. and Huang Z. (2018). High-efficiency and pollution-controlling in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion system by using CO₂ instead of steam as gasification agent. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26:2368−1376. DOI:10.1016/j.cjche.2018.03.016 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[34]	Mattisson T., Lyngfelt A. and Leion H. (2009). Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 3:11−19. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.002 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	Czakiert T., Krzywanski J., Zylka A., et al. (2022). Chemical looping combustion: A brief overview. Energies 15:1563. DOI:10.3390/en15041563 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[36]	Mohammad M. H. and Hugo I. L. (2008). Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO₂ separations—a review. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63:4433−4451. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.028 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[37]	Li Y., Liu J., Liu F., et al. (2022). Influence of doping Al on the reactivity performance of Cu–Fe spinel-type oxygen carrier during chemical-looping combustion. J. Energy Inst. 105:25−32. DOI:10.1016/j.joei.2022.07.014 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[38]	Seo B., Lyu J., Son N., et al. (2023). Enhanced oxygen transfer rate of chemical looping combustion through lattice expansion on CuMn₂O₄ oxygen carrier. Sustain. Energy Fuels. 7:5422−5432. DOI:10.1039/D3SE01159C View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[39]	Liu F., Fang R., Liu J., et al. (2022). Insight into the synergy effect on the improved reactivity of spinel NiMn₂O₄ oxygen carrier in chemical looping combustion. Fuel 313:122680. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122680 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[40]	Wang B., Cai Z., Li H., et al. (2022). Reaction characteristics investigation of CeO₂-enhanced CaSO₄ oxygen carrier with lignite. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 42:319−328. DOI:10.1016/j.cjche.2021.02.016 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[41]	Dawa T. and Sajjadi B. (2024). Exploring the potential of perovskite structures for chemical looping technology: A state-of-the-art review. Fuel Process. Technol. 253:108022. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2023.108022 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[42]	Lyngfelt A., Moldenhauer P., Biermann M., et al. (2023). Operational experiences of chemical-looping combustion with 18 manganese ores in a 300W unit. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 127:103937. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103937 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[43]	Lin Y., Wang H., Fang S., et al. (2022). Chemical looping combustion of lignite using iron ore modified by foreign ions: Alkaline-earth and transition metal ions. Fuel 327:125079. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125079 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[44]	Mao J., Wei Y., Li Z., et al. (2024). Enhanced performance of red mud oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion via tandem reactions. Energy 309:133148. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133148 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[45]	Elgarni M.M., Tijani M.M. and Mahinpey N. (2022). Characterization, kinetics and stability studies of NiO and CuO supported by Al₂O₃, ZrO₂, CeO₂ and their combinations in chemical combustion. Catal. Today. 397:205−219. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2021.09.035 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[46]	Ma Z., Lu Y. and Liu G. (2022). Enhanced cyclic redox reactivity of Fe₂O₃/Al₂O₃ by Sr doping for Chemical-Looping combustion of solid fuels. Fuel 324:124625. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124625 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[47]	Ksepko E. and Lysowski R. (2023). Effective direct chemical looping coal combustion using bimetallic Ti-supported Fe₂O₃-MnO₂ oxygen carriers. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 13:575−592. DOI:10.1002/ghg.2223 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[48]	Liu Y., Long Y., Tang Y., et al. (2019). Effect of Preparation Method on the structural characteristics of NiO-ZrO₂ oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 35:1024−1031. DOI:10.1007/s40242-019-9189-z View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[49]	Xu K., Liu D., Feng L., et al. (2021). Mercury removal by Co₃O₄@TiO₂@Fe₂O₃ magnetic core-shell oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion. Fuel 306:121604. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121604 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[50]	Guan Y., Liu Y., Lin X., et al. (2022). Research progress and perspectives of solid fuels chemical looping reaction with Fe-based oxygen carriers. Energy Fuels 36:13956−13984. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c02802 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[51]	Mei D., Linderholm C. and Lyngfelt A. (2021). Performance of an oxy-polishing step in the 100 kW_th chemical looping combustion prototype. Chem. Eng. J. 409:128202. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.128202 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[52]	Mei D., Soleimanisalim A.H., Linderholm C., et al. (2021). Reactivity and lifetime assessment of an oxygen releasable manganese ore with biomass fuels in a 10 kW_th pilot rig for chemical looping combustion. Fuel Process. Technol. 215:106743. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106743 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[53]	Oliveira G.P. de, Adánez-Rubio I., Costa T.R. da, et al. (2025). Negative CO₂ emissions through iG-CLC of pinus residue in a continuous unit of 0.5 kW_th using a natural Mn-based oxygen carrier. Biomass Bioenergy. 195:107681. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107681. View in Article Google Scholar
[54]	Siriwardane R., Riley J., Benincosa W., et al. (2021). Development of CuFeMnAlO_4+δ oxygen carrier with high attrition resistance and 50-kW_th methane/air chemical looping combustion tests. Appl. Energy. 286:116507. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116507 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[55]	Benjamin F., Juraj P., Josef F., et al. (2023). Synthetic oxygen carrier C28 compared to natural ores for chemical looping combustion with solid fuels in 80 kW_th pilot plant experiments. Fuel 334:126816. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126816 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[56]	Dubey A. and Arora A. (2022). Advancements in carbon capture technologies: A review. J. Clean Prod. 373:133932. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133932 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[57]	Lyngfelt A. and Leckner B. (2015). A 1000 MW_th boiler for chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels – Discussion of design and costs. Appl. Energy. 157:475−487. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.057 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[58]	Rubin E.S., Davison J.E. and Herzog H.J. (2015). The cost of CO₂ capture and storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 40:378−400. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[59]	Zou X., Zhao H. and Zheng C. (2014). Techno-economic evaluation of chemical looping-based coal-fired power plant. Proceed. CSEE. 34:6286−6295. DOI:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.2014.35.005 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[60]	Gu H., Shen L., Xiao J., et al. (2012). Iron ore as oxygen carrier improved with potassium for chemical looping combustion of anthracite coal. Combust. Flame. 159:2480−2490. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.03.013 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[61]	Hong H., Jiang Q., Liu X., et al. (2020). Development of chemical looping combustion power systems at the Chinese academy of sciences. Energy Fuels 34:11791−11812. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02153 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[62]	Ye J., Wang Q., Wang Y., et al. (2020). Analysis of energy utilization efficiency of integrated energy system. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 546:022036. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/546/2/022036 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[63]	Jin H.G., Hong H., Wang B.Q., et al. (2005). A new principle of synthetic cascade utilization of chemical energy and physical energy. Sci. China. Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 48:163−179. DOI:10.1360/04ye0234 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[64]	Yan Q., Lu T., Luo J., et al. (2019). Exergy cascade release pathways and exergy efficiency analysis for typical indirect coal combustion processes. Combust. Theory. Model. 23:1134−1149. DOI:10.1080/13647830.2019.1639826 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[65]	Ryu J.Y., Mulholland J.A., Kim D.H., et al. (2005). Homologue and isomer patterns of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans from phenol precursors: Comparison with municipal waste incinerator data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39:4398−4406. DOI:10.1021/es048224v View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[66]	Stanmore B.R. (2004). The formation of dioxins in combustion systems. Combust. Flame 136:398−427. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.11.004 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[67]	Chen Z., Yang M., Lu S., et al. (2018). Evolution of PCDD/F-signatures during mechanochemical degradation in municipal solid waste incineration filter ash. Chemosphere. 208:176−184. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.161 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[68]	Yan M., Li X., Chen T., et al. (2010). Effect of temperature and oxygen on the formation of chlorobenzene as the indicator of PCDD/Fs. J. Environ. Sci. 22:1637−42. DOI:10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60300-4 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[69]	Ma H., Du N., Lin X., et al. (2018). Inhibition of element sulfur and calcium oxide on the formation of PCDD/Fs during co-combustion experiment of municipal solid waste. Sci. Total. Environ. 633:1263−1271. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.282 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[70]	Zhang H.J., Ni Y.W., Chen J.P., et al. (2008). Influence of variation in the operating conditions on PCDD/F distribution in a full-scale MSW incinerator. Chemosphere. 70:721−730. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.054 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[71]	Julien S., Brereton C.M.H., Lim C.J., et al. (1996). The effect of halides on emissions from circulating fluidized bed combustion of fossil fuels. Fuel 75:1655−1663. DOI:10.1016/S0016-2361(96)00135-4 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[72]	Wang K.S., Chiang K.Y., Lin S.M., et al. (1999). Effects of chlorides on emissions of hydrogen chloride formation in waste incineration. Chemosphere. 38:1571−1582. DOI:10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00377-4 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[73]	Gullett B.K., Bruce K.R., Beach L.O., et al. (1992). Mechanistic steps in the production of PCDD and PCDF during waste combustion. Chemosphere. 25:1387−1392. DOI:10.1016/0045-6535(92)90158-N View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[74]	Bi W., Zhao R., Chen T., et al. (2015). Study on the formation of PCDD/Fs in PVC chemical looping combustion. J. Fuel. Chem. Technol. 43:884−889. DOI:10.1016/S1872-5813(15)30026-8 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[75]	Hua X. and Wang W. (2015). Chemical looping combustion: A new low-dioxin energy conversion technology. J. Environ. Sci. 32:135−145. DOI:10.1016/j.jes.2014.09.044 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[76]	Wang J. and Zhao H. (2015). Chemical looping dechlorination through adsorbent-decorated Fe₂O₃/Al₂O₃ oxygen carriers. Combust. Flame. 162:3503−3515. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.06.008 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[77]	Zhao H. and Wang J. (2018). Chemical-looping combustion of plastic wastes for in situ inhibition of dioxins. Combust. Flame. 191:9−18. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.12.026 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[78]	Ishida M. and Jin H. (1996). A Novel Chemical-Looping Combustor without NO_x Formation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35:2469−2472. DOI:10.1021/ie950680s View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[79]	Ma J., Tian X., Wang C., et al. (2021). Fate of fuel-nitrogen during in situ gasification chemical looping combustion of coal. Fuel. Process. Technol. 215:106710. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106710 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[80]	Song T., Shen L., Xiao J., et al. (2012). Nitrogen transfer of fuel-N in chemical looping combustion. Combust. Flame. 159:1286−1295. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.10.024 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[81]	Song T., Shen T., Shen L., et al. (2013). Evaluation of hematite oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of coal. Fuel 104:244−252. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.030 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[82]	Pérez-Vega R., Adánez-Rubio I., Gayán P., et al. (2016). Sulphur, nitrogen and mercury emissions from coal combustion with CO₂ capture in chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU). Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 46:28−38. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.034 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[83]	Pérez-Astray A., Adánez-Rubio I., Mendiara T., et al. (2019). Comparative study of fuel-N and tar evolution in chemical looping combustion of biomass under both iG-CLC and CLOU modes. Fuel 236:598−607. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.003 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[84]	Pachler R.F., Penthor S., Mayer K., et al. (2020). Investigation of the fate of nitrogen in chemical looping combustion of gaseous fuels using two different oxygen carriers. Energy 195:116926. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.116926 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[85]	Granite E.J., Pennline H.W. and Senior C. (2014). Mercury Control: For Coal-Derived Gas Streams. DOI:10.1002/9783527658787. View in Article Google Scholar
[86]	Liu Z., Liu D., Zhao B., et al. (2020). Mercury removal based on adsorption and oxidation by fly ash: A review. Energy Fuels 34:11840−11866. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02209 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[87]	Ma J., Mei D., Tian X., et al. (2019). Fate of Mercury in volatiles and char during in situ gasification chemical-looping combustion of coal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53:7887−7892. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.8b06931 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[88]	Ni M., Liu D., Jin J., et al. (2020). Ranking oxygen carriers for elemental mercury oxidation in coal-fired chemical-looping combustion: A thermodynamic approach. Energy Fuels 34:2355−2365. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03829 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[89]	Wang L., Shen L., Long Y., et al. (2022). The behavior of organic sulfur species in fuel during chemical looping gasification. Environ. Pollut. 313:120165. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120165 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[90]	Mendiara T., Izquierdo M.T., Abad A., et al. (2014). Release of pollutant components in CLC of lignite. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 22:15−24. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.013 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[91]	Ma J., Mei D., Wang C., et al. (2021). Sulfur fate during in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion (iG-CLC) of coal. Chem. Eng. J. 406:126773. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126773 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[92]	Teyssié G., Leion H., Schwebel G.L., et al. (2011). Influence of lime addition to ilmenite in chemical-looping combustion (CLC) with solid fuels. Energy Fuels 25:3843−3853. DOI:10.1021/ef200623h View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[93]	Cuadrat A., Linderholm C., Abad A., et al. (2011). Influence of limestone addition in a 10 kW_th chemical-looping combustion unit operated with petcoke. Energy Fuels 25:4818−4828. DOI:10.1021/ef200806q View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[94]	Tian X., Wang K., Zhao H., et al. (2017). Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling of high-sulfur coal using copper ore as oxygen carrier. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36:3381−3388. DOI:10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.056 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[95]	Jiang H., Huo R., Zhang Z., et al. (2021). Removal of pollution from the chemical looping process: A mini review. Fuel Process. Technol. 221:106937. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106937 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[96]	Moldenhauer P., Rydén M., Mattisson T., et al. (2014). The use of ilmenite as oxygen carrier with kerosene in a 300 W CLC laboratory reactor with continuous circulation. Appl. Energy. 113:1846−1854. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.009 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[97]	Moldenhauer P., Rydén M., Mattisson T., et al. (2012). Chemical-looping combustion and chemical-looping reforming of kerosene in a circulating fluidized-bed 300 W laboratory reactor. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 9:1−9. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.015 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[98]	Moldenhauer P., Rydén M., Mattisson T., et al. (2012). Chemical-looping combustion and chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling of kerosene with Mn- and Cu-based oxygen carriers in a circulating fluidized-bed 300 W laboratory reactor. Fuel. Process Technol. 104:378−89. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.06.013 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[99]	García-Labiano F., de Diego L.F., García-Díez E., et al. (2017). Combustion and reforming of liquid fossil fuels through chemical looping processes: integration of chemical looping processes in a refinery. Energy Procedia. 114:325−333. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1174 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[100]	Serrano A., García-Labiano F., de Diego L.F., et al. (2017). Chemical looping combustion of liquid fossil fuels in a 1 kW_th unit using a Fe-based oxygen carrier. Fuel Process. Technol. 160:47−54. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.02.015 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[101]	de Diego L.F., Serrano A., García-Labiano F., et al. (2016). Bioethanol combustion with CO₂ capture in a 1 kW_th chemical looping combustion prototype: suitability of the oxygen carrier. Chem. Eng. J. 283:1405−1413. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.085 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[102]	Moldenhauer P., Rydén M., Mattisson T., et al. (2017). Chemical-looping combustion with heavy liquid fuels in a 10 kW pilot plant. Fuel Process Technol. 156:124−137. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.10.027 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[103]	Cuadrat A., Abad A., García-Labiano F., et al. (2012). Relevance of the coal rank on the performance of the in situ gasification chemical-looping combustion. Chem. Eng. J. 195–196:91–102. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.052. View in Article Google Scholar
[104]	Adánez-Rubio I., Abad A., Gayán P., et al. (2013). Performance of CLOU process in the combustion of different types of coal with CO₂ capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 12:430−440. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.025 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[105]	Abuelgasim S., Wang W., Abdalazeez A., et al. (2025). Performance of a novel CLOU oxygen carrier (CuO/ZrO₂/TiO₂/MgO) in the combustion of high-rank coal: Anthracite and bituminous. Fuel 380:133150. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133150 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[106]	Güleç F. and Okolie J.A. (2025). Chemical looping combustion of low-volatile semi-anthracite coal with Co-based metal oxide: Performances, kinetics, and mechanisms. J. Energy Inst. 119:101993. DOI:10.1016/j.joei.2025.101993 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[107]	Tsedenbal B., Kannari N., Sato K., et al. (2020). Effect of hydrogen sulfide on the combustion reactivity of ilmenite ores with coal volatiles under steam reforming. Energy Fuels 34:9862−9871. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01587 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[108]	Mendiara T., Gayán P., García-Labiano F., et al. (2017). Chemical looping combustion of biomass: an approach to BECCS. Energy Procedia. 114:6021−6029. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1737 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[109]	Hoteit A., Chandel M.K., Durécu S., et al. (2009). Biogas combustion in a chemical looping fluidized bed reactor. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 3:561−567. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.04.003 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[110]	Löfberg A., Kane T., Guerrero-Caballero J., et al. (2017). Chemical looping dry reforming of methane: toward shale-gas and biogas valorization. Chem. Eng. Process Process Intensif. 122:523−529. DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2017.05.003 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[111]	Mendiara T., García-Labiano F., Abad A., et al. (2018). Negative CO₂ emissions through the use of biofuels in chemical looping technology: A review. Appl. Energy 232:657−684. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.201 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[112]	Coppola A. and Scala F. (2021). Chemical looping for combustion of solid biomass: a review. Energy Fuels 35:19248−19265. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02600 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[113]	Jenkins B.M., Baxter L.L., Miles T.R., et al. (1998). Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol. 54:17−46. DOI:10.1016/S0378-3820(97)00059-3 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[114]	Adánez-Rubio I., Pérez-Astray A., Mendiara T., et al. (2018). Chemical looping combustion of biomass: CLOU experiments with a Cu-Mn mixed oxide. Fuel Process Technol. 172:179−186. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.12.010 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[115]	Adánez-Rubio I., Pérez-Astray A., Abad A., et al. (2019). Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: an advanced biomasscombustion technology to avoid CO₂ emissions. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change. 24:1293−1306. DOI:10.1007/s11027-019-9840-5 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[116]	Haus J., Lindmüller L., Dymala T., et al. (2020). Increasing the efficiency of chemical looping combustion of biomass by a dual-stage fuel reactor design to reduce carbon capture costs. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change. 25:969−986. DOI:10.1007/s11027-020-09917-2 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[117]	Jiang S., Shen L., Yan J., et al. (2018). Performance in coupled fluidized beds for chemical looping combustion of CO and biomass using hematite as an oxygen carrier. Energy Fuels 32:12721−12729. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02861 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[118]	Gogolev I., Soleimanisalim A.H., Linderholm C., et al. (2021). Commissioning, performance benchmarking, and investigation of alkali emissions in a 10 kW_th solid fuel chemical looping combustion pilot. Fuel 287:119530. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119530 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[119]	Yan J., Shen L., Ou Z., et al. (2019). Enhancing the performance of iron ore by introducing K and Na ions from biomass ashes in a CLC process. Energy 167:168−180. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.075 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[120]	Ohlemüller P., Ströhle J., Epple B. (2017). Chemical looping combustion of hard coal and torrefied biomass in a 1 MW_th pilot plant. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 65:149−159. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.08.013 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[121]	Berdugo Vilches T., Lind F., Rydén M., et al. (2017). Experience of more than 1000 h of operation with oxygen carriers and solid biomass at large scale. Appl. Energy 190:1174−1183. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.032 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[122]	Qasim M., Ayoub M., Ghazali N.A., et al. (2021). Recent advances and development of various oxygen carriers for the chemical looping combustion process: a review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60:8621−8641. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01111 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[123]	Abuelgasim S., Li T., Cao Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of modifying anti-sintering and oxygen uncoupling performance of CuO/TiO₂ by MgO addition: Novel oxygen carrier. Sep. Purif. Technol. 302:122136. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122136 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[124]	Kuang C., Wang S., Luo M., et al. (2020). Investigation of CuO-based oxygen carriers modified by three different ores in chemical looping combustion with solid fuels. Renew. Energy 154:937−948. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.027 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[125]	Ma Z., Liu G., Lu Y., et al. (2022). Redox performance of Fe₂O₃/Al₂O₃ oxygen carrier calcined at different temperature in chemical looping process. Fuel 310:122381. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122381 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[126]	Wang M., Liu J., Shen F., et al. (2016). Theoretical study of stability and reaction mechanism of CuO supported on ZrO₂ during chemical looping combustion. Appl. Surf. Sci. 367:485−492. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.240 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[127]	Li F., Sun Z., Luo S., et al. (2011). Ionic diffusion in the oxidation of iron-effect of support and its implications to chemical looping applications. Energy Environ Sci. 4:876−880. DOI:10.1039/C0EE00589D View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[128]	Gayán P., Forero C.R., Abad A., et al. (2011). Effect of support on the behavior of cu-based oxygen carriers during long-term CLC operation at temperatures above 1073 K. Energy Fuels 25:1316−1326. DOI:10.1021/ef101583w View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[129]	Cabello A., Gayán P., García-Labiano F., et al. (2016). On the attrition evaluation of oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion. Fuel Process Technol. 148:188−197. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.03.004 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[130]	Luo M., Qin Y., Cai J., et al. (2021). Sulfur release and migration characteristics in chemical looping combustion of high-sulfur coal. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 151:1−9. DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2021.05.004 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[131]	Wang K., Tian X., Zhao H. (2016). Sulfur behavior in chemical-looping combustion using a copper ore oxygen carrier. Appl. Energy. 166:84−95. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.011 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[132]	Cheng X., Gu Z., Li F., et al. (2021). Enhanced resistance to carbon deposition in chemical-looping combustion of methane: Synergistic effect of different oxygen carriers via sequence filling. Chem. Eng. J. 421:129776. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2021.129776 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[133]	Yan J., Shen T., Wang P., et al. (2021). Redox performance of manganese ore in a fluidized bed thermogravimetric analyzer for chemical looping combustion. Fuel 295:120564. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120564 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[134]	Shen T., Qin C., Song T., et al. (2025). Periodic abrasion and agglomeration development in hematite and ilmenite oxygen carriers: Long-Term redox cycling analysis via fluidized bed TGA. Fuel 381:133400. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133400 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[135]	Liu F., Song C., Zhu D., et al. (2023). Attrition and attrition-resistance of oxygen carrier in chemical looping process – A comprehensive review. Fuel 333:126304. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126304 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[136]	Gür T.M. (2022). Carbon dioxide emissions, capture, storage and utilization: review of materials, processes and technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 89:100965. DOI:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100965 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[137]	Shen T., Wang S., Yan J., et al. (2020). Performance improvement of chemical looping combustion with coal by optimizing operational strategies in a 3 kW_th interconnected fluidized bed. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 98:103060. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103060 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[138]	Liu L., Li Z., Li W., et al. (2019). The melting characteristics of Vietnamese ilmenite and manganese ores used in chemical looping combustion. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 90:102792. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102792 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[139]	Kazemifar F. (2022). A review of technologies for carbon capture, sequestration, and utilization: Cost, capacity, and technology readiness. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 12:200−230. DOI:10.1002/ghg.2131 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[140]	Figueroa J.D., Fout T., Plasynski S., et al. (2008). Advances in CO₂ capture technology—The U. S. Department of Energy’s Carbon Sequestration Program. Int. J. Greenh Gas Control. 2:9−20. DOI:10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00094-1 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[141]	Ekström C., Schwendig F., Biede O., et al. (2009). Techno-economic evaluations and benchmarking of pre-combustion CO₂ capture and oxy-fuel processes developed in the European ENCAP Project. Energy Procedia. 1:4233−4240. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.234 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[142]	Zhang F., Xu R. and Jiang P. (2022). Energy flow analysis on the full chain system of carbon dioxide capture and geothermal power generation. Nat. Gas Ind. 42:130−138. DOI:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.04.012 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[143]	Ogidiama O.V., Abu Zahra M. and Shamim T. (2018). Techno-economic analysis of a carbon capture chemical looping combustion power plant. J. Energy. Resour. Technol. 140:112004. DOI:10.1115/1.4040193 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[144]	Lyngfelt A. and Thunman H. (2005). Construction and 100 h of operational experience of a 10-kW chemical-looping combustor. CO2 Capture Stor. Deep Geol. Form. :625–645. DOI:10.1016/B978-008044570-0/50122-7. View in Article Google Scholar
[145]	Kronberger B., Johansson E., Löffler G., et al. (2004). A two-compartment fluidized bed reactor for CO₂ capture by chemical-looping combustion. Chem. Eng. Technol. 27:1318−1326. DOI:10.1002/ceat.200402137 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[146]	Ryu H.J., Jin G.T., Yi C.K. (2005). Demonstration of inherent CO₂ separation and no NO_x emission in a 50kW chemical-looping combustor: Continuous reduction and oxidation experiment. Greenh. Gas. Control. Technol.:1907–1910. DOI:10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50238-X. View in Article Google Scholar
[147]	Adánez J., Gayán P., Celaya J., et al. (2006). Chemical looping combustion in a 10 kW_th prototype using a CuO/Al₂O₃ oxygen carrier: effect of operating conditions on methane combustion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45:6075−6080. DOI:10.1021/ie060364l View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[148]	Bolhàr-Nordenkampf J., Pröll T., Kolbitsch P., et al. (2009). Performance of a NiO-based oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion and reforming in a 120 kW unit. Energy Procedia. 1:19−25. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.005 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[149]	Bischi A., Langørgen Ø., Saanum I., et al. (2011). Design study of a 150kW_th double loop circulating fluidized bed reactor system for chemical looping combustion with focus on industrial applicability and pressurization. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 5:467−474. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.09.005 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[150]	Berguerand N. and Lyngfelt A. (2008). Design and operation of a 10kW_th chemical-looping combustor for solid fuels – Testing with South African coal. Fuel 87:2713−2726. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2008.03.008 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[151]	Markström P., Linderholm C. and Lyngfelt A. (2013). Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels – Design and operation of a 100kW unit with bituminous coal. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 15:150−162. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.048 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[152]	Shen L., Wu J., Gao Z., et al. (2009). Reactivity deterioration of NiO/Al₂O₃ oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion of coal in a 10kW_th reactor. Combust. Flame 156:1377−1385. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.02.005 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[153]	Xiao R., Chen L., Saha C., et al. (2012). Pressurized chemical-looping combustion of coal using an iron ore as oxygen carrier in a pilot-scale unit. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 10:363−373. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.008 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[154]	Abad A., Pérez-Vega R., de Diego L.F., et al. (2015). Design and operation of a 50kW_th Chemical looping combustion (CLC) unit for solid fuels. Appl. Energy 157:295−303. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.094 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[155]	Thon A., Kramp M., Hartge E.U., et al. (2014). Operational experience with a system of coupled fluidized beds for chemical looping combustion of solid fuels using ilmenite as oxygen carrier. Appl. Energy. 118:309−317. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.023 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[156]	Ma J., Tian X., Wang C., et al. (2018). Performance of a 50 kWth coal-fuelled chemical looping combustor. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 75:98−106. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.05.002 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[157]	Ströhle J., Orth M. and Epple B. (2014). Design and operation of a 1MWth chemical looping plant. Appl. Energy. 113:1490−1495. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.008 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[158]	Iqbal A., Corinne B., Herbert A., et al. (2012). Alstom’s Chemical Looping Prototypes, Program Update. 37th Int. Tech. Conf. Clean Coal Fuel Sys. https://www.entek.chalmers.se/lyngfelt/co2/157_Iqbal_Alstom_Prototypes_Clearwater2012_FINAL.pdf. View in Article Google Scholar
[159]	Zhao H., Tian X., Ma J., et al. (2020). Chemical looping combustion of coal in china: comprehensive progress, remaining challenges, and potential opportunities. Energy Fuels 34:6696−6734. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00989 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[160]	Baek J.I., Choun M., Kim U., et al. (2022). The K-ClC Project: Development of 3 MW_th ClC steam generation system towards a clean power plant. SSRN Electron. J. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4282602. View in Article Google Scholar
[161]	Haugen N.E.L., Li Z., Gouraud V., et al. (2023). Building the world’s largest Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) unit. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 129:103975. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103975 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[162]	Li Z., Li W., Liu H., et al. (2024). Development and Prospect of Chemical Looping Combustion Technology in China. Proceed. CSE. 44:7200−7221. DOI:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.241370 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[163]	Hekmatmehr H., Esmaeili A., Pourmahdi M., et al. (2024). Carbon capture technologies: A review on technology readiness level. Fuel 363:130898. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130898 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[164]	Contractor R.M., Bergna H.E., Horowitz H.S., et al. (1988). Butane oxidation to maleic anhydride in a recirculating solids reactor. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 38:645−654. DOI:10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60694-7 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[165]	Neal L.M., Yusuf S., Sofranko J.A., et al. (2016). Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane: A chemical looping approach. Energy Technol. 4:1200−1208. DOI:10.1002/ente.201600074 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[166]	Garai M.H.S., Khosravi-Nikou M.R. and Shariat A. (2020). Chemical looping steam methane reforming via Ni-ferrite supported on cerium and zirconium oxides. Chem. Eng. Technol. 43:1813−1822. DOI:10.1002/ceat.202000054 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[167]	Damasceno S., Trindade F.J., Fonseca F.C., et al. (2022). Oxidative coupling of methane in chemical looping design. Fuel. Process. Technol. 231:107255. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107255 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[168]	Brady C., Debruyne Q., Majumder A., et al. (2021). An integrated methane dehydroaromatization and chemical looping process. Chem. Eng. J. 406:127168. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127168 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[169]	Chan M.S.C., Marek E., Scott S.A., et al. (2018). Chemical looping epoxidation. J. Catal. 359:1−7. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.12.030 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[170]	Kane T., Guerrero-Caballero J. and Löfberg A. (2020). H₂S chemical looping selective and preferential oxidation to sulfur by bulk V₂O₅. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 265:118566. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118566 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[171]	Ruan C., Wang X., Wang C., et al. (2022). Selective catalytic oxidation of ammonia to nitric oxide via chemical looping. Nat. Commun. 13:718. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-28370-0 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[172]	Li D., Xu R., Li X., et al. (2020). Chemical looping conversion of gaseous and liquid fuels for chemical production: A review. Energy Fuels 34:5381−5413. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01006 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[173]	Wang X., Su M. and Zhao H. (2021). Process design and exergy cost analysis of a chemical looping ammonia generation system using AlN/Al₂O₃ as a nitrogen carrier. Energy 230:120767. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120767 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[174]	Yang W., Zhao H., Wang K., et al. (2015). Synergistic effects of mixtures of iron ores and copper ores as oxygen carriers in chemical-looping combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35:2811−2818. DOI:10.1016/j.proci.2014.07.010 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[175]	Su Z., Wang Y., Du H., et al. (2020). Using copper ore and hematite fine particles as raw materials of an oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion of coal: Spray Drying granulation and performance evaluation. Energy Fuels 34:8587−8599. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01023 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[176]	Dong Y., Wang Y., Ma J., et al. (2021). Binary-ore oxygen carriers prepared by extrusion–spheronization method for chemical looping combustion of coal. Fuel Process. Technol. 221:106921. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106921 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[177]	Wu X., Dong Y., Ma J., et al. (2023). Industrial-scaled Cu-Fe composite oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion through extrusion-spheronization. Chem. Eng. J. 477:146620. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2023.146620 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[178]	Wang P., Bu H., Liu X., et al. (2024). Inexpensive composite copper ore/red mud oxygen carrier: Industrial granulation via hydroforming and multiple-cycle evaluation in chemical looping combustion. Fuel 365:131271. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131271 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[179]	Leion H., Larring Y., Bakken E., et al. (2009). Use of CaMn_0.875Ti_0.125O₃ as oxygen carrier in chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling. Energy Fuels 23:5276–5283. DOI:10.1021/ef900444d. View in Article Google Scholar
[180]	Liu L., Li Z., Li Z., et al. (2021). Heterogeneous reaction kinetics of a perovskite oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion coupled with oxygen uncoupling. Chem. Eng. J. 417:128054. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.128054 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[181]	Cabello A., Abad A., Gayán P., et al. (2021). Increasing energy efficiency in chemical looping combustion of methane by in-situ activation of perovskite-based oxygen carriers. Appl. Energy. 287:116557. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116557 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[182]	Liu L., Li Z., Wang Y., et al. (2022). Industry-scale production of a perovskite oxide as oxygen carrier material in chemical looping. Chem. Eng. J. 431:134006. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2021.134006 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[183]	Miao Z., Shen L., Li Z., et al. (2023). Sintering and agglomeration characteristics of industrially prepared CaMn_0.5Ti_0.375Fe_0.125O_3-δ perovskite oxygen carrier in chemical looping combustion. Chem. Eng. J. 472:144722. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2023.144722. View in Article Google Scholar
[184]	Wu X., Liu X., Zou G., et al. (2024). Design a novel Ca-Mn perovskite oxygen carrier with balanced performance in chemical looping combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 40:105645. DOI:10.1016/j.proci.2024.105645 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[185]	Yan Y., Mattisson T., Moldenhauer P., et al. (2020). Applying machine learning algorithms in estimating the performance of heterogeneous, multi-component materials as oxygen carriers for chemical-looping processes. Chem. Eng. J. 387:124072. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.124072 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[186]	Dennis J.S., Scott S.A. (2010). In situ gasification of a lignite coal and CO₂ separation using chemical looping with a Cu-based oxygen carrier. Fuel 89:1623−1640. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.019 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[187]	Chen H., Cheng M., Liu L., et al. (2020). Coal-fired chemical looping combustion coupled with a high-efficiency annular carbon stripper. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 93:102889. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102889 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[188]	Ma J., Zhao H., Tian X., et al. (2015). Chemical looping combustion of coal in a 5 kW_th interconnected fluidized bed reactor using hematite as oxygen carrier. Appl. Energy 157:304−313. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.124 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[189]	Yan J., Shen L., Jiang S., et al. (2017). Combustion performance of sewage sludge in a novel clc system with a two-stage fuel reactor. Energy Fuels 31:12570−12581. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02493 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[190]	Cheng M., Li Y., Li Z., et al. (2017). An integrated fuel reactor coupled with an annular carbon stripper for coal-fired chemical looping combustion. Powder. Technol. 320:519−529. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.063 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[191]	Chen X., Li R., Tao Y., et al. (2024). Engineering design and numerical design for chemical looping combustion reactor: A review. Energy Rev. 3:100100. DOI:10.1016/j.enrev.2024.100100 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[192]	Zheng C., Su M. and Zhao H. (2021). Identifying the contribution of rich-CO₂/H₂O gasification on the char conversion in typical atmospheres of chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling via single particle simulation. Combust. Flame. 229:111397. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111397 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[193]	Zheng C., Su M. and Zhao H. (2021). Char conversion characteristics in chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling via single particle simulation. Proceed. CSEE. 41:6331−6340. DOI:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.202038 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[194]	Bao J., Li Z. and Cai N. (2013). Promoting the reduction reactivity of ilmenite by introducing foreign ions in chemical looping combustion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:6119−6128. DOI:10.1021/ie400237p View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[195]	Abad A., Gayán P., de Diego L.F., et al. (2013). Fuel reactor modelling in chemical-looping combustion of coal: 1. model formulation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 87:277−293. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2012.10.006 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[196]	Abad A., Adánez J., Gayán P., et al. (2015). Conceptual design of a 100 MW_th CLC unit for solid fuel combustion. Appl. Energy 157:462−474. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.043 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[197]	Abad A., Gayán P., García-Labiano F., et al. (2022). Relevance of oxygen carrier properties on the design of a chemical looping combustion unit with gaseous fuels. Greenh. Gases. 13:125−143. DOI:10.1002/ghg.2170 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[198]	Parker J.M. (2014). CFD model for the simulation of chemical looping combustion. Powder. Technol. 265:47−53. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2014.01.027 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[199]	Reinking Z., Shim H.-S., Whitty K.J., et al. (2019). Computational simulation of a 100 kW dual circulating fluidized bed reactor processing coal by chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 90:102795. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102795 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[200]	Chen X., Ma J., Tian X., et al. (2019). Numerical investigation on the improvement of carbon conversion in a dual circulating fluidized bed reactor for chemical looping combustion of coal. Energy Fuels 33:12801−12813. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02963 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[201]	Zhu X., Shen T., Bollas G., et al. (2021). Design and operation of a multi-stage reactor system for chemical looping combustion process. Fuel. Process. Technol. 215:106748. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106748 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[202]	Konan N.A. and Huckaby E.D. (2021). CFD investigation of low-attrition air-reactor designs for the NETL chemical-looping combustion reactor. Powder. Technol. 391:142−156. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2021.06.010 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[203]	Chen X. and Zhao H. (2024). A self-consistent design method of the autothermal dual circulating fluidized bed reactor for in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion of coal. Carbon. Capture. Sci. T. 13:100292. DOI:10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100292 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[204]	Chen Xi. (2023). Multi-scale simulation and numerical design method for the reactor of chemical looping combustion. PhD thesis (Huazhong University of Science and Technology). View in Article Google Scholar
[205]	Chen X. and Zhao H. (2024). Numerical design in a two-step joint design process of parallel packed bed reactors for CLC of MSW-generated syngas. Chem. Eng. J. 499:156463. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.156463 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[206]	Chen X. and Zhao H. (2024). A phenomenological design method of the parallel packed bed reactors for chemical looping combustion of gas fuels. Chem. Eng. Sci. 292:119988. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2024.119988 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[207]	Cheng J. (2023). Design and numerical study of natural gas chemical looping combustion system. MEng thesis (Huazhong University of Science and Technology). View in Article Google Scholar
[208]	Tao Y., Chen X. and Zhao H. (2024). Order-reduced simulation and operational regulation of a 10 MW_th autothermal reactor for CH₄-fueled chemical looping combustion. Chem. Eng. J. 499:156314. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.156314 View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

Cited by

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Zhao H., Li Y., Chen X., et al. (2025). Chemical looping combustion: Advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and challenges. The Innovation Energy 2:100118. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100118

Zhao H., Li Y., Chen X., et al. (2025). Chemical looping combustion: Advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and challenges. The Innovation Energy 2:100118. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100118

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

PDF

Figures(9) Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(6355) PDF downloads(7162)

Chemical looping combustion: Advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and challenges

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

PUBLIC SUMMARY

ABSTRACT

REFERENCES

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Welcome!

Share

Article Metrics

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

{{newsColumn.name}}

Official Account

{{newsColumn.name}}

Stay connected

{{newsColumn.name}}

Chemical looping combustion: Advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and challenges

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

PUBLIC SUMMARY

ABSTRACT

REFERENCES

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Welcome!

Share

Article Metrics

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

{{newsColumn.name}}

Official Account

{{newsColumn.name}}

Stay connected

{{newsColumn.name}}