Artificial intelligence for life sciences: A comprehensive guide and future trends

Ming Luo; Wenyu Yang; Long Bai; Lin Zhang; Jia-Wei Huang; Yinhong Cao; Yuhua Xie; Liping Tong; Haibo Zhang; Lei Yu; Li-Wei Zhou; Yi Shi; Panke Yu; Zuoyun Wang; Zuoqiang Yuan; Peijun Zhang; Youjun Zhang; Feng Ju; Hongbin Zhang; Fang Wang; Yuanzheng Cui; Jin Zhang; Gongxue Jia; Dan Wan; Changshun Ruan; Yue Zeng; Pengpeng Wu; Zhaobing Gao; Wenrui Zhao; Yongjun Xu; Guangchuang Yu; Caihuan Tian; Ling N. Jin; Ji Dai; Bingqing Xia; Baojun Sun; Fei Chen; Yi-Zhou Gao; Haijun Wang; Bing Wang; Dake Zhang; Xin Cao; Huaiyu Wang; Tao Huang

doi:10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100105

The Innovation Life > 2024 Vol. 2 > No. 4 > 100105

Next Article Previous Article

REVIEW Open Access

Cite PDF

Artificial intelligence for life sciences: A comprehensive guide and future trends

1.
South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
2.
Institute for Ecological Research and Pollution Control of Plateau Lakes, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Ecological Protection and Resource Utilization of River-lake Networks, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
3.
Department of Hydrogeology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
4.
Organoid Research Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
5.
Hubei Shizhen Laboratory, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China
6.
Shanghai Institute of Immunity and Infection, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
7.
Key Laboratory of Seed Innovation and National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
8.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Taihe Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
9.
Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
10.
Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China
11.
Sino-French Engineer School, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
12.
Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
13.
Shenzhen Technological Research Center for Primate Translational Medicine, Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
14.
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
15.
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Intelligent Monitoring and Protection, School of Ecology and Environment, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710129, China
16.
Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya 572000, China
17.
Key Laboratory of Seed Innovation, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
18.
Environmental Microbiome and Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310030, China
19.
National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding, College of breeding and multiplication (Sanya Institute of Breeding and Multiplication), Hainan University, Sanya 572000, China
20.
State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
21.
Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Munich, Germany
22.
Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
23.
School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
24.
Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China
25.
Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
26.
Research Center for Human Tissue and Organ Degeneration, Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
27.
CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Stake Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
28.
Institute of Clinical Science, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
29.
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100119, China
30.
Department of Bioinformatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
31.
Center of Peony, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
32.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
33.
Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
34.
Key Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, Ministry of Education, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
35.
CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
36.
These authors contributed equally

Show all affliationsShow less

More Information

Corresponding authors: luoming@scbg.ac.cn (M.L.); ji.dai@siat.ac.cn (J.D.); xiabingqing@simm.ac.cn (B.X.); sunbaojun@ioz.ac.cn (B.S.); feichen@hainanu.edu.cn (F.C.); gaoyizhou@yeah.net (Y.Z.G.); wanghaijun@ynu.edu.cn (H.J.W.); bingwang@genetics.ac.cn (B.W.); dakezhang@buaa.edu.cn (D.Z.); caox@fudan.edu.cn (X.C.); hy.wang1@siat.ac.cn (H.Y. W.); huangtao@sibs.ac.cn (T.H.)
Received Date: November 21, 2024

Accepted Date: December 05, 2024

Published Online: December 06, 2024

The Innovation Life 2(4), https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100105 | Cite this article

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

DownLoad: Full size image

PUBLIC SUMMARY

PUBLIC SUMMARY
1. Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a profound impact on all branches of life sciences.
  
  Interdisciplinary cooperation is essential for the future development of AI in life sciences.
  
  The integration of BT and IT will transform the research into AI for Science and Science for AI paradigm.

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence has had a profound impact on life sciences. This review discusses the application, challenges, and future development directions of artificial intelligence in various branches of life sciences, including zoology, plant science, microbiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, neuroscience, psychology, pharmacology, clinical medicine, biomaterials, ecology, and environmental science. It elaborates on the important roles of artificial intelligence in aspects such as behavior monitoring, population dynamic prediction, microorganism identification, and disease detection. At the same time, it points out the challenges faced by artificial intelligence in the application of life sciences, such as data quality, black-box problems, and ethical concerns. The future directions are prospected from technological innovation and interdisciplinary cooperation. The integration of Bio-Technologies (BT) and Information-Technologies (IT) will transform the biomedical research into AI for Science and Science for AI paradigm.

FullText(HTML)

REFERENCES

[1]	Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation 2 : 100179. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179. View in Article Google Scholar
[2]	Sun, D.L., Gao, Y.Z., Ge, X.Y., et al. (2020). Special features of bat microbiota differ from those of terrestrial mammals. Front. Microbiol. 11: 1040. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01040. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Xu, C., Kadosh, D., Sun, D., et al. (2023). Editorial: Omics-originated exploration of pathogenic patterns and molecular mechanisms in human and animal fungal pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 14: 1243709. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1243709. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	Jin, W.-Y., Peng, J., Dai, J., et al. (2024). Bacterial load in meconium. iMeta 3: e173. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.173. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	Jin, W.-Y., Guo, J.-X., Zhang, M., et al. (2023). Absolute quantification of the microbiota spatial distribution in the murine large intestine. The Innovation Life 1: 100030. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100030. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	Huang, J.-W., Zhong, X.-F., and Gao, Y.-Z. (2024). New antibiotic against multi-drug resistant bacteria. The Innovation Life 2 : 100057. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100057. View in Article Google Scholar
[7]	Huang, T., Xu, H., Wang, H., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence for medicine: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. The Innovation Medicine 1: 100030. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100030. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	Cheng, J., Novati, G., Pan, J., et al. (2023). Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science 381: eadg7492. DOI: 10.1126/science.adg7492. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	Zhou, G., Rusnac, D.V., Park, H., et al. (2024). An artificial intelligence accelerated virtual screening platform for drug discovery. Nat. Commun. 15: 7761. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52061-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	Toubiana, D., Fernie, A.R., Nikoloski, Z., et al. (2013). Network analysis: Tackling complex data to study plant metabolism. Trends Biotechnol. 31: 29−36. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.011. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	Keyl, P., Bischoff, P., Dernbach, G., et al. (2023). Single-cell gene regulatory network prediction by explainable AI. Nucleic Acids Res. 51: e20. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1212. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	Gouda, H.F., Hassan, F.A.M., El-Araby, E.E., et al. (2022). Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: A seroprevalence study on small ruminants. BMC Vet. Res. 18: 394. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03486-z. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	Romero-Ferrero, F., Bergomi, M.G., Hinz, R.C., et al. (2019). idtracker. ai: Tracking all individuals in small or large collectives of unmarked animals. Nat. Methods 16: 179−182. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0295-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	Zhang, Y.-J., Luo, Z., Sun, Y., et al. (2023). From beasts to bytes: Revolutionizing zoological research with artificial intelligence. Zool. Res. 44: 1115−1131. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.263. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	Oskyrko, O., Mi, C., Meiri, S., et al. (2024). ReptTraits: A comprehensive dataset of ecological traits in reptiles. Scientific Data 11(1):243. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03079-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[16]	Mi, C., Song, K., Ma, L., et al. (2023). Optimizing protected areas to boost the conservation of key protected wildlife in China. The Innovation 4: 100424. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100424. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	Meiri, S. (2024). SquamBase—A database of squamate (Reptilia: Squamata) traits. Global Ecology and Biogeography 33: e13812. DOI: 10.1111/geb.13812. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[18]	Murali, G., Iwamura, T., Meiri, S., et al. (2023). Future temperature extremes threaten land vertebrates. Nature 615: 461−467. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05606-z. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[19]	Cox, N., Young, B.E., Bowles, P., et al. (2022). A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods. Nature 605: 285−290. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04664-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	Truong, M.A. and Van der Wal, R. (2024). Exploring the landscape of automated species identification apps: Development, promise, and user appraisal. Bioscience 74: 601−613. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae077. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	Miao, Z., Gaynor, K.M., Wang, J., et al. (2019). Insights and approaches using deep learning to classify wildlife. Sci. Rep. 9: 8137. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44565-w. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[22]	Oliver, R.Y., Ellis, D.P.W., Chmura, H.E., et al. (2018). Eavesdropping on the Arctic: Automated bioacoustics reveal dynamics in songbird breeding phenology. Sci. Adv. 4: eaaq1084. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1084. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	Faiss, M. and Stowell, D. (2023). Adaptive representations of sound for automatic insect recognition. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19: e1011541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011541. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[24]	Bogucki, R., Cygan, M., Khan, C.B., et al. (2019). Applying deep learning to right whale photo identification. Conserv. Biol. 33: 676−684. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13226. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	Norouzzadeh, M.S., Nguyen, A., Kosmala, M., et al. (2018). Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115: E5716−5725. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719367115. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	Thalor, M.A., Nagabhyrava, R., Rajkumar, K., et al. (2023). Deep learning insights and methods for classifying wildlife. 2023 3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE). View in Article Google Scholar
[27]	Arac, A., Zhao, P., Dobkin, B.H., et al. (2019). DeepBehavior: A Deep learning toolbox for automated analysis of animal and human behavior imaging data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 13: 20. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00020. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	Zhang, Y. (2008). I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 40. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	Kroll, A., Engqvist, M.K.M., Heckmann, D., et al. (2021). Deep learning allows genome-scale prediction of Michaelis constants from structural features. PLoS Biol. 19: e3001402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001402. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[30]	Sun, B.-J., Li, W.-M., Lv, P., et al. (2024). Genetically encoded lizard color divergence for camouflage and thermoregulation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 41: msae009. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae009. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[31]	Zhang, Y.-J., Zhu, C., Ding, Y., et al. (2018). Subcellular stoichiogenomics reveal cell evolution and electrostatic interaction mechanisms in cytoskeleton. BMC Genomics 19: 469. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4845-0. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[32]	Jiang, S., Ma, Y., and Dai, J. (2024). Synthetic yeast genome project and beyond. The Innovation Life 2: 100059. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100059. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	Chen, S., Xu, J., Cao, J., et al. (2024). Depth-related microbial communities and functional genes in alpine permafrost. The Innovation Life 2: 100081. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100081. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[34]	Yun, T., Li, H., Chang, P.-C., et al. (2021). Accurate, scalable cohort variant calls using DeepVariant and GLnexus. Bioinformatics 36: 5582−5589. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1081. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	Kaplow, I.M., Lawler, A.J., Schäffer, D.E., et al. Relating enhancer genetic variation across mammals to complex phenotypes using machine learning. Science 380 : eabm7993. DOI: 10.1126/science.abm7993. View in Article Google Scholar
[36]	Kamaru, D.N., Palmer, T.M., Riginos, C., et al. (2024). Disruption of an ant-plant mutualism shapes interactions between lions and their primary prey. Science 383: 433−438. DOI: 10.1126/science.adg1464. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[37]	Saupe, E.E., Myers, C.E., Townsend Peterson, A., et al. (2019). Spatio-temporal climate change contributes to latitudinal diversity gradients. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3: 1419−1429. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-0962-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[38]	Sun, B.-j., Ma, L., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Latitudinal embryonic thermal tolerance and plasticity shape the vulnerability of oviparous species to climate change. Ecol. Monogr. 91: e01468. DOI: 10.1002/ecm.1468. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[39]	Ma, L., Conradie, S.R., Crawford, C.L., et al. (2023). Global patterns of climate change impacts on desert bird communities. Nat. Commun. 14: 211. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-35814-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[40]	Samiappan, S., Krishnan, B.S., Dehart, D., et al. (2024). Aerial Wildlife Image Repository for animal monitoring with drones in the age of artificial intelligence. Database (Oxford) 2024 . DOI: 10.1093/database/baae070. View in Article Google Scholar
[41]	Chia, S.Y., Fang, Y.-T., Su, Y.-T., et al. (2023). A global database of bird nest traits. Scientific Data 10(1):923. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02837-1. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[42]	Ding, C., Liang, D., Xin W, et al. (2022). A dataset on the morphological, life-history and ecological traits of the mammals in China. Biodivers. Sci. 30: 21520. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021520. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[43]	Holt, W.V. and Comizzoli, P. (2021). Genome resource banking for wildlife conservation: Promises and caveats. Cryo. Letters 42: 309−320. View in Article Google Scholar
[44]	Zhu, S.E. (2012). Principles and applications of cryopreservation of animal gametes and embryos (Science Press). View in Article Google Scholar
[45]	Wen, L., Li, G., Huang, T., et al. (2022). Single-cell technologies: From research to application. The Innovation 3: 100342. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100342. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[46]	Wu, T., Hu, E., Xu, S., et al. (2021). clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. The Innovation 2 : 100141. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141. View in Article Google Scholar
[47]	Tan, C., Bian, C., Yang, D., et al. (2017). Application of genomic selection in farm animal breeding. Yi Chuan 39: 1033−1045. DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.17-286. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[48]	Hasan, N., Choudhary, S., Naaz, N., et al. (2021). Recent advancements in molecular marker-assisted selection and applications in plant breeding programmes. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 19: 128. DOI: 10.1186/s43141-021-00231-1. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[49]	Milocco, L. and Salazar-Ciudad, I. (2022). A method to predict the response to directional selection using a Kalman filter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119: e2117916119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2117916119. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[50]	Rashamol, V.P., Sejian, V., Pragna, P., et al. (2019). Prediction models, assessment methodologies and biotechnological tools to quantify heat stress response in ruminant livestock. Int. J. Biometeorol. 63: 1265−1281. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-019-01735-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[51]	Gonzalez-Garcia, E., Alhamada, M., Nascimento, H., et al. (2021). Measuring liveweight changes in lactating dairy ewes with an automated walk-over-weighing system. J. Dairy Sci. 104: 5675−5688. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19075. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[52]	Kim, M., Choi, Y., Lee, J.N., et al. (2021). A deep learning-based approach for feeding behavior recognition of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 63: 1453−1463. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2021.e127. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[53]	Spoliansky, R., Edan, Y., Parmet, Y., et al. (2016). Development of automatic body condition scoring using a low-cost 3-dimensional Kinect camera. J. Dairy Sci. 99: 7714−7725. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10607. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[54]	Sutkeviciene, N., Andersson, M.A., Zilinskas, H., et al. (2005). Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress. Theriogenology 63: 739−747. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.04.006. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[55]	Colazo, M.G., Whittaker, P., Macmillan, K., et al. (2018). Evaluation of a modified GnRH-based timed-AI protocol associated with estrus detection in beef heifers inseminated with sex-selected or conventional semen. Theriogenology 118: 90−95. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.037. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[56]	Chebel, R.C., and Cunha, T. (2020). Optimization of timing of insemination of dairy heifers inseminated with sex-sorted semen. J. Dairy Sci. 103: 5591−5603. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17870. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[57]	Lagua, E.B., Mun, H.S., Ampode, K.M.B., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence for automatic monitoring of respiratory health conditions in smart swine farming. Animals (Basel) 13: 1860. DOI: 10.3390/ani13111860. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[58]	Zhang, K., Li, D., Huang, J., et al (2020). Automated video behavior recognition of pigs using two-stream convolutional networks. Sensors (Basel) 20 : 1085. DOI: 10.3390/s20041085. View in Article Google Scholar
[59]	Sadeghi, M., Banakar, A., Minaei, S., et al. (2023). Early detection of avian diseases based on thermography and artificial intelligence. Animals (Basel) 13: 2348. DOI: 10.3390/ani13142348. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[60]	Swarbreck, D., Wilks, C., Lamesch, P., et al. (2008). The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): Gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: D1009−1014. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm965. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[61]	Reiser, L., Bakker, E., Subramaniam, S., et al. (2024). The arabidopsis information resource in 2024. Genetics 227: iyae027. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae027. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[62]	Xie, G., Xuan, J., Liu, B., et al. (2024). FlowerMate 2.0: Identifying plants in China with artificial intelligence. The Innovation 5 : 100636. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100636. View in Article Google Scholar
[63]	Swetnam, T.L., Antin, P.B., Bartelme, R., et al. (2024). CyVerse: Cyberinfrastructure for open science. PLoS computational biology 20: e1011270. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011270. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[64]	Gehan, M.A., Fahlgren, N., Abbasi, A., et al. (2017). PlantCV v2: Image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping. PeerJ 5: e4088. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4088. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[65]	Zhu, W., Han, R., Shang, X., et al. (2024). The CropGPT project: Call for a global, coordinated effort in precision design breeding driven by AI using biological big data. Mol. Plant 17: 215−218. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2023.12.015. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[66]	Chen, F., Dong, W., Zhang, J., et al. (2018). The sequenced angiosperm genomes and genome databases. Front. Plant Sci. 9: 418. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00418. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[67]	Chen, F., Song, Y., Li, X., et al. (2019). Genome sequences of horticultural plants: Past, present, and future. Hortic. Res. 6: 112. DOI: 10.1038/s41438-019-0195-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[68]	Choudhury, B.J. (2001). Estimating gross photosynthesis using satellite and ancillary data: Approach and preliminary results. Remote Sens. Environ. 75: 1−21. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00151-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[69]	Wang, H., Cimen, E., Singh, N., et al. (2020). Deep learning for plant genomics and crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 54: 34−41. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.12.010. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[70]	Huang, S., He, C., Li, J., et al. (2023). Emerging paradigms in exploring the interactions among diet, probiotics, and cancer immunotherapeutic response. The Innovation 4: 100456. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100456. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[71]	Tang, R., Sansonetti, P.J., and Gao, Y.-Z. (2023). Stem cell retrograde: A new reason why colorectal cancer is more common than small intestinal cancer. The Innovation 4: 100387. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100387. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[72]	Deng, S.-K., Zhang, W.-M., Wang, J.-P., et al. (2019). Single point mutation in the transcriptional regulator PnpR renders Pseudomonas sp. strain WBC-3 capable of utilizing 2-chloro-4-nitrophenol. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 143 : 104732. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.104732. View in Article Google Scholar
[73]	Jiao, J.Y., Liu, L., Hua, Z.S., et al. (2021). Microbial dark matter coming to light: challenges and opportunities. Natl Sci Rev 8(3):nwaa280. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa280. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[74]	Zhou, L.-W. (2023). Microbial taxonomy with DNA sequence data as nomenclatural type: How far should we go. The Innovation Life 1(2):100017. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100017. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[75]	Hedlund, B.P., Chuvochina, M., Hugenholtz, P., et al. (2022). SeqCode: A nomenclatural code for prokaryotes described from sequence data. Nat. Microbiol. 7: 1702−1708. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-022-01214-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[76]	Jiménez, D.J. and Rosado, A.S. (2024). SeqCode in the golden age of prokaryotic systematics. ISME J. 18: wrae109. DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae109. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[77]	Karbstein, K., Kösters, L., Hodač, L., et al. (2024). Species delimitation 4.0: Integrative taxonomy meets artificial intelligence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39 : 771-784. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.11.002. View in Article Google Scholar
[78]	Bai, M., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., et al. (2023). Risk assessment and warning system for strategic biological resources in China. The Innovation Life 1: 100004. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100004. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[79]	Yu, D., Andersson-Li, M., Maes, S., et al. (2024). Development of a logic regression-based approach for the discovery of host- and niche-informative biomarkers in Escherichia coli and their application for microbial source tracking. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 90: e0022724. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00227-24. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[80]	Vogl, T., Klompus, S., Leviatan, S., et al. (2021). Population-wide diversity and stability of serum antibody epitope repertoires against human microbiota. Nat. Med. 27: 1442−1450. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01409-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[81]	Du, Y., Liu, L., Ma, W., et al. (2023). The role of extratumoral and intratumoral microorganisms in cancer immunotherapy. The Innovation Life 2: 100016. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100016. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[82]	Zhu, J., Yin, J., Chen, J., et al. (2024). Integrative analysis with microbial modelling and machine learning uncovers potential alleviators for ulcerative colitis. Gut Microbes 16: 2336877. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2336877. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[83]	Zhang, G., Wang, H., Zhang, Z., et al. (2024). Highly accurate classification and discovery of microbial protein-coding gene functions using FunGeneTyper: An extensible deep learning framework. Brief Bioinform. 25: bbae319. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae319. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[84]	Ju, F., Zhai, Q., Luo, G., et al. (2024). Microbiome research for advancing engineering in life science. Eng Life Sci. 24: 2400028. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.202400028. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[85]	Gao, Y.Z., Liu, H., Chao, H.J., et al. (2016). Constitutive expression of a nag-like dioxygenase gene through an internal promoter in the 2-chloronitrobenzene catabolism gene cluster of Pseudomonas stutzeri ZWLR2-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82: 3461−3470. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00197-16. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[86]	Gao, Y.-Z., Liu, X.-Y., Liu, H., et al. (2020). A bph-Like nitroarene dioxygenase catalyzes the conversion of 3-nitrotoluene to 3-methylcatechol by Rhodococcus sp. strain ZWL3NT. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86 : e02517-02519. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02517-19. View in Article Google Scholar
[87]	Mo, Y., Bier, R., Li, X., et al. (2024). Agricultural practices influence soil microbiome assembly and interactions at different depths identified by machine learning. Commun. Biol. 7: 1349. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07059-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[88]	Babaei, A., Jafari, H., Banihashemi, S., et al. (2021). Mathematical analysis of a stochastic model for spread of Coronavirus. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 145: 110788. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110788. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[89]	Yu, C.S., Chang, S.S., Chang, T.H., et al. (2021). Correction: A COVID-19 pandemic artificial intelligence-based system with deep learning forecasting and automatic statistical data acquisition: Development and implementation study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23: e31085. DOI: 10.2196/31085. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[90]	Ayoobi, N., Sharifrazi, D., Alizadehsani, R., et al. (2021). Time series forecasting of new cases and new deaths rate for COVID-19 using deep learning methods. Results Phys. 27: 104495. DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104495. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[91]	Zeroual, A., Harrou, F., Dairi, A., et al. (2020). Deep learning methods for forecasting COVID-19 time-Series data: A comparative study. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 140: 110121. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110121. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[92]	Wang, H., Ceylan Koydemir, H., Qiu, Y., et al. (2020). Early detection and classification of live bacteria using time-lapse coherent imaging and deep learning. Light Sci. Appl. 9: 118. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-00358-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[93]	Gao, Y.-Z., Wang, Y., Ji, M., et al. (2023). A whole-cell hydrogen peroxide biosensor and its application in visual food analysis. The Innovation Life 1: 100011. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100011. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[94]	Soni, A., Al-Sarayreh, M., Reis, M.M., et al. (2021). Hyperspectral imaging and deep learning for quantification of Clostridium sporogenes spores in food products using 1D- convolutional neural networks and random forest model. Food Res. Int. 147: 110577. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110577. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[95]	Ho, C.-S., Jean, N., Hogan, C.A., et al. (2019). Rapid identification of pathogenic bacteria using Raman spectroscopy and deep learning. Nat. Commun. 10: 4927. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12898-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[96]	Bhattacharyya, R.P., Bandyopadhyay, N., Ma, P., et al. (2019). Simultaneous detection of genotype and phenotype enables rapid and accurate antibiotic susceptibility determination. Nat. Med. 25: 1858−1864. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0650-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[97]	Petkidis, A., Andriasyan, V., Murer, L., et al. (2024). A versatile automated pipeline for quantifying virus infectivity by label-free light microscopy and artificial intelligence. Nat. Commun. 15: 5112. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49444-1. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[98]	Metsky, H.C., Welch, N.L., Pillai, P.P., et al. (2022). Designing sensitive viral diagnostics with machine learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 40: 1123−1131. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-022-01213-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[99]	Hie, B., Zhong, E.D., Berger, B., et al. (2021). Learning the language of viral evolution and escape. Science 371: 284−288. DOI: 10.1126/science.abd7331. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[100]	Ong, E., Wang, H., Wong, M.U., et al. (2020). Vaxign-ML: Supervised machine learning reverse vaccinology model for improved prediction of bacterial protective antigens. Bioinformatics 36: 3185−3191. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa119. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[101]	Fu, C., Zhang, X., Veri, A.O., et al. (2021). Leveraging machine learning essentiality predictions and chemogenomic interactions to identify antifungal targets. Nat. Commun. 12: 6497. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26850-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[102]	Santos-Júnior, C.D., Torres, M.D.T., Duan, Y., et al. (2024). Discovery of antimicrobial peptides in the global microbiome with machine learning. Cell 187: 3761−3778.e3716. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.013. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[103]	Luo, M., Zhang, D., Tian, C., et al. (2023). The Innovation Life: An international journal of life sciences. The Innovation Life 1: 100001. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[104]	Stewart, C.J., Ajami, N.J., O'Brien, J.L., et al. (2018). Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature 562: 583−588. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0617-x. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[105]	Huang, S., Haiminen, N., Carrieri, A.P., et al. (2020). Human skin, oral, and gut microbiomes predict chronological age. mSystems 5: . DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00630-19. View in Article Google Scholar
[106]	Caussy, C., Tripathi, A., Humphrey, G., et al. (2019). A gut microbiome signature for cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Commun. 10: 1406. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09455-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[107]	Ruuskanen, M.O., Åberg, F., Männistö, V., et al. (2021). Links between gut microbiome composition and fatty liver disease in a large population sample. Gut Microbes 13: 1−22. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1888673. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[108]	Wu, H., Tremaroli, V., Schmidt, C., et al. (2020). The gut microbiota in prediabetes and diabetes: A population-based cross-sectional study. Cell Metab. 32: 379−390.e373. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.011. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[109]	Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Ni, Y., et al. (2020). Gut microbiome fermentation determines the efficacy of exercise for diabetes prevention. Cell Metab. 31: 77−91.e75. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[110]	Yuan, X., Wang, R., Han, B., et al. (2022). Functional and metabolic alterations of gut microbiota in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Nat. Commun. 13: 6356. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33656-4. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[111]	Kuhlman, B. and Bradley, P. (2019). Advances in protein structure prediction and design. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20: 681−697. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-019-0163-x. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[112]	Jang, Y.J., Qin, Q.-Q., Huang, S.-Y., et al. (2024). Accurate prediction of protein function using statistics-informed graph networks. Nat. Commun. 15: 6601. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50955-0. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[113]	Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596: 583−589. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[114]	Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., et al. (2024). Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630: 493−500. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[115]	Watson, J.L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N.R., et al. (2023). De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 620: 1089−1100. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[116]	Krishna, R., Wang, J., Ahern, W., et al. (2024). Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom. Science 384: eadl2528. DOI: 10.1126/science.adl2528. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[117]	Marquet, C., Heinzinger, M., Olenyi, T., et al. (2022). Embeddings from protein language models predict conservation and variant effects. Hum. Genet. 141: 1629−1647. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02411-y. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[118]	Villegas-Morcillo, A., Gomez, A.M., and Sanchez, V. (2022). An analysis of protein language model embeddings for fold prediction. Brief Bioinform. 23: bbac142. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac142. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[119]	Kulmanov, M., Khan, M.A., Hoehndorf, R., et al. (2018). DeepGO: Predicting protein functions from sequence and interactions using a deep ontology-aware classifier. Bioinformatics 34: 660−668. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx624. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[120]	Gligorijević, V., Renfrew, P.D., Kosciolek, T., et al. (2021). Structure-based protein function prediction using graph convolutional networks. Nat. Commun. 12: 3168. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23303-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[121]	Saha, S., Zack, J., Singh, B., and et al (2006). VGIchan: Prediction and classification of voltage-gated ion channels. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 4 : 253-258. DOI: 10.1016/S1672-0229(07)60006-0. View in Article Google Scholar
[122]	Gao, J., Wei, H., Cano, A., et al. (2020). PSIONplusm server for accurate multi-label prediction of ion channels and their types. Biomolecules 10: 876. DOI: 10.3390/biom10060876. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[123]	Taju, S.W. and Ou, Y.Y. (2019). DeepIon: Deep learning approach for classifying ion transporters and ion channels from membrane proteins. Journal of computational chemistry 40: 1521−1529. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.25805. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[124]	Ren, F., Aliper, A., Chen, J., et al. (2024). A small-molecule TNIK inhibitor targets fibrosis in preclinical and clinical models. Nat Biotechnol. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-024-02143-0. View in Article Google Scholar
[125]	Wei, X., Yang, Q., Yang, Z., et al. (2023). Discovery of novel TRPV1 modulators through machine learning-based molecular docking and molecular similarity searching. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 102: 409−423. DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.14270. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[126]	Kong, W., Tu, X., Huang, W., et al. (2020). Prediction and optimization of Na(V)1.7 sodium channel inhibitors based on machine learning and simulated annealing. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60 : 2739-2753. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01180. View in Article Google Scholar
[127]	Xiao, F., Ding, X., Shi, Y., et al. (2024). Application of ensemble learning for predicting GABA(A) receptor agonists. Comput. Biol. Med. 169: 107958. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.107958. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[128]	Cai, C., Guo, P., Zhou, Y., et al. (2019). Deep learning-based prediction of drug-induced cardiotoxicity. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59: 1073−1084. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00769. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[129]	Kim, H. and Nam, H. (2020). hERG-Att: Self-attention-based deep neural network for predicting hERG blockers. Comput. Biol. Chem. 87: 107286. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107286. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[130]	Ryu, J.Y., Lee, M.Y., Lee, J.H., et al. (2020). DeepHIT: A deep learning framework for prediction of hERG-induced cardiotoxicity. Bioinformatics 36: 3049−3055. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa075. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[131]	Wang, Y., Huang, L., Jiang, S., et al. (2019). Capsule networks showed excellent performance in the classification of hERG blockers/nonblockers. Front. Pharmacol. 10: 1631. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01631. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[132]	Arab, I., Laukens, K., and Bittremieux, W. (2024). Semisupervised learning to boost hERG, Nav1.5, and Cav1.2 cardiac ion channel toxicity prediction by mining a large unlabeled small molecule data set. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64 : 6410-6420. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01102. View in Article Google Scholar
[133]	Wang, T., Du, Z., Zhuo, L., et al. (2024). MultiCBlo: Enhancing predictions of compound-induced inhibition of cardiac ion channels with advanced multimodal learning. International journal of biological macromolecules 276: 133825. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133825. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[134]	Celik, N., O'Brien, F., Brennan, S., et al. (2020). Deep-Channel uses deep neural networks to detect single-molecule events from patch-clamp data. Commun. Biol. 3: 3. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0729-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[135]	Ball, S.T.M., Celik, N., Sayari, E., et al. (2022). DeepGANnel: Synthesis of fully annotated single molecule patch-clamp data using generative adversarial networks. PloS One 17: e0267452. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267452. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[136]	Feltes, B.C., Grisci, B.I., Poloni, J.F., et al. (2018). Perspectives and applications of machine learning for evolutionary developmental biology. Mol. Omics. 14: 289−306. DOI: 10.1039/c8mo00111a. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[137]	Čapek, D., Safroshkin, M., Morales-Navarrete, H., et al. (2023). EmbryoNet: Using deep learning to link embryonic phenotypes to signaling pathways. Nat. Methods 20: 815−823. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-01873-4. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[138]	Ameen, M., Sundaram, L., Shen, M., et al. (2022). Integrative single-cell analysis of cardiogenesis identifies developmental trajectories and non-coding mutations in congenital heart disease. Cell 185: 4937−4953.e4923. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.028. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[139]	Stillman, N.R. and Mayor, R. (2023). Generative models of morphogenesis in developmental biology. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 147: 83−90. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.02.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[140]	Liberali, P., and Schier, A.F. (2024). The evolution of developmental biology through conceptual and technological revolutions. Cell 187: 3461−3495. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.053. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[141]	Turley, J., Chenchiah, I.V., Martin, P., et al. (2024). Deep learning for rapid analysis of cell divisions in vivo during epithelial morphogenesis and repair. eLife 12: RP87949. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87949. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[142]	VerMilyea, M., Hall, J.M.M., Diakiw, S.M., et al. (2020). Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. Hum. Reprod. 35(4):770−784. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa013. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[143]	Song, Q., and Su, J. (2021). DSTG: deconvoluting spatial transcriptomics data through graph-based artificial intelligence. Brief Bioinform. 22: bbaa414. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa414. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[144]	Villoutreix, P. (2021). What machine learning can do for developmental biology. Development 148: dev188474. DOI: 10.1242/dev.188474. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[145]	Matula, J., Polakova, V., Salplachta, J., et al. (2022). Resolving complex cartilage structures in developmental biology via deep learning-based automatic segmentation of X-ray computed microtomography images. Sci. Rep. 12: 8728. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12329-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[146]	Chai, B., Efstathiou, C., Yue, H., et al. (2024). Opportunities and challenges for deep learning in cell dynamics research. Trends Cell Biol. 34: 955−967. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.10.010. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[147]	Aggarwal, S., Gupta, S., Gupta, D., et al. (2023). An artificial intelligence-based stacked ensemble approach for prediction of protein subcellular localization in confocal microscopy images. 15 : 1695. DOI: 10.3390/su15021695. View in Article Google Scholar
[148]	Lawrimore, J., Doshi, A., Walker, B., et al. (2019). AI-assisted forward modeling of biological structures. Front Cell Dev Biol. 7: 279. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00279. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[149]	Hallou, A., Yevick, H.G., Dumitrascu, B., et al. (2021). Deep learning for bioimage analysis in developmental biology. Development 148: dev199616. DOI: 10.1242/dev.199616. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[150]	Harfouche, A.L., Jacobson, D.A., Kainer, D., et al. (2019). Accelerating climate resilient plant breeding by applying next-generation artificial intelligence. Trends Biotechnol. 37: 1217−1235. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.05.007. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[151]	Fuentes-Peñailillo, F., Gutter, K., Vega, R., et al. (2024). Transformative technologies in digital agriculture: Leveraging internet of things, remote sensing, and artificial intelligence for smart crop management. 13 : 39. DOI:10.3390/jsan13040039. View in Article Google Scholar
[152]	Farooq, M.A., Gao, S., Hassan, M.A., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in plant breeding. Trends Genet. 40: 891−908. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2024.07.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[153]	Park, J., Bai, B., Ryu, D., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative phase imaging methods for life sciences. Nat. Methods 20: 1645−1660. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-02041-4. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[154]	Licaj, I., Felice, D., Germinario, C., et al. (2023). An artificial intelligence-integrated analysis of the effect of drought stress on root traits of "modern" and "ancient" wheat varieties. Front. Plant Sci. 14: 1241281. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1241281. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[155]	Holzinger, A., Keiblinger, K., Holub, P., et al. (2023). AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology. N Biotechnol. 74: 16−24. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[156]	Cembrowska-Lech, D., Krzemińska, A., Miller, T., et al. (2023). An Integrated multi-omics and artificial intelligence framework for advance plant phenotyping in horticulture. Biology 12: 1298. DOI: 10.3390/biology12101298. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[157]	Hati, A.J. and Singh, R.R. (2023). AI-driven pheno-parenting: A deep learning based plant phenotyping trait analysis model on a novel soilless farming dataset. IEEE Access 11: 35298−35314. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3265195. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[158]	Lee, U., Chang, S., Putra, G.A., et al. (2018). An automated, high-throughput plant phenotyping system using machine learning-based plant segmentation and image analysis. PloS One 13: e0196615. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196615. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[159]	Martin-Arevalillo, R. and Vernoux, T. (2023). Decoding the auxin matrix: Auxin biology through the eye of the computer. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74: 387−413. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102720-033523. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[160]	Aasim, M., Ali, S.A., Altaf, M.T., et al. (2023). Artificial neural network and decision tree facilitated prediction and validation of cytokinin-auxin induced in vitro organogenesis of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. ). Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 153: 611−624. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-023-02498-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[161]	Saito, T., Wang, S., Ohkawa, K., et al. (2024). Deep learning with a small dataset predicts chromatin remodelling contribution to winter dormancy of apple axillary buds. Tree Physiol. 44 : 10.1093/treephys/tpae072. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpae072. View in Article Google Scholar
[162]	Correia, D.L.P., Bouachir, W., Gervais, D., et al. (2020). Leveraging artificial intelligence for large-scale plant phenology studies from noisy time-lapse images. IEEE Access 8: 13151−13160. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2965462. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[163]	Cieslak, M., Owens, A., and Prusinkiewicz, P. (2022). Computational models of auxin-driven patterning in shoots. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 14: a040097. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040097. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[164]	Hesami, M. and Jones, A.M.P. (2020). Application of artificial intelligence models and optimization algorithms in plant cell and tissue culture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104: 9449−9485. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10888-2. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[165]	Mann, M., Kumar, C., Zeng, W.F., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery. Cell Syst. 12: 759−770. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.06.006. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[166]	Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., et al. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620: 47−60. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[167]	Sheikh, M., Iqra, F., Ambreen, H., et al. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence and high-throughput phenotyping for crop improvement. J. Integr. Agric. 23: 1787−1802. DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2023.10.019. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[168]	Yang, K.K., Wu, Z., and Arnold, F.H. (2019). Machine-learning-guided directed evolution for protein engineering. Nat. Methods 16: 687−694. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0496-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[169]	Burley, S.K., Bhikadiya, C., Bi, C., et al. (2023). RCSB Protein Data Bank (RCSB. org): delivery of experimentally-determined PDB structures alongside one million computed structure models of proteins from artificial intelligence/machine learning. Nucleic acids Res. 51: D488−d508. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1077. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[170]	Qiu, Y. and Wei, G.W. (2023). Artificial intelligence-aided protein engineering: from topological data analysis to deep protein language models. Brief. Bioinform. 24: bbad289. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad289. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[171]	Yu, J. and Hu, S. (2021). On the ultimate finishing line of the Human Genome Project. The Innovation 2: 100133. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100133. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[172]	Wall, B.P.G., Nguyen, M., Harrell, J.C., et al. (2025). Machine and deep learning methods for predicting 3D genome organization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2856: 357−400. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4136-1_22. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[173]	Lee, Y., Park, S.H., and Lee, H. (2024). Prediction of the 3D cancer genome from whole-genome sequencing using InfoHiC. Mol. Syst. Biol. DOI: 10.1038/s44320-024-00065-2. View in Article Google Scholar
[174]	GTEx Consortium (2015). The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science 348 : 648-660. DOI: 10.1126/science.1262110. View in Article Google Scholar
[175]	Ramprasad, P., Ren, J., and Pan, W. (2024). Enhancing gene expression predictions using deep learning and functional annotations. Genet. Epidemiol. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22595. View in Article Google Scholar
[176]	Senior, A.W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., et al. (2020). Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature 577: 706−710. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[177]	Wang, Y., Lian, B., Zhang, H., et al. (2023). A multi-view latent variable model reveals cellular heterogeneity in complex tissues for paired multimodal single-cell data. Bioinformatics 39: btad005. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad005. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[178]	Hu, J., Chen, M., and Zhou, X. (2022). Effective and scalable single-cell data alignment with non-linear canonical correlation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 50: e21. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1147. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[179]	Wang, X., Duan, M., Li, J., et al. (2024). MarsGT: Multi-omics analysis for rare population inference using single-cell graph transformer. Nature Commun. 15: 338. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44570-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[180]	Zhang, J., Larschan, E., Bigness, J., et al. (2024). scNODE : Generative model for temporal single cell transcriptomic data prediction. Bioinformatics 40: ii146−ii154. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae393. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[181]	Yoon, C., Park, E., Misra, S., et al. (2024). Deep learning-based virtual staining, segmentation, and classification in label-free photoacoustic histology of human specimens. Light Sci. Appl. 13: 226. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-024-01554-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[182]	Alheejawi, S., Berendt, R., Jha, N., et al. (2021). An efficient CNN based algorithm for detecting melanoma cancer regions in H&E-stained images. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference 2021: 3982−3985. DOI: 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630443. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[183]	Tsai, S.-T., Liu, C.-H., Chan, C.-C., et al. (2022). H&E-like staining of OCT images of human skin via generative adversarial network. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121: 134102. DOI: 10.1063/5.0122965. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[184]	Chen, G.B., Liu, S., Zhang, L., et al. (2024). Building and sharing medical cohorts for research. The Innovation 5: 100623. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100623. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[185]	Lee, T., Sung, M.K., Lee, S., et al. (2019). Convolutional neural network model to predict causal risk factors that share complex regulatory features. Nucleic Acids Res. 47: e146. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz868. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[186]	Hong, M.M., Froelicher, D., Magner, R., et al. (2024). Secure discovery of genetic relatives across large-scale and distributed genomic datasets. Res. Comput. Mol. Biol. 14758: 308−313. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3989-4_19. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[187]	Gettings, K.B., Tillmar, A., Sturk-Andreaggi, K., et al. (2024). Review of SNP assays for disaster victim identification: Cost, time, and performance information for decision-makers. J. Forensic Sci. 69: 1546−1557. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15585. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[188]	K, S.S. and Nair, M.S. (2024). GenCoder: A novel convolutional neural network based autoencoder for genomic sequence data compression. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 21: 405−415. DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2024.3366240. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[189]	Yu, P., Guo, S., Xu, R., et al. (2021). Cohort studies of long-term exposure to outdoor particulate matter and risks of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Innovation 2: 100143. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100143. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[190]	Wu, S., Xu, Y., Zhang, Q., et al. (2023). Gene-environment interaction analysis via deep learning. Genet Epidemiol. 47: 261−286. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22518. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[191]	Li, T., Huang, T., Xiao, N., et al. (2024). Innovative medicine and health management: A special session of The Innovation Conference 2024. The Innovation Medicine 2: 100088. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-med.2024.100088. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[192]	Zhong, J., Shi, J., and Amundadottir, L.T. (2023). Artificial intelligence and improved early detection for pancreatic cancer. The Innovation 4: 100457. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100457. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[193]	Xiao, N., Ding, Y., Cui, B., et al. (2024). Navigating obesity: A comprehensive review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, complications and management strategies. The Innovation Medicine 2: 100090. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-med.2024.100090. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[194]	Wei, K., Qian, F., Li, Y., et al. (2024). Integrating multi-omics data of childhood asthma using a deep association model. Fundam. Res. 4: 738−751. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2024.03.022. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[195]	Wang, L., Zhang, C., Fan, S., et al. (2023). Treatment options for adult intermediate-risk AML patients in CR1: Allo-HSCT or chemotherapy. The Innovation 4: 100461. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100461. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[196]	Huang, T., Tu, K., Shyr, Y., et al. (2008). The prediction of interferon treatment effects based on time series microarray gene expression profiles. J. Transl. Med. 6: 44. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-44. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[197]	Zhang, X., Chen, C., Wu, M., et al. (2012). Plasma microRNA profile as a predictor of early virological response to interferon treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients. Antivir. Ther. 17: 1243−1253. DOI: 10.3851/imp2401. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[198]	Chen, L., Pan, X., Hu, X., et al. (2018). Gene expression differences among different MSI statuses in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 143: 1731−1740. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31554. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[199]	Han, X., Cai, C., Deng, W., et al. (2024). Landscape of human organoids: Ideal model in clinics and research. The Innovation 5: 100620. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100620. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[200]	Yongcong, F. and Zhuo, X. (2024). Towards personalized medicine: Unlocking on-demand organ manufacturing through 3D bioprinting. The Innovation Life 2: 100096. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100096. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[201]	Achler, T. (2023). What AI, neuroscience, and cognitive science can learn from each other: An embedded perspective. Cogn. Comput. 16: 2428−2436. DOI: 10.1007/s12559-023-10194-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[202]	Badrulhisham, F., Pogatzki-Zahn, E., Segelcke, D., et al. (2024). Machine learning and artificial intelligence in neuroscience: A primer for researchers. Brain Behav. Immun. 115: 470−479. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.005. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[203]	Richards, B.A., Lillicrap, T.P., Beaudoin, P., et al. (2019). A deep learning framework for neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 22: 1761−1770. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0520-2. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[204]	Surianarayanan, C., Lawrence, J.J., Chelliah, P.R., et al. (2023). Convergence of artificial intelligence and neuroscience towards the diagnosis of neurological disorders-a scoping review. Sensors (Basel) 23: 3062. DOI: 10.3390/s23063062. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[205]	Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Cao, Z., et al. (2020). Decoding brain states from fMRI signals by using unsupervised domain adaptation. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 24: 1677−1685. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2940695. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[206]	Haight, T.J. and Eshaghi, A. (2023). Deep learning algorithms for brain imaging. 100 : 549-550. DOI. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000206808. View in Article Google Scholar
[207]	Reader, A.J., Corda, G., Mehranian, A., et al. (2021). Deep learning for PET image reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences 5(1):1−25. DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2020.3014786. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[208]	Zaharchuk, G. and Davidzon, G. (2021). Artificial intelligence for optimization and interpretation of PET/CT and PET/MR images. Semin. Nucl. Med. 5: 134−142. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.10.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[209]	Pachitariu, M., Sridhar, S., Pennington, J., et al. (2024). Spike sorting with Kilosort4. Nat. Methods 21: 914−921. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02232-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[210]	Barnova, K., Mikolasova, M., Kahankova, R.V., et al. (2023). Implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based methods in brain-computer interaction. Comput. Biol. Med. 163: 107135. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107135. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[211]	Dou, Y., Xia, J., Fu, M., et al. (2023). Identification of epileptic networks with graph convolutional network incorporating oscillatory activities and evoked synaptic responses. NeuroImage 284: 120439. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120439. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[212]	Li, S., Tang, Z., Yang, L., et al. (2023). Application of deep reinforcement learning for spike sorting under multi-class imbalance. Comput. Biol. Med. 164: 107253. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107253. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[213]	Zhang, Z. and Dai, J. (2024). Fully implantable wireless brain-computer interface for humans: Advancing toward the future. The Innovation 5: 100595. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100595. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[214]	Deng, C., Li, X., and Dai, J. (2023). Challenges for translating implantable brain-computer interface to medical device. The Innovation Medicine 1: 100040. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100040. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[215]	Aldarondo, D., Merel, J., Marshall, J.D., et al. (2024). A virtual rodent predicts the structure of neural activity across behaviours. Nature 632: 594−602. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07633-4. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[216]	Cowley, B.R., Calhoun, A.J., Rangarajan, N., et al. (2024). Mapping model units to visual neurons reveals population code for social behaviour. Nature 629: 1100−1108. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07451-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[217]	Margalit, E., Lee, H., Finzi, D., et al. (2024). A unifying framework for functional organization in early and higher ventral visual cortex. Neuron 112: 2435−2451.e2437. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.04.018. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[218]	Michaels, J.A., Schaffelhofer, S., Agudelo-Toro, A., et al. (2020). A goal-driven modular neural network predicts parietofrontal neural dynamics during grasping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117: 32124−32135. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005087117. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[219]	Zhou, B., Li, Z., Kim, S., et al. (2022). Shallow neural networks trained to detect collisions recover features of visual loom-selective neurons. eLife 11: e72067. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72067. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[220]	Kabra, M., Robie, A.A., Rivera-Alba, M., et al. (2013). JAABA: Interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior. Nat. Methods 10: 64−67. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2281. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[221]	Pereira, T.D., Aldarondo, D.E., Willmore, L., et al. (2019). Fast animal pose estimation using deep neural networks. Nat. Methods 16: 117−125. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0234-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[222]	Han, Y., Chen, K., Wang, Y., et al. (2024). Multi-animal 3D social pose estimation, identification and behaviour embedding with a few-shot learning framework. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6: 48−61. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-023-00776-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[223]	Marks, M., Jin, Q., Sturman, O., et al. (2022). Deep-learning-based identification, tracking, pose estimation and behaviour classification of interacting primates and mice in complex environments. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4: 331−340. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-022-00477-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[224]	Mathis, A., Mamidanna, P., Cury, K.M., et al. (2018). DeepLabCut: Markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. 21: 1281−1289. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[225]	Tseng, Y.T., Zhao, B., Ding, H., et al. (2023). Systematic evaluation of a predator stress model of depression in mice using a hierarchical 3D-motion learning framework. Transl. Psychiatry. 13: 178. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-023-02481-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[226]	Anagnostopoulou, P., Alexandropoulou, V., Lorentzou, G., et al. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Autism Assessment. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 15: 95−107. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11231. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[227]	Helmy, E.M., Elnakib, A., Elnakieb, Y.A., et al. (2023). Role of artificial intelligence for autism diagnosis using DTI and fMRI: A survey. Biomedicines 11: 1858. DOI. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071858. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[228]	Marciano, F., Venutolo, G., Ingenito, C.M., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence: The "Trait D'Union" in different analysis approaches of autism spectrum disorder studies. Curr Med Chem. 28: 6591−6618. DOI: 10.2174/0929867328666210203205221. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[229]	Moridian, P., Ghassemi, N., Jafari, M., et al. (2022). Automatic autism spectrum disorder detection using artificial intelligence methods with MRI neuroimaging: A review. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 15: 999605. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.999605. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[230]	Sarisik, E., Popovic, D., Keeser, D., et al. (2024). EEG-based signatures of schizophrenia, depression, and aberrant aging: A supervised machine learning investigation. Schizophr. Bull. sbae150. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae150. View in Article Google Scholar
[231]	Shahamiri, S.R. and Thabtah, F.A.J.C.C. (2020). Autism AI: A new autism screening system based on artificial intelligence. Cogn. Comput. 12: 766−777. DOI: 10.1007/s12559-020-09743-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[232]	Tekkeşin, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 22: 8−9. DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.28661. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[233]	Arnold, C. (2023). Inside the nascent industry of AI-designed drugs. Nat. Med. 29: 1292−1295. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02361-0. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[234]	Zhang, C., Xie, L., Lu, X., et al. (2024). Developing an improved cycle architecture for AI-based generation of new structures aimed at drug discovery. Molecules 29: 1499. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29071499. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[235]	Kp Jayatunga, M., Ayers, M., Bruens, L., et al. (2024). How successful are AI-discovered drugs in clinical trials. A first analysis and emerging lessons. Drug Discov. Today 29: 104009. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104009. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[236]	Adjei, A.A., LoRusso, P., Ribas, A., et al. (2017). A phase I dose-escalation study of TAK-733, an investigational oral MEK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest. New Drugs 35: 47−58. DOI: 10.1007/s10637-016-0391-2. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[237]	Callaway, E. (2024). 'A landmark moment': Scientists use AI to design antibodies from scratch. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-024-00846-7. View in Article Google Scholar
[238]	Hutson, M. (2024). How AI is being used to accelerate clinical trials. Nature 627: S2−S5. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-024-00753-x. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[239]	Lee, K., Paek, H., Huang, L.C., et al. (2024). SEETrials: Leveraging large language models for safety and efficacy extraction in oncology clinical trials. medRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.18.24301502. View in Article Google Scholar
[240]	Liu, R., Rizzo, S., Whipple, S., et al. (2021). Evaluating eligibility criteria of oncology trials using real-world data and AI. Nature 592: 629−633. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03430-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[241]	Yuan, C., Ryan, P.B., Ta, C., et al. (2019). Criteria2Query: A natural language interface to clinical databases for cohort definition. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 26: 294−305. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy178. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[242]	Parvathaneni, V., Kulkarni, N.S., Muth, A., et al. (2019). Drug repurposing: A promising tool to accelerate the drug discovery process. Drug Discov. Today 24: 2076−2085. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.014. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[243]	Pushpakom, S., Iorio, F., Eyers, P.A., et al. (2019). Drug repurposing: Progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18: 41−58. DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2018.168. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[244]	Yoo, H., Kim, K.H., Singh, R., et al. (2020). Validation of a deep learning algorithm for the detection of malignant pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs. JAMA Netw. Open 3: e2017135. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17135. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[245]	Nam, J.G., Hwang, E.J., Kim, J., et al. (2023). AI improves nodule detection on chest radiographs in a health screening population: A randomized controlled trial. Radiology 307: e221894. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221894. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[246]	Williams, D.F. (2009). On the nature of biomaterials. Biomaterials 30: 5897−5909. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.027. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[247]	Alizadeh-Osgouei, M., Li, Y., and Wen, C. (2019). A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications. Bioact Mater. 4: 22−36. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.11.003. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[248]	Pina, S., Oliveira, J.M., and Reis, R.L. (2015). Natural‐based nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A review. Adv. Mater. 27: 1143−1169. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201403354. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[249]	Koutsopoulos, S. (2012). Molecular fabrications of smart nanobiomaterials and applications in personalized medicine. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 64: 1459−1476. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.002. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[250]	Holzapfel, B.M., Reichert, J.C., Schantz, J.-T., et al. (2013). How smart do biomaterials need to be. A translational science and clinical point of view. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 6: 581−603. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.009. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[251]	Bose, S., Ke, D., Sahasrabudhe, H., et al. (2018). Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 93: 45−111. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.003. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[252]	Filippi, M., Mekkattu, M., and Katzschmann, R.K. (2024). Sustainable biofabrication: From bioprinting to AI-driven predictive methods. Trends Biotechnol. S 0167-7799(24):00180−X. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.07.002. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[253]	Stuart, S., Watchorn, J., and Gu, F.X. (2023). Sizing up feature descriptors for macromolecular machine learning with polymeric biomaterials. npj Comput. Mater. 9: 102. DOI: 10.1038/s41524-023-01040-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[254]	Xue, K., Wang, F., Suwardi, A., et al. (2021). Biomaterials by design: Harnessing data for future development. Mater. Today Bio. 12: 100165. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100165. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[255]	Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. and Chan, M.K.Y. (2021). Computational data-driven materials discovery. Trends Chem. 3: 79−82. DOI: 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.12.007. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[256]	Suwardi, A., Wang, F., Xue, K., et al. (2022). Machine learning-driven biomaterials evolution. Adv. Mater. 34: 2102703. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202102703. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[257]	Magennis, E.P., Hook, A.L., Davies, M.C., et al. (2016). Engineering serendipity: High-throughput discovery of materials that resist bacterial attachment. Acta Biomater. 34: 84−92. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.008. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[258]	Wu, C.-T., Chang, H.-T., Wu, C.-Y., et al. (2020). Machine learning recommends affordable new Ti alloy with bone-like modulus. Mater. Today 34: 41−50. DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.008. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[259]	Raccuglia, P., Elbert, K.C., Adler, P.D.F., et al. (2016). Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature 533: 73−76. DOI: 10.1038/nature17439. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[260]	Kalidindi, S.R. and De Graef, M. (2015). Materials data science: Current status and future outlook. Annual Review of Materials Research 45: 171−193. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-020844. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[261]	Sokolov, A.N., Atahan-Evrenk, S., Mondal, R., et al. (2011). From computational discovery to experimental characterization of a high hole mobility organic crystal. Nat. Commun. 2: 437. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1451. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[262]	Rymarczyk, T., Klosowski, G., Kozlowski, E., et al (2019). Comparison of selected machine learning algorithms for industrial electrical tomography. Sensors 19 : 1521. DOI: 10.3390/s19071521. View in Article Google Scholar
[263]	Yao, J., Chen, H., Xu, Z., et al. (2020). Development of a wearable electrical impedance tomographic sensor for gesture recognition with machine learning. IEEE J Biomed. Health Inform. 24: 1550−1556. DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2019.2945593. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[264]	Liu, Z., Zhang, T., Yang, M., et al. (2021). Hydrogel pressure distribution sensors based on an imaging strategy and machine learning. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3: 3599−3609. DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.1c00488. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[265]	Loh, G.C., Lee, H.C., Tee, X.Y., et al. (2020). Viscosity prediction of lubricants by a general feed-forward neural network. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60: 1224−1234. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01068. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[266]	Lee, J., Oh, S.J., An, S.H., et al. (2020). Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication 12: 035018. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[267]	Baradaran, S., Moghaddam, E., Nasiri-Tabrizi, B., et al. (2015). Characterization of nickel-doped biphasic calcium phosphate/graphene nanoplatelet composites for biomedical application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 49: 656−668. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.050. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[268]	Okafor, E., Obada, D.O., and Dodoo-Arhin, D. (2020). Ensemble learning prediction of transmittance at different wavenumbers in natural hydroxyapatite. Sci. Afr. 9: 1550−1556. DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00516. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[269]	Yu, J., Wang, Y., Dai, Z., et al. (2021). Structural features modeling of substituted hydroxyapatite nanopowders as bone fillers via machine learning. Ceram. Int. 47: 9034−9047. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.026. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[270]	Gu, G.X., Chen, C.-T., Richmond, D.J., et al. (2018). Bioinspired hierarchical composite design using machine learning: simulation, additive manufacturing, and experiment. Mater. Horiz. 5: 939−945. DOI: 10.1039/c8mh00653a. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[271]	Bauer T W, S.J. (1999). The pathology of total joint arthroplasty: I. Mechanisms of implant fixation. Skeletal Radiol. 28: 423−432. DOI: 10.1007/s002560050541. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[272]	Sparks, T.D., Kauwe, S.K., Parry, M.E., et al. (2020). Machine learning for structural materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 50: 27−48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-110519-094700. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[273]	Murshid, N., Mouhtady, O., Abu-samha, M., et al. (2022). Metal oxide hydrogel composites for remediation of dye-contaminated wastewater: Principal component analysis. Gels 8: 702. DOI: 10.3390/gels8110702. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[274]	Karaoglu, I.C., Kebabci, A.O., and Kizilel, S. (2023). Optimization of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel properties through an artificial neural network model. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15: 44796−44808. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c12207. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[275]	Bozuyuk, U., Dogan, N.O., and Kizilel, S. (2018). Deep insight into PEGylation of bioadhesive chitosan nanoparticles: Sensitivity study for the key parameters through artificial neural network model. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10: 33945−33955. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b11178. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[276]	Dogan, N.O., Bozuyuk, U., Erkoc, P., et al. (2022). Parameters influencing gene delivery efficiency of PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles: Experimental and modeling approach. Adv. NanoBiomed Res. 2: 2100033. DOI: 10.1002/anbr.202100033. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[277]	Li, Z., Song, P., Li, G., et al. (2024). AI energized hydrogel design, optimization and application in biomedicine. Mater Today Bio. 25: 101014. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101014. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[278]	Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Chandra Sekhar.P, D., et al. (2023). Rapid, autonomous high-throughput characterization of hydrogel rheological properties via automated sensing and physics-guided machine learning. Appl. Mater. Today 30: 101720. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101720. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[279]	Seifermann, M., Reiser, P., Friederich, P., et al (2023). High-throughput synthesis and machine learning assisted design of photodegradable hydrogels. Small Methods DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202300553. View in Article Google Scholar
[280]	Kazemi, M., Ahangarani, S., Esmailian, M., et al. (2022). Investigating the corrosion performance of Ti-6Al-4V biomaterial alloy with hydroxyapatite coating by artificial neural network. Materials Science and Engineering: B 278: 115644. DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115644. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[281]	Coşkun, M.İ. and Karahan, İ.H. (2018). Modeling corrosion performance of the hydroxyapatite coated CoCrMo biomaterial alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 745: 840−848. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.253. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[282]	Montazerian, M., Zanotto, E.D., and Mauro, J.C. (2019). Model-driven design of bioactive glasses: from molecular dynamics through machine learning. Int. Mater. Rev. 65: 297−321. DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2019.1694779. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[283]	Noori Banu, P.S. and Devaki Rani, S. (2018). Artificial neural network based optimization of prerequisite properties for the design of biocompatible titanium alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 149: 259−266. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.039. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[284]	Sultana, N., Sikdar, S., Chattopadhyay, P.P., et al. (2013). Informatics based design of prosthetic Ti alloys. Mater. Technol. 29: B69−B75. DOI: 10.1179/1753555713y.0000000103. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[285]	Chang, Y.-J., Jui, C.-Y., Lee, W.-J., et al. (2019). Prediction of the composition and hardness of high-entropy alloys by machine learning. Jom 71: 3433−3442. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-019-03704-4. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[286]	Wen, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, C., et al. (2019). Machine learning assisted design of high entropy alloys with desired property. Acta Mater. 170: 109−117. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[287]	Owh, C., Ow, V., Lin, Q., et al. (2022). Bottom-up design of hydrogels for programmable drug release. Biomater. Adv. 141: 213100. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213100. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[288]	Reddy, R.D.P. and Sharma, V. (2020). Additive manufacturing in drug delivery applications: A review. Int J Pharm. 589: 119820. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119820. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[289]	Rio, L.G.-d., Diaz-Rodriguez, P., and Landin, M. (2021). Design of novel orotransmucosal vaccine-delivery platforms using artificial intelligence. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 159: 36−43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.12.018. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[290]	Rio, L.G.-d., Diaz-Rodriguez, P., Pedersen, G.K., et al. (2022). Sublingual boosting with a novel mucoadhesive thermogelling hydrogel following parenteral CAF01 priming as a strategy against chlamydia trachomatis. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11: 2102508. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202102508. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[291]	Uka, A., Ndreu Halili, A., Polisi, X., et al. (2021). Basis of image analysis for evaluating cell biomaterial interaction using brightfield microscopy. Cells Tissues Organs 210: 77−104. DOI: 10.1159/000512969. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[292]	Zhang, K., Wang, J., Liu, T., et al. (2021). Machine learning-reinforced noninvasive biosensors for healthcare. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10: 2100734. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202100734. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[293]	Kim, N., Lee, H., Han, G., et al. (2023). 3D-printed functional hydrogel by DNA-induced biomineralization for accelerated diabetic wound healing. Adv. Sci. 10: e2300816. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202300816. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[294]	Tong, L., Wijnen, A.J.v., Wang, H., et al. (2024). Advancing bone biology: The mutual promotion of biology and pioneering technologies. The Innovation Life 2: 100078. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100078. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[295]	Chen, B., Dong, J., Ruelas, M., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence-assisted high-throughput screening of printing conditions of hydrogel architectures for accelerated diabetic wound healing. Advanced Functional Materials 32: 2201843. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202201843. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[296]	Brumberg, V., Astrelina, T., Malivanova, T., et al. (2021). Modern wound dressings: Hydrogel dressings. Biomedicines 9: 1235. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9091235. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[297]	Queen, D. (2019). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in wound care-the wounded machine! Int Wound J. 16 : 311 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13108. View in Article Google Scholar
[298]	Ding, Y., Tang, H., Zhang, C., et al. (2021). High‐throughput screening of self‐healable polysulfobetaine hydrogels and their applications in flexible electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31: 2100489. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202100489. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[299]	Chen, K., Liang, K., Liu, H., et al. (2023). Skin-inspired ultra-tough supramolecular multifunctional hydrogel electronic skin for human–machine interaction. Nano-Micro Lett. 15: 102. DOI: 10.1007/s40820-023-01084-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[300]	Kai, T., Jiahao, Y., Jiyuan, Z., et al. (2023). Deep-learning enabled active biomimetic multifunctional hydrogel electronic skin. ACS Nano. 17: 16160−16173. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c05253. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[301]	Wang, F., Semirumi, D.T., He, A., et al. (2024). Physical, mechanical characterization, and artificial neural network modeling of biodegradable composite scaffold for biomedical applications. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 136: 108889. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108889. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[302]	Liu, H., Fu, Z., Yang, K., et al. (2019). Machine learning for glass science and engineering: A review. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 557: 119419. DOI: 10.1016/j.nocx.2019.100036. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[303]	Nazarahari, A. and Canadinc, D. (2021). Prediction of the NiTi shape memory alloy composition with the best corrosion resistance for dental applications utilizing artificial intelligence. Mater. Chem. Phys. 258: 123974. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123974. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[304]	Miao, Z., Liu, Z., Gaynor, K.M., et al. (2021). Iterative human and automated identification of wildlife images. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3: 885−895. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-021-00393-0. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[305]	Silvestro, D., Goria, S., Sterner, T., et al. (2022). Improving biodiversity protection through artificial intelligence. Nat. Sustain. 5 : 415-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00851-6. View in Article Google Scholar
[306]	Yu, Y., Mao, J., Wullschleger, S.D., et al. (2022). Machine learning–based observation-constrained projections reveal elevated global socioeconomic risks from wildfire. Nat. Commun. 13: 1250. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28853-0. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[307]	Liu, L., Zhou, W., Guan, K., et al. (2024). Knowledge-guided machine learning can improve carbon cycle quantification in agroecosystems. Nat. Commun. 15: 357. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43860-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[308]	Deng, J., Xie, Y., Wei, R., et al. (2024). Application of machine learning in ecological red line identification: A case study of Chengdu–Chongqing urban agglomeration. Diversity 16: 300. DOI: 10.3390/d16050300. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[309]	Liu, L., Mou, C., and Xu, F. (2024). Improved wildlife recognition through fusing camera trap images and temporal metadata. Diversity 16: 139. DOI: 10.3390/d16030139. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[310]	Nelson, D. and Wang, J. (1992). Introduction to artificial neural systems. (West Publishing Co.) DOI: 10.1016/0925-2312(92)90018-K. View in Article Google Scholar
[311]	Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., et al. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 86: 2278−2324. DOI: 10.1109/5.726791. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[312]	Buchanan, C., Bi, Y., Xue, B., et al. (2021). Deep convolutional neural networks for detecting dolphin echolocation clicks. 2021 36th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ). View in Article Google Scholar
[313]	Zhang, P., Goodman, S.J., O’Connell, M.J., et al. (2023). Marine mammal genomes: Important resources for unravelling adaptation and evolution in the marine environment. The Innovation Geoscience 1: 100022. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100022. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[314]	Blount, D., Gero, S., Van Oast, J., et al. (2022). Flukebook: An open-source AI platform for cetacean photo identification. Mamm. Biol. 102: 1005−1023. DOI: 10.1007/s42991-021-00221-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[315]	Khan, C., Blount, D., Parham, J., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence for right whale photo identification: from data science competition to worldwide collaboration. Mamm. Biol 102: 1025−1042. DOI: 10.1007/s42991-022-00253-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[316]	Ju, F. and Zhang, T. (2015). 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing data mining of microbial diversity and interactions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99: 4119−4129. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6536-y. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[317]	Ghadermazi, P. and Chan, S.H.J. (2024). Microbial interactions from a new perspective: Reinforcement learning reveals new insights into microbiome evolution. Bioinformatics 40: .btae003. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae003. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[318]	Ghannam, R.B. and Techtmann, S.M. (2021). Machine learning applications in microbial ecology, human microbiome studies, and environmental monitoring. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19: 1092−1107. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.028. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[319]	McElhinney, J., Catacutan, M.K., Mawart, A., et al. (2022). Interfacing machine learning and microbial omics: A promising means to address environmental challenges. Front. Microbiol. 13: 851450. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.851450. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[320]	Walsh, C., Stallard-Olivera, E., and Fierer, N. (2024). Nine (not so simple) steps: A practical guide to using machine learning in microbial ecology. mBio 15: e0205023. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02050-23. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[321]	Hernández Medina, R., Kutuzova, S., Nielsen, K.N., et al. (2022). Machine learning and deep learning applications in microbiome research. ISME Commun. 2: 98. DOI: 10.1038/s43705-022-00182-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[322]	Wang, X.W., Sun, Z., Jia, H., et al. (2024). Identifying keystone species in microbial communities using deep learning. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8: 22−31. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02250-2. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[323]	Wang, F., Xiang, L., Sze-Yin Leung, K., et al. (2024). Emerging contaminants: A One Health perspective. The Innovation 5: 100612. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100612. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[324]	Xiang, L., Harindintwali, J.D., Wang, F., et al. (2022). Integrating biochar, bacteria, and plants for sustainable remediation of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56: 16546−16566. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02976. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[325]	Fan, Y., Wang, X., Funk, T., et al. (2022). A critical review for real-time continuous soil monitoring: Advantages, challenges, and perspectives. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56: 13546−13564. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03562. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[326]	Janga, J.K., Reddy, K.R., and Raviteja, K. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning approaches into remediation of contaminated sites: A review. Chemosphere 345: 140476. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140476. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[327]	Zhang, S., Zhao, J., and Zhu, L. (2024). Predicting removal efficiency of organic pollutants by soil vapor extraction based on an optimized machine learning method. Sci. Total Env. 927: 172438. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172438. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[328]	Du, Z., Sun, X., Zheng, S., et al. (2024). Optimal biochar selection for cadmium pollution remediation in Chinese agricultural soils via optimized machine learning. J. Hazard. Mater. 476: 135065. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135065. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[329]	Palansooriya, K.N., Li, J., Dissanayake, P.D., et al. (2022). Prediction of soil heavy metal immobilization by biochar using machine learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56: 4187−4198. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08302. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[330]	Wu, G., Kechavarzi, C., Li, X., et al. (2013). Machine learning models for predicting PAHs bioavailability in compost amended soils. Chem. Eng. J. 223: 747−754. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.122. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[331]	Sakizadeh, M., Mirzaei, R., and Ghorbani, H. (2017). Support vector machine and artificial neural network to model soil pollution: A case study in Semnan Province, Iran. Neural. Comput. Appl. 28: 3229−3238. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2231-x. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[332]	Aghazadeh, F., Ghasemi, M., Kazemi Garajeh, M., et al. (2023). An integrated approach of deep learning convolutional neural network and google earth engine for salt storm monitoring and mapping. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 14: 101689. DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101689. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[333]	Han, K. and Wang, Y. (2021). A review of artificial neural network techniques for environmental issues prediction. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 145: 2191−2207. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10748-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[334]	Tan, M., Zhang, X., Luo, W., et al. (2023). Deep learning based spatial distribution estimation of soil Pb using multi-phase multispectral remote sensing images in a mining area. Land 12: 1789. DOI: 10.3390/land12091789. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[335]	Nkinahamira, F., Feng, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2024). Machine learning approaches for monitoring environmental metal pollutants: Recent advances in source apportionment, detection, quantification, and risk assessment. Trends Analyt. Chem. 180: 117980. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2024.117980. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[336]	Zhalehdoost, A. and Taleai, M. (2022). A review of the application of machine learning and geospatial analysis methods in air pollution prediction. Pollution 8: 904−933. DOI: 10.22059/poll.2022.336044.1300. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[337]	Hou, D., O'Connor, D., Nathanail, P., et al. (2017). Integrated GIS and multivariate statistical analysis for regional scale assessment of heavy metal soil contamination: A critical review. Environ. Pollut. 231: 1188−1200. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.021. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[338]	Wang, L., Cheng, Y., Meftaul, I.M., et al. (2024). Advancing soil health: Challenges and opportunities in integrating digital imaging, spectroscopy, and machine learning for bioindicator analysis. Anal. Chem. 96: 8109−8123. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05311. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[339]	Hall, A. and Agarwal, V. (2024). Barriers to adopting artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in nuclear power. Prog. Nucl. Energy 175: 105295. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105295. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[340]	Chen, K., Chen, H., Zhou, C., et al. (2020). Comparative analysis of surface water quality prediction performance and identification of key water parameters using different machine learning models based on big data. Water Res. 171: 115454. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115454. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[341]	Ding, F., Zhang, W., Cao, S., et al. (2023). Optimization of water quality index models using machine learning approaches. Water Res. 243: 120337. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120337. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[342]	Zhi, W., Appling, A.P., Golden, H.E., et al. (2024). Deep learning for water quality. Nat. Water 2: 228−241. DOI: 10.1038/s44221-024-00202-z. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[343]	Thorslund, J., Bierkens, M.F.P., Oude Essink, G.H.P., et al. (2021). Common irrigation drivers of freshwater salinisation in river basins worldwide. Nat. Commun. 12: 4232. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24281-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[344]	Pang, M., Du, E., and Zheng, C. (2024). Contaminant transport modeling and source attribution with attention-based graph neural network. Water Resour. Res 60: e2023WR035278. DOI: 10.1029/2023WR035278. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[345]	Connolly, R.M., Jinks, K.I., Shand, A., et al. (2023). Out of the shadows: Automatic fish detection from acoustic cameras. Aquat. Ecol. 57: 833−844. DOI: 10.1007/s10452-022-09967-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[346]	Qian, J., Qian, L., Pu, N., et al. (2024). An intelligent early warning system for harmful algal blooms: Harnessing the power of big data and deep learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58: 15607−15618. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03906. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[347]	Mansfield, L.A., Nowack, P.J., Kasoar, M., et al. (2020). Predicting global patterns of long-term climate change from short-term simulations using machine learning. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 3: 44. DOI: 10.1038/s41612-020-00148-5. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[348]	Gibson, P.B., Chapman, W.E., Altinok, A., et al. (2021). Training machine learning models on climate model output yields skillful interpretable seasonal precipitation forecasts. Commun. Earth Environ. 2: 159. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-021-00225-4. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[349]	Oyounalsoud, M.S., Yilmaz, A.G., Abdallah, M., et al. (2024). Drought prediction using artificial intelligence models based on climate data and soil moisture. Sci. Rep. 14: 19700. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70406-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[350]	Eyring, V., Collins, W.D., Gentine, P., et al. (2024). Pushing the frontiers in climate modelling and analysis with machine learning. Nat. Clim. Change 14: 916−928. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-024-02095-y. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[351]	Bi, K., Xie, L., Zhang, H., et al. (2023). Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks. Nature 619: 533−538. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06185-3. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[352]	Sundaramoorthy, R.A., Ananth, A.D., Seerangan, K., et al. (2024). Implementing heuristic-based multiscale depth-wise separable adaptive temporal convolutional network for ambient air quality prediction using real time data. Sci. Rep. 14: 18437. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68793-x. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[353]	Guo, Z., Jing, X., Ling, Y., et al. (2024). Optimized air quality management based on air quality index prediction and air pollutants identification in representative cities in China. Sci. Rep. 14: 17923. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68972-w. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[354]	Pelt, D.H.M., Habets, P.C., Vinkers, C.H., et al. (2024). Building machine learning prediction models for well-being using predictors from the exposome and genome in a population cohort. Nat. Mental Health 2: 1217−1230. DOI: 10.1038/s44220-024-00294-2. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[355]	Nallakaruppan, M.K., Gangadevi, E., Shri, M.L., et al. (2024). Reliable water quality prediction and parametric analysis using explainable AI models. Sci. Rep. 14: 7520. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56775-y. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[356]	Hu, Y., Wei, F., Fu, B., et al. (2023). Ecosystems in China have become more sensitive to changes in water demand since 2001. Commun. Earth Environ. 4: 444. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-01105-9. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[357]	Richards, C.E., Tzachor, A., Avin, S., et al. (2023). Rewards, risks and responsible deployment of artificial intelligence in water systems. Nat. Water 1: 422−432. DOI: 10.1038/s44221-023-00069-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[358]	Tesfay Abraha, A., Assefa Woldeamanuel, T., and Gebremariam Beyene, E. (2024). Tracking and tracing water consumption for informed water sensitive intervention through machine learning approach. npj Clean Water 7: 28. DOI: 10.1038/s41545-024-00309-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[359]	Zhang, B., Ouyang, C., Cui, P., et al. (2024). Deep learning for cross-region streamflow and flood forecasting at a global scale. The Innovation 5 : 100617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100617. View in Article Google Scholar
[360]	Nearing, G., Cohen, D., Dube, V., et al. (2024). Global prediction of extreme floods in ungauged watersheds. Nature 627: 559−563. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07145-1. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[361]	Yang, W., Wang, Z., Wu, S., et al. (2024). Climate change and urbanization inducing a tipping point in the hydrosphere. The Innovation Geoscience 2: 100074. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2024.100074. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[362]	Yang, W., Zhang, J., Hua, P., et al. (2023). Global framework for flood risk management under climate change and urbanization. The Innovation Geoscience 1: 100009. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100009. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[363]	Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Hua, P., et al. (2023). Filling in missing pieces in the co-development of artificial intelligence and environmental science. The Innovation Geoscience 1: 100007. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100007. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[364]	Coffer, M.M. (2020). Balancing privacy rights and the production of high-quality satellite imagery. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54: 6453−6455. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02365. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[365]	Xu, Y., Bai, T., Yu, W., et al. (2023). AI security for geoscience and remote sensing: Challenges and future trends. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 11: 60−85. DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2023.3272825. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[366]	Zhao, T., Wang, S., Ouyang, C., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. The Innovation 5: 100691. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100691. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

Cited by

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Luo M., Yang W., Bai L., et al., (2024). Artificial intelligence for life sciences: A comprehensive guide and future trends. The Innovation Life 2(4): 100105. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100105

Luo M., Yang W., Bai L., et al., (2024). Artificial intelligence for life sciences: A comprehensive guide and future trends. The Innovation Life 2(4): 100105. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100105

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

PDF

Figures(10)

Article Metrics

Article views(26677) PDF downloads(12518)

Artificial intelligence for life sciences: A comprehensive guide and future trends

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

PUBLIC SUMMARY

ABSTRACT

REFERENCES

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Welcome!

Share

Article Metrics

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

{{newsColumn.name}}

Journal links

{{newsColumn.name}}

Stay connected

Artificial intelligence for life sciences: A comprehensive guide and future trends

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

PUBLIC SUMMARY

ABSTRACT

REFERENCES

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Welcome!

Share

Article Metrics

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

{{newsColumn.name}}

Journal links

{{newsColumn.name}}

Stay connected