Article Contents
REPORT   Open Access     Cite

Dual-dynamic control and metabolic rebalancing guided by toxic target discovery for efficient dencichine production

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Elucidating the toxicity mechanism caused by overexpressing serA encoding 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase.

      Engineering a dual-dynamic genetic circuit to improve cell growth and dencichine (β-ODAP) production.

      This systematic engineering strategy enables the highest reported biosynthesis titer of β-ODAP.

  • Construction of microbial cell factories often requires extensive reconfiguration of metabolic networks, which frequently compromises cell growth. Here, we engineered E. coli to produce dencichine (β-ODAP), a plant-derived hemostatic agent. Knocking out serB blocks the competing L-serine pathway, causing L-serine auxotrophy and severely impairing cell growth. This growth defect was only partially restored by supplementation with L-serine or L-glycine, suggesting the presence of additional growth-limiting factors. Through adaptive laboratory evolution and reverse engineering, we further uncovered that overexpression of serA to enhance the supply of the precursor L-2,3-diaminopropionate led to accumulation of the toxic byproduct 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) from α-ketoglutarate. To resolve these two growth constraints, we developed a growth-phase-dependent dual-dynamic regulation circuit. This circuit gradually activates serA expression and progressively represses serB expression as cells enter the stationary phase, thereby reducing 2-HG accumulation and alleviating L-serine auxotrophy. Combined with pathway balancing and cofactor optimization, the final engineered strain produced 13.46 g L-1 of β-ODAP with a yield of 0.32 g g-1 in 3-L bioreactors. This study reveals a toxicity mechanism in serine-pathway engineering and provides a dynamic regulation strategy applicable to the biosynthesis of serine-pathway-derived metabolites.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Gao J., Zuo Y., Xiao F., et al. (2022). Biosynthesis of catharanthine in engineered Pichia pastoris. Nat. Synth. 2:231−242. DOI:10.1038/s44160-022-00205-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Liang F., Xie Y., Zhang C., et al. (2025). Elucidation of the final steps in Taxol biosynthesis and its biotechnological production. Nat. Synth. 4:1212−1222. DOI:10.1038/s44160-025-00800-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Srinivasan P. and Smolke C. D. (2020). Biosynthesis of medicinal tropane alkaloids in yeast. Nature 585:614−619. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2650-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Lombe B. K., Zhou T., Kang G., et al. (2026). Biosynthesis of cinchona alkaloids. Nature 653:306−314. DOI:10.1038/s41586-026-10227-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Paddon C. J., Westfall P. J., Pitera D. J., et al. (2013). High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature 496:528−532. DOI:10.1038/nature12051

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Zhang J., Hansen L. G., Gudich O., et al. (2022). A microbial supply chain for production of the anti-cancer drug vinblastine. Nature 609:341−347. DOI:10.1038/s41586-022-05157-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Li X., Zhou Z., Li W., et al. (2022). Design of stable and self-regulated microbial consortia for chemical synthesis. Nat. Commun. 13:1554. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-29215-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Bao T., Qian Y., Xin Y., et al. (2023). Engineering microbial division of labor for plastic upcycling. Nat. Commun. 14:5712. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-40777-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Dahl R. H., Zhang F., Alonso-Gutierrez J., et al. (2013). Engineering dynamic pathway regulation using stress-response promoters. Nat. Biotechnol. 31:1039−1046. DOI:10.1038/nbt.2689

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Chen Z., Yu S., Liu J., et al. (2024). Concentration recognition-based auto-dynamic regulation system (CRUISE) enabling efficient production of higher alcohols. Adv. Sci. 11:1−17. DOI:10.1002/advs.202310215

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Zhang Y., Wei M., Zhao G., et al. (2021). Bioresource technology high-level production of L-homoserine using a non-induced, non-auxotrophic Escherichia coli chassis through metabolic engineering. Bioresour. Technol. 327:124814. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124814

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Liu L., Li J., Gai Y., et al. (2023). Protein engineering and iterative multimodule optimization for vitamin B(6) production in Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 14:5304. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-40928-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Fernández-Cabezón L., Rosich i Bosch B., Kozaeva E., et al. (2022). Dynamic flux regulation for high-titer anthranilate production by plasmid-free, conditionally-auxotrophic strains of Pseudomonas putida. Metab. Eng. 73:11−25. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2022.05.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Ma Y., Shang Y. and Stephanopoulos G. (2024). Engineering peroxisomal biosynthetic pathways for maximization of triterpene production in Yarrowia lipolytica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121:e2314798121. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2314798121

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Zhou S., Yuan S. F., Nair P. H., et al. (2021). Development of a growth coupled and multi-layered dynamic regulation network balancing malonyl-CoA node to enhance (2S)-naringenin biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 67:41−52. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.05.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Liang C., Zhang X., Wu J., et al. (2020). Dynamic control of toxic natural product biosynthesis by an artificial regulatory circuit. Metab. Eng. 57:239−246. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2019.12.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Pitera D. J., Paddon C. J., Newman J. D., et al. (2007). Balancing a heterologous mevalonate pathway for improved isoprenoid production in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 9:193−207. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2006.11.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Dueber J. E., Wu G. C., Malmirchegini G. R., et al. (2009). Synthetic protein scaffolds provide modular control over metabolic flux. Nat. Biotechnol. 27:753−759. DOI:10.1038/nbt.1557

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Peracchi A. (2018). The limits of enzyme specificity and the evolution of metabolism. Trends Biochem. Sci. 43:984−996. DOI:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.09.015

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Niehaus T. D. and Hillmann K. B. (2020). Enzyme promiscuity, metabolite damage, and metabolite damage control systems of the tricarboxylic acid cycle. FEBS J. 287:1343−1358. DOI:10.1111/febs.15284

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Sun J., Jeffryes J. G., Henry C. S., et al. (2017). Metabolite damage and repair in metabolic engineering design. Metab. Eng. 44:150−159. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2017.10.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Linster C. L., Van Schaftingen E. and Hanson A. D. (2013). Metabolite damage and its repair or pre-emption. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9:72−80. DOI:10.1038/nchembio.1141

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Hou M., Gao S., Wu J., et al. (2025). Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli to enhance L-tryptophan biosynthesis. Syst. Microbiol. Biom. 5:622−634. DOI:10.1007/s43393-025-00338-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Gu P., Yang F., Su T., et al. (2014). Construction of an L-serine producing Escherichia coli via metabolic engineering. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41:1443−1450. DOI:10.1007/s10295-014-1476-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Zhang X., Zhang D., Zhu J., et al. (2019). High-yield production of l-serine from glycerol by engineered Escherichia coli. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 46:221−230. DOI:10.1007/s10295-018-2113-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Liu H., Fang G., Wu H., et al. (2018). L-cysteine production in Escherichia coli based on rational metabolic engineering and modular strategy. Biotechnol. J. 13:1−6. DOI:10.1002/biot.201700695

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Bankole O. E., Verma D. K., Chávez González M. L., et al. (2022). Recent trends and technical advancements in biosensors and their emerging applications in food and bioscience. Food Biosci. 47:101695. DOI:10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101695

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Zou Y., Zhang J., Wang J., et al. (2024). A self-regulated network for dynamically balancing multiple precursors in complex biosynthetic pathways. Metab. Eng. 82:69−78. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2024.02.001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Ream M. and Prather K. L. J. (2024). Engineered autonomous dynamic regulation of metabolic flux. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2:233−243. DOI:10.1038/s44222-023-00140-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Yang Y., Lin Y., Wang J., et al. (2018). Sensor-regulator and RNAi based bifunctional dynamic control network for engineered microbial synthesis. Nat. Commun. 9:1−10. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-05466-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Song C., Luan J., Cui Q., et al. (2019). Enhanced heterologous spinosad production from a 79-kb synthetic multioperon assembly. ACS Synth. Biol. 8:137−147. DOI:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00402

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Ge C., Yu Z., Sheng H., et al. (2022). Redesigning regulatory components of quorum-sensing system for diverse metabolic control. Nat. Commun. 13:1−12. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-29933-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Doong S. J., Gupta A. and Prather K. L. J. (2018). Layered dynamic regulation for improving metabolic pathway productivity in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115:2964−2969. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1716920115

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Stella R. G., Gertzen C. G. W., Smits S. H. J., et al. (2021). Biosensor-based growth-coupling and spatial separation as an evolution strategy to improve small molecule production of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab. Eng. 68:162−173. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.10.003

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Lu L., Wang X., Wang T., et al. (2024). A bacterial platform for producing aromatic esters from glycerol. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1:751−764. DOI:10.1038/s44286-024-00148-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Hou J., Gao C., Guo L., et al. (2020). Rewiring carbon flux in Escherichia coli using a bifunctional molecular switch. Metab. Eng. 61:47−57. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2020.05.004

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Wei L., Zhao J., Wang Y., et al. (2022). Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for high-level γ-aminobutyric acid production from glycerol by dynamic metabolic control. Metab. Eng. 69:134−146. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.11.010

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Lee J. M., Hammarén H. M., Savitski M. M., et al. (2023). Control of protein stability by post-translational modifications. Nat. Commun. 14:1−16. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-35795-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Xu P., Li L., Zhang F., et al. (2014). Improving fatty acids production by engineering dynamic pathway regulation and metabolic control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111:11299−11304. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1406401111

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Huang L., Shi H., Gao B., et al. (2014). Decichine enhances hemostasis of activated platelets via AMPA receptors. Thromb. Res. 133:848−854. DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.009

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Li J., Qiu P., Wang S., et al. (2019). β-N-Oxalyl-L-α,β-diaminopropionic acid from Panax notoginseng plays a major role in the treatment of type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 114:108801. DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108801

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Huang D., Wang X., Liu W., et al. (2023). Remodeling metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum for high-level dencichine production. Bioresour. Technol. 388:129800. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129800

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Li W., Zhou Z., Li X., et al. (2022). Biosynthesis of plant hemostatic dencichine in Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 13:5492. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-33255-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Jiang Y., Chen B., Duan C., et al. (2015). Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81:2506−2514. DOI:10.1128/AEM.04023-14

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Edwards A., Njaci I., Sarkar A., et al. (2023). Genomics and biochemical analyses reveal a metabolon key to β-L-ODAP biosynthesis in Lathyrus sativus. Nat. Commun. 14:5199. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-36503-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Kim J. and Copley S. D. (2012). Inhibitory cross-talk upon introduction of a new metabolic pathway into an existing metabolic network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:E2856−64. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1208509109

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Kim J., Kershner J. P., Novikov Y., et al. (2010). Three serendipitous pathways in E. coli can bypass a block in pyridoxal-5'-phosphate synthesis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6:1–13. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2010.88.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [48] Zhao G. and Winkler M. E. (1996). A novel α-ketoglutarate reductase activity of the sera-encoded 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli K-12 and its possible implications for human 2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria. J. Bacteriol. 178:232−239. DOI:10.1128/jb.178.1.232-239.1996

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Lemke J. J., Sanchez-Vazquez P., Burgos H. L., et al. (2011). Direct regulation of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein promoters by the transcription factors ppGpp and DksA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:5712−5717. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1019383108

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] McGinness K. E., Baker T. A. and Sauer R. T. (2006). Engineering controllable protein degradation. Mol. Cell 22:701−707. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.027

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Samsonov V. V., Kuznetsova A. A., Rostova J. G., et al. (2022). Revealing a new family of D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenases in Escherichia coli and Pantoea ananatis encoded by ydiJ. Microorganisms. 10:1766. DOI:10.3390/microorganisms10091766

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Miksch G., Bettenworth F., Friehs K., et al. (2005). The sequence upstream of the -10 consensus sequence modulates the strength and induction time of stationary-phase promoters in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 69:312−320. DOI:10.1007/s00253-005-0016-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Jahns T. (1996). Unusually stable NAD-specific glutamate dehydrogenase from the alkaliphile Amphibacillus xylanus. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 70:89−95. DOI:10.1007/BF00393573

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Piao X., Wang L., Lin B., et al. (2019). Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for production of L-aspartate and its derivative β-alanine with high stoichiometric yield. Metab. Eng. 54:244−254. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2019.04.012

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Liu L., Ding D., Wang H., et al. (2025). Balancing cell growth and product synthesis for efficient microbial cell factories. Adv. Sci. 12:e10649. DOI:10.1002/advs.202510649

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Xiao D., Zhang W., Guo X., et al. (2021). A d-2-hydroxyglutarate biosensor based on specific transcriptional regulator DhdR. Nat. Commun. 12:1−14. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-27357-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Liu Y., Kang Z., Zhang W., et al. (2024). Metabolic functions of misunderstood D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Innov. Life 2:100101. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100101

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Kang Z., Zhang M., Gao K., et al. (2021). An l-2-hydroxyglutarate biosensor based on specific transcriptional regulator LhgR. Nat. Commun. 12:3619. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-23723-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Ye D., Guan K. and Xiong Y. (2018). Metabolism, activity, and targeting of D- and L-2-hydroxyglutarates. Trends in Cancer 4:151−165. DOI:10.1016/j.trecan.2017.12.005

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Dinh C. V. and Prather K. L. J. (2019). Development of an autonomous and bifunctional quorum-sensing circuit for metabolic flux control in engineered Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116:25562−25568. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1911144116

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Yuan S., Xu C., Jin M., et al. (2025). Stress-driven dynamic regulation of multiple genes to reduce accumulation of toxic aldehydes. Metab. Eng. 90:129−140. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2025.03.009

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Zhang Y., Wu J., Yu J., et al. (2026). Dual-dynamic control and metabolic rebalancing guided by toxic target discovery for efficient dencichine production. The Innovation Life 4:100242. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2026.100242
    Zhang Y., Wu J., Yu J., et al. (2026). Dual-dynamic control and metabolic rebalancing guided by toxic target discovery for efficient dencichine production. The Innovation Life 4:100242. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2026.100242

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(5)     Tables(1)

Supplementary Information

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(238) PDF downloads(140)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint