Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

Cost-effective federated molecular design with FedMol

More Information
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. A federated framework for collaborative training of molecular generative models.

      Combining low rank adaptation (LoRA) with knowledge distillation (KD).

      FedMol achieves superior performance under high data heterogeneity, maintaining better distribution matching.

  • Generating molecules with properties of interest is a fundamental challenge in computational molecular design. However, a significant portion of valuable chemical data resides within proprietary corporate data silos, limiting the potential of data-driven approaches for molecular design. Federated learning provides a framework for collaborative model training without sharing raw data, but existing methods face challenges in communication efficiency and robustness to heterogeneous data distributions. Here we introduce FedMol, a federated learning framework that combines pre-trained molecular language models with parameter-efficient fine-tuning (using low-rank adaptation) and knowledge distillation to enable privacy-preserving molecular generation. We evaluate FedMol on the GuacaMol distribution-learning benchmarks under varying degrees of data heterogeneity simulated via Dirichlet partitioning. Our results show that FedMol achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art centralized models by updating only 2.4% of parameters through low-rank adaptation. Under high heterogeneity, knowledge distillation outperforms standard federated averaging in preserving chemical diversity. This work demonstrates a practical approach to collaborative molecular design that respects data privacy, with potential applications in drug discovery where proprietary data and multi-institutional collaboration are both critical.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Kang, N.Y., Ha, H.H., Yun, S.W. et al. (2011). Diversity-driven chemical probe development for biomolecules: beyond hypothesis-driven approach. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40:3613−3626. DOI:10.1039/C0CS00172D

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Honarparvar, B., Govender, T., Maguire, G.E. et al. (2014). Integrated approach to structure-based enzymatic drug design: molecular modeling, spectroscopy, and experimental bioactivity. Chem. Rev. 114:493−537. DOI:10.1021/cr300314q

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Bagal, V., Aggarwal, R., Vinod, P. et al. (2021). MolGPT: molecular generation using a transformer-decoder model. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62:2064−2076. DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00600

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Gómez-Bombarelli, R., Wei, J.N., Duvenaud, D. et al. (2018). Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Cent. Sci. 4:268−276. DOI:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00572

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Li, C. (2025). Breaking data silos in drug discovery with federated learning. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2:288−289. DOI:10.1038/s44286-025-00213-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Durant, G., Boyles, F., Birchall, K. et al. (2024). The future of machine learning for small-molecule drug discovery will be driven by data. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4:735−743. DOI:10.1038/s43588-024-00699-0

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Hanser, T., Ahlberg, E., Amberg, A. et al. (2025). Data-driven federated learning in drug discovery with knowledge distillation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1−14. DOI:10.1038/s42256-025-00991-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Chen, S., Xue, D., Chuai, G. et al. (2020). FL-QSAR: a federated learning-based QSAR prototype for collaborative drug discovery. Bioinformatics 36:5492−5498. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Li, L., Fan, Y., Tse, M. et al. (2020). A review of applications in federated learning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 149:106854. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106854

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Huang, T., Xu, H., Wang, H. et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence for medicine: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. Innov. Med. 1:100030. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100030

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Zhu, W., Luo, J., and White, A.D. (2022). Federated learning of molecular properties with graph neural networks in a heterogeneous setting. Patterns 3. DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100521. DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100521

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Cozac, R., Hasic, H., Choong, J.J. et al. (2025). kMoL: an open-source machine and federated learning library for drug discovery. J. Cheminform. 17:22. DOI:10.1186/s13321-025-00967-9

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Bassani, D., Brigo, A., and Andrews-Morger, A. (2023). Federated learning in computational toxicology: an industrial perspective on the effiris hackathon. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 36:1503−1517. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00137

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Luo, B., Li, X., Wang, S. et al. (2021). Cost-effective federated learning design. In IEEE INFOCOM 2021. pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1109/INFOCOM42981.2021.9488679.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [15] Zhu, Z., Hong, J., and Zhou, J. (2021). Data-free knowledge distillation for heterogeneous federated learning. In ICML. pp. 12878–12889. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2105.10056.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [16] Lu, Z., Pan, H., Dai, Y. et al. (2024). Federated learning with non-IID data: A survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 11:19188−19209. DOI:10.1109/JIOT.2024.3376548

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Hu, E.J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P. et al. (2022). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In ICLR. pp. 3. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.09685.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [18] Gou, J., Yu, B., Maybank, S.J. et al. (2021). Knowledge distillation: A survey. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 129:1789−1819. DOI:10.1007/s11263-021-01453-z

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Brown, N., Fiscato, M., Segler, M.H. et al. (2019). GuacaMol: benchmarking models for de novo molecular design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59:1096−1108. DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00839

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Yang, A., Yang, B., Hui, B. et al. (2024). Qwen2 technical report. ArXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.10671.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [21] Ainslie, J., Lee-Thorp, J., De Jong, M. et al. (2023). GQA: Training generalized multi-query transformer models from multi-head checkpoints. In Proc. EMNLP 2023. pp. 4895–4901. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.298.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [22] Su, J., Ahmed, M., Lu, Y. et al. (2024). Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. Neurocomputing 568:127063. DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127063

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Zaheer, M. et al. (2020). Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. In Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst. pp. 429–450. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1812.06127.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [24] Kim, S., Chen, J., Cheng, T. et al. (2023). PubChem 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 51:D1373−D1380. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkac956

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Gaulton, A., Bellis, L.J., Bento, A.P. et al. (2012). ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D1100−D1107. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkr777

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C. et al. (2017). Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Secur. Priv. pp. 3–18. DOI: 10.1109/SP.2017.41.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [27] He, Y., Li, B., Liu, L. et al. (2025). Towards Label-Only membership inference attack against pre-trained large language models. In Proc. 34th USENIX Secur. Symp. pp. 1609–1628. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.18943.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [28] Preuer, K., Renz, P., Unterthiner, T. et al. (2018). Fréchet chemnet distance: a metric for generative models for molecules in drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58:1736−1741. DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00234

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Cavanagh, J.M., Sun, K., Gritsevskiy, A. et al. (2024). Smileyllama: Modifying large language models for directed chemical space exploration. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.02231.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [30] Izdebski, A., Olszewski, J., Gawade, P. et al. (2025). Synergistic benefits of joint molecule generation and property prediction. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.16559.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [31] Chen, X., Wang, Y., He, J. et al. (2025). Graph generative pre-trained transformer. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.01073.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [32] Kwon, Y., Yoo, J., Choi, Y. et al. (2019). Efficient learning of non-autoregressive graph variational autoencoders for molecular graph generation. J. Cheminform. 11:70. DOI:10.1186/s13321-019-0396-x

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Iwata, H., Nakai, T., Koyama, T. et al. (2023). VGAE-MCTS: A new molecular generative model combining the variational graph auto-encoder and monte carlo tree search. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 63:7392−7400. DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01220

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Wu, J.N., Wang, T., Chen, Y. et al. (2024). t-SMILES: a fragment-based molecular representation framework for de novo ligand design. Nat. Commun. 15:4993. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-49388-6

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Mahmood, O., Mansimov, E., Bonneau, R. et al. (2021). Masked graph modeling for molecule generation. Nat. Commun. 12:3156. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-23415-2

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Geng, Z., Xie, S., Xia, Y. et al. (2023). De novo molecular generation via connection-aware motif mining. arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.01129.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [37] Huang, Y., Zeng, Y., Dwivedi, V.P. et al. (2026). Higher-order grammar representations for molecular generation and learning. In ICLR.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [38] Ueda, R., Nakai, T., Yoshida, K. et al. (2025). Mitigation of membership inference attack by knowledge distillation on federated learning. IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. 108:267−279. DOI:10.1587/transfun.2024CIP0004

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Karimireddy, S.P., Kale, S., Mohri, M. et al. (2020). Scaffold: Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning. In ICML. pp. 5132–5143. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.06378.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [40] You, J., Ying, R., Ren, X. et al. (2018). Graphrnn: Generating realistic graphs with deep auto-regressive models. In ICML. pp. 5708–5717. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.08773.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [41] Schütt, K., Kindermans, P.J., Sauceda Felix, H.E. et al. (2017). Schnet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions. vol. 30. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.08566.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [42] Satorras, V.G., Hoogeboom, E., and Welling, M. (2021). E(n) equivariant graph neural networks. In ICML. pp. 9323–9332. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2102.09844.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [43] Stärk, H., Beaini, D., Corso, G. et al. (2022). 3d infomax improves gnns for molecular property prediction. In ICML. pp. 20479–20502. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2110.04126.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [44] Carlini, N., Chien, S., Nasr, M. et al. (2022). Membership inference attacks from first principles. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Secur. Priv. pp. 1897–1914. DOI: 10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833649.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [45] Shi, S., Zhang, J., Jiang, S. et al. (2025). DP-GENG: Differentially private dataset distillation guided by dp-generated data. DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v40i11.37854.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [46] Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I. et al. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In ACM CCS. pp. 308–318. DOI: 10.1145/2976749.2978318.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [47] Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B. et al. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In ACM CCS. pp. 1175–1191. DOI: 10.1145/3133956.3133982.

    View in Article Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Dong T., You L. and Chen C. (2026). Cost-effective federated molecular design with FedMol. The Innovation Drug Discovery 1:100022. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-drugdisc.2026.100022
    Dong T., You L. and Chen C. (2026). Cost-effective federated molecular design with FedMol. The Innovation Drug Discovery 1:100022. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-drugdisc.2026.100022

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(4)     Tables(5)

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(436) PDF downloads(142)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint