Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access     Cite

Bi-level Optimization of Residential Community Energy Systems: Space Heating and DHW Loads under Multi-Energy Pricing

    Fund Project: This work was supported by the project of national Science Foundation of China (No. 52577132) and Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (No.24JCQNJC01680). Academic Papers of the 28th Annual Meeting of the China Association for Science and Technology.
More Information
  • Corresponding author: xljin@tju.edu.cn 
  • DownLoad: Full size image
    1. Developed a hierarchical optimization approach for RCES managing space heating and DHW under multi-energy pricing.

      Upper-level model optimizes electricity/heat supply and pricing to maximize the RCES operator's economic returns.

      Lower-level model controls radiators and electric water heaters to adjust load profiles for cost reduction.

      Solved the bi-level problem using KKT conditions and strong duality, transforming it into a tractable MILP model.

      Case studies show effective supply-demand flexibility coordination, boosting operator profits and reducing consumer costs.

  • Focusing on thermal demands including space heating and domestic hot water (DHW), this study develops a hierarchical optimization approach for residential community energy systems (RCES) operating under a multi-energy pricing mechanism. In the upper-level model, the RCES operator utilizes various energy conversion devices to jointly schedule electricity/heat supply and set retail multi-energy prices, aiming to achieve optimal economic returns. Conversely, the lower-level problem explicitly models controllable assets like radiators and electric water heaters, ensuring consumers can satisfy their thermal comfort and water usage needs. Guided by the operator’s price signals, residents act as followers to adjust their load profiles, thereby minimizing expenses and realizing integrated demand response (IDR). To solve this bi-level problem, the lower-level constraints are transformed using Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions and strong duality theory, converting the original model into a tractable single-level mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulation. Case studies on a typical RCES indicate that accurately modeling controllable loads facilitates effective IDR. Furthermore, the framework successfully coordinates flexibility on both the supply and demand sides. The results confirm that this strategy yields a win-win outcome, simultaneously boosting the operator’s profits and reducing the energy expenditures of residential consumers.
  • 加载中
  • [1] International Energy Agency (2022). Climate resilience for energy security (IEA).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [2] International Energy Agency (2021). Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector (IEA).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [3] Palensky P. and Dietrich D. (2011). Demand side management: Demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 7:381−388. DOI:10.1109/tii.2011.2158841

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Qi T., Hui H. and Song Y. (2025). Exploring the feasible regulation region of building HVAC systems within hygro-thermal comfort. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 16:2926−2939. DOI:10.1109/tsg.2025.3569074

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] International Energy Agency (2023). Buildings – energy system (IEA).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [6] Kauko H., Delgado B.M., Backe S., et al. (2025). Reducing electricity demand and enhancing heat supply flexibility through energy efficiency and district heating. Energy 322:135310. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135310

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Thonipara A., Runst P., Ochsner C., et al. (2019). Energy efficiency of residential buildings in the European Union – An exploratory analysis of cross-country consumption patterns. Energy Policy 129:1156−1167. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.003

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Biéron M., Le Dréau J. and Haas B. (2025). Development of a GHG-based control strategy for a fleet of hybrid heat pumps to decarbonize space heating and domestic hot water. Appl. Energy 378:124751. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124751

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Qi T., Hui H., Feng W., et al. (2025). Flexible resource endowment of urban buildings considering climate diversity in China. Carbon Neutrality 4. DOI:10.1007/s43979-025-00136-9.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [10] Paterakis N.G., Erdinç O. and Catalão J.P.S. (2017). An overview of demand response: Key elements and international experience. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69:871−891. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.167

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Haider H.T., See O.H. and Elmenreich W. (2016). A review of residential demand response of smart grid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59:166−178. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.016

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] European Commission (2023). Energy system integration (European Commission).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [13] European Commission (2019). The European Green Deal (European Commission).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [14] Wang J., Zhong H., Ma Z., et al. (2017). Review and prospect of integrated demand response in the multi-energy system. Appl. Energy 202:772−782. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.150

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Gao H., Zhao Y., He S., et al. (2022). Demand response management of community integrated energy system: A multi-energy retail package perspective. Appl. Energy 330:120278. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120278

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Li G. and Du Y. (2018). Performance investigation and economic benefits of new control strategies for heat pump-gas fired water heater hybrid system. Appl. Energy 232:101−118. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.065

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Lu Y., Yu X., Jin X., et al. (2020). Bi-level optimization framework for buildings to heating grid integration in integrated community energy systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 12:860−873. DOI:10.1109/tste.2020.3023251

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Jia H., Liang S., Jin X., et al. (2025). Bi-level optimization of a low-carbon industrial park with an air source heat pump array considering the cold island effect: A real case from China. Energy 324:135804. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135804

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Yao L., Teo J.C. and Wang C.H. (2023). Resident-centric distributed community energy management system. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 14:849−863. DOI:10.1109/tste.2022.3227160

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Mendes G., Ioakimidis C. and Ferrão P. (2011). On the planning and analysis of integrated community energy systems: A review and survey of available tools. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15:4836−4854. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.067

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Brum M., Erickson P., Jenkins B., et al. (2015). A comparative study of district and individual energy systems providing electrical-based heating, cooling, and domestic hot water to a low-energy use residential community. Energy Build. 92:306−312. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.045

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Baligen Talihati, Tao S., Fu S., et al. (2024). Energy storage sharing in residential communities with controllable loads for enhanced operational efficiency and profitability. Appl. Energy 373:123880. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123880

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Mota B., Faria P. and Vale Z. (2024). Energy cost optimization through load shifting in a photovoltaic energy-sharing household community. Renew. Energy 221:119812. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2023.119812

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Roshani A.S., Assareh E., Ershadi A., et al. (2024). Optimization of a hybrid renewable energy system for off-grid residential communities using numerical simulation, response surface methodology, and life cycle assessment. Renew. Energy:121425. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121425.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [25] Gjorgievski V.Z., Velkovski B., Markovski B., et al. (2024). Energy community demand-side flexibility: Energy storage and electricity tariff synergies. Energy 313:134078. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2024.134078

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] O’Connell N., Pinson P., Madsen H., et al. (2014). Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39:686−699. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.098

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Kakkar R., Agrawal S. and Tanwar S. (2024). A systematic survey on demand response management schemes for electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 203:114748. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114748

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Shen M. and Chen J. (2022). Optimization of peak-valley pricing policy based on a residential electricity demand model. J. Clean. Prod.:134761. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134761.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [29] Huang W., Zhang N., Kang C., et al. (2019). From demand response to integrated demand response: Review and prospect of research and application. Prot. Control Mod. Power Syst. 4. DOI:10.1186/s41601-019-0126-4.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [30] Bian Y., Xie L., Ma L., et al. (2025). A novel two-stage energy sharing model for data center cluster considering integrated demand response of multiple loads. Appl. Energy 384:125454. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125454

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Chen J.C., Qi B., Rong Z.K., et al. (2021). Multi-energy coordinated microgrid scheduling with integrated demand response for flexibility improvement. Energy 217:119387. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119387

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Frison L., Gölzhäuser S., Dampfhoffer M., et al. (2025). Evaluation of AI-driven adaptive control algorithms for optimizing heat pump efficiency in building heating and hot water supply: First practical insights. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3140:052014. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/3140/5/052014

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Chakraborty S., Ellis M.J. and Narayanan V. (2025). Air-to-air multi-function heat pumps for combined space conditioning and domestic water heating. Energy Rep. 14:3536−3546. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.10.033

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Abrami G., Pistocchini L., Famiglietti J., et al. (2026). Thermodynamic analysis of propane-based zeotropic mixtures in space heating and domestic hot water heat pumps. Appl. Therm. Eng.:129972. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.129972.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [35] Lachhwani K. and Dwivedi A. (2017). Bi-level and multi-level programming problems: Taxonomy of literature review and research issues. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 25:847−877. DOI:10.1007/s11831-017-9216-5

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Liu J. and Li J. (2015). A bi-level energy-saving dispatch in smart grid considering interaction between generation and load. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6:1443−1452. DOI:10.1109/tsg.2014.2386780

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Ye Y., Papadaskalopoulos D., Kazempour J., et al. (2020). Incorporating non-convex operating characteristics into bi-level optimization electricity market models. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 35:163−176. DOI:10.1109/tpwrs.2019.2925317

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Kardakos E.G., Simoglou C.K. and Bakirtzis A.G. (2016). Optimal offering strategy of a virtual power plant: A stochastic bi-level approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid. DOI:10.1109/tsg.2015.2419714.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [39] Wang D., Hu Q., Jia H., et al. (2019). Integrated demand response in district electricity-heating network considering double auction retail energy market based on demand-side energy stations. Appl. Energy 248:656−678. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.050

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Jin X., Wu Q. and Jia H. (2020). Local flexibility markets: Literature review on concepts, models and clearing methods. Appl. Energy 261:114387. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114387

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Karimi H., Jadid S. and Saboori H. (2019). Multi-objective bi-level optimisation to design real-time pricing for demand response programs in retail markets. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 13:1287−1296. DOI:10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6123

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Lin W., Jin X., Mu Y., et al. (2018). A two-stage multi-objective scheduling method for integrated community energy system. Appl. Energy 216:428−441. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.007

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Wang D., Zhi Y., Jia H., et al. (2019). Optimal scheduling strategy of district integrated heat and power system with wind power and multiple energy stations considering thermal inertia of buildings under different heating regulation modes. Appl. Energy 240:341−358. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.199

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Jiang T., Li Z., Jin X., et al. (2018). Flexible operation of active distribution network using integrated smart buildings with heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems. Appl. Energy 226:181−196. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.091

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Li Y., Feng C., Wen F., et al. (2018). Energy pricing and management of park energy internet containing electric vehicles and power-to-gas. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 42:192–196 (in Chinese).

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [46] Chen J., Zhang W., Zhang Y., et al. (2018). Day-ahead scheduling of distribution level integrated electricity and natural gas system based on fast-ADMM with restart algorithm. IEEE Access 6:17557−17569. DOI:10.1109/access.2018.2818756

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Razmara M., Maasoumy M., Shahbakhti M., et al. (2015). Optimal exergy control of building HVAC system. Appl. Energy 156:555−565. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.051

    View in Article CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Feng J., Ding Y. and Wang H.J. (2012). EnergyPlus energy simulation software and its application tools. Build. Energy Effic.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [49] Wu J. and Xu G. (2003). Major Chinese cities’ solar radiant intensities in winter. J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 35:1236−1239.

    View in Article Google Scholar

    [50] Analysis of energy flow optimization in regional electricity-gas-heat integrated energy system considering operational constraints.

    View in Article Google Scholar

  • Cite this article:

    Liang S., Jin X., Jia H., et al. (2026). Bi-level Optimization of Residential Community Energy Systems: Space Heating and DHW Loads under Multi-Energy Pricing. Energy Use 2:100036. https://doi.org/10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2026.100036
    Liang S., Jin X., Jia H., et al. (2026). Bi-level Optimization of Residential Community Energy Systems: Space Heating and DHW Loads under Multi-Energy Pricing. Energy Use 2:100036. https://doi.org/10.59717/ipj.energy-use.2026.100036

Welcome!

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Marketplace website at marketplace.copyright.com.

Figures(5)     Tables(2)

Share

  • Share the QR code with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends.

Article Metrics

Article views(688) PDF downloads(490)

Relative Articles

Cited by

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint