Seagrass restoration at the right time in the right site with right methods can generate persistent carbon benefits in China
-
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
DownLoad:
Full size image
-
PUBLIC SUMMARY
-
Zostera japonica beds have declined, and suitable habitats may contract under future climate change.
Remote sensing and habitat modelling identify vulnerable areas and guide restoration planning.
Site-specific strategies based on habitat, decline, and genetics improve restoration decisions.
Linking restoration priorities with blue carbon assessment supports coastal conservation and management.
-
-
ABSTRACT
Zostera japonica beds have declined substantially along the coast of China, highlighting the need for targeted and effective restoration planning. This study develops a restoration roadmap that supports China’s carbon neutrality goals by addressing three key questions: where restoration should occur, when it should be implemented, and which methods should be used. Field surveys, satellite remote sensing, genetic data, and species distribution modelling were integrated to identify restoration opportunities under current and future climate conditions. The results indicate that northern China, particularly the Bohai Sea region, contains the largest extent of suitable and persistent habitat, whereas several southern populations have experienced substantial bed degradation. A rule-based restoration decision framework combined seagrass bed decline and genetic diversity to recommend region-specific restoration strategies across the species range. The phased framework prioritizes areas suitable under current and 2050s conditions, particularly those projected to remain suitable by the 2100s, while treating areas becoming suitable mainly by the 2100s as long-term adaptive reserves. By the 2100s, approximately 103,371 ha of potential suitable habitat is projected, corresponding to an estimated potential carbon stock of 10.86 Tg C. These findings provide a spatially explicit framework for improving Z. japonica restoration planning and evaluating its potential long-term carbon benefits in China.-
Keywords:
- strategic /
- restoration/carbon /
- stock /
- survey/driving /
- factors/spatial /
- distribution /
- patterns
-
-
REFERENCES
[1] Liu Z., Deng Z., He G., et al. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3:141−155. DOI:10.1038/s43017-021-00244-x [2] Houghton R. A. (2007). Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35:313−347. DOI:10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057 [3] Luisetti T. (2021). Some countries donate blue carbon. Nat. Clim. Change 11:647−648. DOI:10.1038/s41558-021-01103-9 [4] Duarte C. M., Agusti S., Barbier E., et al. (2020). Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580:39−51. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2146-7 [5] Lu N., Tian H., Fu B., et al. (2022). Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Change 12:847−853. DOI:10.1038/s41558-022-01432-3 [6] Lu F., Hu H., Sun W., et al. (2018). Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115:4039−4044. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1700294115 [7] Yu Z., Ciais P., Piao S., et al. (2022). Forest expansion dominates China’s land carbon sink since 1980. Nat. Commun. 13:5374. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-32961-2 [8] Piao S., He Y., Wang X., et al. (2022). Estimation of China’s terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink: Methods, progress and prospects. Sci. China Earth Sci. 65:641−651. DOI:10.1007/s11430-021-9892-6 [9] Nelleman C., Corcoran E., Duarte C. M., et al. (2008). Blue carbon: The role of healthy oceans in binding carbon (UNEP/FAO/UNESCO/IUCN/CSIC), pp:1-78. DOI:10.1590/S0100-06832008000200014 [10] Macreadie P. I., Costa M. D. P., Atwood T. B., et al. (2021). Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2:826−839. DOI:10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1 [11] Falkowski P. G., Barber R. T. and Smetacek V. V. (1998). Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281:200−207. DOI:10.1126/science.281.5374.200 [12] Duarte C. M. (1995). Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes. Ophelia 41:87−112. DOI:10.1080/00785236.1995.10422039 [13] Chefaoui R. M., Duarte C. M. and Serrao E. A. (2018). Dramatic loss of seagrass habitat under projected climate change in the Mediterranean Sea. Global Change Biol. 24:4919−4928. DOI:10.1111/gcb.14401 [14] Duarte C. M., Kennedy H., Marbà N., et al. (2013). Assessing the capacity of seagrass meadows for carbon burial: Current limitations and future strategies. Ocean Coast. Manage. 83:32−38. DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.09.001 [15] Orth R. J., Lefcheck J. S., McGlathery K. S., et al. (2020). Restoration of seagrass habitat leads to rapid recovery of coastal ecosystem services. Sci. Adv. 6:eabc6434. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abc6434 [16] Unsworth R. K. F., Cullen-Unsworth L. C., Jones B. L. H., et al. (2022). The planetary role of seagrass conservation. Science 377:609−613. DOI:10.1126/science.abq6923 [17] Liu C., Liu G., Casazza M., et al. (2022). Current status and potential assessment of China’s ocean carbon sinks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56:6584−6595. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.1c08106 [18] Zhou Q. Q., Ke Y. H., Wang X. Y., et al. (2022). Developing seagrass index for long term monitoring of seagrass bed: A case study in Yellow River Delta, China. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 194:286−301. DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.10.011 [19] Fourqurean J. W., Duarte C. M., Kennedy H., et al. (2012). Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock. Nat. Geosci. 5:505−509. DOI:10.1038/ngeo1477 [20] Dunic J. C., Brown C. J., Connolly R. M., et al. (2021). Long‐term declines and recovery of meadow area across the world’s seagrass bioregions. Global Change Biol. 27:4096−4109. DOI:10.1111/gcb.15684 [21] Orth R. J., Moore K. A., Marion S. R., et al. (2012). Seed addition facilitates eelgrass recovery in a coastal bay system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 448:177−195. DOI:10.3354/meps09522 [22] Waycott M., Duarte C. M., Carruthers T. J., et al. (2009). Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:12377−12381. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0905620106 [23] Huang Y.-H., Lee C.-L., Chung C.-Y., et al. (2015). Carbon budgets of multispecies seagrass beds at Dongsha Island in the South China Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 106:92−102. DOI:10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.03.004 [24] Hu W. J., Zhang D. A., Chen B., et al. (2021). Mapping the seagrass conservation and restoration priorities: Coupling habitat suitability and anthropogenic pressures. Ecol. Indic. 129:107960. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107960 [25] Zhang X., Li Y. L., Kaldy J. E., et al. (2024). Population genetic patterns across the native and invasive range of a widely distributed seagrass: Phylogeographic structure, invasive history and conservation implications. Divers. Distrib. 30:1−18. DOI:10.1111/ddi.13803 [26] Zhang X., Lin H., Song X., et al. (2019). A unique meadow of the marine angiosperm Zostera japonica, covering a large area in the turbid intertidal Yellow River Delta, China. Sci. Total Environ. 686:118−130. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.320 [27] Huang X. P., Huang L. M., Li Y. H., et al. (2006). Main seagrass beds and threats to their habitats in the coastal sea of South China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 51:136−142. DOI:10.1007/s11434-006-9136-5 [28] Yue S., Zhou Y., Xu S., et al. (2021). Can the non-native salt marsh halophyte Spartina alterniflora threaten native seagrass (Zostera japonica) habitats. a case study in the Yellow River Delta, China. Front. Plant Sci. 12:643425. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.643425 [29] Hodoki Y., Ohbayashi K., Tanaka N., et al. (2013). Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Zostera japonica (Aschers. et Graebn.) for Seagrass Conservation in Brackish Lower Reaches of the Hii River System, Japan. Estuaries Coasts 36:127−134. DOI:10.1007/s12237-012-9564-1 [30] Lee S., Ma S., Lim Y., et al. (2004). Genetic diversity and its implications in the conservation of endangeredZostera japonica in Korea. J. Plant Biol. 47:275−281. DOI:10.1007/Bf03030519 [31] Hepburn C., Qi Y., Stern N., et al. (2021). Towards carbon neutrality and China's 14th Five-Year Plan: Clean energy transition, sustainable urban development, and investment priorities. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 8:100130. DOI:10.1016/j.ese.2021.100130 [32] Short F. T. and Coles R. G. (2001). Global seagrass research methods (Elsevier), pp:1-473. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-50891-1.X5000-2 [33] Hossain M. S., Bujang J. S., Zakaria M. H., et al. (2015). The application of remote sensing to seagrass ecosystems: an overview and future research prospects. Int. J. Remote Sens. 36:61−114. DOI:10.1080/01431161.2014.990649 [34] Phillips S. J., Anderson R. P. and Schapire R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190:231−259. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 [35] Elith J., Phillips S. J., Hastie T., et al. (2011). A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17:43−57. DOI:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x [36] Dormann C. F., Elith J., Bacher S., et al. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27−46. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x [37] Liang H., Wang L., Wang S., et al. (2023). Remote sensing detection of seagrass distribution in a marine lagoon (Swan Lake), China. Opt. Express 31:27677−27695. DOI:10.1364/OE.498901 [38] Tucker C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 8:127−150. DOI:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 [39] Xu H. Q. (2006). Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27:3025−3033. DOI:10.1080/01431160600589179 [40] Healey S. P., Cohen W. B., Yang Z. Q., et al. (2005). Comparison of tasseled cap-based landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sens. Environ. 97:301−310. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.009 [41] Somers B. and Asner G. P. (2013). Multi-temporal hyperspectral mixture analysis and feature selection for invasive species mapping in rainforests. Remote Sens. Environ. 136:14−27. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.006 [42] Muscarella R., Galante P. J., Soley-Guardia M., et al. (2014). ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for MAXENT ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5:1198−1205. DOI:10.1111/2041-210x.12261 [43] Brown J. L., Bennett J. R. and French C. M. (2017). SDMtoolbox 2.0: The next generation Python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. PeerJ 5:e4095. DOI:10.7717/peerj.4095 [44] Wood S. N. (2017). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R (chapman and hall/CRC), pp:1-447. DOI:10.1201/9781315370279 [45] Zuur A. F., Ieno E. N., Walker N. J., et al. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R (Springer), pp:938–939. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00663_9.x. [46] Wood S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. STAT. SOC. B. 73:3−36. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x [47] Saunders M. I., Leon J., Phinn S. R., et al. (2013). Coastal retreat and improved water quality mitigate losses of seagrass from sea level rise. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19:2569−2583. DOI:10.1111/gcb.12218 [48] Stocker T. F., Qin D., Plattner G.-K., et al. (2014). IPCC, 2013: Climate change 2013 - The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Cambridge University Press), pp:117-1308. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781107415324 [49] Pörtner H.-O., Roberts D. C., Masson-Delmotte V., et al. (2019). The ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate 1155:10−1017. DOI:10.1017/9781009157964 [50] Giribabu D., Hari R., Sharma J., et al. (2024). Performance assessment of GEBCO_2023 gridded bathymetric data in selected shallow waters of Indian ocean using the seafloor from ICESat-2 photons. Mar. Geophys. Res. 45:1. DOI:10.1007/s11001-023-09534-z [51] Nicholls R. J. and Cazenave A. (2010). Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328:1517−1520. DOI:10.1126/science.1185782 [52] Duarte C. M. (1991). Seagrass Depth Limits. Aquat. Bot. 40:363−377. DOI:10.1016/0304-3770(91)90081-F [53] Duarte C. M., Marbà N., Krause-Jensen D., et al. (2007). Testing the predictive power of seagrass depth limit models. Estuaries Coasts 30:652−656. DOI:10.1007/Bf02841962 [54] Capistrant-Fossa K. A. and Dunton K. H. (2024). Rapid sea level rise causes loss of seagrass meadows. Commun. Earth Environ. 5:87. DOI:10.1038/s43247-024-01236-7 [55] Lajeunesse M. J. (2015). Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta‐analysis. Ecology 96:2056−2063. DOI:10.1890/14-2402.1 [56] Assis J., Tyberghein L., Bosch S., et al. (2018). Bio‐ORACLE v2. 0: Extending marine data layers for bioclimatic modelling. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 27:277-284. DOI:10.1111/geb.12693 [57] Tyberghein L., Verbruggen H., Pauly K., et al. (2012). Bio‐ORACLE: A global environmental dataset for marine species distribution modelling. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21:272−281. DOI:10.1111/J.1466-8238.2011.00656.X [58] Wu N., Qu Y., Guse B., et al. (2018). Hydrological and environmental variables outperform spatial factors in structuring species, trait composition, and beta diversity of pelagic algae. Ecol. Evol. 8:2947−2961. DOI:10.1002/ece3.3903 [59] Meng Y. C., Gou R. K., Bai J. K., et al. (2022). Spatial patterns and driving factors of carbon stocks in mangrove forests on Hainan Island, China. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 31:1692−1706. DOI:10.1111/geb.13549 [60] Rahmawati S., Hernawan U. E., McMahon K., et al. (2019). Blue carbon in seagrass ecosystem: Guideline for the assessment of carbon stock and sequestration in Southeast Asia (UGM PRESS), pp:1-112. http://ugmpress.ugm.ac.id/en/product/lingkungan/blue-carbon-in-seagrass-ecosystem [61] Saunders M. I., Doropoulos C., Bayraktarov E., et al. (2020). Bright Spots in Coastal Marine Ecosystem Restoration. Curr. Biol. 30:R1500−R1510. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.056 [62] Hughes A. R. and Stachowicz J. J. (2004). Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:8998−9002. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0402642101 [63] van Katwijk M. M., Thorhaug A., Marbà N., et al. (2016). Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large‐scale planting. J. Appl. Ecol. 53:567−578. DOI:10.1111/1365-2664.12562 [64] Duarte C. M., Apostolaki E. T., Serrano O., et al. (2025). Conserving seagrass ecosystems to meet global biodiversity and climate goals. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1:150−165. DOI:10.1038/s44358-025-00028-x [65] Yu L., Khachaturyan M., Matschiner M., et al. (2023). Ocean current patterns drive the worldwide colonization of eelgrass (Zostera marina). Nat. Plants 9:1207−1220. DOI:10.1038/s41477-023-01464-3 [66] Reusch T. B. H. (2006). Does disturbance enhance genotypic diversity in clonal organisms. A field test in the marine angiosperm Zostera marina. Mol. Ecol. 15:277−286. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02779.x [67] Jahnke M., Olsen J. L. and Procaccini G. (2015). A meta‐analysis reveals a positive correlation between genetic diversity metrics and environmental status in the long‐lived seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mol. Ecol. 24:2336−2348. DOI:10.1111/mec.13174 [68] Atwater D. Z., Ervine C. and Barney J. N. (2018). Climatic niche shifts are common in introduced plants. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2:34−43. DOI:10.1038/s41559-017-0396-z [69] Jahnke M., Gullström M., Larsson J., et al. (2019). Population genetic structure and connectivity of the seagrass in the Western Indian Ocean is influenced by predominant ocean currents. Ecol. Evol. 9:8953−8964. DOI:10.1002/ece3.5420 [70] Procaccini G., Olsen J. L. and Reusch T. B. H. (2007). Contribution of genetics and genomics to seagrass biology and conservation. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 350:234−259. DOI:10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.035 [71] van Oosterhout C., Supple M. A., Morales H. E., et al. (2025). Genome engineering in biodiversity conservation and restoration. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1:543−555. DOI:10.1038/s44358-025-00065-6 [72] Thorogood R., Mustonen V., Aleixo A., et al. (2023). Understanding and applying biological resilience, from genes to ecosystems. npj Biodivers. 2:16. DOI:10.1038/s44185-023-00022-6 [73] Pansini A., Berlino M., Mangano M. C., et al. (2025). Meta-analysis reveals the effectiveness and best practices for the iconic Mediterranean seagrass restoration. Sci. Total Environ. 976:179325. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179325 [74] Samper‐Villarreal J., Lovelock C. E., Saunders M. I., et al. (2016). Organic carbon in seagrass sediments is influenced by seagrass canopy complexity, turbidity, wave height, and water depth. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61:938−952. DOI:10.1002/lno.10262 [75] Röhr M. E., Holmer M., Baum J. K., et al. (2018). Blue carbon storage capacity of temperate eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 32:1457−1475. DOI:10.1029/2018GB005941 [76] Krause J. R., Cameron C., Arias-Ortiz A., et al. (2025). Global seagrass carbon stock variability and emissions from seagrass loss. Nat. Commun. 16:3798. DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-59204-4 [77] Zhu J.-J. and Yan B. (2022). Blue carbon sink function and carbon neutrality potential of mangroves (Elsevier), pp:153438. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153438 [78] Zhang D., Zhao Y. and Wu J. (2023). Assessment of carbon balance attribution and carbon storage potential in China's terrestrial ecosystem. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 189:106748. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106748 [79] Lovelock C. E. and Reef R. (2020). Variable Impacts of Climate Change on Blue Carbon. One Earth 3:195−211. DOI:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.010 [80] Wang F., Sanders C. J., Santos I. R., et al. (2021). Global blue carbon accumulation in tidal wetlands increases with climate change. Natl. Sci. Rev. 8:nwaa296. DOI:10.1093/nsr/nwaa296 -
ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Cite this article:
Wang H., Li X., Zang Y., et al. (2026). Seagrass restoration at the right time in the right site with right methods can generate persistent carbon benefits in China. The Innovation Geoscience 4:100253. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2026.100253
Welcome!
To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.
Export File
Citation
Wang H., Li X., Zang Y., et al. (2026). Seagrass restoration at the right time in the right site with right methods can generate persistent carbon benefits in China. The Innovation Geoscience 4:100253. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2026.100253
Format
Content
-
Figure 1.
Predicted habitat suitability for Z. japonica under current environmental conditions
-
Figure 2.
Projected shifts in the centroid of suitable habitat for Z. japonica under future climate scenarios within the northwestern Pacific region
-
Figure 3.
Spatial distribution and temporal changes of Z. japonica beds along the coast of China, excluding Taiwan Island
-
Figure 4.
Spatial changes in suitable habitat for Z. japonica under future climate scenarios
-
Figure 5.
Potential suitable and unsuitable areas for Z. japonica restoration in the 2100s under the progressive restoration framework
-
Figure 6.
Structural equation models showing the environmental factors associated with carbon stocks in Z. japonica beds
-
Figure 7.
Technology roadmap for the strategic restoration of Z. japonica beds based on spatial modelling and carbon stock assessment
