Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review

Weiren Wu; Jun Shen; Hui Kong; Yu Yang; Erxing Ren; Zekuan Liu; Weida Wang; Mingming Dong; Lijin Han; Chao Yang; Hongfei Zheng; Qianghui Xu; Xiaoyu Yao; Jing Zhao; Sheng Li; Qingqing Yang; Jun Liu; Yunfei Zhang; Ji Li; Yongpeng Guo; Jianwei Li; Mengrou Li; Hui Liu; Dezhi Zheng; Rui Xiong; Jiefei Ma; Zhe Zhang; Gang Pei; Xianze Ao; Jie Ji; Wengan Sun; Teng Fei; Fuqiang Wang; Zexu Zhang; Jianzhong Liu; Yong Wei; Wei Yang; Liang Zhao; Aibing Zhang; Yinyue Wang; Jianjun Liu; Weiyang Xu; Chongfeng Zhang; Ruina Xu; Lele Chen; Zhiguo Qu; Hui Wang; Youjun Lu; Dengwei Jing; Long Li; Haiwang Li; Tiefeng Li; Rong Chen; Jianyin Xiong; Yun Kong; Hongsheng Wang; Jiang Qin; Yong Shuai; Xiaojia Zeng; Bing Shen; Fengchun Sun; Zhi Tao; Tianshou Zhao; Peixue Jiang

doi:10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100029

The Innovation Energy > 2024 Vol. 1 > No. 2 > 100029

Next Article Previous Article

REVIEW Open Access

Cite PDF

Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Lunar Exploration and Space Engineer Center, Beijing 100190, China
3.
National Key Lab of Vehicular Transmission School of Mechanical Engineering Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
4.
MIIT Key Laboratory of Complex-Field Intelligent Exploration, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
5.
National Engineering Laboratory for Electric Vehicles, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
6.
Yangtze Delta Region Academy, Beijing institute of Technology, Jiaxing 314003, China
7.
Key Laboratory of Dark Matter and Space Astronomy, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210034, China
8.
Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
9.
School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
10.
School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
11.
School of Astronautics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin, Harbin, 150001, China
12.
Center for Lunar and Planetary Sciences, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
13.
Key Laboratory of Earth and Planetary Physics, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
14.
Chinese Academy of Sciences No. 19, Beituchengxi Road, Beijing 100029, China
15.
State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
16.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
17.
National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
18.
Key Laboratory of Lunar and Deep Space Exploration, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
19.
Shanghai Institute of Aerospace Technology, No. 3888 Yuanjiang Road, Minhang District, Shanghai 201109, China
20.
Shanghai Academy of Space flight Technology, Shanghai 201109, China
21.
Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
22.
Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
23.
Key Laboratory of Thermal Fluid Science and Engineering, MOE of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
24.
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering (SKLMFPE), Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
25.
Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
26.
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aero-Engine Aero-thermodynamics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
27.
State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
28.
Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
29.
Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
30.
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
31.
Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
32.
Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Show all affliationsShow less

More Information

Corresponding authors: wuwr@cae.cn (W.W.); jshen@bit.edu.cn (J.S.); konghui2020@bit.edu.cn (H.K.); 3120235557@bit.edu.cn (Y.Y.); xiongjy@bit.edu.cn (J.X.); kongyun@bit.edu.cn (Y.K.); wanghongsheng@ucas.ac.cn (H.W.); qinjiang@hit.edu.cn (J.Q.); shuaiyong@hit.edu.cn (Y.S.); zengxiaojia@mail.gyig.ac.cn (X.Z.); bingshen@pku.edu.cn (B.S.); sunfch@bit.edu.cn (F.S.); tao_zhi@buaa.edu.cn (Z.T.); zhaots@sustech.edu.cn (T.Z.); jiangpx@tsinghua.edu.cn (P.J.)
Received Date: April 19, 2024

Accepted Date: May 20, 2024

Published Online: May 25, 2024

The Innovation Energy 1(2), https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100029 | Cite this article

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

DownLoad: Full size image

PUBLIC SUMMARY

PUBLIC SUMMARY
1. Advanced environmental control and construction technologies are overviewed.
  
  Cutting-edge techniques for extraterrestrial in situ resource utilization are summarized.
  
  Innovative technologies for efficient energy harvesting on the moon are highlighted.
  
  Typical technologies for planetary transportation platforms and geological explorations are commented.
  
  The current status, challenges, and perspectives are introduced and envisioned.

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

Deep space exploration expands our understanding about the evolution history of solar system, while the future development heavily relies on the construction of energy systems and utilization of resources on the planet. This paper systematically reviewed the progress in the environmental control and construction technologies of space bases, extraterrestrial in situ resource utilization technology, energy systems, key technologies for planetary transportation platforms, and geological explorations. The current status, pros and cons of these technologies and systems are introduced and discussed. As an important artificial microenvironment in the space base, the environmental control and life support system (ECLSS) provides necessary resources for human. Sintering and additive manufacturing technologies demonstrate the potential to construct a space base with lunar regolith or simulants. The extraction and in situ utilization of resources on the Moon, including water ice, oxygen, and helium-3, are crucial to maintain life support for lunar exploration. Typical energy systems that can be used on the Moon include photovoltaic cell, Stirling power generation technology, closed Brayton cycle (CBC) system, Rankine cycle system, heat storage system, and integrated energy system. The CBC system has the highest thermal efficiency (39%) among them, making it suitable for late-period energy supply. The performance of various planetary rovers, the most important transportation platforms, are summarized. Through geological explorations, the resource distribution, content, and occurrence can be obtained. Perspectives on the future, promotions of environment adaptation, resource recovery, energy efficiency, and intelligence of the existing technologies are still needed to move forward on space explorations.

FullText(HTML)

REFERENCES

[1]	Evans, M.E., and Graham, L.D. (2020). A Flexible Lunar Architecture for Exploration (FLARE) supporting NASA's Artemis Program. Acta Astronaut. 177: 351−372. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.07.032. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[2]	Metzger, P.T. (2023). Economics of in-space industry and competitiveness of lunar-derived rocket propellant. Acta Astronaut. 207: 425−444. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.03.014. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[3]	Carpenter, J.D., Fisackerly, R., De Rosa, D.,et al. (2012). Scientific preparations for lunar exploration with the European Lunar Lander. Planet. Space Sci. 74(1): 208−223. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.07.024. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[4]	Haeuplik-Meusburger, S., and Bannova, O. (2023). Reflections on early lunar base design-From sketch to the first moon landing. Acta Astronaut. 202: 729−741. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.09.021. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	Nesnas, I.A.D., Kerber, L., Sellar, G., et al. (2023). Moon Diver: Exploring a pit's exposed strata to understand lunar volcanism. Acta Astronaut. 211: 163−176. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.05.042. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[6]	Olthoff, C., Kaschubek, D., and Killian, M. (2023). Dynamic thermal interactions between spacesuits and lunar regolith in permanently shaded regions on the moon. Acta Astronaut. 203: 351−369. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.12.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[7]	Eccles, D.S., Guidi, C., and Rathjen, T.W. (2021). Avoiding costly delays in human space exploration: Historical perspectives on NASA programs. J. Space Safety Eng. 8: 281−287. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsse.2021.10.002. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[8]	Siegel, B., Spry, J.A., Broyan, J., et al. (2023). Development of a NASA roadmap for planetary protection to prepare for the first human missions to Mars. Life Sci. Space Res. 38: 1−7. DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2023.03.009. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[9]	Konstantinidis, M., Lalla, E.A., Daly, M.G., et al. (2021). Elemental estimation of terrestrial analogues from the CanMars rover field campaign using LiRS: Implications for detecting silica-rich deposits on Mars. Icarus 358. DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114113. View in Article Google Scholar
[10]	Chumikov, A.E., Cheptsov, V.S., Wurz, P., et al. (2021). Design, characteristics and scientific tasks of the LASMA-LR laser ionization mass spectrometer onboard Luna-25 and Luna-27 space missions. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 469. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2021.116676. View in Article Google Scholar
[11]	Litvak, M., Kozlova, T., Ilyin, A., et al. (2022). Luna-25 robotic arm: Results of experiment with analog of lunar regolith in lunar like conditions. Acta Astronaut. 200: 282−290. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.08.003. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	Shkuratov, Y., Kaydash, V., Sysolyatina, X., et al. (2013). Lunar surface traces of engine jets of Soviet sample return probes: The enigma of the Luna-23 and Luna-24 landing sites. Planet. Space Sci. 75: 28−36. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.016. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[13]	Dallas, J.A., Raval, S., Gaitan, J.P.A., et al. (2020). Mining beyond earth for sustainable development: Will humanity benefit from resource extraction in outer space. Acta Astronaut. 167: 181−188. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.11.006. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[14]	Sterling Saletta, M., and Orrman-Rossiter, K. (2018). Can space mining benefit all of humanity. : The resource fund and citizen's dividend model of Alaska, the ‘last frontier’. Space Policy 43: 1−6. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.02.002. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[15]	McKeown, B., Dempster, A.G., Saydam, S., and Coulton, J. (2023). Commercial Lunar Ice Mining: Is There a Role for Royalties. Space Policy 64: 101525. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101525. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[16]	Liu, Z., Cheng, K., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Performance analysis of the heat pipe-based thermoelectric generator (HP-TEG) energy system using in-situ resource for heat storage applied to the early-period lunar base. Appl. Therm. Eng. 218. 119303,DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119303. View in Article Google Scholar
[17]	Tang, J., Jiang, S., Quan, Q., et al. (2019). Soil simulant preparation for lunar deep drilling exploration: Modeling and validation. Planet. Space Sci. 173: 1−13. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.05.005. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[18]	Wang, Y., Hao, L., Li, Y., et al. (2022). In-situ utilization of regolith resource and future exploration of additive manufacturing for lunar/martian habitats: A review. Appl. Clay Sci. 229. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2022.106673. View in Article Google Scholar
[19]	Chen, H., du Jonchay, T.S., Hou, L., et al. (2020). Integrated in-situ resource utilization system design and logistics for Mars exploration. Acta Astronaut. 170: 80−92. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.031. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[20]	Lee, S., and van Riessen, A. (2022). A Review on geopolymer technology for lunar base construction. Materials 15(13). DOI: 10.3390/ma15134516. View in Article Google Scholar
[21]	Ruess, F., Zacny, K., and Braun, B. (2008). Lunar in-situ resource utilization: Regolith bags automated filling technology. AIAA SPACE 2008 Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-7678. View in Article Google Scholar
[22]	Benaroya, H., Indyk, S., and Mottaghi, S. (2012). Advanced Systems Concept for Autonomous Construction and Self-repair of Lunar Surface ISRU Structures. In Moon: Prospective Energy and Material Resources, V. Badescu, ed. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg), pp. 641-660. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-27969-0_27. View in Article Google Scholar
[23]	Horz, F. (1985). Lava tubes-potential shelters for habitats. Lunar bases and space activities of the 21st century. View in Article Google Scholar
[24]	Khoshnevis, B., Carlson, A., Leach, N., et al. (2012). Contour crafting simulation plan for lunar settlement infrastructure buildup. Earth and Space 2012:1458−1467. DOI: 10.1061/9780784412190.155. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[25]	Hecht, M., Hoffman, J., Rapp, D., et al. (2021). Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment (MOXIE). Space Sci. Rev. 217: 9. DOI: 10.1007/s11214-020-00782-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[26]	Schlueter, L., and Cowley, A. (2020). Review of techniques for In-Situ oxygen extraction on the moon. Planet. Space Sci. 181: 104753. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.104753. View in Article Google Scholar
[27]	Sowers, G.F., and Dreyer, C.B. (2019). Ice mining in lunar permanently shadowed regions. New Space 7: 235−244. DOI: 10.1089/space.2019.0002. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[28]	Schieber, G.L., Jones, B.M., Orlando, T.M., et al. (2022). Indirect solar receiver development for the thermal extraction of H₂O(v) from lunar regolith: Heat and mass transfer modeling. Acta Astronaut. 190: 365−376. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.09.020. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	Pu, Z., Zhang, G., Hassanpour, A., et al. (2021). Regenerative fuel cells: Recent progress, challenges, perspectives and their applications for space energy system. Appl. Energy 283. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116376. View in Article Google Scholar
[30]	Mercer, C., Jankovsky, A., Reid, C., et al. (2010). Energy storage technology development for space exploration. AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-8709. View in Article Google Scholar
[31]	Palos, M.F., Serra, P., Fereres, S., et al. (2020). Lunar ISRU energy storage and electricity generation. Acta Astronaut. 170: 412−420. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.02.005. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[32]	Li, J., Yang, L., Yang, Q., et al. (2022). Degradation adaptive energy management with a recognition-prediction method and lifetime competition-cooperation control for fuel cell hybrid bus. Energy Conver. Manag. 271. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116306. View in Article Google Scholar
[33]	OCHMO (2023). Environmental Control and Life Support Subsystem Diagram. OCHMO. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03974-8_4. View in Article Google Scholar
[34]	Wang, H.M., Guo, D.D., Zhang, W.R., et al. (2023). Observation, prediction, and risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in a vehicle cabin environment. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4: 101375. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101375. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[35]	OCHMO (2022). Spaceflight Toxicology Chemical Contaminants. OCMHO. View in Article Google Scholar
[36]	Akay, Ö., Bashkatov, A., Coy, E., et al. (2022). Electrolysis in reduced gravitational environments: current research perspectives and future applications. npj Micrograv. 8: 56. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-022-00239-y. View in Article Google Scholar
[37]	Sabatier, P. (1922). Catalysis in organic chemistry (D. Van Nostrand Company). DOI:10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449. View in Article Google Scholar
[38]	Vogt, C., Monai, M., Kramer, G.J., and Weckhuysen, B.M. (2019). The renaissance of the Sabatier reaction and its applications on Earth and in space. Nat. Catal. 2: 188−197. DOI: 10.1038/s41929-019-0244-4. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[39]	Green, R.D., Matter, P.H., Holt, C., et al. (2016). Development status for a combined solid oxide co-electrolyzer and carbon formation reactor system for oxygen regeneration. In AIAA SPACE 2016. DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-5454. View in Article Google Scholar
[40]	High-Performance Photocatalytic Oxidation Reactor System. (2015). NASA tech. brief.(39-4). https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/21769-mfs-33126-1. View in Article Google Scholar
[41]	OCHMO (2023). Water-human consumption. NASA-STD-3001 Tech. Brief. OCHMO-TB-027 Rev B. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/water-technical-brief-ochmo.pdf View in Article Google Scholar
[42]	Holder, D.W., and Hutchens, C.F. (2003). Development Status of the International Space Station Urine Processor Assembly. Int. Conf. Environ. Sys. DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-2690. View in Article Google Scholar
[43]	Nelson, G.J., Vijapur, S.H., Hall, T.D., et al. (2020). Electrochemistry for space life support. Electrochem. Soc. Int. 29:47. DOI 10.1149/2.F06201IF. View in Article Google Scholar
[44]	Carter, D.L., Tobias, B., and Orozco, N.Y. (2013). Status of ISS water management and recovery. 43rd Int. Conf. Environ. Sys. DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-3509. View in Article Google Scholar
[45]	Massa, G.D., Dufour, N.F., Carver, J.A., et al. (2017). VEG-01: Veggie hardware validation testing on the international space station. Open Agri. 2(1): 33−41. DOI: 10.1515/opag-2017-0003. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[46]	Zabel, P., Bamsey, M., Schubert, D., et al. (2016). Review and analysis of over 40 years of space plant growth systems. Life Sci. Space Res. 10: 1−16. DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2016.06.004. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[47]	Broyan, J.L., McKinley, M., Stambaugh, I., et al. (2021). NASA environmental control and life support technology development and maturation for exploration: 2021 to 2022 overview. 51st Int. Conf. Environ. Sys. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210023841. View in Article Google Scholar
[48]	Gitelson, I.I., Terskov, I.A., Kovrov, B.G., et al. (1989). Long-term experiments on man's stay in biological life-support system. Adv. Space Res. 9: 65-71. DOI: 10.1016/0273-1177(89)90030-6. View in Article Google Scholar
[49]	Du, M., Peng, X., Zhang, H., et al., (2021). Geology, environment, and life in the deepest part of the world’s oceans. The Innovation 2: 100109. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100109. View in Article Google Scholar
[50]	Tang, Y., Dong, W., Ai, W., et al. (2021). Design and establishment of a large-scale controlled ecological life-support system integrated experimental platform. Life Sci. Space Res. 31: 121−130. DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2021.08.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[51]	Fu, Y., Yi, Z., Du, Y., et al. (2021). Establishment of a closed artificial ecosystem to ensure human long-term survival on the moon. bioRxiv 2021.01.12.426282. DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.12.426282. View in Article Google Scholar
[52]	Yin, J., and Slater, L. (2023). Understanding heatwave-drought compound hazards and impacts on socio-ecosystems. The Innovation Geoscience 1: 100042. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100042. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[53]	Sanders, G.B., and Larson, W.E. (2012). Progress made in lunar in situ resource utilization under NASA's exploration technology and development program. ASCE: 457-478. DOI: 10.1061/9780784412190.050. View in Article Google Scholar
[54]	Zhou, S.Q., Zhu, X.Y., Lu, C.H., et al. (2022). Synthesis and characterization of geopolymer from lunar regolith simulant based on natural volcanic scoria. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 35(1): 144−159. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.06.014. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[55]	Khitab, A., Anwar, W., Mehmood, I., et al. (2016). Lunar concrete: Prospects and challenges. Astro. Rep. 60: 306−312. DOI: 10.1134/S1063772916020050. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[56]	Isachenkov, M., Chugunov, S., Akhatov, I., et al. (2021). Regolith-based additive manufacturing for sustainable development of lunar infrastructure–An overview. Acta Astronaut. 180: 650−678. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.005. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[57]	Taylor, L.A., and Meek, T.T. (2005). Microwave sintering of lunar soil: properties, theory, and practice. J. Aerospace Eng. 18: 188−196. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2005)18:3(188). View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[58]	Fateri, M., Meurisse, A., Sperl, M., et al. (2019). Solar sintering for lunar additive manufacturing. J. Aerospace Eng. 32: 04019101. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001093. View in Article Google Scholar
[59]	Licheri, R., Orrù, R., Sani, E., et al. (2022). Spark plasma sintering and optical characterization of lunar regolith simulant. Acta Astronaut. 201: 164−171. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.09.016. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[60]	Lim, S., Prabhu, V.L., Anand, M., et al. (2017). Extra-terrestrial construction processes - Advancements, opportunities and challenges. Adv. Space Res. 60(7): 1413−1429. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.038. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[61]	Hintze, P., Curran, J., and Back, T. (2009). Lunar surface stabilization via sintering or the use of heat cured polymers. In AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum & Aerospace Exposition DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-1015. View in Article Google Scholar
[62]	Anderson, S.D., and Thangavelautham, J. (2021). Solar-powered additive manufacturing in extraterrestrial environments. Earth and Space 2021: 732−744. DOI: 10.1061/9780784483374.068. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[63]	Cesaretti, G., Dini, E., De Kestelier, X., et al. (2014). Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology. Acta Astronaut. 93: 430−450. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[64]	Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., and Salet, T. (2016). Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virt. Phys. Prototyp. 11: 209−225. DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[65]	Lim, S., Buswell, R.A., Le, T.T., et al. (2012). Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Auto. Construct. 21: 262−268. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[66]	Prater, T., Werkheiser, N., Ledbetter, F., et al. (2019). 3D printing in zero G technology demonstration mission: Complete experimental results and summary of related material modeling efforts. Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Tech. 101(1-4): 391−417. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2827-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[67]	Thomas, D., Snyder, M.P., Napoli, M., et al. (2017). Effect of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene melt extrusion additive manufacturing on mechanical performance in reduced gravity. In AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-5278. View in Article Google Scholar
[68]	Allende, M.I., Davis, B.A., Miller, J.E., et al. (2020). Hypervelocity impact performance of biopolymer-bound soil composites for space construction. J. Aerospace Eng. 33: 04020001. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001110. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[69]	Ferrone, K., Taylor, A., and Helvajian, H. (2022). In situ resource utilization of structural material from planetary regolith. Adv. Space Res. 69: 2268−2282. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.12.025. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[70]	Steiner, J.T., and Malla, R.B. (2021). A study of layered structural configurations as thermal and impact shielding of lunar habitats. Earth and Space 2021: 1285−1296. DOI: 10.1061/9780784483374.119. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[71]	Kalapodis, N., Málaga-Chuquitaype, C., and Kampas, G. (2022). Structural efficiency of varying-thickness regolith-based lunar arches against inertial loading. Acta Astronaut. 191: 438−450. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.11.031. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[72]	Heiken, G., Vaniman, D., and French, B.M. (1991). Lunar sourcebook: A user's guide to the Moon (Cup Archive). Cambridge University Press. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar_sourcebook/. View in Article Google Scholar
[73]	Zheng, Y., Wang, S., Ouyang, Z., et al. (2009). CAS-1 lunar soil simulant. Adv. Space Res. 43: 448−454. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.07.006. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[74]	Matsushima, T., Katagiri, J., Uesugi, K., et al. (2009). 3D shape characterization and image-based DEM simulation of the lunar soil simulant FJS-1. J. Aerospace Eng. 22: 15−23. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:1(15). View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[75]	Ryu, B.-H., Wang, C.-C., and Chang, I. (2018). Development and geotechnical engineering properties of KLS-1 lunar simulant. J. Aerospace Eng. 31: 04017083. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000798. View in Article Google Scholar
[76]	Bonanno, A., and Bernold, L. (2015). Exploratory review of sintered lunar soil based on the results of the thermal analysis of a lunar soil simulant. J. Aerospace Eng. 28: 04014114. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000428. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[77]	Gustafson, G. (2009). JSC-1A lunar regolith simulant: availability and characterization. 2009 Lunar Regolith Simulant Workshop. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.049. View in Article Google Scholar
[78]	Watson, K., Murray, B.C., and Brown, H. (1961). The behavior of volatiles on the lunar surface. J. Geophy. Res. 66: 3033−3045. DOI: 10.1029/jz066i009p03033. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[79]	Fisher, E.A., Lucey, P.G., Lemelin, M., et al. (2017). Evidence for surface water ice in the lunar polar regions using reflectance measurements from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter and temperature measurements from the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment. Icarus 292: 74−85. DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.03.023. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[80]	Hayne, P.O., Hendrix, A., Sefton-Nash, E., et al. (2015). Evidence for exposed water ice in the Moon’s south polar regions from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter ultraviolet albedo and temperature measurements. Icarus 255: 58−69. DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.03.032. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[81]	Li, S., Lucey, P.G., Milliken, R.E., et al. (2018). Direct evidence of surface exposed water ice in the lunar polar regions. PNAS 115: 8907−8912. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802345115. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[82]	Colaprete, A., Schultz, P., Heldmann, J., et al. (2010). Detection of water in the LCROSS ejecta plume. Science 330: 463−468. DOI: 10.1126/science.1186986. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[83]	Deutsch, A.N., Neumann, G.A., and Head, J.W. (2017). New evidence for surface water ice in small‐scale cold traps and in three large craters at the north polar region of Mercury from the Mercury Laser Altimeter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44: 9233−9241. DOI: 10.1002/2017GL074723. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[84]	Sunshine, J., A'hearn, M., Groussin, O., et al. (2006). Exposed water ice deposits on the surface of comet 9P/Tempel 1. Science 311: 1453−1455. DOI: 10.1126/science.1123632. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[85]	Nazari-Sharabian, M., Aghababaei, M., Karakouzian, M., et al. (2020). Water on Mars—a literature review. Galaxies 8: 40. DOI. DOI: 10.3390/galaxies8020040. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[86]	Lauro, S.E., Pettinelli, E., Caprarelli, G., et al. (2021). Multiple subglacial water bodies below the south pole of Mars unveiled by new MARSIS data. Nat. Astron. 5: 63−70. View in Article Google Scholar Scopus
[87]	Watters, T.R., Campbell, B.A., Leuschen, C.J., et al. (2024). Evidence of ice-rich layered deposits in the medusae fossae formation of Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51(2): e2023GL105490. DOI: 10.1029/2023GL105490. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[88]	Doran, P., Hayes, A., Grasset, O., et al. (2024). The COSPAR planetary protection policy for missions to icy worlds: A review of history, current scientific knowledge, and future directions. Life Sci. Space Res. 41: 86-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2024.02.002. View in Article Google Scholar
[89]	Jie, J., Weiwei, Z., Xu, Y., et al. (2022). Overview of water ice sampling and detection techniques in the lunar polar region. J. Deep Space Explor. 9: 101−113. DOI: 10.15982/j.issn.2096-9287.2022.20210151. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[90]	Song, H., Zhang, J., Ni, D., et al. (2021). Investigation on in-situ water ice recovery considering energy efficiency at the lunar south pole. Appl. Energy 298: 117136. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117136. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[91]	Frias, J.A., Shafirovich, E., and VanWoerkom, M. (2014). Extraction of volatiles from lunar regolith using solar power. J. Thermophys. Heat Trans. 28: 343−346. DOI: 10.2514/1.T4106. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[92]	Duke, M., Gustafson, R., and Rice, E. (1998). Mining of lunar polar ice. 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-1069. View in Article Google Scholar
[93]	Cole, J.D., Lim, S., Sargeant, H.M., et al. (2023). Water extraction from icy lunar simulants using low power microwave heating. Acta Astronaut. 209: 95−103. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.04.035. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[94]	Liu, Z., Deng, Z., and Huang, X. (2023). A carbon-monitoring strategy through near-real–time data and space technology. The Innovation 4: 100346. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100346. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[95]	Zhang L., Zhang J., and Mitchell R.N. (2022). Dichotomy in crustal melting on early Mars inferred from antipodal effect. The Innovation 3: 100280. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100280. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[96]	Wang, S., Sun, P., Zhang, G., et al., (2022). Contribution of periphytic biofilm of paddy soils to carbon dioxide fixation and methane emissions. The Innovation 3(1), 100192. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100192. View in Article Google Scholar
[97]	Wasilewski, T.G. (2018). Evaluation of drilling-based water extraction methods for Martian ISRU from mid-latitude ice resources. Planet. Space Sci. 158: 16−24. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2018.05.012. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[98]	Biswas, J., Sheridan, S., Pitcher, C., et al. (2020). Searching for potential ice-rich mining sites on the Moon with the Lunar Volatiles Scout. Planet. Space Sci. 181: 104826. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.104826. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[99]	Li, X., Zhang, G., Wang, C., et al. (2020). Water harvesting from soils by light-to-heat induced evaporation and capillary water migration. Appl. Therm. Eng. 175: 115417. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115417. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[100]	Yang, L., Zhang, C., Yu, X., et al. (2021). Extraterrestrial artificial photosynthetic materials for in-situ resource utilization. Nation. Sci. Rev. 8(8). DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab104. View in Article Google Scholar
[101]	Yao, Y., Wang, L., Zhu, X., et al. (2022). Extraterrestrial photosynthesis by Chang’E-5 lunar soil. Joule 6: 1008−1014. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.011. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[102]	Chen, Y., Hu, S., Li, J., et al. (2023). Chang’e-5 lunar samples shed new light on the Moon. The Innovation Geoscience 1: 100014. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100014. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[103]	Feng, D., Zhang, C., Jiang, W., et al. (2020). Design and trial of extraterrestrial artificial photosynthesis device. Chin. Space Sci. Tech. 40: 13−22. DOI: 10.16708/j.cnki.1000-758X.2020.0067. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[104]	Yang, Q., Dong, R., Yang, S., et al. (2023). Microfluidic system for extraterrestrial artificial photosynthetic device. Microsys. Tech. 29(1): 49−61. DOI: 10.1007/s00542-022-05370-0. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[105]	Ellingham H.J.T. (1944). Reducibility of oxides and sulphides in metallurgical processes. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 63:125-160. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5000630501. View in Article Google Scholar
[106]	Li, H., Fang, W., Wang, L.-X., et al., (2023). Physical regulation of copper catalyst with a hydrophobic promoter for enhancing CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. The Innovation 4: 100445. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100445. View in Article Google Scholar
[107]	Yoshida, H., Watanabe, T., Kanamori, H., et al. (2000). Experimental study on water production by hydrogen reduction of lunar soil simulant in a fixed bed reactor. In Space Resources Roundtable II 75. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000srrt.conf..75Y. View in Article Google Scholar
[108]	Lee, K.A., Oryshchyn, L., Paz, A., et al. (2013). The ROxygen project: Outpost-scale lunar oxygen production system development at Johnson Space Center. J. Aerospace Eng. 26: 67−73. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000230. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[109]	Sargeant, H.M. (2020). Water from lunar regolith: Reduction by hydrogen for a small-scale demonstration of in situ resource utilisation for the Moon. PhD Thsis, The Open University, UK. DOI:10.21954/ou.ro.00011fb6. View in Article Google Scholar
[110]	Denk, T. (2022). Terrestrial demonstrator for the hydrogen extraction of oxygen from lunar regolith with concentrated solar energy. PhD Thesis, Universidad od Seville, Seville. DOI: oai:idus.us.es:11441/133362. View in Article Google Scholar
[111]	Lee, H.-C., Dhage, S., Akhtar, M.S., et al. (2010). A simulation study on the direct carbothermal reduction of SiO₂ for Si metal. Current Appl. Phys. 10: S218−S221. DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.11.053. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[112]	Gustafson, R., White, B., Fidler, M., et al. (2010). Demonstrating the solar carbothermal reduction of lunar regolith to produce oxygen. In 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-1163. View in Article Google Scholar
[113]	Seboldt, W., Lingner, S., Hoernes, S., et al. (1991). Lunar oxygen extraction using fluorine. Resources of Near-Earth Space, University of Arizona, Space Science Series, Tucson (accepted 1991). View in Article Google Scholar
[114]	Lomax, B.A., Conti, M., Khan, N., et al. (2020). Proving the viability of an electrochemical process for the simultaneous extraction of oxygen and production of metal alloys from lunar regolith. Planet. Space Sci. 180: 104748. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.104748. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[115]	Shi, H., Li, P., Yang, Z., et al. (2022). Extracting oxygen from chang'e-5 lunar regolith simulants. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10(41): 13661−13668. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03545. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[116]	Liu, A., Shi, Z., Hu, X., et al. (2017). Lunar soil simulant electrolysis using inert anode for Al-Si alloy and oxygen production. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164(2): H126−H133. DOI: 10.1149/2.1381702jes. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[117]	Shchetkovskiy, A., Mckechnie, T.N., Sadoway, D.R., et al. (2012). Development and testing of high surface area iridium anodes for molten oxide electrolysis. Earth and Space 2010: 1039-1045. DOI: 10.1061/41096(366)96. View in Article Google Scholar
[118]	Schreiner, S.S., Sibille, L., Dominguez, J.A., et al. (2016). A parametric sizing model for Molten Regolith Electrolysis reactors to produce oxygen on the Moon. Adv. Space Res. 57(7): 1585−1603. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2016.01.006. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[119]	Paley, M.S., Karr, L.J., and Curreri, P. (2009). Oxygen production from lunar regolith using Ionic liquids. In Space, Propulsion and Energy Sciences International Forum. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090017882. View in Article Google Scholar
[120]	Badescu, V. (2009). Mars: prospective energy and material resources (Springer Science & Business Media). View in Article Google Scholar
[121]	Sibille, L., Carpenter, P., Schlagheck, R., et al. (2006). Lunar regolith simulant materials: Recommendations for standardization, production, and usage. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20060051776. View in Article Google Scholar
[122]	Stoeser, D., Rickman, D., and Wilson, S. (2011). Design and specifications for the highland regolith prototype simulants NU-LHT-1M and-2M. View in Article Google Scholar
[123]	Trigwell, S., Captain, J., Weis, K., et al. (2013). Electrostatic beneficiation of lunar regolith: Applications in in situ resource utilization. J.Aerospace Eng. 26(1): 30−36. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000226. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[124]	Rasera, J.N., Cilliers, J.J., Lamamy, J.A., et al. (2020). The beneficiation of lunar regolith for space resource utilisation: A review. Planet. Space Sci. 186. 104879. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2020.104879. View in Article Google Scholar
[125]	Lee, H.-C., Dhage, S., Akhtar, M.S., et al. (2010). A simulation study on the direct carbothermal reduction of SiO₂ for Si metal. Current Appl. Phy. 10(2, Supplement):S218-S221. DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.11.053. View in Article Google Scholar
[126]	Halmann, M., Frei, A., and Steinfeld, A. (2011). Vacuum carbothermic reduction of Al₂O₃, BeO, MgO-CaO, TiO₂, ZrO₂, HfO₂ + ZrO₂, SiO₂, SiO₂ + Fe₂O₃, and GeO₂ to the metals. A thermodynamic study. Mine. Process. Extract. Metal. Rev. 32(4): 247−266. DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2010.530723. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[127]	Du Fresne, E., and Schroeder, J. (1983). Magma electrolysis. Res. Use Space Resour.(83-36). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840008159. View in Article Google Scholar
[128]	Schreiner, S.S., Sibille, L., Dominguez, J.A., et al. (2015). Development of a molten regolith electrolysis reactor model for lunar in-situ resource utilization. In AIAA Aerospace Research Central. DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-1180. View in Article Google Scholar
[129]	Hecht, M., Hoffman, J., Rapp, D., et al. (2021). Mars oxygen ISRU experiment (Moxie). Space Sci. Rev. 217: 1−76. DOI: 10.1007/s11214-020-00782-8. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[130]	Guerra, V., Silva, T., Ogloblina, P., et al. (2017). The case for in situ resource utilisation for oxygen production on Mars by nonequilibrium plasmas. Plasma Sour. Sci. Tech. 26: 11LT01. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/aa8dcc. View in Article Google Scholar
[131]	Guerra, V., Silva, T., Pinhao, N., et al. (2022). Plasmas for in situ resource utilization on Mars: Fuels, life support, and agriculture. J. Appl. Phys. 132: 070902. DOI: 10.1063/5.0098011. View in Article Google Scholar
[132]	Ogloblina, P., Morillo-Candas, A.S., Silva, A.F., et al. (2021). Mars in situ oxygen and propellant production by non-equilibrium plasmas. Plasma Sour. Sci. Tech. 30: 065005,DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/abec28. View in Article Google Scholar
[133]	Kelly, S., Verheyen, C., Cowley, A., et al. (2022). Producing oxygen and fertilizer with the Martian atmosphere by using microwave plasma. Chem. 8(10): 2797−2816. DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.07.015. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[134]	McKinney, L.G., Silva, T., Guerra, V., et al. (2024). A numerical model for plasma reactor design: Application to CO₂ conversion for Mars In-Situ Resource Utilization. AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum. DOI: 10.2514/6.2024-2243. View in Article Google Scholar
[135]	Simko, T., and Gray, M. (2014). Lunar helium-3 fuel for nuclear fusion: Technology, economics, and resources. World Future Rev. 6: 158−171. DOI: 10.1177/1946756714536142. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[136]	Kuhlman, K., Kulcinski, G., and Schmitt, H. (2004). Simulation of helium-3 extraction from lunar ilmenite. In Space Resources Roundtable VI. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040196377. View in Article Google Scholar
[137]	Wittenberg, L., Santarius, J., and Kulcinski, G. (1986). Lunar source of ³He for commercial fusion power. Fusion Tech. 10(2): 167−178. DOI: 10.13182/FST86-A24972. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[138]	Fegley, B., and Swindle, T.D. (1993). Lunar volatiles: Implications for lunar resource utilization. Resour. near-Earth space: 367-426. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993rnes.book.367F. View in Article Google Scholar
[139]	Slyuta, E., Abdrakhimov, A., and Galimov, E. (2007). The estimation of helium-3 probable reserves in lunar regolith. In 38th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 38: 2175. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/2175.pdf. View in Article Google Scholar
[140]	Li, D., Liu, H., Zhang, W., et al. (2010). Lunar ³He estimations and related parameters analyses. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53: 1103−1114. DOI: 10.1007/s11430-010-3071-7. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[141]	Kulcinski, G., and Schmitt, H.H.J.J.F.T. (1992). Fusion power from lunar resources. Fusion Tech. 21: 2221−2229. DOI: 10.13182/FST92-A29717. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[142]	Lucey, P.G., Blewett, D.T., and Hawke, B.R. (1998). Mapping the FeO and TiO₂ content of the lunar surface multispectral imagery. J. Geophys. Res. Planet. 103(E2): 3679−3699. DOI: 10.1029/97je03019. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[143]	Pepin, R., Nyquist, L., Phinney, D., et al (1970). Rare gases in Apollo 11 lunar material. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Suppl. 1: 1435. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19700065482. View in Article Google Scholar
[144]	Eberhardt, P., Geiss, J., Graf, H., et al. (1972). Trapped solar wind noble gases in Apollo 12 lunar fines 12001 and Apollo 11 breccia 10046. Bern Univ.(Switzerland). View in Article Google Scholar
[145]	Wittenberg, L., Cameron, E., Kulcinski, G., et al. (1992). A review of ³He resources and acquisition for use as fusion fuel. Fusion Tech. 21(4): 2230−2253. DOI: 10.13182/FST92-A29718. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[146]	Sviatoslavsky, I., Jacobs, M.J.E., Construction,, et al. (1988). Mobile helium-3 mining and extraction system and its benefits toward lunar base self-sufficiency. Eng. Construct. Operat. Space: 310-321. DOI: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ecos.proc.310S. View in Article Google Scholar
[147]	Sviatoslavsky, I.J.N. (1988). Processes and energy costs for mining lunar helium-3. In NASA, Lewis Research Center, Lunar Helium-3 and Fusion Power. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890005477. View in Article Google Scholar
[148]	Kulcinski, G.L., Sviatoslavsky, I., Santarius, J., et al. (1988). Energy requirements for He-3 mining operations on the Moon. Trans. Fifth Sympos. Space Nuclear Power Sys: 77-80. DOI: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988snps.symp..77K. View in Article Google Scholar
[149]	Gilmore, D.G. (2002). Spacecraft thermal control handbook: Cryogenics. In AIAA Aerospace Res. Central. DOI:10.2514/4.989148. View in Article Google Scholar
[150]	Bowman Jr, R.C. (2006). Roles of hydrogen in space explorations. In AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP 837: 175-199. DOI: 10.1063/1.2213074. View in Article Google Scholar
[151]	Toutanji, H.A., Evans, S., Grugel, R.N.J.C., et al. (2012). Performance of lunar sulfur concrete in lunar environments. Construct. Build. Mater. 29: 444−448. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.041. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[152]	Grugel, R.N., and Toutanji, H.J.A.i.S.R. (2008). Sulfur “concrete” for lunar applications–Sublimation concerns. Adv. Space Res. 41: 103−112. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.08.018. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[153]	Wang, K.-t., Lemougna, P.N., Tang, Q., et al. (2017). Lunar regolith can allow the synthesis of cement materials with near-zero water consumption. Gondwana Res. 44: 1−6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.11.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[154]	Lee, J., Ann, K.Y., Lee, T.S., et al. (2018). Bottom-up heating method for producing polyethylene lunar concrete in lunar environment. Adv. Space Res. 62(1): 164−173. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.03.039. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[155]	Liu, M., Tang, W., Duan, W., et al. (2019). Digital light processing of lunar regolith structures with high mechanical properties. Ceram. Int. 45: 5829−5836. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.049. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[156]	Aguiar, B.A., Nisar, A., Thomas, T., et al. (2023). In-situ resource utilization of lunar highlands regolith via additive manufacturing using digital light processing. Ceram. Int. 49: 17283−17295. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.095. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[157]	Canning, J., and Peng, G. (2012). Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering: Introduction. Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering. View in Article Google Scholar
[158]	Goulas, A., Binner, J.G., Harris, R.A., and Friel, R.J. (2017). Assessing extraterrestrial regolith material simulants for in-situ resource utilisation based 3D printing. Appl. Mater. Today 6: 54−61. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2016.11.004. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[159]	Wang, R., Qiao, G., Song, G.J.C., and Materials, B. (2023). Additive manufacturing by laser powder bed fusion and thermal post-treatment of the lunar-regolith-based glass-ceramics for in-situ resource utilization. Construct. Build. Mater. 392: 132051. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132051. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[160]	Liu, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Numerical analysis on lunar heat storage system: Multi-objective optimization, heat storage capacity, and thermal insulation performance. J. Energy Stor. 59: 106508. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.106508. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[161]	Tillotson, B.J.A.S.T. (1991). Regolith thermal energy storage for lunar nighttime power. Conf. Adv. SEI Tech. DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-3420. View in Article Google Scholar
[162]	Cui, T., Xuan, Y., and Li, Q. (2016). Design of a novel concentrating photovoltaic–thermoelectric system incorporated with phase change materials. Energy Conver. Manag. 112: 49−60. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.008. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[163]	Zhang, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., et al. (2024). Sustainable thermal energy harvest for generating electricity. The Innovation 5: 100591. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100591. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[164]	Afshar-Mohajer, N., Wu, C.-Y., Curtis, J.S., et al. (2015). Review of dust transport and mitigation technologies in lunar and Martian atmospheres. Adv. Space Res. 56(6): 1222−1241. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.007. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[165]	Allison, C. (2017). Building a Viable Spaceport Economy through the Eyes of a Reentry Vehicle Operator. In AIAA Space Astronaut. Forum Expos. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-5350. View in Article Google Scholar
[166]	Gläser, P., Oberst, J., Neumann, G., et al. (2018). Illumination conditions at the lunar poles: Implications for future exploration. Planet. Space Sci. 162: 170−178. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2017.07.006. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[167]	Liu, Z., Cheng, K., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Performance analysis of the heat pipe-based thermoelectric generator (HP-TEG) energy system using in-situ resource for heat storage applied to the early-period lunar base. Appl. Therm. Eng. 218: 119303. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119303. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[168]	Fleith, P., Cowley, A., Canals Pou, A., et al. (2020). In-situ approach for thermal energy storage and thermoelectricity generation on the Moon: Modelling and simulation. Planet. Space Sci. 181: 104789. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.104789. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[169]	Xie, H., Li, C., Sun, L., et al. (2020). Conceptualization of in-situ energy support technology on the Moon. Adv. Eng. Sci. 52: 1-9. DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese.202000313. View in Article Google Scholar
[170]	Chu, S., and Majumdar, A. (2012). Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488: 294−303. DOI: 10.1038/nature11475. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[171]	Jeevarajan, J.A. (2009). Power Goals for NASA's Exploration Program. In AIAA-Houston Annual Tech. Symposium 2009. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090020689. View in Article Google Scholar
[172]	Queneau, Y., Han, B. (2022). Biomass: Renewable carbon resource for chemical and energy industry. The Innovation 3:100184. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100184. View in Article Google Scholar
[173]	Kuhn, V., Klemeš, J., and Bulatov, I. (2008). MicroCHP: Overview of selected technologies, products and field test results. Appl. Therm. Eng. 28: 2039−2048. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.02.003. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[174]	Bouvenot, J.B., Andlauer, B., Stabat, P., et al. (2014). Gas Stirling engine μCHP boiler experimental data driven model for building energy simulation. Energy Build. 84: 117−131. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.023. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[175]	Roselli, C., Sasso, M., Sibilio, S., et al. (2011). Experimental analysis of microcogenerators based on different prime movers. Energy Build. 43(4): 796−804. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.021. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[176]	Babazadeh, M.A., Babaelahi, M., and Saadatfar, M. (2023). Enhancing solar stirling engine performance through the use of innovative heat transfer fin shapes. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 190: 108290. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108290. View in Article Google Scholar
[177]	Al-Nimr, M.d., Khashan, S.A., and Al-Oqla, H. (2023). Novel techniques to enhance the performance of Stirling engines integrated with solar systems. Renew. Energy 202: 894−906. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.086. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[178]	Lu, X., Yao, W., Wang, C., et al. (2019). Exergy analysis of a lunar based solar thermal power system with finite-time thermodynamics. Energy Proced. 158: 792−796. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.209. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[179]	Ren, S., Feng, X., Gundersen, T., et al. (2023). Performance improvement of liquid air energy storage: Introducing Stirling engine and solar energy. Energy Conver. Manag. 296: 117666. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117666. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[180]	Hu, D.H., Li, M., and Li, Q.J.E. (2021). A solar thermal storage power generation system based on lunar in-situ resources utilization: Modeling and analysis. Energy 223: 120083. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120083. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[181]	Smirnov, S.V., Sinkevich, M.V., Antipov, Y.A., et al. (2021). A calculation method of a heat rejection system in a lunar power plant consisting of a free-piston Stirling engine (FPSE). Acta Astronaut. 180: 46−57. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.12.008. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[182]	Yang, Q., Li, J., Cao, W., et al. (2022) An improved vehicle to the grid method with battery longevity management in a microgrid application. Energy 198: 117374. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117374. View in Article Google Scholar
[183]	Hu, D.-H., Li, M., and Li, Q. (2021). Numerical analysis of thermal storage characteristics of stacked lunar regolith spheres. J. Appl. Therm. Eng. Design Proces. Equip. Eco. 188: 116617. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116617. View in Article Google Scholar
[184]	Balasubramaniam, R., Gokoglu, S.A., Sacksteder, K.R., et al. (2011). Analysis of solar-heated thermal wadis to support extended-duration lunar exploration. J.Thermophys. Heat Trans. 25(1): 130−139. DOI: 10.2514/1.49843. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[185]	Zhang, K., Sun, P., Li, S., et al. (2022). Characteristic of thermal energy system self-driven by exhausted heat from equipment in lunar base. Appl. Therm. Eng. 213: 118751. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118751. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[186]	Liu, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Numerical analysis on lunar heat storage system: Multi-objective optimization, heat storage capacity, and thermal insulation performance. J. Energy Stor. 59: 106508. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.106508. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[187]	Zhang, C., Shi, L., Pei, G., et al. (2023). Thermodynamic analysis of combined heating and power system with In-Situ resource utilization for lunar base. Energy 284: 129230. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129230. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[188]	Liu, Z., Wang, Z., Cheng, K., et al. (2023). Performance assessment of closed Brayton cycle-organic Rankine cycle lunar base energy system: Thermodynamic analysis, multi-objective optimization. Energy 278: 127936. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127936. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[189]	Saleh, B.J. (2016). Performance analysis and working fluid selection for ejector refrigeration cycle. Appl. Therm. Eng. 107: 114−124. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.147. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[190]	Sherwani, A.F.J.I.J.o.R. (2022). Analysis of organic Rankine cycle integrated multi evaporator vapor-compression refrigeration (ORC-mVCR) system. Int. J. Refrig. 138: 233−243. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2022.03.014. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[191]	Malwe, P.D., Shaikh, J., Gawali, B.S., et al. (2022). Dynamic simulation and exergy analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle integrated with vapor compression refrigeration system. Sustain. Energy Tech. Assess. 53: 102684. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102684. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[192]	Xia, X., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Energy, conventional and advanced exergy analysis for the organic Rankine cycle-vapor compression refrigeration combined system driven by low-grade waste heat. Appl. Therm. Eng. 220: 119650. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119650. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[193]	Liu, Z., Cheng, K., Yin, Z., et al. (2022). Evaluation of the CBC-ORC energy system in lunar base: Working fluid combination selection, day and night operation performance. Energy Conver. Manag. 257: 115445. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115445. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[194]	Gromov, V., Kemurdjian, A., Bogatchev, A., et al. (2003). Lunokhod 2-A retrospective Glance after 30 Years. In EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assem: 14528. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003EAEJA..14528G. View in Article Google Scholar
[195]	Li, J., Liu, J., Wang, T., et al. (2024). Analysis of the evolution characteristics of hydrogen leakage and diffusion in a temperature stratified environment. Energy 293: 130598. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130598. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[196]	Li, J., Tian, Z., Yang, Q., et al. (2023). A new visual approach with the concentration calibration method for the hydrogen leakage and distribution research. Fuel 346: 128132. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128132. View in Article Google Scholar
[197]	Branicio, P.S. (2012). Atomistic mechanisms in silicon carbide nanostructures. J. Comput. Theoret. Nanosci. 9: 1870−1880. DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2012.2598. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[198]	Ning, X.J., Huvey, N., and Pirouz, P. (1997). Dislocation cores and hardness polarity of 4H‐SiC. JACS 80(7): 1645−1652. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03033.x. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[199]	Morris, R.V. (1983). Handbook of lunar soils (Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center). View in Article Google Scholar
[200]	Sitch, P., Jones, R., Öberg, S., and Heggie, M. (1995). Ab initio investigation of the dislocation structure and activation energy for dislocation motion in silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. B 52: 4951. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.4951. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[201]	Harvey, B.J.S., and Exploration, R.L. (2007). Samplers, rovers and orbiters. Soviet and Russian Lunar Exploration. Praxis: 239-286. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73976-2_7. View in Article Google Scholar
[202]	Wang, W.-R., Ren, X., Wang, F.-F., et al. (2015). Terrain reconstruction from Chang'e-3 PCAM images. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 15: 1057. DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/7/013. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[203]	Gellert, R., Rieder, R., Brückner, J., et al. (2006). Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer (APXS): Results from Gusev crater and calibration report. J. Geophys. Res. Planet. 111(E2). DOI: 10.1029/2005je002555. View in Article Google Scholar
[204]	Arvidson, R.E., Bell III, J.F., Bellutta, P., et al. (2010). Spirit mars rover mission: Overview and selected results from the northern Home Plate Winter Haven to the side of Scamander crater. J. Geophys. Res. Planet. 115(E7). DOI: 10.1029/2010je003633. View in Article Google Scholar
[205]	Mangold, N., Gupta, S., Caravaca, G., et al. (2022). Significance of the variations in fluvial input within Jezero crater from Perseverance rover observations. 53rd Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2022/pdf/1814.pdf. View in Article Google Scholar
[206]	Blackley, W., and Scattergood, R. (1991). Ductile-regime machining model for diamond turning of brittle materials. Precis. Eng. 13: 95−103. DOI: 10.1016/0141-6359(91)90500-i. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[207]	Maeda, K., Suzuki, K., Fujita, S., et al. (1988). Defects in plastically deformed 6H SiC single crystals studied by transmission electron microscopy. Philosoph. Magaz. A 57: 573−592. DOI: 10.1080/01418618808214408. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[208]	Helmick, D., Angelova, A., and Matthies, L. (2009). Terrain adaptive navigation for planetary rovers. J. Field Robot. 26: 391−410. DOI: 10.1002/rob.20292. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[209]	Leger, P.C., Trebi-Ollennu, A., Wright, J.R., et al. (2005). Mars exploration rover surface operations: Driving spirit at gusev crater. 2005 IEEE ICSMC. DOI: 10.1109/ICSMC.2005.1571411. View in Article Google Scholar
[210]	Ho, K., Peynot, T., and Sukkarieh, S. (2012). Analysis of terrain geometry representations for traversability of a mars rover. 11th ASSC: 359-372. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/67613/15/Ho-ASSC-2011.pdf. View in Article Google Scholar
[211]	Sutoh, M., Otsuki, M., Wakabayashi, S., et al. (2015). The right path: comprehensive path planning for lunar exploration rovers. IEEE MRA 22: 22−33. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2014.2381359. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[212]	Choi, D., Kim, Y., Jung, S., et al. (2017). Improvement of step-climbing capability of a new mobile robot RHyMo via kineto-static analysis. Mechan. Mach. Theory 114: 20−37. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.03.018. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[213]	Patel, N., Slade, R., and Clemmet, J. (2010). The ExoMars rover locomotion subsystem. J. Terramechan. 47: 227−242. DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2010.02.004. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[214]	Vago, J., Witasse, O., Svedhem, H., et al. (2015). ESA ExoMars program: the next step in exploring Mars. Sol. Sys. Res. 49: 518−528. DOI: 10.1134/s0038094615070199. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[215]	Cordes, F., Kirchner, F., and Babu, A. (2018). Design and field testing of a rover with an actively articulated suspension system in a Mars analog terrain. J. Field Robot. 35: 1149−1181. DOI: 10.1002/rob.21808. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[216]	Yang, Q., Shen, J., Li, J., et al. (2022). An Improved Adaptive Coordination Control of Wind Integrated Multi-Terminal HVdc System. IEEE TPEL 38: 5490-5499. DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3228949. View in Article Google Scholar
[217]	Ke, F., Li, Z., and Yang, C. (2017). Robust tube-based predictive control for visual servoing of constrained differential-drive mobile robots. IEEE TIE 65: 3437−3446. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2756595. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[218]	Kobayashi, T., Fujiwara, Y., Yamakawa, J., et al. (2010). Mobility performance of a rigid wheel in low gravity environments. J. Terramechan. 47: 261−274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2009.12.001. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[219]	Pérez del Pulgar Mancebo, C.J., Romeo Manrique, P., Paz Delgado, G.J., et al. (2019). Choosing the best locomotion mode in reconfigurable rovers. Electronics 8: 818. DOI: 10.3390/electronics8070818. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[220]	Martín-Torres, F.J., Zorzano, M.-P., Valentín-Serrano, P., et al. (2015). Transient liquid water and water activity at Gale crater on Mars. Nat. Geosci. 8: 357−361. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2412. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[221]	McCarthy, J., Minsky, M.L., Rochester, N., and Shannon, C.E. (2006). A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, august 31, 1955. AI magaz. 27: 12−12. DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[222]	Maimone, M., Cheng, Y., and Matthies, L. (2007). Two years of visual odometry on the mars exploration rovers. J. Field Robot. 24: 169−186. DOI: 10.1002/rob.20184. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[223]	Maimone, M., Johnson, A., Cheng, Y., et al. (2006). Autonomous navigation results from the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission. Exp. Robot. 9th Int. Sympos. Exp. Robot. 21: 3-13. DOI: 10.1007/11552246_1. View in Article Google Scholar
[224]	Börner, A., Baumbach, D., Buder, M., et al. (2015). IPS-an autonomous navigation system for future planetary exploration missions. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/31018236.pdf. View in Article Google Scholar
[225]	Li, B., Chen, P., Liu, H., et al. (2021). Random sketch learning for deep neural networks in edge computing. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1: 221−228. DOI: 10.1038/s43588-021-00039-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[226]	Hong, Z., Tu, B., Tong, X., et al. (2022). A Fast Large-Scale Path Planning Method on Lunar DEM Using Distributed Tile Pyramid Strategy. IEEE JSTARS 16: 344−355. DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3226527. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[227]	Seo, M.-G., Hong, S.-M., and Tahk, M.-J. (2016). Lunar lander landing site decision in low-fuel case. MATEC Web Conf. 54: 09003. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20165409003. View in Article Google Scholar
[228]	Laubach, S.L., and Burdick, J.W. (1999). An autonomous sensor-based path-planner for planetary microrovers. Proceedings 1999 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Auto. 1: 347-354. DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.1999.770003. View in Article Google Scholar
[229]	Rubio, F., Valero, F., and Llopis-Albert, C. (2019). A review of mobile robots: Concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications. Int. J.Adv. Robot. Sys. 16:1729881419839596. DOI: 10.1177/1729881419839596. View in Article Google Scholar
[230]	Li, S., Lucey, P.G., Milliken, R.E., et al. (2018). Direct evidence of surface exposed water ice in the lunar polar regions. PNAS 115: 8907−8912. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.180234511. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[231]	Wu, Y. (2012). Major elements and Mg# of the Moon: Results from Chang’E-1 Interference Imaging Spectrometer (IIM) data. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 93:214-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.07.011. View in Article Google Scholar
[232]	Feldman, W., Gasnault, O., Maurice, S., et al. (2002). Global distribution of lunar composition: New results from lunar prospector. J. Geophys. Res. 107(E3): 1-13. DOI: 10.1029/2001JE001506. View in Article Google Scholar
[233]	Sunshine, J.M., Farnham, T.L., Feaga, L.M., et al. (2009). Temporal and spatial variability of lunar hydration as observed by the deep impact spacecraft. Science 326: 565−568. DOI: 10.1126/science.1179788. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[234]	Fa, W., and Wieczorek, M.A. (2012). Regolith thickness over the lunar nearside: Results from Earth-based 70-cm Arecibo radar observations. Icarus 218: 771−787. DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.01.010. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[235]	Theinat, A.K., Modiriasari, A., Bobet, A., et al. (2020). Lunar lava tubes: Morphology to structural stability. Icarus 338: 113442. DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113442. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[236]	Barnes, J.J., Kring, D.A., Tartèse, R., et al. (2016). An asteroidal origin for water in the Moon. Nat. Commun. 7: 11684. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11684. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[237]	Whiteway, J.A., Komguem, L., Dickinson, C., et al. (2009). Mars Water-Ice Clouds and Precipitation. Science 325: 68−70. DOI. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172344. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar
[238]	Abbud-Madrid, A. (2018). Space and Planetary Resources. Planet. Geo.: 369-394. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65179-8_15. View in Article Google Scholar
[239]	Łuszczek, K., and Krzesińska, A.M. (2020). Copper in ordinary chondrites: Proxies for resource potential of asteroids and constraints for minimum-invasive and economically efficient exploitation. Planet. Space Sci. 194: 105092. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2020.105092. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[240]	Nabiei, F., Badro, J., Dennenwaldt, T., et al. (2018). A large planetary body inferred from diamond inclusions in a ureilite meteorite. Nat. Commun. 9: 1327. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03808-6. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[241]	Nestola, F., Goodrich, C.A., Morana, M., et al. (2020). Impact shock origin of diamonds in ureilite meteorites. PNAS 117: 25310−25318. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1919067117. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[242]	Łuszczek, K., and Przylibski, T.A. (2019). Potential deposits of selected metallic resources on L chondrite parent bodies. Planet. Space Sci. 168: 40−51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.02.005. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus
[243]	Łuszczek, K., and Przylibski, T.A. (2021). Selected metal resources on H chondrite parent bodies. Planet. Space Sci. 206: 105309. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2021.105309. View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar Scopus

Cited by

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Wu W., Shen J., Kong H., et al., (2024). Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review. The Innovation Energy 1(2): 100029. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100029

Wu W., Shen J., Kong H., et al., (2024). Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review. The Innovation Energy 1(2): 100029. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100029

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Standard PDF

Extended PDF

Figures(9)

Article Metrics

Article views(23297) PDF downloads(10326)

Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

PUBLIC SUMMARY

ABSTRACT

REFERENCES

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Welcome!

Share

Article Metrics

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

{{newsColumn.name}}

Official Account

{{newsColumn.name}}

Stay connected

{{newsColumn.name}}

Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

PUBLIC SUMMARY

ABSTRACT

REFERENCES

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Cite this article:

Welcome!

Share

Article Metrics

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

{{newsColumn.name}}

Official Account

{{newsColumn.name}}

Stay connected

{{newsColumn.name}}