Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

Tailoring self-assembled granular hydrogels (GHs) for immunomodulation and chronic wound healing

More Information
  • Corresponding author: py.wang@ojlab.ac.cn
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Integrating click chemistry and phase separation is feasible for preparing granular hydrogels (GHs).

      GHs with rationally selected bioactive compounds can accelerate the healing of chronic and infected wounds.

      GHs with tailored biofunctions are promising for applications in immunomodulation and tissue regeneration.

  • Granular hydrogels (GHs) hold a prominent position in tissue engineering and drug delivery due to their unique physicochemical properties. However, challenges still exist in tailoring bioactive GHs. This study presents a straightforward approach for preparing GHs with on-demand bioactivity. By utilizing the click chemistry of nucleophilic opening of epoxides by amines, in conjunction with the in-situ formation of poly(amino alcohol ethers) (MDP) prepolymers and lignosulfonate (LS) complexation-mediated phase separation, we have developed a new family of poly(amino alcohol ethers)-based GHs, named MDPS. MDPS exhibits microstructures with interconnected microgels, which have excellent hemocompatibility, cytocompatibility, and antioxidative properties. Moreover, by incorporating bioactive compounds within the microgel units, the curcumin-loaded MDPS exhibits outstanding anti-inflammatory effects in macrophage polarization, subsequently accelerating wound healing in a diabetic wound model. We further validate the feasibility of our approach to tailoring GHs with on-demand bioactivity by substituting LS with tannic acid (TA) to generate another type of GH, named MDPT, which exhibits excellent antibacterial properties both in vitro and in an S. aureus-infected wound model. Finally, the universal applicability of the proposed strategy is further demonstrated by utilizing two additional alternatives, sodium phytate (SP) and fucoidan (FCD), to prepare functional GHs. Overall, we develop a rapid and environmentally friendly strategy for tailoring functional GHs and demonstrate their versatile functions and bioactivities in two wound models. The approach presented here enables the customized design of bioactive GHs to advance applications in tissue regeneration and drug delivery.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Zvinavashe A. T., Laurent J., Mhada M., et al. (2021). Programmable design of seed coating function induces water-stress tolerance in semi-arid regions. Nat. Food 2:485−493. DOI:10.1038/s43016-021-00315-8

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Caserto J. S., Wright L., Reese C., et al. (2024). Ingestible hydrogel microparticles improve bee health after pesticide exposure. Nat. Sustain. 7:1441−1451. DOI:10.1038/s41893-024-01432-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Correa S., Grosskopf A. K., Hernandez H. L., et al. (2021). Translational applications of hydrogels. Chem. Rev. 121:11385−11457. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01177

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Daly A. C., Riley L., Segura T., et al. (2020). Hydrogel microparticles for biomedical applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5:20−43. DOI:10.1038/s41578-019-0148-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Richbourg N., Wechsler M. E., Rodriguez-Cruz J. J., et al. (2024). Model-based modular hydrogel design. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2:575−587. DOI:10.1038/s44222-024-00167-4

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Emiroglu D. B., Bekcic A., Dranseike D., et al. (2022). Building block properties govern granular hydrogel mechanics through contact deformations. Sci. Adv. 8:eadd8570. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.add8570

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Daly A. C. (2024). Granular hydrogels in biofabrication: recent advances and future perspectives. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 13:2301388. DOI:10.1002/adhm.202301388

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Jaberi A., Kedzierski A., Kheirabadi S., et al. (2024). Engineering microgel packing to tailor the physical and biological properties of gelatin methacryloyl granular hydrogel scaffolds. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 13:2402489. DOI:10.1002/adhm.202402489

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Wan Y., Han J., Cheng F., et al. (2020). Green preparation of hierarchically structured hemostatic epoxy-amine sponge. Chem. Eng. J. 397:125445. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.125445

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Tuftee C., Alsberg E., Ozbolat I. T., et al. (2024). Emerging granular hydrogel bioinks to improve biological function in bioprinted constructs. Trends Biotechnol. 42:339−352. DOI:10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.09.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Kühn S., Sievers J., Stoppa A., et al. (2020). Cell-instructive multiphasic gel-in-gel materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30:1908857. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201908857

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] De France K. J., Xu F. and Hoare T. (2018). Structured macroporous hydrogels: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7:1700927. DOI:10.1002/adhm.201700927

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Garcia C. G. and Kiick K. L. (2019). Methods for producing microstructured hydrogels for targeted applications in biology. Acta Biomater. 84:34−48. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.028

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Franco C. L., Price J. and West J. L. (2011). Development and optimization of a dual-photoinitiator, emulsion-based technique for rapid generation of cell-laden hydrogel microspheres. Acta Biomater. 7:3267−3276. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Headen D. M., Aubry G., Lu H., et al. (2014). Microfluidic-based generation of size-controlled, biofunctionalized synthetic polymer microgels for cell encapsulation. Adv. Mater. 26:3003−3008. DOI:10.1002/adma.201304880

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Dendukuri D., Pregibon D. C., Collins J., et al. (2006). Continuous-flow lithography for high-throughput microparticle synthesis. Nat. Mater. 5:365−369. DOI:10.1038/nmat1617

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Naqvi S. M., Vedicherla S., Gansau J., et al. (2016). Living cell factories-electrosprayed microcapsules and microcarriers for minimally invasive delivery. Adv. Mater. 28:5662−5671. DOI:10.1002/adma.201503598

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Sinclair A., O'Kelly M. B., Bai T., et al. (2018). Self-healing zwitterionic microgels as a versatile platform for malleable cell constructs and injectable therapies. Adv. Mater. 30:1803087. DOI:10.1002/adma.201803087

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Tang S., Huang L., Daniels-Mulholland R. J., et al. (2016). Compositional tuning of epoxide-polyetheramine “click” reaction toward cytocompatible, cationic hydrogel particles with antimicrobial and DNA binding activities. Acta Biomater. 43:292−302. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Wan Y., Han J., Cheng F., et al. (2022). Leveraging polyetheramine-bisepoxide reaction in water and LCST-mediated phase separation toward microstructured poly(amino alcohol ethers) hydrogels. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 641:128572. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128572

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Wan Y., Han J., Cheng F., et al. (2023). LCST-mediated phase separation strategy for preparation of poly(amino alcohol ethers) microparticle-gelatin hydrogel composites. Eur. Polym. J. 189:111983. DOI:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.111983

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Li K., Zhong W., Li P., et al. (2023). Recent advances in lignin antioxidant: Antioxidant mechanism, evaluation methods, influence factors and various applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 251:125992. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125992

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Wang Y., Branicky R., Noe A., et al. (2018). Superoxide dismutases: Dual roles in controlling ROS damage and regulating ROS signaling. J. Cell Biol. 217:1915−1928. DOI:10.1083/jcb.201708007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Sies H. and Jones D. P. (2020). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21:363−383. DOI:10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Yu Y., Zhang W., Liu X., et al. (2022). Extracellular matrix scaffold-immune microenvironment modulates tissue regeneration. Compos. Part B-Eng. 230:109524. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109524

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Peng Y., Ao M., Dong B., et al. (2021). Anti-inflammatory effects of curcumin in the inflammatory diseases: status, limitations and countermeasures. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 15:4503−4525. DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S327378

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Hunt M., Torres M., Bachar-Wikstrom E., et al. (2024). Cellular and molecular roles of reactive oxygen species in wound healing. Commun. Biol. 7:1534. DOI:10.1038/s42003-024-07219-w

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Moghaddam A. M., Mohammadian S., Vazini H., et al. (2018). Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J. Cell. Physiol. 233:6425. DOI:10.1002/jcp.26429

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Huang Y., Xiao L., Zhou J., et al. (2021). Strong Tough Polyampholyte Hydrogels via the Synergistic Effect of Ionic and Metal-Ligand Bonds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31:2103917. DOI:10.1002/adfm.202103917

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Chen S., Saeed A. F. U. H., Liu Q., et al. (2023). Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 8:207. DOI:10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Uberoi A., McCready-Vangi A. and Grice E. A. (2024). The wound microbiota: microbial mechanisms of impaired wound healing and infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22:507−521. DOI:10.1038/s41579-024-01035-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Cao H., Xiang D., Zhou X., et al. (2023). High-strength, antibacterial, antioxidant, hemostatic, and biocompatible chitin/PEGDE-tannic acid hydrogels for wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 307:120609. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120609

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Wan Y., Li S., Han J., et al. (2025). Tailoring self-assembled granular hydrogels (GHs) for immunomodulation and chronic wound healing. The Innovation Materials 3:100154. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2025.100154
    Wan Y., Li S., Han J., et al. (2025). Tailoring self-assembled granular hydrogels (GHs) for immunomodulation and chronic wound healing. The Innovation Materials 3:100154. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2025.100154

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(7)    

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(4351) PDF downloads(1329)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint