Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

A Unified Value Signal Driven Strategy for Coordinated Multi-Energy Optimization in Building Clusters

    Fund Project: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U22B20112)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: xychen@hhu.edu.cn 
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Electricity, heat, and cooling differ in transport dynamics, useful-work potential, and associated carbon responsibility; treating them as equivalent kilowatt-hours can therefore distort their system value.

      This study integrates heating-network dynamics, energy quality, and carbon responsibility at the node–time level to derive a comparable value signal for heterogeneous energy carriers.

      In a four-building-cluster case study, the proposed strategy reduces total system cost by 15.66% and raises average exergy efficiency to 66.50%.

  • China’s transition toward an energy powerhouse requires not only a secure and low-carbon energy supply but also flexible and efficient coordination of distributed resources at the demand side. Building-cluster integrated energy systems couple electricity, heat, and cooling, whose transport dynamics, useful-work potential, and carbon responsibilities differ substantially. Conventional energy-based metrics therefore cannot fully capture how network states and energy quality affect nodal marginal values. This study proposes a unified value-signal-driven strategy for coordinated multi-energy optimization in building clusters. First, a coupled energy–carbon flow model represents the hydraulic–thermal dynamics, transport delays, and virtual thermal storage of the heating network, enabling the spatiotemporal tracing of heat and its associated carbon responsibility. Second, exergy is adopted as a common physical basis, while energy quality factors and exergy–carbon potentials quantify carrier-specific useful-work potential and carbon responsibility. An economic and low-carbon dispatch model is then formulated, and the generalized marginal exergy price is defined as the full KKT-based envelope derivative of the optimal value with respect to nodal exergy demand in a continuous convex pricing subproblem. In a four-cluster case study, the load-side response delays obtained from the steady-state, quasi-dynamic, and fully dynamic models are approximately 0, 25, and 55 min, respectively. Relative to unoptimized operation, the proposed strategy reduces daily total cost by 15.66%. Relative to energy-based optimization, it further reduces total cost by CNY 1,591.79 and increases average exergy efficiency from 56.11% to 66.50%, while carbon cost increases by CNY 842.50. Across nine finite-difference tests, the mean and maximum relative errors of the KKT-based marginal values are 0.0391% and 0.1570%, respectively. The framework provides a demand-side mechanism for coordinating local multi-energy resources and supports the development of a more secure, flexible, and low-carbon energy system.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Chen X., Liu J., Lin B., et al. (2025). Promote the Revolution in Energy Use to Enhance the Impetus for Green Transformation and Development. Energy Use 1:100001. DOI:10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2025.100001

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Chen X. (2024). Green and low-carbon energy-use. Innov. Energy 1:100003. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100003

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Chen X. (2025). Urban Energy Use and Its Friendly Interaction with Power Grid. Energy Use 1:100011. DOI:10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2025.100011

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Xiang Y., Chen L., Wuyun Q., et al. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Building-to-Grid Interaction. Energy Use 2:100043. DOI:10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2025.100043

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Ma L., Liu N., Wang L., et al. (2026). Multi-party energy management for smart building cluster with PV systems using automatic demand response. Energy Build. 121:11−21. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.072

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Dawes G., Kirant-Mitić T., Jiang Z., et al. (2025). Energy flexibility at multi-building scales: A review of the dominant factors and their uncertainties. Energy Build. 346:116157. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116157

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Jing Z., Chen X., Bu L., et al. (2024). Intelligent optimization for building energy management considering indoor heat transfer. Innov. Energy 1:100058. DOI:10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100058

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Li S., Chen X., Bu L., et al. (2024). Two-stage optimization for the air conditioning system in public buildings with flexible control of indoor load. Energy Build. 312:114162. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114162

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Zhu J., Han L., Yu J., et al. (2026). Planning High-PV Penetration Park: Enhancing Local PV Utilization and Economic Efficiency through Multi-Energy Storage. Energy Use 2:100042. DOI:10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2025.100042

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Zhu D., Korolija I., Dong Z.Y., et al. (2025). Coordinated Optimization of Carbon-Electricity-Gas Trading in Multi-Vector Energy Systems across Buildings. Energy Use 1:100003. DOI:10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2025.100003

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Ghilardi L.M.P., Castelli A.F., Moretti L., et al. (2021). Co-optimization of multi-energy system operation, district heating/cooling network and thermal comfort management for buildings. Appl. Energy 302:117480. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117480

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Qian C., He N., Cheng Z., et al. (2024). Optimal scheduling of building energy system with integrated virtual energy storage based on multi-task model predictive control. J. Build. Eng. 98:111185. DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111185

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Zhang H., Xiao F., Zhang C., et al. (2023). A multi-agent system based coordinated multi-objective optimal load scheduling strategy using marginal emission factors for building cluster demand response. Energy Build. 281:112765. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112765

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Hua H., Chen X., Gan L., et al. (2024). Demand-side joint electricity and carbon trading mechanism. IEEE Trans. Ind. Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2:14−25. DOI:10.1109/TICPS.2023.3335328

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Huang W., Zhang N., Cheng Y., et al. (2020). Multienergy networks analytics: Standardized modeling, optimization, and low carbon analysis. Proc. IEEE 108:1411−1436. DOI:10.1109/JPROC.2020.2993787

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Yao S., Gu W., Lu S., et al. (2021). Dynamic optimal energy flow in the heat and electricity integrated energy system. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 12:179−190. DOI:10.1109/TSTE.2020.2988682

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Chen X., Bu L., Chen C., et al. (2024). An operational optimization method of regional multi-energy system considering thermal quasi-dynamic characteristics. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 10:2551−2563. DOI:10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.03830

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Lu S., Gu W., Zhou S., et al. (2020). High-resolution modeling and decentralized dispatch of heat and electricity integrated energy system. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 11:1451−1463. DOI:10.1109/TSTE.2019.2927637

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Yang J., Zhang N., Botterud A., et al. (2020). On an equivalent representation of the dynamics in district heating networks for combined electricity-heat operation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 35:560−570. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2935748

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Chen B., Wu W., Guo Q., et al. (2022). An efficient optimal energy flow model for integrated energy systems based on energy circuit modeling in the frequency domain. Appl. Energy 326:119923. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119923

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Chen X., Hu Y., Zhao J., et al. (2025). Downscaling deconstruction, hybrid semi-mechanism state estimation and cascaded dynamic equivalent modelling of complex district heating networks. Energy 322:135678. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135678

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Wang X., Han L., Wang C., et al. (2023). A time-scale adaptive dispatching strategy considering the matching of time characteristics and dispatching periods of the integrated energy system. Energy 267:126584. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2022.126584

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Qin Y., Liu P. and Li Z. (2022). Multi-timescale hierarchical scheduling of an integrated energy system considering system inertia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 169:112911. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112911

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Cheng Y., Zhang N., Wang Y., et al. (2019). Modeling carbon emission flow in multiple energy systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10:3562−3574. DOI:10.1109/TSG.2018.2830775

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Kang C., Zhou T., Chen Q., et al. (2015). Carbon emission flow from generation to demand: A network-based model. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6:2386−2394. DOI:10.1109/TSG.2015.2388695

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Huang J., Duan W., Zhou Q., et al. (2022). Methodology for carbon emission flow calculation of integrated energy systems. Energy Rep. 8:1090−1097. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.263

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Bu L., Chen X., Gan L., et al. (2023). Low-carbon operation method of the building based on dynamic carbon emission factor of power system. IET Smart Grid 6:67−85. DOI:10.1049/stg2.12085

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Tsatsaronis G. (2007). Definitions and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics. Energy 32:249−253. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.002

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Rosen M.A., Dincer I. and Kanoglu M. (2008). Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact. Energy Policy 36:128−137. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.006

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Tahir M.F., Chen H. and Han G. (2021). Exergy hub based modelling and performance evaluation of integrated energy system. J. Energy Storage 41:102912. DOI:10.1016/j.est.2021.102912

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Li J., Wang D., Jia H., et al. (2022). Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system. Appl. Energy 324:119725. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119725

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Yang W., Huang Y., Zhang T., et al. (2023). Mechanism and analytical methods for carbon emission-exergy flow distribution in heat-electricity integrated energy system. Appl. Energy 352:121980. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121980

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Chen J., Chen H., Liang Z., et al. (2024). A joint solution framework for the optimal operation and evaluation of integrated energy systems based on exergy. Energy Convers. Manag. 301:118071. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118071

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Chen J., Chen H., Lin Z., et al. (2023). Multi-objective optimal dispatch of integrated heat and electricity energy systems considering heat load energy quality. Energy Rep. 9:1191−1200. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.05.081

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Liu S., Han S., Tian J., et al. (2024). A multi-objective optimization scheduling approach of integrated energy system considering the exergy efficiency using the variable step-size approximation method. Energy 311:133370. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133370

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Peng S., Liu S. and Wu X. (2025). Optimal scheduling of integrated energy system considering exergoeconomic performance. Energy 320:135171. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135171

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Chen L., Suzuki H., Wachi T., et al. (2002). Components of nodal prices for electric power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 17:41−49. DOI:10.1109/59.982191

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Deng L., Li Z., Sun H., et al. (2019). Generalized locational marginal pricing in a heat-and-electricity-integrated market. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10:6414−6425. DOI:10.1109/TSG.2019.2904522

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Li J., Xiang Y., Gu C., et al. (2023). Formulation of locational marginal electricity-carbon price in power systems. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 9:1968−1972. DOI:10.17775/CSEEJPES.2021.06400

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Jiang Y., Wan C., Botterud A., et al. (2021). Convex relaxation of combined heat and power dispatch. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 36:1442−1458. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3025070

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Bu L., Chen X., Yu K., et al. (2026). A Unified Value Signal Driven Strategy for Coordinated Multi-Energy Optimization in Building Clusters. Energy Use 2:100066. https://doi.org/10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2026.100066
    Bu L., Chen X., Yu K., et al. (2026). A Unified Value Signal Driven Strategy for Coordinated Multi-Energy Optimization in Building Clusters. Energy Use 2:100066. https://doi.org/10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2026.100066

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(6)    

Supplementary Information

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(198) PDF downloads(80)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint