Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access     Cite

Sus scrofa domesticus reveals the genetic evolution of adaptive traits during early divergence

    Show all affliationsShow less
More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Domestic pigs diverge from wild boars yet remain interfertile, serving as a model for early speciation.

      Pigs split into high and low gene flow groups shaped by introgression and selection.

      The profile of bile acid shift improves glucose balance and metabolic health under energy-rich domestic diets.

      Regulatory changes precede coding alterations, showing traits evolve before reproductive isolation.

  • Domestication has generated extensive phenotypic diversity within Sus scrofa, producing marked divergence from wild boars in morphology, behavior, and metabolic physiology across numerous distinct breeds. Yet domestic pigs and wild boars remain interfertile, as effective reproductive barriers have not emerged. This condition, phenotypic divergence without reproductive isolation, makes domestic pigs an informative model for studying genetic processes during the earliest phases of speciation, capturing the tension between selection-driven innovation and gene flow–maintained continuity. Here, we categorize domestic pig breeds by historical gene flow intensity with wild boars (high vs. low) and examine their contrasting genetic architectures, assessing how environmental adaptation and artificial selection shape genomic homogeneity and heterogeneity. Using bile acid (BA) metabolism as an illustrative example, we show that domestic pigs experienced a functional shift in which cytochrome P450 family 8 subfamily B member 1 (CYP8B1) silencing and 4 subfamily A member 21 (CYP4A21) neofunctionalization replaced cholic acid (CA) with hyocholic acid (HCA) as the primary BA. This transition suggests that phenotypic diversification can precede reproductive isolation and that evolutionary changes in regulatory regions may occur before alterations in coding sequences.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Wolf J.B. and Ellegren H. (2017). Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18:87−100. DOI:10.1038/nrg.2016.133

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Johnson N.A. (2022). Speciation: Genomic sequence data and the biogeography of speciation. Natl. Sci. Rev. 9:nwac294. DOI:10.1093/nsr/nwac294

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Jarrett B.J.M., Downing P.A. and Svensson E.I. (2025). Meta-analysis reveals that phenotypic plasticity and divergent selection promote reproductive isolation during incipient speciation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9:833−844. DOI:10.1038/s41559-025-02687-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Diaz F., Allan C.W., Chen X., et al. (2022). Divergent evolutionary trajectories shape the postmating transcriptional profiles of conspecifically and heterospecifically mated cactophilic Drosophila females. Commun. Biol. 5:842. DOI:10.1038/s42003-022-03758-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Fotopulosova V., Tanieli G., Fusek K., et al. (2024). A minimal hybrid sterility genome assembled by chromosome swapping between mouse subspecies (Mus musculus). Mol. Biol. Evol. 41:msae211. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msae211

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Ramírez O., Ojeda A., Tomàs A., et al. (2009). Integrating Y-chromosome, mitochondrial, and autosomal data to analyze the origin of pig breeds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:2061−72. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msp118

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Mabry M.E., Rowan T.N., Pires J.C., et al. (2021). Feralization: Confronting the complexity of domestication and evolution. Trends. Genet. 37:302−305. DOI:10.1016/j.tig.2021.01.005

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Zhu Y., Li W., Yang B., et al. (2017). Signatures of selection and interspecies introgression in the genome of Chinese domestic pigs. Genome. Biol. Evol. 9:2592−2603. DOI:10.1093/gbe/evx186

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Ai H., Zhang M., Yang B., et al. (2021). Human-mediated admixture and selection shape the diversity on the modern swine (Sus scrofa) Y chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38:5051−5065. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msab230

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Liu L., Bosse M., Megens H.J., et al. (2019). Genomic analysis on pygmy hog reveals extensive interbreeding during wild boar expansion. Nat. Commun. 10:1992. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-10017-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Frantz L.A., Schraiber J.G., Madsen O., et al. (2015). Evidence of long-term gene flow and selection during domestication from analyses of Eurasian wild and domestic pig genomes. Nat. Genet. 47:1141−8. DOI:10.1038/ng.3394

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Bosse M., Megens H.J., Madsen O., et al. (2014). Untangling the hybrid nature of modern pig genomes: A mosaic derived from biogeographically distinct and highly divergent Sus scrofa populations. Mol. Ecol. 23:4089−102. DOI:10.1111/mec.12807

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Zhang Z., Zhang Q., Xiao Q., et al. (2018). Distribution of runs of homozygosity in Chinese and Western pig breeds evaluated by reduced-representation sequencing data. Anim. Genet. 49:579−591. DOI:10.1111/age.12730

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Rubin C.J., Megens H.J., Martinez Barrio A., et al. (2012). Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:19529−36. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1217149109

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Bovo S., Ribani A., Muñoz M., et al. (2020). Whole-genome sequencing of European autochthonous and commercial pig breeds allows the detection of signatures of selection for adaptation of genetic resources to different breeding and production systems. Genet. Sel. Evol. 52:33. DOI:10.1186/s12711-020-00553-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Revidatti M.A., Gama L.T., Martin Burriel I., et al. (2021). On the origins of American Criollo pigs: A common genetic background with a lasting Iberian signature. PLoS One 16:e0251879. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251879

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Erven J.A.M., Mattiangeli V., Dreshaj M., et al. (2025). Archaeogenomic insights into commensalism and regional variation in pig management in Neolithic northwest Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122:e2410235122. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2410235122

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Frantz L.A., Schraiber J.G., Madsen O., et al. (2013). Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus. Genome. Biol. 14:R107. DOI:10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r107

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Bosse M., Megens H.J., Madsen O., et al. (2012). Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: Consequence of demography and the recombination landscape. PLoS. Genet. 8:e1003100. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003100

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Rowley-Conwy P. (2025). European Neolithic farmers interbred their domestic pigs with wild boar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122:e2504472122. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2504472122

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Groenen M.A., Archibald A.L., Uenishi H., et al. (2012). Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 491:393−8. DOI:10.1038/nature11622

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Yang G., Ren J., Zhang Z., et al. (2009). Genetic evidence for the introgression of Western NR6A1 haplotype into Chinese Licha breed associated with increased vertebral number. Anim. Genet. 40:247−50. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01820.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Larson G., Albarella U., Dobney K., et al. (2007). Ancient DNA, pig domestication, and the spread of the Neolithic into Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:15276−81. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0703411104

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Yang L., Yin H., Bai L., et al. (2024). Mapping and functional characterization of structural variation in 1060 pig genomes. Genome. Biol. 25:116. DOI:10.1186/s13059-024-03253-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Pérez-Montarelo D., Rodríguez M.C., Fernández A., et al. (2015). Haplotypic diversity of porcine LEP and LEPR genes involved in growth and fatness regulation. J. Appl. Genet. 56:525−533. DOI:10.1007/s13353-015-0284-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Bosse M., Megens H.J., Frantz L.A., et al. (2014). Genomic analysis reveals selection for Asian genes in European pigs following human-mediated introgression. Nat. Commun. 5:4392. DOI:10.1038/ncomms5392

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Stanton D.W.G., Manin A., Evin A., et al. (2026). Genomic and morphometric evidence for Austronesian-mediated pig translocation in the Pacific. Science 391:eadv4963. DOI:10.1126/science.adv4963

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Larson G., Dobney K., Albarella U., et al. (2005). Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication. Science 307:1618−21. DOI:10.1126/science.1106927

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Goedbloed D.J., Megens H.J., Van Hooft P., et al. (2013). Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis reveals recent genetic introgression from domestic pigs into Northwest European wild boar populations. Mol. Ecol. 22:856−66. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05670.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Amaral A.J., Megens H.J., Crooijmans R.P., et al. (2008). Linkage disequilibrium decay and haplotype block structure in the pig. Genetics 179:569−79. DOI:10.1534/genetics.107.084277

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Ma Y.F., Han X.M., Huang C.P., et al. (2019). Population genomics analysis revealed origin and high-altitude adaptation of Tibetan pigs. Sci. Rep. 9:11463. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-47711-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Tong X., Chen D., Hu J., et al. (2023). Accurate haplotype construction and detection of selection signatures enabled by high quality pig genome sequences. Nat. Commun. 14:5126. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-40434-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Ding J., Cui X., Wang X., et al. (2024). Multi-omics analysis of gut microbiota and metabolites reveals contrasting profiles in domestic pigs and wild boars across urban environments. Front. Microbiol. 15:1450306. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1450306

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Zong W., Chen L., Zhang D., et al. (2025). Two telomere-to-telomere pig genome assemblies and pan-genome analyses provide insights into genomic structural landscape and genetic adaptations. Imeta 4:e70013. DOI:10.1002/imt2.70013

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Rong B., Zhang Q., Zhang X., et al. (2024). Hyocholic acid: A novel therapeutic strategy for metabolic syndrome. Innov. Life 2:100093. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100093

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Zheng X., Chen T., Jiang R., et al. (2021). Hyocholic acid species improve glucose homeostasis through a distinct TGR5 and FXR signaling mechanism. Cell. Metab. 33:791−803. DOI:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.11.017

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Fan M., Yang Z., Jin L., et al. (2025). Differential roles of individual bile acid in physiology and disease. Pharmacol. Res. 218:107845. DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107845

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Lundell K. and Wikvall K. (2003). Gene structure of pig sterol 12alpha-hydroxylase (CYP8B1) and expression in fetal liver: Comparison with expression of taurochenodeoxycholic acid 6alpha-hydroxylase (CYP4A21). Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1634:86−96. DOI:10.1016/j.bbalip.2003.09.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Lundell K. and Wikvall K. (2008). Species-specific and age-dependent bile acid composition: Aspects on CYP8B and CYP4A subfamilies in bile acid biosynthesis. Curr. Drug. Metab. 9:323−31. DOI:10.2174/138920008784220574

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Morita S., Yamasaki H. and Ogura M. (1970). Bile acids of wild boar, Sus scrofa leucomystax (Temminck et Schlegel). Yonago. Acta. Med. 14:82−6. DOI:10.3109/00365517009046222

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Boström H. (1986). Characterization of 6 alpha-hydroxylation of taurochenodeoxycholic acid in pig liver. J. Lipid. Res. 27:807−12. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.046

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Patience J.F., Rossoni-Serão M.C. and Gutiérrez N.A. (2015). A review of feed efficiency in swine: Biology and application. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 6:33. DOI:10.1186/s40104-015-0031-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Robeson M.S. II, Khanipov K., Golovko G., et al. (2017). Assessing the utility of metabarcoding for diet analyses of the omnivorous wild pig (Sus scrofa). Ecol. Evol. 8:185−196. DOI:10.1002/ece3.3638

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Heng Y.C., Chua J.H.X., Silvaraju S., et al. (2026). Metagenomic insights into the global wild boar faecal microbiome reveal novel taxa and carbohydrate degraders distinguishing wild and domesticated Sus. MicrobiomeVOLME 14:123. DOI:10.1186/s40168-026-02392-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Canright V.R., Piaggio A.J. and Beasley J.C. (2024). Invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) diets on barrier islands in the southeastern United States. Pest. Manag. Sci. 80:3901−3911. DOI:10.1002/ps.8093

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Zhang B., Sun Z., Yu Z., et al. (2022). Transcriptome and targeted metabolome analysis provide insights into bile acids' new roles and mechanisms on fat deposition and meat quality in lamb. Food. Res. Int. 162:111941. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111941

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Lundell K. (2004). The porcine taurochenodeoxycholic acid 6alpha-hydroxylase (CYP4A21) gene: Evolution by gene duplication and gene conversion. Biochem. J. 378:1053−8. DOI:10.1042/BJ20031657

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Ai H., Fang X., Yang B., et al. (2015). Adaptation and possible ancient interspecies introgression in pigs identified by whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 47:217−25. DOI:10.1038/ng.3199

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Mikawa S., Morozumi T., Shimanuki S.I., et al. (2007). Fine mapping of a swine quantitative trait locus for number of vertebrae and analysis of an orphan nuclear receptor, germ cell nuclear factor (NR6A1). Genome. Res. 17:586−593. DOI:10.1101/gr.6085507

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Herrero-Medrano J.M., Megens H.J., Groenen M.A., et al. (2013). Conservation genomic analysis of domestic and wild pig populations from the Iberian Peninsula. BMC. Genet. 14:106. DOI:10.1186/1471-2156-14-106

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Zorc M., Škorput D., Gvozdanović K., et al. (2022). Genetic diversity and population structure of six autochthonous pig breeds from Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia. Genet. Sel. Evol. 54:30. DOI:10.1186/s12711-022-00718-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Atrian-Afiani F., Berger B., Draxl C., et al. (2023). Selective sweeps in the Austrian Turopolje and other commercial pig populations. Animals (Basel) 13:3749. DOI:10.3390/ani13243749

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Ishikawa K., Doneva R., Raichev E.G., et al. (2021). Population genetic structure and diversity of the East Balkan Swine (Sus scrofa) in Bulgaria, revealed by mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite analyses. Anim. Sci. J. 92:e13630. DOI:10.1111/asj.13630

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Liu T., Ji D., Li X., et al. (2024). Population genetics reveals new introgression in the nucleus herd of min pigs. Genes Genomics 46:389−398. DOI:10.1007/s13258-024-01490-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Burgos C., Latorre P., Altarriba J., et al. (2015). Allelic frequencies of NR6A1 and VRTN, two genes that affect vertebrae number in diverse pig breeds: A study of the effects of the VRTN insertion on phenotypic traits of a Duroc×Landrace-Large White cross. Meat. Sci. 100:150−155. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.09.143

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Muñoz M., Bozzi R., García F., et al. (2018). Diversity across major and candidate genes in European local pig breeds. PLoS One 13:e0207475. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0207475

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Molinero E., Pena R.N., Estany J., et al. (2025). Unravelling novel and closely linked association signals for fat-related traits in pigs using prioritised variants from whole-genome sequence data. Animal 19:101496. DOI:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101496

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Poklukar K., Mestre C., Škrlep M., et al. (2023). A meta-analysis of genetic and phenotypic diversity of European local pig breeds reveals genomic regions associated with breed differentiation for production traits. Genet. Sel. Evol. 55:88. DOI:10.1186/s12711-023-00858-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Huang Y., Zhou L., Zhang J., et al. (2020). A large-scale comparison of meat quality and intramuscular fatty acid composition among three Chinese indigenous pig breeds. Meat. Sci. 168:108182. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108182

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Jørgensen D. (2024). The Medieval Pig. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press. DOI:10.1017/9781805432456

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [61] Wang L., Li K., Yang G., et al. (2011). Animal genetic resources in China: Pigs (ed. China National Commission of Animal Genetic Resources). China Agricultural Press. http://course.syt126.com/?m=course&p=detail&cid=8&kid=341

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [62] Innan H. and Kim Y. (2004). Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:10667−72. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0401720101

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Samuk K., Owens G.L., Delmore K.E., et al. (2017). Gene flow and selection interact to promote adaptive divergence in regions of low recombination. Mol. Ecol. 26:4378−4390. DOI:10.1111/mec.14226

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Burbrink F.T., DeBaun D., Foley N.M., et al. (2025). Recombination-aware phylogenomics. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 40:900−912. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2025.06.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Han Y., Zhao Z., Stanton D.W.G., et al. (2025). Ancient genomics reveals the origin, dispersal, and human management of East Asian domestic pigs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 42:msaf214. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msaf214

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Barmentlo N.W.G., Meirmans P.G., Stiver W.H., et al. (2024). Natural selection on feralization genes contributed to the invasive spread of wild pigs throughout the United States. Mol. Ecol. 33:e17383. DOI:10.1111/mec.17383

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] Zhang C. and Plastow G. (2011). Genomic diversity in pig (Sus scrofa) and its comparison with human and other livestock. Curr. Genomics. 12:138−46. DOI:10.2174/138920211795564386

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [68] Chen Z., Zhou M., Sun Y., et al. (2024). Exploration of genome-wide recombination rate variation patterns at different scales in pigs. Animals (Basel) 14:1345. DOI:10.3390/ani14091345

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Ribani A., Taurisano V., Karatosidi D., et al. (2023). Signatures of admixture and genetic uniqueness in the autochthonous Greek black pig breed deduced from gene polymorphisms affecting domestication-derived traits. Animals (Basel) 13:1763. DOI:10.3390/ani13111763

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [70] Wu G.S., Yao Y.G., Qu K.X., et al. (2007). Population phylogenomic analysis of mitochondrial DNA in wild boars and domestic pigs revealed multiple domestication events in East Asia. Genome. Biol. 8:R245. DOI:10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r245

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Bosse M., Megens H.J., Madsen O., et al. (2015). Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations. Genome. Res. 25:970−81. DOI:10.1101/gr.187039.114

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [72] Touma S., Fusho K. and Arakawa A. et al. (2025). Assessment of genetic diversity and inbreeding in the Okinawa indigenous Agu pig through pedigree analysis. Anim. Biosci. 38:1105−1115. DOI:10.5713/ab.24.0646

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Qiao R., Li X., Madsen O., et al. (2023). Potential selection for lipid kinase activity and spermatogenesis in Henan native pig breeds and growth shaping by introgression of European genes. Genet. Sel. Evol. 55:64. DOI:10.1186/s12711-023-00841-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [74] Kim J., Cho S., Caetano-Anolles K., et al. (2015). Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in Korean Native Black Pig from Jeju Island. BMC. Genet. 16:3. DOI:10.1186/s12863-014-0160-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Yang R., Jin S., Fang S., et al. (2024). Genetic introgression from commercial European pigs to the indigenous Chinese Lijiang breed and associated changes in phenotypes. Genet. Sel. Evol. 56:24. DOI:10.1186/s12711-024-00893-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [76] Patterson N., Price A.L. and Reich D. (2006). Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS. Genet. 2:e190. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [77] Lawson D.J., van Dorp L. and Falush D. (2018). A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots. Nat. Commun. 9:3258. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-05257-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [78] Feng X., Diao S., Liu Y., et al. (2023). Exploring the mechanism of artificial selection signature in Chinese indigenous pigs by leveraging multiple bioinformatics database tools. BMC Genomics 24:743. DOI:10.1186/s12864-023-09848-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [79] Hongo H., Ishiguro N., Watanobe T., et al. (2002). Variation in mitochondrial DNA of Vietnamese pigs: Relationships with Asian domestic pigs and Ryukyu wild boars. Zoolog. Sci. 19:1329−35. DOI:10.2108/zsj.19.1329

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [80] Cao M., Yuan T., Li D., et al. (2025). Whole-genome resequencing reveals positive selection and introgression signatures and genetic loci associated with early puberty traits in Chinese indigenous pigs. Genet. Sel. Evol. 57:29. DOI:10.1186/s12711-025-00975-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [81] Li D., Wang Y., Yuan T., et al. (2024). Pangenome and genome variation analyses of pigs unveil genomic facets for their adaptation and agronomic characteristics. Imeta 3:e257. DOI:10.1002/imt2.257

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [82] Ishihara S., Arakawa A., Ba N.V., et al. (2023). Population structure of Vietnamese pigs using mitochondrial DNA. Anim. Sci. J. 94:e13875. DOI:10.1111/asj.13875

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [83] A V., Kumar A., Mahala S., et al. (2024). Revelation of genetic diversity and genomic footprints of adaptation in Indian pig breeds. Gene 893:147950. DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2023.147950

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [84] Du H., Zhou L., Liu Z., et al. (2024). The 1000 Chinese indigenous pig genomes project provides insights into the genomic architecture of pigs. Nat. Commun. 15:10137. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-54471-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [85] Li Z., Wei S., Li H., et al. (2017). Genome-wide genetic structure and differentially selected regions among Landrace, Erhualian, and Meishan pigs using specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing. Sci. Rep. 7:10063. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-09969-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [86] Larson G., Liu R., Zhao X., et al. (2010). Patterns of East Asian pig domestication, migration, and turnover revealed by modern and ancient DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:7686−91. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0912264107

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [87] Li Z., Liu X., Wang C., et al. (2023). The pig pangenome provides insights into the roles of coding structural variations in genetic diversity and adaptation. Genome. Res. 33:1833−1847. DOI:10.1101/gr.277638.122

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [88] Yuan H., Li C., Zhao S., et al. (2025). Unraveling the genetic diversity and adaptive traits of laboratory pig breeds within the perspective of whole - genome resequencing. BMC Genomics 26:604. DOI:10.1186/s12864-025-11790-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [89] Wen H., Blackburn H.D., Mulim H.A., et al. (2025). Characterization of genomic diversity and population structure of worldwide Duroc subpopulations and other pig breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 58:1. DOI:10.1186/s12711-025-01017-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] Kim K.S., Larsen N., Short T., et al. (2000). A missense variant of the porcine melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene is associated with fatness, growth, and feed intake traits. Mamm. Genome. 11:131−5. DOI:10.1007/s003350010025

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Jokubka R., Maak S., Kerziene S., et al. (2006). Association of a melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) polymorphism with performance traits in Lithuanian White pigs. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 123:17−22. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00559.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [92] Fontanesi L., Schiavo G., Scotti E., et al. (2015). A retrospective analysis of allele frequency changes of major genes during 20 years of selection in the Italian Large White pig breed. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 132:239−46. DOI:10.1111/jbg.12127

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [93] Liu Y., Xu Y., Li G., et al. (2025). Local climate adaptation in Chinese indigenous pig genomes. Animals 15:2412. DOI:10.3390/ani15162412

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [94] Liu C., Ao N., Liang Y., et al. (2024). Analysis of cis-regulatory changes underlying phenotype divergence shaped by domestication in pigs. Front. Genet. 15:1421859. DOI:10.3389/fgene.2024.1421859

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [95] Luo Y.B., Huang N., Zha C.W., et al. (2026). Telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of a male pig provides insight into population structure and selection for body stature. Nat. Genet. 58:195−205. DOI:10.1038/s41588-025-02433-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [96] Wang Y., Feng R., Hu X., et al. (2025). Latitude-driven adaptive evolution of body length in diverse pig breeds across China. BMC. Biol. 23:150. DOI:10.1186/s12915-025-02265-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [97] Wang Z., Song B., Yao J., et al. (2024). Whole-genome analysis reveals distinct adaptation signatures to diverse environments in Chinese domestic pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 15:97. DOI:10.1186/s40104-024-01053-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [98] Gao Y., Feng X., Diao S., et al. (2024). Deciphering genetic characteristics of South China and North China indigenous pigs through selection signatures. BMC Genomics 25:1191. DOI:10.1186/s12864-024-11119-y

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [99] Du H., Liu Z., Lu SY., et al. (2024). Genomic evidence for human-mediated introgressive hybridization and selection in the developed breed. BMC Genomics 25:331. DOI:10.1186/s12864-024-10259-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [100] Liu C., Huang R., Su G., et al. (2023). Introgression of pigs in Taihu Lake region possibly contributed to the improvement of fertility in Danish Large White pigs. BMC Genomics 24:733. DOI:10.1186/s12864-023-09860-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [101] Fontanesi L. (2022). Invited review: Genetics and genomics of pigmentation variability in pigs: A review. Livest. Sci. 265:105079. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105079

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [102] Giovannini S., Strillacci M.G., Bagnato A., et al. (2023). Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of belted pig breeds: A review. Animals (Basel) 13:3072. DOI:10.3390/ani13193072

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [103] Fang M., Larson G., Ribeiro H.S., et al. (2009). Contrasting mode of evolution at a coat color locus in wild and domestic pigs. PLoS. Genet. 5:e1000341. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000341

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [104] Giuffra E., Evans G., Törnsten A., et al. (1999). The Belt mutation in pigs is an allele at the Dominant white (I/KIT) locus. Mamm. Genome. 10:1132−6. DOI:10.1007/s003359901178

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [105] Hirooka H., de Koning D.J., van Arendonk J.A., et al. (2002). Genome scan reveals new coat color loci in exotic pig cross. J. Hered. 93:1−8. DOI:10.1093/jhered/93.1.1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [106] Muñoz M., Bozzi R., García-Casco J., et al. (2019). Genomic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in European local pig breeds assessed with a high density SNP chip. Sci. Rep. 9:13546. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-49830-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [107] Twining C.W., Bernhardt J.R., Derry A.M., et al. (2021). The evolutionary ecology of fatty-acid variation: Implications for consumer adaptation and diversification. Ecol. Lett. 24:1709−1731. DOI:10.1111/ele.13771

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [108] Haslewood G.A. (1967). Bile salt evolution. J. Lipid. Res. 8:535−50. DOI:10.1016/S0022-2275(20)38873-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [109] Sasaki T. (1966). Stero-bile acids and bile alcohols: LXXXII. Comparative studies on the bile salts of fishes by thin layer chromatography. J. Biochem. 60:56−62. DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a128399

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [110] Hofmann A.F. and Roda A. (1984). Physicochemical properties of bile acids and their relationship to biological properties: An overview of the problem. J. Lipid. Res. 25:1477−89. DOI:10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34421-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [111] Watt S.M. and Simmonds W.J. (1984). Effects of four taurine-conjugated bile acids on mucosal uptake and lymphatic absorption of cholesterol in the rat. J. Lipid. Res. 25:448−55. DOI:10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37796-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [112] Heuman D.M., Hylemon P.B. And Vlahcevic Z.R. (1989). Regulation of bile acid synthesis. III. Correlation between biliary bile salt hydrophobicity index and the activities of enzymes regulating cholesterol and bile acid synthesis in the rat. J. Lipid. Res. 30:1161−71. DOI:10.1016/S0022-2275(20)38276-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [113] Sheriha G.M., Waller G.R., Chan T., et al. (1968). Composition of bile acids in ruminants. Lipids 3:72−8. DOI:10.1007/BF02530972

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [114] Martínez-Álvaro M., Mattock J., Auffret M., et al. (2022). Microbiome-driven breeding strategy potentially improves beef fatty acid profile benefiting human health and reduces methane emissions. Microbiome 10:166. DOI:10.1186/s40168-022-01352-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [115] Lin L., Lai Z., Yang H., et al. (2023). Genome-centric investigation of bile acid metabolizing microbiota of dairy cows and associated diet-induced functional implications. ISME. J. 17:172−184. DOI:10.1038/s41396-022-01333-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [116] Zheng K., Guo L., Cao Y., et al. (2024). High-concentrate diet decreases lamb fatty acid contents by regulating bile acid composition. Food. Chem. X. 24:101871. DOI:10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101871

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [117] Araya Z., Hellman U. and Hansson R. (1995). Characterisation of taurochenodeoxycholic acid 6 alpha-hydroxylase from pig liver microsomes. Eur. J. Biochem. 231:855−61. DOI:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0855d.x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [118] Takahashi S., Fukami T., Masuo Y., et al. (2016). Cyp2c70 is responsible for the species difference in bile acid metabolism between mice and humans. J. Lipid. Res. 57:2130−2137. DOI:10.1194/jlr.M071183

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [119] Tavoloni N. (1986). Bile acid structure and bile formation in the guinea pig. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 879:186−201. DOI:10.1016/0005-2760(86)90102-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [120] Li J. and Dawson P.A. (2019). Animal models to study bile acid metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Basis. Dis. 1865:895−911. DOI:10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.05.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [121] van Hees H.M.J., Ballari S.A., Dieste-Pérez L., et al. (2023). Diet and stomach characteristics of feral piglets (Sus scrofa): Implications for farmed piglets. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl). 107:529−540. DOI:10.1111/jpn.13726

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [122] Canright V.R., Piaggio A.J., Chinn S.M., et al. (2023). DNA metabarcoding reveals consumption of diverse community of amphibians by invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the southeastern United States. Sci. Rep. 13:20889. DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-48139-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] Russo G., Danieli P.P., Primi R., et al. (2017). Stable isotopes in tissues discriminate the diet of free-living wild boar from different areas of central Italy. PLoS One 12:e0183333. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0183333

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [124] Castillo-Contreras R., Mentaberre G., Fernandez Aguilar X., et al. (2021). Wild boar in the city: Phenotypic responses to urbanisation. Sci. Total. Environ. 773:145593. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145593

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [125] Sayin S.I., Wahlström A., Felin J., et al. (2013). Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist. Cell. Metab. 17:225−35. DOI:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.003

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [126] Lauridsen C. (2020). Effects of dietary fatty acids on gut health and function of pigs pre- and post-weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 98:skaa086. DOI:10.1093/jas/skaa086

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [127] Lundell K., Hansson R. and Wikvall K. (2001). Cloning and expression of a pig liver taurochenodeoxycholic acid 6alpha-hydroxylase (CYP4A21): A novel member of the CYP4A subfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 276:9606−12. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M006584200

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [128] Pellicoro A., van den Heuvel FA., Geuken M., et al. (2007). Human and rat bile acid-CoA: Amino acid N-acyltransferase are liver-specific peroxisomal enzymes: Implications for intracellular bile salt transport. Hepatology 45:340−8. DOI:10.1002/hep.21528

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [129] Smith Z., Ryerson D. and Kemper J.K. (2013). Epigenomic regulation of bile acid metabolism: Emerging role of transcriptional cofactors. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 368:59−70. DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2012.04.008

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [130] Yin C., Liu X., Fang W., et al. (2025). Hyocholic acid species as the key modulator for cecal epithelial homeostasis in low-birth-weight piglets. Nutrients 17:3415. DOI:10.3390/nu17213415

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [131] Qi D., Zheng T., Yang M., et al. (2024). Bile acid composition and transcriptome analysis of the liver and small intestine in different species. Metabolites 14:451. DOI:10.3390/metabo14080451

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [132] Yamada S., Kawaguchi H., Yamada T., et al. (2017). Cholic acid enhances visceral adiposity, atherosclerosis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in microminipigs. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 24:1150−1166. DOI:10.5551/jat.39909

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [133] Gåfvels M., Olin M., Chowdhary BP., et al. (1999). Structure and chromosomal assignment of the sterol 12alpha-hydroxylase gene (CYP8B1) in human and mouse: Eukaryotic cytochrome P-450 gene devoid of introns. Genomics 56:184−196. DOI:10.1006/geno.1998.5606

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [134] Simpson A.E. (1997). The cytochrome P450 4 (CYP4) family. Gen. Pharmacol. 28:351−9. DOI:10.1016/s0306-3623(96)00246-7

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [135] Shinde S.S., Teekas L., Sharma S., et al. (2019). Signatures of relaxed selection in the CYP8B1 gene of birds and mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 87:209−220. DOI:10.1007/s00239-019-09903-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [136] Dehal P., Predki P., Olsen A.S., et al. (2001). Human chromosome 19 and related regions in mouse: Conservative a4d lineage-specific evolution. Science 293:104−11. DOI:10.1126/science.1060310

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [137] Tennyson C.N., Klamut H.J. and Worton R.G. (1995). The human dystrophin gene requires 16 hours to be transcribed and is cotranscriptionally spliced. Nat. Genet. 9:184−90. DOI:10.1038/ng0295-184

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [138] Yan B., Sun Y., Fu K., et al. (2023). Effects of glyphosate exposure on gut-liver axis: Metabolomic and mechanistic analysis in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Sci. Total. Environ. 902:166062. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166062

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [139] Endo Y., Kamei K.I. and Inoue-Murayama M. (2018). Genetic signatures of lipid metabolism evolution in Cetacea since the divergence from terrestrial ancestor. J. Evol. Biol. 31:1655−1665. DOI:10.1111/jeb.13361

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [140] Sharma V. and Hiller M. (2018). Loss of enzymes in the bile acid synthesis pathway explains differences in bile composition among mammals. Genome. Biol. Evol. 10:3211−3217. DOI:10.1093/gbe/evy243

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [141] Zhang M. and Chiang JY. (2001). Transcriptional regulation of the human sterol 12alpha-hydroxylase gene (CYP8B1): Roles of heaptocyte nuclear factor 4alpha in mediating bile acid repression. J. Biol. Chem. 276:41690−9. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M105117200

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [142] Arthur R.K. and Ruvinsky I. (2011). Evidence that purifying selection acts on promoter sequences. Genetics 189:1121−6. DOI:10.1534/genetics.111.133637

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [143] She X., Rohl C.A., Castle J.C., et al. (2009). Definition, conservation and epigenetics of housekeeping and tissue-enriched genes. BMC Genomics 10:269. DOI:10.1186/1471-2164-10-269

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [144] Wei K., Ma L. and Zhang T. (2019). Characterization of gene promoters in pig: Conservative elements, regulatory motifs and evolutionary trend. PeerJ 7:e7204. DOI:10.7717/peerj.7204

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [145] Zhang M. and Chiang J.Y. (2001). Transcriptional regulation of the human sterol 12alpha-hydroxylase gene (CYP8B1): Roles of heaptocyte nuclear factor 4alpha in mediating bile acid repression. J. Biol. Chem. 276:41690−9. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M105117200

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [146] Maj M.A., Burrin D.G. and Manjarín R. (2023). Decreased FXR agonism in the bile acid pool is associated with impaired FXR signaling in a pig model of pediatric NAFLD. Biomedicines 11:3303. DOI:10.3390/biomedicines11123303

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [147] Schiöth H.B., Boström A., Murphy S.K., et al. (2016). A targeted analysis reveals relevant shifts in the methylation and transcription of genes responsible for bile acid homeostasis and drug metabolism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Genomics 17:462. DOI:10.1186/s12864-016-2814-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [148] Sohn H.A., Go H., An T.H., et al. (2026). DNMT1 Facilitates the progression of MASLD by impeding transcription mediated by HNF4α and PPARα. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2025.1099.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [149] Leighton G. and Williams D.C. Jr. (2020). The methyl-CpG-binding domain 2 and 3 proteins and formation of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex. J. Mol. Biol. 432:1624−1639. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [150] Kaluscha S., Domcke S., Wirbelauer C., et al. (2022). Evidence that direct inhibition of transcription factor binding is the prevailing mode of gene and repeat repression by DNA methylation. Nat. Genet. 54:1895−1906. DOI:10.1038/s41588-022-01241-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [151] Kim D.H., Kwon S., Byun S., et al. (2016). Critical role of RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of Small Heterodimer Partner in maintaining bile acid homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 7:12179. DOI:10.1038/ncomms12179

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [152] Mao W., Ge X., Chen Q., et al. (2025). Epigenetic mechanisms in the transcriptional regulation of circadian rhythm in mammals. Biology (Basel). 14:42. DOI:10.3390/biology14010042

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [153] Zhang Y., Lin Y., Cai H., et al. (2025). EZH2 confers lenvatinib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing ACSL1-Mediated ferroptosis. BMC Cancer 25:1638. DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-15086-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [154] Choi J., Ryoo Z.Y., Cho D.H., et al. (2021). Trans-tail regulation-mediated suppression of cryptic transcription. Exp. Mol. Med. 53:1683−1688. DOI:10.1038/s12276-021-00711-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [155] Sharma R., Lake B.G., Foster J., et al. (1988). Microsomal cytochrome P-452 induction and peroxisome proliferation by hypolidaemic agents in rat liver, k mechanistic interrelationship. Biochem. Pharmac. 37:1193−1201. DOI:10.1016/0006-2952(88)90770-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [156] Long M. (2001). Evolution of novel genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:673−80. DOI:10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00252-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [157] Lee J.S., Galvin K.M. and Shi Y. (1993). Evidence for physical interaction between the zinc-finger transcription factors YY1 and Sp1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6145−9. DOI:10.1073/pnas.90.13.6145

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Rong B., Niu N., Zong W., et al. (2026). Sus scrofa domesticus reveals the genetic evolution of adaptive traits during early divergence. The Innovation Life 4:100222. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2026.100222
    Rong B., Niu N., Zong W., et al. (2026). Sus scrofa domesticus reveals the genetic evolution of adaptive traits during early divergence. The Innovation Life 4:100222. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2026.100222

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(3)     Tables(1)

Supplementary Information

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(1220) PDF downloads(378)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint