| [1] | Valgimigli M., Choi K.H., Giacoppo D., et al. (2025). Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 406:1091−1102. DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01562-4 |
| [2] | Virani S.S., Newby L.K., Arnold S.V., et al. (2023). 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease: A report of the American heart association/American college of cardiology joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 148:e9−e119. DOI:10.1161/cir.0000000000001168 |
| [3] | Vrints C., Andreotti F., Koskinas K.C., et al. (2024). 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 45:3415−3537. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177 |
| [4] | Wang Y., Zhao X., Lin J., et al. (2016). Association between CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele status and efficacy of clopidogrel for risk reduction among patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. JAMA 316:70−78. DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.8662 |
| Wang A., Tian X., Cheng S., et al. (2026). From aspirin to clopidogrel monotherapy: A new paradigm for secondary prevention in coronary artery disease. The Innovation Medicine 4:100189. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-med.2026.100189 |
To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.
The overall summary of the clopidogrel monotherapy for the secondary prevention in coronary artery disease